Phantom Time Hypothesis

    Newer Older

    When Dr. Hans-Ulrich Niemitz introduces his paper on the “phantom time hypothesis”, he kindly asks his readers to be patient, benevolent, and open to radically new ideas, because his claims are highly unconventional. This is because his paper is suggesting three difficult-to-believe propositions: 1) Hundreds of years ago, our calendar was polluted with 297 years which never occurred; 2) this is not the year 2010, but rather 1713; and 3) The purveyors of this hypothesis are not crackpots.

    The Phantom Time Hypothesis suggests that the early Middle Ages (614-911 A.D.) never happened, but were added to the calendar long ago either by accident, by misinterpretation of documents, or by deliberate falsification by calendar conspirators. This would mean that all artifacts ascribed to those three centuries belong to other periods, and that all events thought to have occurred during that same period occurred at other times, or are outright fabrications.

    read more:
    Did the Early Middle Ages Really Exist? by Dr. Hans-Ulrich Niemitz


    © Copyright 2010 Michael Paukner. All Rights Reserved.
    Print Shop | Twitter | Facebook

    ncomment, sonidososcuros, squooshies, and 55 other people added this photo to their favorites.

    1. Julien Trédan-Turini 56 months ago | reply

      Being born in 1685 feels weird :)

    2. MaddenGuides [deleted] 56 months ago | reply

      I wanna make a back claim on my pension
      that I have to wait a few decades for in real terms
      A simply fabulous theory

    3. r.AI (-) 54 months ago | reply

      How is he going to test the hypothesis? A time machine?

    4. star over desert 42 months ago | reply

      WOW LOVE THIS and the hypothesis

    5. romana klee 37 months ago | reply


    keyboard shortcuts: previous photo next photo L view in light box F favorite < scroll film strip left > scroll film strip right ? show all shortcuts