decisions decisions, 2007
so i tried my best to watch "an inconvenient truth" last night.
but i kept getting LOST in the blizzard of mysteriously vague and barely visible "facts"
for instance, camera pans in on stratified ice melting glacier. gore's comedic overvoice drolling, "you can see each ice layer for each year", (but there is no scale so you can't tell if the layers are ten feet thick, five feet thick, one foot thick? then he says, "we can test ice core samples backwards of 650,000 years"
well, if you do the basic math calculations, allotting one foot per year layer, we would have to have drilled over 123 miles into the earth's surface
you can keep breaking it down if you'd like (changing the ice core layering numbers, but the point, i guess, is that when "we" have drilled, the ridiculously and all time farthest depth is less than 9 miles) so keep that in mind as you try to make up the facts to match al gore's proposal
unfortunately, even dumbed down wikipedia adds some contradictions to al's movie version: "The length of the record depends on the depth of the ice core and varies from a few years up to 800 kyr for the EPICA core. The time resolution (i.e. the shortest time period which can be accurately distinguished) depends on the amount of annual snowfall, and reduces with depth as the ice compacts under the weight of layers accumulating on top of it. Upper layers of ice in a core correspond to a single year or sometimes a single season. Deeper into the ice the layers thin and annual layers become indistinguishable." hmmmm. now that's really different than the info he was saying. and frankly i think he's not just full of shit, so are all the people who just jump into junk science because it's sexy and contemporary. and hey, that IS ANY OF YOU who are just starting to crumble under the repetition of media catch phrases. but don't blame yourselves or get angry at new information. i know, who has the time to cross reference anything anymore?
there is a startlingly good scene in the book Brave New World where one of the lead characters is told by one of the world leaders that science is bunk. he cries out, "but it's the backbone of our society". the world leader then asks him what he really knows about science. beyond the jargan and propaganda, what does he really know of true, hard science? and he knows nothing and is ashamed and realizes that he really only knows stories about science, not true science
last night, i watched this movie with someone who kind of belives the same things as helmholtz watson (the dashing, over-intelligent outcast/untouchable... that's right, the unavoidable corporate caste system -- c'mon, you knew there was a reason that the xians and the islams are being pitted against each other, right?!).
periodically, i would stop the movie after one of al gore's wordy explanations and say, "what does that mean? what did he just say?" not once could my compadre actually relay back the info that was said. so i would, verbatim and then i would ask again, "what does that mean?" but it was idiotic gibberish and had no meaning at all
and way too much of the movie is just sheer "clean up" propoganda. and whose pocket do you think al is in?
not sure if y'all get it but the war btwn the energy cartels and the new corporates is raging pretty damn fiercely in this economic pilot project we fondly call the united states
gore represents globalism and global views. bush is pretending to represent nationalism and nationalistic views (though we know that isn't true), but he is also global -- something like the patriot act (which deals heavily with online internet business, black market and tax evasion issues) would NEVER have passed in this county if he wasn't involved in globalism at the deepest level -- hell, i'm gonna make a NEW WORLD ORDER shirt today to honor his father's catch phrase
problem/reaction/solution has become the manufacturing goal of the media and corporations are wildly at war with each other. the ability to use nations as human shields or weapons is increasing. humans are becoming weapons, living weapons. once again
if we all jumped heedlessly onto the "clean up" band wagon, we might find some new enlightenment. studies show, however, that "clean up" crew mentality is very lucrative for pocket buddy corporates that "shoot pool" with the politicians and make trade outs for big pay offs. cf the fct up stats from the exxon valdeez clean up if you don't believe me (no, really, spend ten minutes and do some personal research!!!!!)
but, back to the movie. in ONE breath he states thtat we are politically obligated and MORALLY obligated AND ETHICALLY OBLIGATED to global warming -- it's obvious that includes all of you who aren't anarchists!!!! you're all being called to submit and bow down. damn. the anarchist is left out of the equation, AGAIN!
can anyone else smell a fking HUGE TARIFF coming?
have you paid your annual "global warming tax" yet? your share this year is 138,000 u.s dollars. we've just taken it from the federal reserve. you paid for it in iraq and at the gas pumps. we burned the money. your country will soon be dancing through a delicious recession until the next bill shows up. use credit. pay later. eat filter fish. take medications. sleep less. get angry all the time. drive your car recklessly
what an entertaining culture!!!!
i think fellini did a great job of interpreting petronius. in his film fellini's satyricon", the poet refers to us, the viewer and the students in the film as a "race of slaves"
secretly, i prefer mr.huxley's corporate translation of the same phrase: community, stability, identity
i promise to see the whole movie. maybe several times
my favorite part so far is when he uses the invisible lift to avoid showing how current temperatures correspond with the outrageous projections -- i think i even shouted out, "donkey show" when i really meant to say "dog and pony show"
people either forget or don't know that the little organisms in the ocean that "filter" all the stuff scientists call oxygen (hahaha) that we breathe, well, they're taking strange vacations lately and going different ways than before for reasons that are related to basic change. revegetation, pattern shifts, industrialization, toxic waste (hey, even little organisms will move away from radioactive poison once they catch on), and so many other things contribute to a different migrational period for them. and weather weapons, which have been tested and used several times within the past five years are just normal outgrowths of comic book fantasies come to life through secret laboratories that fill our cities and communities with ideas and applications, education and doctored foods. it's not new stuff, folks. none of it
and those little organisms that make all that oxygen will stabilize into "normal" patterns again. and what about the fking whales? and the sonar project that is devastating oceanic life and has been for the past decade? you know what i'm saying? there's just info coming to the surface that SEEMS NEW and exciting and dangerous. but it isn't really any of that
it's just news UNLESS you have to pay for it. then, it's time to watch the monkeys have their boston tea party