Drag to set position!
Share
(1 to 100 of 106 replies)
Special
4:39am, 16 November 2004
Partial Black and White tutorial
End Result

This can be accomplished in Photoshop and Paintshop Pro (and surely other software as well) but I chose to write my tutorial based on the method I use in Paint Shop Pro, since it's the way I normally turn my images partial black and white. It's just much faster (for me) this way since it's the method I've used longer. Also.. there are many tutorials out there on how to accomplish this in Photoshop but I've never seen one on Paint Shop Pro using my method.
Many of you probably already have Photoshop and not Paint Shop Pro.. but PSP is easy to come by. You can download a free trial at www.jasc.com. It's much cheaper than Photoshop, so those of you who are currently without a good digital image editor, you might want to think about getting yourself a copy. I use PSP 6, so while some things have probably changed in the newer versions, I am sure they left the options named the same.
While I tag my images as "masked" as Devos once suggested, they aren't all truly masked and the process I use is quite simple really. You'll see.
First let me just say that it's my opinion that a good masking job never ruins a photo.. but merely adds to it, whereas an awful masking job obviously turns a photo into an eyesore. Practice the method until it doesn't fall into the later category or I will gouge my own eyes out upon viewing your photo.
Deciding which image would look better partial black and white (and for what reasons) is up to you. Decide on an image.. and which parts you want turned black and white and which left in color and then open it in PSP. If you want to edit it any other way (contrast.. color balance) then do it BEFORE you convert it to partial black and white. It's best to start with an image that will be easier to edit. Don't pick an image that's too busy for your first try. Pick an image where the part (or parts) that will remain in color don't have too many twists and turns. Tricky edges are a bitch.
Here's my before image. I wanted to turn everything but the Sexy BC Rich Warlock black and white.
Original Photo

Once your image is opened..click on the 'retouch' tool and an option window will pop up. In my version it's a little hand icon. (Noted in the 'at work" screencap below) From the retouch option window.. click the middle tab (might be positioned differently in your version) and select saturation down from the retouch mode. Then go back to the first tab, and make sure that your paintbrush is set for round and that opacity is set at 100%. You should set the size of the brush higher to start and go lower the closer you get to the parts of the image you want left in color.
Conversion in Process

You will need to look at the larger version to make out the toolbars.
Essentially what you will be doing is drawing out the color. Every part of the photo that you want converted to black and white, you need to draw on. Zoom in and out if need be. Just make sure you cover every pixel that is suppose to be B&W. I normally start by drawing out the color further away from the parts of the image I want left in color.. then I work my way in.. decreasing the size of the brush (and zooming into the photo) the closer I get to parts that are to be left colororized. It gets tricky when you have to do the edges on what remains color and what is to be converted black and white. It's just like trying to stay between the lines in a coloring book, and i'm sure that's something you all can figure out.
The important thing is that you know the method used.. and you work with it. It's nothing more than using the retouch tool in Paint Shop Pro to 'color' the saturation out.
Here are some more examples. All done within PaintShop Pro (NOT Photoshop).
There is a Cutouts group on Flickr and they have links to tutorials on how this can be accomplished in Photoshop and other software.
Hopefully I wrote this in a way that's understandable. If not feel free to ask questions. If anyone finds this method useful I'd love to see the images you used it on.
[tags: manipulation]
End Result

