|
|
Nice work!
I can find my own tagged photos again.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Nice!
But I wish that the same URL wasn't used for both the view with my photos and the one without.
If I click the tag, I see the page with my photos included, but if I load that same URL (or even just refresh that page), my photos disappear.
Any URL that I can use to see my photos included with everyone else's (like you get when you click the tag from the photo page)??
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I, too, am happy to see the return of functionality that used to exist. But here's another way it is incomplete: Once upon a time, if you clicked on a tag on someone else's photopage, it would show you all of their photos with that tag.
Note: Having URLs such as Brenda requests would (I expect) probably also solve my request.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Yes, I noticed some of my older shots getting views and traced them to your new trending section. A nice idea to increase people's views
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Also my post today did not get any auto tags from flickr. Nor did any of my contacts' latest posts. Have you stopped doing them?
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 mag3737:
+1 for a return to: "if you clicked on a tag on someone else's photopage, it would show you all of their photos with that tag."
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
mag3737:
+1 for a return to: "if you clicked on a tag on someone else's photopage, it would show you all of their photos with that tag."
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
+1 to:
mag3737:
Once upon a time, if you clicked on a tag on someone else's photopage, it would show you all of their photos with that tag.
Well, actually the new tag-page "sometimes" gives you a top-row with photos from the photographer you came from. But it only works with a "normal" mouse-click. It doesn't work when opening page in a new tab via right- or ctrl-clicking (which is the way I usually go - tab-close has been my back-button for years). And the connection to the photographer is also lost if you post the link or bookmark it.
PS. I've made my own fix for this. But native support working with right/ctrl-clicking would definetely be nice.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
Stig Nygaard edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
Oups, the "old" tag-pages doesn't work anymore?
If I go through the Tag-overview page on my profile it for example says I have 82 items tagged "colorful". But if I click on that tag I get an empty page!
Edit: A couple of minutes after I get 2, but still pretty far from the 82 photos I have...
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
Stig Nygaard edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
 Stig Nygaard:
If I go through the Tag-overview page on my profile it for example says I have 82 items tagged "colorful". But if I click on that tag I get an empty page!
I had a similar experience. However, it seems that all searching is suffering problems at the moment; the other day, search found that I have 684 photos tagged "Cambridgeshire" but just now, going to my photostream, limiting the search to my own photos, and searching for Cambridgeshire ( www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=40878011%40N07&view_al... ) gives no results; unsurprisingly, using the advanced option to restrict this search to tags ( www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=40878011%40N07&view_al... ) also gives no results.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Stig Nygaard:
Search is borked at the moment, could that be related?
www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157664772793562/
.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
You all might want to read the bugs on the original test thread that started 6 weeks ago . Some of them have been fixed, others not ..
"[Test] New presentation & layout when clicking on tag"
www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157661627070954/
.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
Scarlet Pimpernel edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
Stig Nygaard:
But if I click on that tag I get an empty page!
yes!
Oops! There are no matches for “bluepeople” in this user's photos.
Please try broadening your search.
nothing new for me!
as ever!
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Search the Help Forum isn't working either now...
We couldn't find any topics in our help forum about tags.
We give up!
...
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Stig Nygaard:
If I go through the Tag-overview page on my profile it for example says I have 82 items tagged "colorful". But if I click on that tag I get an empty page!
Edit: A couple of minutes after I get 2, but still pretty far from the 82 photos I have...
Things seem to be returning to normal after the complete collapse of search earlier this evening. When I go to www.flickr.com/photos/stignygaard/tags#C-tags and click on "colorful" I am now taken to www.flickr.com/photos/stignygaard/tags/colorful/ which says that it is displaying 80 photos. That's not quite the 82 that you reported your tags page as saying, but I often find minor discrepancies between the tags page and search (cf. www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157657707785093/#reply7... and subsequent posts in that thread.)
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 Steve-h:
I'm still getting auto-tags on new uploads (last night and today), so they still seem to be there...
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 Scarlet Pimpernel:
You all might want to read the bugs on the original test thread that started 6 weeks ago . Some of them have been fixed, others not ..
