Probably a more realistic model of North American travel patterns

    Newer Older

    The same 60,000 trips (of 20 or more miles each) through the same 750,000 randomly-chosen geotags, grouped with 10-mile radius, from the Twitter streaming API, August, 2011.

    Map of actual (truck) traffic volumes in 2010. Pretty close in some ways, pretty far off in others.

    straup, TedSher, limboplax, almm1524, and 16 other people added this photo to their favorites.

    1. davesix 27 months ago | reply

      These are all just fascinating. I open them all and look, just so you know.

    2. TedSher 27 months ago | reply

      It seems hardly anyone twitters while traveling through my hometown.

    3. •Don Johnson 27 months ago | reply

      As clear a case you can make for long-distance high-speed rail.

    4. /\/\ichael Patric|{ 27 months ago | reply

      This I find to be further convincing evidence that you can, in fact, get your kicks on Route 66.

    5. Gem Images 27 months ago | reply

      Curious that IH-10 dies out between San Antonio and the junction with IH-20 near Pecos. Were truck drivers avoiding that area?

    6. Eric Fischer 27 months ago | reply

      This map doesn't know the actual route that anyone took, only the density of geotagged tweets along the possible routes. From my one experience with that stretch of Interstate 10, there is very little along that route, so it doesn't surprise me that there are few things that anyone wants to tweet about along it. In reality, truck drivers do use it because it's a shorter distance than going out of their way.

    7. Gem Images 27 months ago | reply

      Eric, you certainly are right about there not being much to comment on along I-10 west of San Antonio! My kinda country thought....you should know by now that I will take a picture of just about anything....

    8. Eric Fischer 27 months ago | reply

      I wonder if it would turn out different using photo counts instead of tweet counts.

    9. •Don Johnson 27 months ago | reply

      Well, a simpler answer yet would be that on that stretch of road, people simply can't access the internet very well. Data coverage maps for AT&T & Verizon confirm this, with AT&T skirting the route, and Verizon a bit worse.

    10. Eric Fischer 27 months ago | reply

      That's true... when I was there I remember having only occasional network connectivity, on a tiny carrier I had never heard of.

    11. merriehaskell 27 months ago | reply

      I wonder also about the density of cell phone towers from which to tweet along some of those sparser routes (if you know you don't have signal, you don't tweet, and/ Could be wrong since the last time I took 90 and 94 across the Dakotas was 5+ years ago, and cell towers are presumably much denser now...

    12. merriehaskell 27 months ago | reply

      Er... got lost in the middle of editing that comment, but I think the gist is clear. I hope.

    13. Silus Grok 27 months ago | reply

      Fascinating. Beautiful.

      If you're taking requests, might I suggest the Wasatch Front? ( Northern Utah, comprising Provo, Salt Lake, Ogden, and Park City )

    14. Silus Grok 27 months ago | reply

      I especially love the cruise lines!

    15. evxanadu 27 months ago | reply

      Let me know if I'm just being stupid, but don't most of these maps show people using their cellphones to twitter and upload pictures WHILE DRIVING? And, isn't that illegal, and shouldn't all these people actually be in jail?

    16. Silus Grok 27 months ago | reply

      @evxanadu: These are twitter updates while in transit. Which isn't the same thing. I can be in transit and update my twitter stream every time I gas-up (which I do, actually); I can be a passenger in the car; or — as is evidenced by the lines criss-crossing the Caribbean — I could be on a ship. :)

    keyboard shortcuts: previous photo next photo L view in light box F favorite < scroll film strip left > scroll film strip right ? show all shortcuts