This can be accomplished in Photoshop and Paintshop Pro (and surely other software as well) but I chose to write my tutorial based on the method I use in Paint Shop Pro, since it's the way I normally turn my images partial black and white. It's just much faster (for me) this way since it's the method I've used longer. Also.. there are many tutorials out there on how to accomplish this in Photoshop but I've never seen one on Paint Shop Pro using my method.
Many of you probably already have Photoshop and not Paint Shop Pro.. but PSP is easy to come by. You can download a free trial at www.jasc.com. It's much cheaper than Photoshop, so those of you who are currently without a good digital image editor, you might want to think about getting yourself a copy. I use PSP 6, so while some things have probably changed in the newer versions, I am sure they left the options named the same.
While I tag my images as "masked" as Devos once suggested, they aren't all truly masked and the process I use is quite simple really. You'll see.
First let me just say that it's my opinion that a good masking job never ruins a photo.. but merely adds to it, whereas an awful masking job obviously turns a photo into an eyesore. Practice the method until it doesn't fall into the later category or I will gouge my own eyes out upon viewing your photo.
Deciding which image would look better partial black and white (and for what reasons) is up to you. Decide on an image.. and which parts you want turned black and white and which left in color and then open it in PSP. If you want to edit it any other way (contrast.. color balance) then do it BEFORE you convert it to partial black and white. It's best to start with an image that will be easier to edit. Don't pick an image that's too busy for your first try. Pick an image where the part (or parts) that will remain in color don't have too many twists and turns. Tricky edges are a bitch.
Here's my before image. I wanted to turn everything but the Sexy BC Rich Warlock black and white.
Original Photo

Once your image is opened..click on the 'retouch' tool and an option window will pop up. In my version it's a little hand icon. (Noted in the 'at work" screencap below) From the retouch option window.. click the middle tab (might be positioned differently in your version) and select saturation down from the retouch mode. Then go back to the first tab, and make sure that your paintbrush is set for round and that opacity is set at 100%. You should set the size of the brush higher to start and go lower the closer you get to the parts of the image you want left in color.
Conversion in Process

You will need to look at the larger version to make out the toolbars.
Essentially what you will be doing is drawing out the color. Every part of the photo that you want converted to black and white, you need to draw on. Zoom in and out if need be. Just make sure you cover every pixel that is suppose to be B&W. I normally start by drawing out the color further away from the parts of the image I want left in color.. then I work my way in.. decreasing the size of the brush (and zooming into the photo) the closer I get to parts that are to be left colororized. It gets tricky when you have to do the edges on what remains color and what is to be converted black and white. It's just like trying to stay between the lines in a coloring book, and i'm sure that's something you all can figure out.
The important thing is that you know the method used.. and you work with it. It's nothing more than using the retouch tool in Paint Shop Pro to 'color' the saturation out.
Here are some more examples. All done within PaintShop Pro (NOT Photoshop).
There is a Cutouts group on Flickr and they have links to tutorials on how this can be accomplished in Photoshop and other software.
Hopefully I wrote this in a way that's understandable. If not feel free to ask questions. If anyone finds this method useful I'd love to see the images you used it on.
[tags: manipulation]
That's very interesting, Special. I hadn't thought of doing it that way.
In Photoshop, a (the?) way to do it is to select the paintbrush and select 'saturation' mode. I just had to go try it out.
Could somebody post about the 'masking' process, because I'm not sure how that one works, either.
Thanks again, Special, that was a really great write-up!
In Photoshop, a (the?) way to do it is to select the paintbrush and select 'saturation' mode. I just had to go try it out.
Could somebody post about the 'masking' process, because I'm not sure how that one works, either.
Thanks again, Special, that was a really great write-up!
I'll write one on the Photoshop method of doing this and the true masking technique if you want. I can do it both ways. I just thought most people knew that method already. If you want it, give me another day or so since one tutorial a day is my limit. heh.
No, right now!!!
hehe, just kidding. It'd be great if you get around to it, though, or if you know of a good online tutorial you could point me in the direction of - that'd be splendid, too.
hehe, just kidding. It'd be great if you get around to it, though, or if you know of a good online tutorial you could point me in the direction of - that'd be splendid, too.
Max, I don't really read tutorials much. I normally stumble onto things on my own while goofing with images. That's how I developed this method, so I don't know of any tutorials on this.. or masking which I also figured out through trial and error. I just know that in the cutouts group people were talking about their methods.
If my 'conversion in progress" screencap confuses you I'm sorry. I just realized you might think "what the heck?" since i have the final product beside a 'working on' version. It's because for the sake of the tutorial i was editing the image again to get a screencap and had both images open for sort of a during and after approach. It is like those stupid cooking shows that take out the food and it's completely done, right after they put it in the oven.
If my 'conversion in progress" screencap confuses you I'm sorry. I just realized you might think "what the heck?" since i have the final product beside a 'working on' version. It's because for the sake of the tutorial i was editing the image again to get a screencap and had both images open for sort of a during and after approach. It is like those stupid cooking shows that take out the food and it's completely done, right after they put it in the oven.
lol... no I understand your tutorial perfectly - I just like to learn about all sorts of ways of doing things. That's why I started this group ;)
If there's more than one way to skin a cat, I think I should know both ways to skin that darn cat.
If there's more than one way to skin a cat, I think I should know both ways to skin that darn cat.
Special
16 years ago
Actually, is Devos a member of this group? Because he does the true masking for his partial black and whites. He might want to write the tutorial. I mean, I'll write it if not.. but he might want to write it. To have his say.. so to speak.
common throne [deleted]
16 years ago
When I do this in Photoshop I simply add a duplicate layer of the first over the top, convert it to b&w (using whichever technique is your favourite) and then rub out bits of the top layer to reveal the colour layer underneath.
Is there anything wrong with that method?
Is there anything wrong with that method?
The duplicate layer method has the advantage of giving you more control over the B&W portion - getting the right saturation, having infra-red style B&W channel only, noise etc.

