Newer Older

    President Barack Obama holds House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's granddaughter, following the Democratic National Committee dinner at the Westin St. Francis Hotel in San Francisco, Calif., Oct. 15, 2009. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

    This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.

    pavsma, maxim dronov, halstatt1, and 101 other people added this photo to their favorites.

    View 20 more comments

    1. misaankei [deleted] 65 months ago | reply

      Wonderful - sweet Baby and sweet :))) power President - GENIAL !!!

    2. Unalienable Rights by GOD- not Executive Order 65 months ago | reply

      Br careful GrandMa Pelosi ...there is a Frankenstein in the White house that wants your organs before you die. He wrote a book last year on the subject. Gruesome!

      Take organs from 'helpless patients'

      Sunstein's proposal regarding marriage is hardly the only controversial section of his book. WND reported last week that in the same book, Sunstein defended the possibility of removing organs from terminally ill patients without their permission.

      He also strongly pushed for the removal of organs from deceased individuals who did not explicitly consent to becoming organ donors.

      Sunstein and Thaler discussed multiple legal scenarios regarding organ donation. One possibility presented in the book, termed by Sunstein as "routine removal," posits that "the state owns the rights to body parts of people who are dead or in certain hopeless conditions, and it can remove their organs without asking anyone's permission."

      "Though it may sound grotesque, routine removal is not impossible to defend," wrote Sunstein. "In theory, it would save lives, and it would do so without intruding on anyone who has any prospect for life."

    3. Beth Wales 65 months ago | reply

      How very dis-apposite and inappropriate the comment above seems in the context of the photograph.

    4. Unalienable Rights by GOD- not Executive Order 65 months ago | reply

      YET, The comment does NOT raise concern with you....WHY NOT?
      As it should concern all of us who care for our elders.

      Remember the scene in "The Time Machine" when a young lady was drowning and no one cared. That is where we are NOW! SAD

    5. patjoelee 65 months ago | reply

      Its seems as if this person can't be happy about anything. That baby is beautiful and the President looks content. How on earth do you see a Frankenstein in the White House?. It sounds like you're watching too much T.V.!!!!

    6. Unalienable Rights by GOD- not Executive Order 65 months ago | reply

      What the Media will never tell you about the health care plans


    7. tunde4 65 months ago | reply

      Just go away and never come back!

    8. Unalienable Rights by GOD- not Executive Order 65 months ago | reply

      tunde ,Just like a Control freak and your Dear Leader the Maoist would say...shoot the opponents in the head, drown the little babies in the rice paddy. In this case kill by abortion.

    9. Beth Wales 65 months ago | reply

      Think you've just shot yourself in the foot Vitalissue.

    10. tunde4 65 months ago | reply

      The picture above shows a sensitive side of the president. He is a wonderful father, a real role model, I am so proud of the American People for choosing Barack Obama for president.

    11. Sarita Linda 65 months ago | reply

      Maybe Vitltes could shoot her keyboard too?? Drown the babies in the rice paddy?? Really??? Just a wee bit dramatic don't you think?

    12. Unalienable Rights by GOD- not Executive Order 65 months ago | reply

      Middle you are getting silly...and more zombie like everyday. Progressive liberals always skip over the facts and attack the messenger...never mind the FACTS

      Here ya go, this will cheer you up:

    13. Sarita Linda 65 months ago | reply

      Well if you actually gave us FACTS instead of the same old lies, you might be credible. As it is you post usless blabber from these communist websites like the good lemming you are.

    14. {}+*^ [deleted] 65 months ago | reply

      I am still crying over that link that Vittles provided on another photo...my handkerchief is soaked with tears...

    15. Sarita Linda 65 months ago | reply

      hahahaha, you're killing me!!

    16. mamalobaloca 65 months ago | reply

      Aw, precious photo!! Those wings...oh, my!

    17. Colour Shop 65 months ago | reply

      love this one so much!

    18. jdog1063 64 months ago | reply

      Did your mommy leave you to be raised by your Grammy, too?

    19. halstatt1 63 months ago | reply

      He know just the right way to hold a baby. Such great fatherly instinct and just the right temperment. in this quiet, thoughtful moment. Not all babies like gregarious bouncing. This is a lovely image of a first meeting. :)

    20. grossdc 60 months ago | reply

      This is a GREAT pic, you should release this one to the press they would LOVE it.

    keyboard shortcuts: previous photo next photo L view in light box F favorite < scroll film strip left > scroll film strip right ? show all shortcuts