"[Test] New presentation & layout when clicking on tag"
www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157661627070954/
As a fellow contributor to that thread, I am grateful to you for making that point!
As an example of the puzzles posed by this new feature, can anyone explain why, on www.flickr.com/photos/tags/cambridgeshire , the second photo in the "Recently tagged" section is this one: www.flickr.com/photos/109369678@N08/25020765866 ? I cannot see the text "Camb" anywhere, let alone a tag of "Cambridgeshire", it does not appear to be geo-tagged and there are no notes, so far as I can tell.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
It doesn't work with machine tags :( eg www.flickr.com/photos/tags/taxonomy:kingdom=Animalia is empty while is should show a bunch of images.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
[https://www.flickr.com/photos/lhirlimann/] Ludovic Hirlimann:
Workaround for now - remove the markup from the tag (e.g. ':' and '=') and concatenate what remains - e.g. www.flickr.com/photos/tags/taxonomykingdomAnimalia
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
It seems the new tag pages breaks the old links:
For many years we use hyperlinks in group search,
for instance this link:
www.flickr.com/groups/565317@N20/pool/tags/Malus
It does work, as before, and at the bottom you find new link (cluster tags)
"See all public content on Flickr tagged with Malus?",
(www.flickr.com/photos/tags/Malus/clusters/)
but if you click on that link it takes you to the black page Page Not Found
I would be happier is Flickr concentrate to fix other features he broke before, like notes, albums comments, maps, etc., instead of again breaking something what was perfectly OK.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
Tatters ✾ edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
Oh no, clusters are gone?!
Can Flickr please comment on whether these will be making a return?
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 bhautik joshi:
noted , but ugly
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
It looks pretty nonsensical on the trending tags page when I have a peek--for instance, the tag "street" is represented atm by a vintage photo portrait of 2 elderly people, and "city" by an empty beach and sand. Also I see a lot of "trending" tags are the auto-tags Flickr sticks on our photos, such as "serene." (ie they have nothing to do with anything I am trying to convey)
Which leads me to ask the dreaded question from the old Auto-tags thread--when will we be given a tool to more easily get rid of unwanted auto-tags? I don't want all my photos that Flickr is auto-tagging with words such as "surreal" popping up on the new trending tags page, and I can only imagine what happens when the "people" tag icon is taken by a doll or toy, given past threads about toy photography and the anger it seems to incur (also I really don't want anyone thinking I somehow want the tag "people" on doll photos or "garden" on grave ones, etc.). I have been able to keep of with deleting the auto-tags of my new photos but I have literally thousands of old ones I need to find time for...
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 Bebopgirl1969: Which leads me to ask the dreaded question from the old Auto-tags thread--when will we be given a tool to more easily get rid of unwanted auto-tags?
Staff have stated in that topic that there are no plans for such a tool:
www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157652019487118/page56/...
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 kmacgray:
OK, thanks--guess it's time to start setting an hour or so a day aside to get rid of the old auto-tags then... Blah.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Bebopgirl1969:
Also I see a lot of "trending" tags are the auto-tags Flickr sticks on our photos, such as "serene.
No robots here! We only use 100% organic, human-added tags to compute tending tags on Flickr; autotags are not used in the computation.
Additionally: yes, picking an image to represent each tag will sometimes be inaccurate in pretty much _exactly_ the same way that we as humans will quibble over what type of green the color of a leaf is. Luckily for us our community here on Flickr is very meticulous so the tags are by-and-large an accurate representation of what is in the images :]
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
bhautik joshi:
No robots here! We only use 100% organic, human-added tags to compute tending tags on Flickr; autotags are not used in the computation.
Well I've just looked at the this photo in the top trending tag "serene" and I cannot see any other reference to "serene" apart from the auto tag.
www.flickr.com/photos/dubusregis/6447375205/in/photolist-...
Or this one
www.flickr.com/photos/123513652@N06/16554945446/in/photol...
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 Pictures from the Ghost Garden:
Well, regardless, those photos are indeed serene, no? I suppose that's the important thing. :-)
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Pictures from the Ghost Garden:
I cannot see any other reference to "serene" apart from the auto tag.