I don't usually Photoshop my stuff but this was fun.
When I originally saw this playground apparatus the red rings just popped out at me but when I saw the photograph (I'm not digital) they were lost in a muddied background. This technique let me recapture my original feeling for the shot.
Here's the original for comparison.
Special
16 years ago
ni.co . there's nothing wrong with the method you described. It's whatever works best for you.
Auntie G did you do that in Photoshop or in Paintshop Pro? You said Photoshop your stuff so just curious which method you used.
Auntie G did you do that in Photoshop or in Paintshop Pro? You said Photoshop your stuff so just curious which method you used.
I have Photoshop Elements (much cheaper than full Photoshop) but the method is the same as you described for Paintshop Pro. As I moved inward towards the red parts, I reduced the size of the brush and enlarged the size of the image.
I haven't really explored this option in depth myself, but you can do the same thing with freely available tools. The Gimp is an open source program and they have a tutorial you can follow here:
www.gimp.org/tutorials/Selective_Color/
It seems there are a few more steps involved, but hey, it's free?! BTW, there are also versions available for MacOSX, Linux (UNIX) and yes, even Windows!
www.gimp.org/tutorials/Selective_Color/
It seems there are a few more steps involved, but hey, it's free?! BTW, there are also versions available for MacOSX, Linux (UNIX) and yes, even Windows!
Thanks Eric (Snowdeal) for pointing out this discussion. What I usually do in Photoshop (Windows version) is:
1. Zoom in to the picture to a level that is appropriate for selecting the object you want to REMAIN IN COLOR (so it's the other way around compared to Special's approach)
2. Then, using the lasso tool (or any other selection tool), meticulously select the part of the image you want to remain in color.
3. Save the selection (Select, Save Selection)after selecting it as a precaution (actually, you might do that while in the process of getting the selection right).
4. Then zoom out again to "Fit on Screen" (for pasting purposes)
5. Finally copy the selection to the clipboard, set the image to grayscale (Image, Mode, grayscale). Then set it back to RGB color mode and paste the clipboard selection back in.
It has the advantages described by IanL as it will be a seperate layer. Which allows for adjustment to be made afterwards, like the request I did for Special.
Original Mask:

Pink Beetle at Special's request:

Or you can play around with the black and white layer like I did in this one:
<
1. Zoom in to the picture to a level that is appropriate for selecting the object you want to REMAIN IN COLOR (so it's the other way around compared to Special's approach)
2. Then, using the lasso tool (or any other selection tool), meticulously select the part of the image you want to remain in color.
3. Save the selection (Select, Save Selection)after selecting it as a precaution (actually, you might do that while in the process of getting the selection right).
4. Then zoom out again to "Fit on Screen" (for pasting purposes)
5. Finally copy the selection to the clipboard, set the image to grayscale (Image, Mode, grayscale). Then set it back to RGB color mode and paste the clipboard selection back in.
It has the advantages described by IanL as it will be a seperate layer. Which allows for adjustment to be made afterwards, like the request I did for Special.
Original Mask:

Pink Beetle at Special's request:

Or you can play around with the black and white layer like I did in this one:
<
I just did a variant on what deVos described, using GraphicConverter on OS X.
1) Prepare two copies of the image, A and B.
2) Desaturate copy A. Adjust brightness, contrast and saturation so the tiger looks best, in copy B.
3) Erase everything around the tiger in copy B by painting it white using various tools at different resolutions.
4) Use the "magic pen" object select tool at a very permissive setting to select the entire tiger image from copy B. Copy and paste onto copy A of the image. Alignment is easy since GraphicConverter shows the pasted object translucent while moving it into its proper place.
5) Finishing touches - minor corrections at some boundaries.
Result:
1) Prepare two copies of the image, A and B.
2) Desaturate copy A. Adjust brightness, contrast and saturation so the tiger looks best, in copy B.
3) Erase everything around the tiger in copy B by painting it white using various tools at different resolutions.
4) Use the "magic pen" object select tool at a very permissive setting to select the entire tiger image from copy B. Copy and paste onto copy A of the image. Alignment is easy since GraphicConverter shows the pasted object translucent while moving it into its proper place.
5) Finishing touches - minor corrections at some boundaries.
Result:
I’ve used this technique quite a bit with my bird photography, because so often the bird is embedded in a similar colored background. Depending on the desired output, you can make the distinction as subtle or apparent as need be. Here are three images that I did a couple of years ago, but are still some of my favorites.



The technique I used goes as follows:
(In Photoshop)
1. In layers, duplicate your original image and work off the copy
2. Use the pen tool to create a path around the bird
3. From the paths tab select “create selection from path” (I think I used a two pixel feather for these, but I’ve used up to five, but most often zero)
4. From the SELECT menu, choose select inverse
5. From the channel mixer, check the monochrome checkbox and tweak the channels for a desired balance.
6. At this point, you have an image with only the subject in color, and the rest of the image in grayscale. Select inverse again so you’re working with the subject. At this point I like to bump up the saturation a bit. Especially with these images as they handled it well. Sometimes this gets too gaudy, but what about this process isn’t iterative?
7. Now either duplicate the original image again (if you’re like me, it’s still labeled “background”) or double-click the original image to change it to a layer. Drag the original (or copy of original) up on top of your manipulated image. Bring down the opacity of the color image (top), so you can see through to the gray/color image, thereby “re-colorizing” the image.
The result will be an all-color image with your subject standing out considerably more than the background.



