• or a boy? it is sometimes hard to tell to our modern eyes with pictures of this period! - agrippinamaior
  • he looks like Ewan MacGregor. - JoniMakesStuff

Portrait of seated man in dark suit with small girl standing beside him

Newer Older

Format: Glass plate negative.

Rights Info: No known restrictions on publication.

Repository: Phillips Glass Plate Negative Collection, Powerhouse Museum www.powerhousemuseum.com/collection/database/collection=Phillips_Glass _Plate_Negative

Part Of: Powerhouse Museum Collection

General information about the Powerhouse Museum Collection is available at www.powerhousemuseum.com/collection/database

Persistent URL: www.powerhousemuseum.com/collection/database/?irn=385874

Acquisition credit line: Gift of the Estate of Raymond W Phillips, 2008

J_CH*, Pezzente, blanca perse, leff, and 20 other people added this photo to their favorites.

  1. delight.1027 69 months ago | reply

    That's probably a boy.

  2. besu25 65 months ago | reply

    Hi, I'm an admin for a group called Fascination Nostalgia, and we'd love to have this added to the group!

    Invitation / Invitación / Einladung / Invito / Convite / Uitnodiging / Приглашение /招待

    The photo is beautiful

    www.flickr.com/groups/fascination_nostalgia/

  3. suzy8track 64 months ago | reply

    The child appears to be a bit agitated. Very nice photo.

  4. J. C. Merriman 55 months ago | reply

    It's a tricky one, we vote for girl - although the socks and shoes suggest boy, when zoomed in there is a short dress with a wide belt with a fancy buckle and a buttoned pleat - we think a boy would have shorts at this age. Very cute all the same!

  5. katrpillar 54 months ago | reply

    Interesting how much fashion has changed over the last century.....

  6. Daniel Fasciolo 52 months ago | reply

    Very interesting but I don´t understand the girl/boy actitude...

  7. Indie Christian 52 months ago | reply

    The child looks like a girl, but in a way the child has some boyish features as well.

  8. ckstaples44 51 months ago | reply

    i think it is a boy - the stance and the hat seem "masculine"

  9. cuisle west ... away awhile 41 months ago | reply

    More than likely a boy ... considering his clothing ... and yes, during this era and at this age, a boy would still have worn a tunic suit or pleated dress with a slouched belt. There may be matching shorts under the tunic, not visable in the photograph, and more often than not it was a boy who would have worn this type of belt.

  10. IndyMcDuff (Bellifemine Studios) 39 months ago | reply

    Boy, probably...but...doesn't it look like Shelly Winters? (I'm sorry for calling a living person - at least in this photo - an 'it'. Doesn't seem right. But we don't know whether it was a boy or a girl.)

  11. abriony 20 months ago | reply

    I think it's a boy too, young boys were often dressed like this at the time this photo was taken.
    Fashions have changed a lot over the years, at one time no woman would have been seen dead wearing trousers (pants to you in the US) these days they not only wear trousers but mens suits.

  12. quasymody 2 days ago | reply

    ? Possibly the same location

keyboard shortcuts: previous photo next photo L view in light box F favorite < scroll film strip left > scroll film strip right ? show all shortcuts