Confirming your observation. Not claiming it to be relevant here, but after the possibility was pointed out to me here in HF, I have found that sometimes strange links can be made by the bot extending its view of targets via matches with words having the same root. If in some language, "serene" is a word derived from "ser" (which latter does exist for sure in other languages) it may well connect with parts of other words in your two examples. That was a lot of words which may not have added to clarity of the explanation!
.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
Giant_Schnauzer edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
Interesting observations, Pictures and Schnauzer, and thanks for the info, bhautik joshi!
(hope this doesn't post multiple times, Help Forum is acting weird for me)
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Actually quite a few of the photos under the serene tag in the Trending series do NOT have the word serene in their tags but it is used in the headline for the photos
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 Darren LoPrinzi:
Well, regardless, those photos are indeed serene, no? I suppose that's the important thing. :-)
No arguments about the serenity of the photos :-) But this is a section callied trending tags and bhautik joshi: states "We only use 100% organic, human-added tags to compute tending tags on Flickr; autotags are not used in the computation".
One of those photos I linked to has no user tags at all but it is auto tagged "serene" so how can the auto tags not be part of the computation?
On the other hand this photo:
www.flickr.com/photos/35922267@N04/25078614673/in/photoli...
Is currently the top item under "Recently Tagged - Temple". It has no user tags at all and the auto tags are "outdoor" "architecture" "building" "skyline" and "city".
And it isn't a photo of a temple…
Puzzling
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Pictures from the Ghost Garden:
currently the top item under "Recently Tagged - Temple". It has no user tags at all and the auto tags are "outdoor" "architecture" "building" "skyline" and "city".
And it isn't a photo of a temple…
A short-sighted person with his or her glasses off (e.g. me!) might mistake it for a Buddhist temple so it's just imaginable that there might be a "ghost" autotag of "temple" (of the kind that make photos appear in magic view categories but can't be seen by users), but "temple" never occurs as an autotag so far as I can tell ( www.flickr.com/search/?text=temple%20NOT%20%22temple%22 yields no results). Furthermore, I have just looked at www.flickr.com/photos/tags/temple , and this photo is no longer visible. So it's definitely puzzling.
I noted above a photo in the www.flickr.com/photos/tags/cambridgeshire "recently tagged" results that had no obvious reason to be there. It's also no longer to be seen, but at the moment only two of the first eight results in the "recently tagged" section of that page have a visible user tag "Cambridgeshire"; my best guesses for why the first eight might have appeared are as follows:
1. "Cambridge" in title;
2. Geo-tagged to a place in Cambridgeshire;
3. Ditto;
4. User tag "Cambridgeshire";
5. Geo-tagged to a place in Cambridgeshire;
6. User tag "Cambridgeshire";
7. Geo-tagged to a place in Cambridgeshire;
8. Another mystery case ( www.flickr.com/photos/daisyduke/24755857044 ). No visible text "Cambridge" on the photo at all; not geo-tagged; no notes so far as I can tell. I can guess where the photo might have been taken in Cambridge but the only connection that I can imagine that a search engine might detect is that the photographer gives "Cambridge" as her home. But it's news to me that that now counts as a search criterion (and it's ill-advised if it does, since people move around!) and it's certainly not a "100% organic, human-added tag".
On checking again, no. 8 has vanished from the display. However, this doesn't alter my judgement that these results do not display photos tagged "Cambridgeshire" in the usual Flickr meaning of that term. It's striking that www.flickr.com/photos/tags/cambridgeshire says that there are 4,885 photos recently tagged "Cambridgeshire", yet clicking "View all 4,885" takes me to a page which says that there are only 1,949 results. The URL shows that this is a genuine tag search and the first few photos bear this out. The drop in the number seems to me to confirm that the "recently tagged" results on the tags page are not the result of a true tag search.
I reckon that the "all photos tagged Cambridgeshire" section of the page again displays the results of a text search; it's certainly the case that, when clicking on the "View all" link next to these photos, the results displayed are the results of a text search.