The technique I used goes as follows:
(In Photoshop)
1. In layers, duplicate your original image and work off the copy
2. Use the pen tool to create a path around the bird
3. From the paths tab select “create selection from path” (I think I used a two pixel feather for these, but I’ve used up to five, but most often zero)
4. From the SELECT menu, choose select inverse
5. From the channel mixer, check the monochrome checkbox and tweak the channels for a desired balance.
6. At this point, you have an image with only the subject in color, and the rest of the image in grayscale. Select inverse again so you’re working with the subject. At this point I like to bump up the saturation a bit. Especially with these images as they handled it well. Sometimes this gets too gaudy, but what about this process isn’t iterative?
7. Now either duplicate the original image again (if you’re like me, it’s still labeled “background”) or double-click the original image to change it to a layer. Drag the original (or copy of original) up on top of your manipulated image. Bring down the opacity of the color image (top), so you can see through to the gray/color image, thereby “re-colorizing” the image.
The result will be an all-color image with your subject standing out considerably more than the background.
I might be kind of an idiot, but couldn't you also do what woodcreeper is talking out by using the technique described by deVos and upping the saturation of the cutout (or doing whatever other adjustment you wanted?
B e t h
16 years ago
The problem I always have with this technique is getting a "line" around the thing I've cutout. Woodcreeper's technique is nice because the difference between the layers is smaller so you don't get an artificial border between the thing you cutout and the background. However, for a true color-in on a desaturated background, like deVos is talking about I'd be interested in hearing people's techniques to eliminate that artificial-looking border. Sometimes I end up using a layer mask and painting around the edges with a brush on flow < 100%, but even then it's hard to get a natural look sometimes. Depends on the subject.
As drlynch points out, there are many ways to skin a cat. I like using layers of images so I can alternately blur backgrounds, change the overlay properties, etc. This morning I used the simple method of just selecting the area I wanted to remain in color, then desaturating the surrounding area. That image is here
the easiest way to not have that hard edge is to feather the selection by 2-5 pixels.
also woodcreeper you should try using the magnetic lasso (click when it won't stick where you want it to) and then Create Mask-->Reveal Selection.
also woodcreeper you should try using the magnetic lasso (click when it won't stick where you want it to) and then Create Mask-->Reveal Selection.
Peptis
16 years ago
Hi everyone, I'm new here, but I thought I could share too.
I used a similar technique to bring the flower in this photo to the foreground. I tried not to overdo the effect as to keep it looking natural.

Using a technique similar to woodcreeper's (in Photoshop) I used the pen tool to create a path around the flower. After duplicating the layer and masking out the background I reduced the brightness and saturation of the background layer. I then applied a Gaussian blur of 3 pixels to the image mask to make the transition between the layers a bit less harsh.
I've also placed a note on the image where I had to remove a stray leaf from passing in front of the subject of the photo. I did it rather quickly so, if you look closely, you can see where the leaf originally passed. Check out the note for more information.
I used a similar technique to bring the flower in this photo to the foreground. I tried not to overdo the effect as to keep it looking natural.

Using a technique similar to woodcreeper's (in Photoshop) I used the pen tool to create a path around the flower. After duplicating the layer and masking out the background I reduced the brightness and saturation of the background layer. I then applied a Gaussian blur of 3 pixels to the image mask to make the transition between the layers a bit less harsh.
I've also placed a note on the image where I had to remove a stray leaf from passing in front of the subject of the photo. I did it rather quickly so, if you look closely, you can see where the leaf originally passed. Check out the note for more information.
All of this is great. I agree first and foremost that there are a whole lot of ways to skin a cat.
And I also agree with matt.ohara about both feathering the selection and using the magnetic lasso.

I threw this together in like 10 minutes using first the lasso and then going back and doing minute corrections with the standard selection tool. A quick feather and then an applied mask, and BOOM, we're off to the races.
And I also agree with matt.ohara about both feathering the selection and using the magnetic lasso.

I threw this together in like 10 minutes using first the lasso and then going back and doing minute corrections with the standard selection tool. A quick feather and then an applied mask, and BOOM, we're off to the races.
B e t h, one way I've found of reducing the sharp border effect is select the cutout zone by whatever means (magnetic lasso, selective color selection, whatever), then create a mask, erase out extraneous areas (this is particularly useful with the selective color selection method) and then apply a blurring filter to the mask. This makes the translation softer. Then you can either turn the cutout or backgroun b&w directly on the image or create a separate layer via copy from the selection, which I find a better method. If you see parts of the selection disturbing the overall effect, you can then switch to the copy layer and work on that.
Simes
16 years ago
My first attempt:

I wanted to refer back to this thread when doing it, but the server was down. :)
So this is just a quick hack in Photoshop - I duplicated the image, desaturated the bottommost layer and erased the bits from the top layer that I didn't want. It needs some fringing removed, but that's a subject for another thread...

