• ...half of which is taken from the 1911 edition of Britannica, and as such includes a huge number of bafflingly anachronistic references. - flashboy
  • I thought the 1911 Britannica stuff belonged here, to be honest...

What Wikipedia would look like if on paper, broken down

Newer Older

Based on this image. More here.

Dual licensed under GFDL/Creative Commons attribution-sharealike

Guillaume Paumier, R.B. Boyer, bnz, and 16 other people added this photo to their favorites.

  1. RadsWiki [deleted] 91 months ago | reply

    I love it!!!

  2. Giggy Alex 88 months ago | reply

    Oh my god...go team!

  3. pfctdayelise 88 months ago | reply

    but where are the policy essays?

  4. -Marlith- 87 months ago | reply

    How about RFA?

  5. -Marlith- 86 months ago | reply

    And where is that huge rollback page?

  6. Whole Wheat Toast 86 months ago | reply

    naw, i don't think he's active with this, but, lol!

  7. blm07 85 months ago | reply

    Yeah, Family Guy tries to reference anything and everything possible now... yawn. "Gee there Stewie, remember those Star Wars movies? Let's not even bother to make a parody of it, let's try to condense the movies into an episode using Family Guy characters! Yeah! That's funny!"

  8. Whole Wheat Toast 84 months ago | reply

    i apologize about this guy here see he just flew in from wikipedia and he tring to adjust to life outside wiipedia...;/

  9. Meisam‌ 73 months ago | reply

    Include:
    Articles of non-english people that are not even notable in their own countries with off-line references that no-one have access!

keyboard shortcuts: previous photo next photo L view in light box F favorite < scroll film strip left > scroll film strip right ? show all shortcuts