Similar points were made when users were providing feedback on the test launch of the new tags pages ( www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157661627070954/ ), but seemed to have no effect; it's probably futile to repeat them here but I am hoping that one more attempt might get staff to see that the page is not doing what users expect or (I suspect) what staff themselves intended.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
It's rather sad that what started off as a great idea is being destroyed by including photos which have no relevance to the tag section.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
How can I look up a SPECIFIC tag word. I can't seem to find a way to do it that with this new layout. Has that feature been taken away with this new update? If not, can someone please tell me how to do it. I miss that capability from the old layout. Thanks.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
bhautik joshi:
No robots here! We only use 100% organic, human-added tags to compute tending tags on Flickr; autotags are not used in the computation.
This photo has 100% auto tags This im seeing often. That came up in tag trending. Time and time again i'm getting photos come up that only have the word in the titles too.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
Scarlet Pimpernel edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
Tag trending tag "Lake" 100% auto tag "Lake"
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 Eileen's Snapshots:
How can I look up a SPECIFIC tag word
Do you already know what the tag is or do you want to select it from www.flickr.com/photos/tags/ ?
In the former case, type the tag into the search box at top right of any screen, click "Search photos" from the drop down (if it's visible) or just hit return. The results page shows photos that have your word anywhere, including titles, descriptions, geo-tagging and autotagging. To confine the results to photos to which users have purposely added the word as a tag, click on "Advanced" (on the right, near the top), which opens a sub-menu; click "Tags" on the right.
From www.flickr.com/photos/tags/, at the moment, you have to click on the tag that interests you, scroll down to the "All photos tagged ..." section and click "View all" on the right of the heading. To confine the results to photos to which users have purposely added the word as a tag, open the "Advanced" sub menu and click "Tags", as above. (You can apply the same approach to the "recently tagged" section if you wish, except that here, when you click on "View all ...", the results page shows the results of a tag search by default; there's no need to open the advanced search sub menu.)
The second method seems always to carry out a safe search, whatever your preferences, so you may want to amend the "safe search" drop down on the results page if you want to include moderate or restricted photos in the results.
And on any photo page you can click on a tag or autotag. In this case the results page will show at the top a section devoted to your photos, if the photo was your own, or to photos from the same user as the one that you were just viewing. This section is truly the result of a tag search (so, if you clicked on an autotag it may not appear, since autotags do not count as tags for searching purposes, although you can now launch a tag search by clicking on one!) The other sections of the page function (or malfunction) in the same way as if you had opened the page from www.flickr.com/photos/tags/ .
Unless I am missing something, the new tags pages are far from straightforward, and I hope that, after the weekend, someone from Flickr will admit that it isn't meant to be this confusing, or else offer an explanation for what they have done!
Finally, in case it's any help, you can still use a long-standing feature, and see a list of a particular user's tags by opening the "More" drop down menu on the photostream page and selecting "Tags". It's then possible to click on a link to search that person's photos for a particular tag. You can also do this for your own photos, of course, although your own tags page displays differently to you (when logged in) from the way that it displays to others, giving you options to delete and edit, as well as to search.
[Edited to acknowledge that the "Recently tagged" section of the new tags page doesn't behave in quite the same way as the "All photos" section!]
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
sps1955 edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
 Trondheim byarkiv:
+1 for a return to: "if you clicked on a tag on someone else's photopage, it would show you all of their photos with that tag."
This morning I find that clicking on a tag in a photo page (not mine) does begin with photos from that user. I am not seeing the group for people I follow. What are others seeing?
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 swanq:
This morning I find that clicking on a tag in a photo page (not mine) does begin with photos from that user. I am not seeing the group for people I follow. What are others seeing?
A partial description of my experience is in fact buried in my previous post!, i.e.
"on any photo page you can click on a tag or autotag. In this case the results page will show at the top a section devoted to your photos, if the photo was your own, or to photos from the same user as the one that you were just viewing. This section is truly the result of a tag search (so, if you clicked on an autotag it may not appear, since autotags do not count as tags for searching purposes, although you can now launch a tag search by clicking on one!)"