I wanted to refer back to this thread when doing it, but the server was down. :)
So this is just a quick hack in Photoshop - I duplicated the image, desaturated the bottommost layer and erased the bits from the top layer that I didn't want. It needs some fringing removed, but that's a subject for another thread...
Simes, with such a uniformely colored subject, you can simply use select -> color range -> sampled colors and sample for the organge. There's a checkbox somewhere for contiguos, if you uncheck that, it selects the sample color everywhere. Then you can create a layer with the selection, leave it colored and desaturate the background layer to your heart's content. It's what I did with this photo:
I know this is an old thread, but it's resulted in some neat effects on some new photographs of mine. I was a bit sloppy in the execution, but hopefully that will improve.


I feel like it's a technique that I need to be careful to use sparingly, because it's so dramatic and fun. But in both these cases I think it works because it clarifies the meaning of the pictures.
Thanks! I had a lot of fun.


I feel like it's a technique that I need to be careful to use sparingly, because it's so dramatic and fun. But in both these cases I think it works because it clarifies the meaning of the pictures.
Thanks! I had a lot of fun.
Sandy Girl
16 years ago
Here's one I did in Photoshop. I saturated the grass, I took the colour out of the grain bins and sky and came up with this.

Since it was an overcast day anyway, it made the process much easier.

Since it was an overcast day anyway, it made the process much easier.
No Middle Name
16 years ago
Saw the tutorial, had to have a go:

I used the GIMP, selecting the flower with the magic wand (selects contiguous areas of similar colours), copying into a new layer, then desaturating the original layer. Hooray! I have a new toy!

I used the GIMP, selecting the flower with the magic wand (selects contiguous areas of similar colours), copying into a new layer, then desaturating the original layer. Hooray! I have a new toy!
mightymis
16 years ago
there's a whole group for this kind of stuff: flickr.com/groups/cutouts/
great stuff there....
great stuff there....
In photoshop, the way to go is masks. Select your area by quickmask, lasso, marquee, or some combination, then add a new later (saturation or channel mixer) and set to black and white.
As always with layers, the beauty of it is that you can repeatedly change your mind once you see the results.
Desaturating NOT QUITE ALL THE WAY TO B&W is also very very effective at times.
Soft-edge masks are a good idea, your eye can't really see soft-edge color changes very well if they don't correspond to contrast changes (think watercolor over pencil drawing)
As always with layers, the beauty of it is that you can repeatedly change your mind once you see the results.
Desaturating NOT QUITE ALL THE WAY TO B&W is also very very effective at times.
Soft-edge masks are a good idea, your eye can't really see soft-edge color changes very well if they don't correspond to contrast changes (think watercolor over pencil drawing)
dawn m. armfield
16 years ago
Special, I followed your tutorial for PSP and it was quite nice. I've been using the magic wand to choose areas and then inverting the selection to convert. However, the magic wand isn't always as easy as I'd like. This was a piece of cake! Thanks for sharing.
portorikan
16 years ago
Here's my attempt at it as well. I used the select color range method in photoshop and erased any extraneous colors that appeared.
In hue/saturation you can go to 'edit' and select 'blues' for example and turn the saturation down which will make all the blue in the picture grey.
You can then repeat this with the other colours available. It's a fast, simple technique which can be combined with others.
You can then repeat this with the other colours available. It's a fast, simple technique which can be combined with others.
Robert & Kristin
16 years ago
I discovered by accident this Father's Day that my dad's garage door shows up as a nice shade of gray (even though it's really a tan color); all I've done here is up the saturation level and contrast a bit.
MelinaTGirl:
I'm not an administrator or anything but...
Could you please edit your post and replace the image with a more reasonably-sized version. That large image is screwing up the formatting of the whole thread (at least on my 1024-wide display).
Thanks.
[ed. done]
I'm not an administrator or anything but...
Could you please edit your post and replace the image with a more reasonably-sized version. That large image is screwing up the formatting of the whole thread (at least on my 1024-wide display).
Thanks.
[ed. done]
Wow I think I got it... just in time too! Using a tablet helps a lot... also not forgetting to use zoom for all of the fine editing. I also experimented a lot with brushes. Using the harder ones to get in the cracks and the soft ones for larger areas. The hardest point on this image was choosing what to reveal. I also found desaturate a little flat….
I found this article mentioned above quite useful Selective Color

BIRD
I found this article mentioned above quite useful Selective Color

BIRD
Studio E
16 years ago
Here's an example of one I did by creating a duplicate layer and painting out the color.

