Blastoff!

The flame is 18.5 long. On other photos, nine discrete Mach diamonds can be seen in the plume.

 

The sound was incredible, deep, and loud… louder than any rocket I have heard. I was hanging out at the far pads and was quite close to this one (this was only a 170mm zoom vs. 400mm for most of the other BALLS shots)

 

(Previous)(Next)

  • Ian A. Fraser 9y

    WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    --
    Seen in 1-2-3 (?)
  • janekeeler 9y

    ahhhhh................
  • خريبط 9y

    Woow
    Wonderfully

  • Joseph Hurtado 9y

    W O W... what a shot, and what a moment!
  • Incognita Nom de Plume 9y

    We would love this pic in the Dust pool
    www.flickr.com/groups/museumofdust/
  • Arthur 9y

    great shot -

    you photos are CRAZY!!!

    --
    Seen on your photo stream. (?)
  • Charles Lin 9y

    Wonderful shot! =) Just perfectly framed too! =)
  • Troy McCullough 9y

    awesome! a perfect shot.

    --
    Seen in Scientist Photographers (?)
  • Fibra 8y

    What a perfect shot. Great moment!
  • ol108 8y

    Awesome shot... one of the best I've seen!

    A note to the poster, however: The term "Mach Diamond" having anything to do with the speed of a motor's exit gases is actually a misnomer. :-o

    Mach diamonds, as great as they look, are telling you that you have not expanded the combustion products at the nozzle exit to the exact surrounding ambient pressure. Theoretically (but usually not really so) if the conditions were absolutely correct you would have no mach diamonds.

    Imagine the exhaust as a hollow column - the walls of the column are reflective to pressure waves. As these waves cross back and forth they create the zones of differing densities and termperature we call mach diamonds. The pressure waves come from the gas in the column trying to match the surrounding pressure.

    So you really cannot tell much by counting mach diamonds...certainly not thrust or exhaust velocity.

    The general volume of the plume is relatable to thrust when compared to exactly the same propellant operating at the same pressure at the same ambient pressure, but with a different nozzle and thrust level.

    Just FYI. ;-)
  • Steve Jurvetson 8y

    fascinating.... so many people have relayed this "rule of thumb" to me
  • The Sorry Shutter 8y


    A+++ Grade Photo
  • Michael Menefee 8y

    Awesome site, makes me wish I got to observe this in person. Thanks for sharing!

    --
    Seen in A+++ Photo (Post 1 give A+++ logo to 3 pics)-1/day-Read Rules (?)


    A+++ Grade Photo
    Commented with SIC
  • Kimberly Dickinson 8y

    Amazing capture!


    A+++ Grade Photo
  • Wonderful_World** (in and out) 8y

    Love this shot! Please Share your best pictures of the world with us.

    What
    a Wonderful World
    Group
    please add tag WONDERWORLD
    Contests - Mountains and the Rugged Country Perfect Capture. Best sunrise and sunset, Spectacular Landscapes and September Photo of the Month *Open NOW*

    No doubt this is a Worlds Best Dazzling shot! We'd love to include it in our
    collection! So here's your official invitation!


    World's Best Dazzling Shots please add tag "WORLDBEST"
    Contests - Perfect High Speed Photo, Excellent Autumn Capture, Spectacular Landscapes, *OPEN NOW*
    It's all about water, Brilliant Animal's Shot, Amazing Sunrise/Sunset and Amazing Macro *Vote NOW*<
  • Steve Jurvetson 7y

    WIRED issue 16.11 has a cool story and diagram of this rocket.
    .
  • David Reese 5y

    Just happened on this photo -- yea the "rule of thumb" ain't exactly right :) Check out the isentropic flow relations (as posted previously), particularly the one for A/A* -- that gives expansion ratio as a function of exit Mach number and gamma value for the exhaust. Typical solid propellant exhaust has a gamma of ~1.2, so plug that into the relation with M = 9 and you'll get A/A* = 12,383, meaning the exit cone would have to expand to 12,383 times the throat area to get that flow velocity. If that weren't enough, the pressure at that point (given by the P/Pt equation) would be 1.76e-6 that of the chamber pressure; that's impossible to have in a rocket operating in the atmosphere, due to flow separation in the nozzle. (At that pressure ratio, for the flow not to separate, the chamber pressure would have to be ~3 million psi!)

    Neat pic, though. I heard Gene scrubbed this year -- too bad. Balls should still be great though, as always; see you on the playa!
  • steveoh9 5y

    What motor is that? . . .btw this is an amazing shot!
  • Steve Jurvetson 5y

    a homebrew Q motor
  • Shandchem 4y

    Magnificent capture of this lovely rocket launching!
11,067 views
51 faves
28 comments
Taken on September 30, 2006
  • EF100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
  • ƒ/7.1
  • 170.0 mm
  • 1/5000
  • 800
  • Flash (off, did not fire)
  • Show EXIF
This photo is in 6 albums
This photo is in 3 galleries

Additional info

  • Viewing this photo Public
  • Safety level of this photo Safe
  • S Search
    Photo navigation
    < > Thumbnail navigation
    Z Zoom
    B Back to context