[Edit to add that this section also doesn't appear if I open the link in a new tab, as mentioned by Stig Nygaard in the next post below.]
After that I get a "recently tagged" section, a "related groups" section and an "All photos" section.
I've only ever seen the "people you follow" section on an ordinary search results page (and it's a fairly recent development there, I think - I don't think that it was a part of search results until a year ago and I don't think it was part of the old tags pages). [Edit to add that on reflection I realize that clicking a tag on a photo took one to a normal search results page until the new tags feature was introduced - so the page that came up after clicking on a tag indeed showed your photos, photos from people you follow and all photos, like a normal search results page, because that's what it was!]
I think that it might be a good thing if the tag results and the ordinary search results pages used the same design - it would be easier for users to grasp and perhaps easier for the developers to de-bug and maintain if only one page were used! However, careful thought would have to be given to how this would work so that it offered the best features of the normal search page and the new tags page in combination.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
sps1955 edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
swanq:
This morning I find that clicking on a tag in a photo page (not mine) does begin with photos from that user. I am not seeing the group for people I follow. What are others seeing?
As written a few days ago above, I've seen "photos from that user" from the beginning (at least since the official launch). However it only works with a normal left-click on tags. If I open a tag-page in a new tab/window via right- or control-click on a tag, the feature doesn't work.
I can't remember if the group for people I follow was there yesterday, but I don't have it either now (I remember it was there at least some of the time in the limited users testing period).
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 sps1955:
THANK YOU!! I didn't even think of that. I wanted specific pictures for Amsterdam as inspiration for an upcoming family vacation. I didn't feel like scrolling through thousands of random photos looking for the specific subject under TRIPS just because it was a "Trending Tag". I also like that they still have options for "Interesting" , "Relevant", etc on the far right drop-down menu.
Much appreciation *BIG smile*
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
Eileen's Snapshots edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
I am curious about something. Since the new tag presentation started , some of my picture found based on some tags, but my public images do not have a single tag. Yet, images pop up in the stats from searches on tags. When I look at the pic that was found in a search, I can see I have zero tags, plus I checked the option of not being searched on Flickr. Those images that show up in tag searches are not in any groups either.
Another case was an image that showed up in the stats based on a search for "restricted" tags. Apparently there is a category called "restricted" for the tags. What is this? None of my images are tagged with this word. My images have no tags at all!!
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Can I share my official Links with Flickr pro account ... anyone can suggest me please
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 ColetteSimonds:
Another case was an image that showed up in the stats based on a search for "restricted" tags. Apparently there is a category called "restricted" for the tags. What is this? None of my images are tagged with this word. My images have no tags at all!!
My observations is that the tag presentation is using words from Titles and Descriptions, and Auto Tags. It seems to have been broken from the start.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Scarlet Pimpernel:
Yes, you are right. The last found image had a description block. But supposedly I can't be found through searches. So I don't quite understand why my images were found. I checked the box "No wide search on Flickr" Oh well!!
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
bhautik joshi:
The main Search bar where members have set there photostream so that site wide searches can't be done isn't working with the Tag Trending function
Is this a bug, or is this just the way it is in the new Tag Trending function?
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Scarlet Pimpernel:
Ah, that's what I thought! But it might not even be working with words from descriptions either. I removed all my tags from my public photos and some of my images still show up in searches (no photos in groups).
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Are the Trending Tags available via the Flickr API?
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I am seeing a new feature although discussion on the main "Updates to tags" thread suggests that it is currently being tested with some users only.
On hover, any tag or autotag on the photo page grows and becomes two links (each with its own hint): one is under the buddy icon and takes one to the photos with the same tag in the same photostream as one was viewing (which might be one's own or someone else's); the other is under the text and takes one to the new-style tag results page which begins with a section also devoted to the photos with the same tag in the same photostream as one was viewing. So the photo page (which some people already find generates slowly and erratically) has been made a bit more complicated to give an additional route to results that were already available on the new-style tag results page. I'm tempted to say that, of all the things connected with the new-style tag results page that need fixing, this was the least necessary!
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
bhautik joshi:
depth of field - Still gives completely different results between user tag and auto tag .. But you say auto tags are not part of trending ...
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
sps1955:
On hover, any tag or autotag on the photo page grows and becomes two links (each with its own hint): one is under the buddy icon and takes one to the photos with the same tag in the same photostream as one was viewing (which might be one's own or someone else's); the other is under the text and takes one to the new-style tag results page ...
Are you using Stig's Flickr Fixr? It looks something like this?:
Don't blame Flickr for that feature if you don't like it :-) It's a feature I added to Stig's Flickr Fixr before Flickr introduced the new tags-pages. But so far I want to keep the feature in my script because it unlike Flickr's own solution also works when opening a tags-page in a new tab (via right- or control-clicking a (buddy-)tag).
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
Stig Nygaard edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
Stig Nygaard:
That's it! I have indeed recently installed your Flickr Fixr to help with the display of maps (above all), and found that it contains many other useful features, but hadn't previously noticed this one and, on seeing it, didn't register that it was part of your package of fixes.
I dislike it only to the extent that it duplicates something available already (but I appreciate that it didn't do that when you first developed it and I can see that it works on opening a new tab in a way that Flickr's own solution doesn't) and because it suggested that developers were still altering things connected with tags without attending to what seem to me to be the obvious weaknesses of the new tags page (whereas in fact it's not the work of Flickr's developers at all!)
I am simultaneously embarrassed and apologetic (and grateful to you for your work)!
PS: I should have known that this wasn't a Flickr development because of the useful hints that appear on hover!
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
sps1955 edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
An excellent outcome to the query revealing an interesting piece of work on the part of Stig.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
It must still be quite rare to find a photo of one's own when going through the trending tags, none of mine with 'snow' and many photos come several times.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 ausfi:
It must still be quite rare to find a photo of one's own when going through the trending tags, none of mine with 'snow'
There's more than 8.000.000 searchable photos tagged "snow" on Flickr...
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Stig Nygaard:
I know, I did not mean all Flickr photos, I just meant the 80 pages of photos you are shown when you click one trending tag/picture on the new tags page: Tags — All Time Most Popular.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Hello, Up There!
Is it normal if we see the pair of breasts in public search result page when we type for "woman" even when we are in Sign Out mode and also in Sign In mode with Safe Search ON? Shouldn't it be set as moderate/restricted/adult content?
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
reminiscent toy edited this topic 111 months ago.
|
|
|
[https://www.flickr.com/photos/daisyduck2007/] DinosaursAreNotDead:
Is it normal if we see the pair of breasts in public search result page when we type for "woman" even when we are in Sign Out mode and also in Sign In mode with Safe Search ON?
It IS normal, meaning you can expect images showing nudity to turn up on the Search results with SS set to on, if that image is *not* flagged as "moderate". (or "restricted").
You can report the image, using the "report abuse" link in the footer of the Photo page.
.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Um shouldn't the screenshot be removed considering it shows unfiltered nudity on a public (safe) page?
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 FlyButtafly:
Um shouldn't the screenshot be removed considering it shows unfiltered nudity on a public (safe) page?
Of course...as I now find the answer. :)
Thanks  MabelAmber® ***Pluto5339*** Queen of Streetshots!
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Should photos under the heading "Your photos of [tag]" show all of your photos with that tag?
Should the photos under the heading "All Photos tagged [tag]" be showing some of my photos with that tag?
Shouldn't all of my photos of mine with a particular tag be in the "Your photos . . ." and none of them under the heading "All Photos . . ."?
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Oh, and are my photos displayed on the new tag pages visible only to me? Because I've set them all to be not searchable. If others can see them, fix this now.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 James_Shook:
Shouldn't all of my photos of mine with a particular tag be in the "Your photos . . ." and none of them under the heading "All Photos . . ."?
I think I've seen that happen a few times.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
mag3737:
Once upon a time, if you clicked on a tag on someone else's photopage, it would show you all of their photos with that tag.
+1
I'm using a Greasemonkey script to enforce that on my own tags, but I can't get it to work on other people's.
I've never ever wanted *everyone's* photos to show up when I clicked a specific user's tag, especially my own tags.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 Wil C. Fry:
I'm using a Greasemonkey script to enforce that on my own tags, but I can't get it to work on other people's.
I've made a Greasemonkey script which should work for both your own and other people's photos this way. Well at least it works both ways for me - ahem most times (sometimes there seems to be some timing issue - a reload of the page should usually fix this).
Or is it maybe this one you are already using (with problems?):
www.flickr.com/groups/96035807@N00/discuss/72157655601688...
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Stig Nygaard:
The one I'm using is here:
userscripts-mirror.org/scripts/review/473863
And I must correct myself. It does indeed search within the photostream of other people, at least today when I tried it. A few days ago, that didn't work, so I assumed that part was broken.
I will chalk it up to Flickr's general glitchiness, which has been a defining characteristic of the site for a few years. :-/
Your script has a few other features that I likely wouldn't use, but I do appreciate your work. :-)
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 TPorter2006:
Are the Trending Tags available via the Flickr API?
There's no external API for Trending Tags right now. We'll advise if that changes.
Posted 111 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I know, now you need to adjust current implementation and fix various details. But once it's running stable and fine, what about adding supplementary "locally trending tags"? For sure at any time, different things will be happening/trending and shot different places around the world...
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
How do I remove or opt-out of your hidden tagging system? I see my pictures are still being tagged (Magic View) even though I don't want them tagged. Shouldn't it be up to the users how our own pictures are displayed? Or by posting them on Yahoo, are we giving up our rights to our pictures now?
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 ZedOmega: There is no opt out.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
kmacgray:
Thank you. If I set all my pictures to private, will that remove them from Magic View?
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
ZedOmega: No, I don't believe so but others may know more about that.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
ZedOmega: Or by posting them on Yahoo, are we giving up our rights to our pictures now?
What specific rights do you claim are being given up?
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
kmacgray:
The right to display my pictures in a manner of my own choosing. I don't recall reading anything that says I give Yahoo permission to display my pictures however they want to.
If that is stated somewhere, I appreciate if anyone can direct me to that text. If it exists, then I withdraw my comment.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
ZedOmega:
This is the Terms Of Service that apply to your situation
policies.yahoo.com/us/en/yahoo/terms/utos/index.htm
See specifically Section 9
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
ZedOmega: The right to display my pictures in a manner of my own choosing
For that to be the case, you would need to display them on your own website that you control completely. As it is now, you've agreed to post your images on a third-party site who can display them as they wish.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
ZedOmega:
The right to display my pictures in a manner of my own choosing.
Some people have objected to the auto tags (which make Magic View possible), on the grounds that it violates their (artistic) autonomy. Give this thread a read through, as you scroll down you will encounter where the "right" to autotag our photos is questioned. However, if I recall rightly, there is no staff comment.
www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157652019487118/
I don't recall reading anything that says I give Yahoo permission to display my pictures however they want to.
That part is covered in a TOS section. Check out this link and scroll down to where it says:
9. CONTENT SUBMITTED OR MADE AVAILABLE FOR INCLUSION ON THE SERVICE
However, this discussion is better suited in the other Official Thread, which specifically introduces the Auto tags , I linked to.
.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
MabelAmber***Pluto5339***MysteryGuest edited this topic 110 months ago.
|
|
|
 ColleenM:
Excellent - just what I was looking for. Thanks!
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
kmacgray:
Totally understand. I signed up long before the auto-tagging system was implemented. I disagree with Yahoo not allowing an opt-out, but this is not my website so I really only have the choice to accept the changes or delete my photos and account. Thank you!
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
ZedOmega edited this topic 110 months ago.
|
|
|
MabelAmber® ***Pluto5339*** Queen of Streetshots:
Thank you!
I participated in the auto-tagging thread (I assume the same one) a while back. Since no opt-out was offered, I manually removed all tags from all my photos. But with the hidden auto-tagging in place, I'm now right back where I was before.
Yahoo has done a horrible job managing Flickr, so I can understand some of the efforts they are making to further monetize the site. I just don't like the changes they've implemented which take away my ability to control my pictures, as I had in the past. But this place is bleeding money and I have chosen to continue using it. I know I have the choice to accept the changes or delete my photos and profile.
Thanks again.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
ZedOmega:
how our own pictures are displayed
Previous participants have already clarified on the "display" aspect of your query.
But in relation to "auto tags", does the display get affected? Besides, as far as I understand, only you see the magic view on your own account, and that also only if you choose to view in that mode.
So, I don't think the auto tags affect the "display" all that much.
But do correct me if I am missing something.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 Matthew Almon Roth:
Thanks, Matthew. I appreciate you answering my question. Do let us know if that changes...
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I can't remove the auto tags. The x has disappeared!
The tags are often wrong and ridiculous!
Give us the ability to remove them !!!! Stop forcing unwanted changes down our throats!
We are supposed to have the right to how our photos are found, and unwanted tags violate this!
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
sh@ron0 ( no fav without comment please) edited this topic 110 months ago.
|
|
|
 sh@ron0 (dubonnet):
I can't remove the auto tags.
Join the discussion here:
www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157666040748880/
.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I can no longer remove auto tags I do not want on my shots.
Please restore the ability to edit my own photos' tags.
Some are irrelevant to my intentions, some are ridiculously inappropriate and some are so general (i.e. indoor/ outdoor) as to be pretty useless.
Thanks
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
If your system's going to auto-generate erroneous tags for my photos, at least restore my ability to remove them.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
Hey - love what you are doing Flickr BUT, I can't delete auto generated tags, I can hide them using an option in settings, but they are still returned in searches.
It makes for a really if'y search experience, I put a lot of effort into tagging my pictures, so when I run a search and have weird wrong auto generated tag results returned, which I can't delete or hide from searches, its a bit of waste of my effort accurately tagging pictures!
It also means your search algorithms won't learn, they'll just assume there doing an amazing 100% correct job!!!
Must be an oversight? Look forward to the update/fix, otherwise keep up the brilliant work:-)
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I can't delete the machine added tags. I don't know if this is a bug right now or if it's an intentional change but it needs to be fixed. The photo should only have tags that the uploader approves of, especially because many of the flickr auto generated tags are wrong.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
 historygradguy (jobhunting):
I'm having the same problem. I was able to delete the auto tags by clicking on the X at the side of them, now that function has gone.
I'd appreciate it's return as I hate the Auto generated tags on My photos.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I despise Auto generated tags. If I can no longer delete them I will no longer use Flickr.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
I am very upset by the inability to delete auto tags. I don't care if the child tag is only visible to certain people, I don't want it on my photos, period. You should never take control of how and where other people's images appear, including in searches. Tags are far too important to allow a computer free reign over them.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
FlyButtafly:
I am very upset by the inability to delete auto tags.
Seconding this. It's important to me to be able to keep my tags accurate and to control what phrasing any particular photo can be found by. If this no-longer-removable-tag thing is a bug, please acknowledge the bug (it's been posted here for a couple of days now, unacknowledged) and fix it. If not, please rethink. The one thing that made autotags tolerable was the ability to remove the wrong ones. Hiding them does not solve the issue: it's not their visibility that matters, it's what they do.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
FlyButtafly:
Totally agree.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
FlyButtafly:
I agree completely.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
FlyButtafly:
I totally agree with you!!!
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
FlyButtafly:
+1
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
This is what comes up when I click feedback from the Tags page. My issue is NOT being able to REMOVE tags I Didn't Attach to my pictures Nor do I want Attached to my pictures.
The Algorithm used is pathetic at best but and wrong over 60% of the time but really besides the point. I didn't attach them , don't want tags on MY pictures. Flickr Insists on attaching them and now making them PERMINENT. Why no choice?
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
It is the standard force it on the customers, one reason I wont go pro. Option to remove please.. not that flickr listen.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
|
|
FlyButtafly:
+1
Flickr, please fix this.
Posted 110 months ago.
( permalink
)
|
Feed – Subscribe to help discussion threads