For this image, I desaturated all the color channels except the blue, because I didn't want to deal with using the brush on all those small areas. Guess I was just being lazy!

For this image, I desaturated all the color channels except the blue, because I didn't want to deal with using the brush on all those small areas. Guess I was just being lazy!
StephenHill
16 years ago
Here are 2 of my first attempts at a cutout. This is definately a good reason to buy a tablet. I cut the colour potion to a new layer and desaturated the rest.


I would like to add something to this rather old topic. Interesting effects can be made if you take the cyan channel in portraits as the bw channel. You will get a very soft skin. In my example on purpose I did not brighten up the picture afterwards in order to make the eyes more outstanding. The eyecolor was unchanged. I will further mess around with that effect.
lethal seashore [deleted]
14 years ago
another option you can play with us GIMP is to use the lasso tool, select the area you want to remain colored, then invert the selection, then use the image menu to convert the inverted selection to greyscale. I find it easier sometimes to use the lasso. Otherwise I use the layering method on the tutorial referenced earlier in the thread. If the image is complex though I use the layering method exclusively, especially if the colored areas is broken up by uncolored parts.....sorry dont have any right now I can use as examples.
For selective color photos I find it alot easier to just do a color layer and b&w layer and erase the sections of the b&w layer you want color...no masking, lasso tools or any of that nonsense..And 10x faster.
Yes. I agree with XtwizX. Using a b/w layer and carefully erasing the areas where you want colors, is the technique I favor a lot too. Here's a recent cutout that I did...

Though I must say, to each his own. So I wouldn't say any particular technique is the best. Whatever works for you is the best! :)
Happy New Year, folks!

Though I must say, to each his own. So I wouldn't say any particular technique is the best. Whatever works for you is the best! :)
Happy New Year, folks!
GuppyStorm
14 years ago
Thanks so much for this! I have tried it out a bit... Even if they're not good, I'm having a blast!
My first attempts are in a set:
www.flickr.com/photos/guppystormdotcom/sets/7215759446842...
My first attempts are in a set:
www.flickr.com/photos/guppystormdotcom/sets/7215759446842...
ashwinmudigonda
14 years ago
Another way to select is using "Select Color" from Select. You can adjust the region using the fuzziness factor. You can always layer mask the portions that you didnt intend to select. Here is an example:
kind mist [deleted]
14 years ago
Hello all,
I posted two photos using patial black and white technique, the first one was taken "as is" using the special color mode feature of my canon s2 where you can select the color that you want keep :

And a second one where I used the filter proposed in Picasa :
I posted two photos using patial black and white technique, the first one was taken "as is" using the special color mode feature of my canon s2 where you can select the color that you want keep :

And a second one where I used the filter proposed in Picasa :
yikes_scoobie
14 years ago
The method you describred in photoshop and PSP looks great, anyone ever done it to a black and white photo using watercolours, inks or acrylics?
Time consuming but fun also with equally interesting results. It was very popular in the early to mid 20th century to colourise black and whites. To get more of this authentic feel using software actually make your image black and white and paint in the colours using an overlay layer, some of the dark of the black and white comes through also and it is closer to the original methods using inks and paints. Of course the simple masking and erasing methods are equally valid and make for amazing images also, not better or worse, just a new style for the digital age :)
Time consuming but fun also with equally interesting results. It was very popular in the early to mid 20th century to colourise black and whites. To get more of this authentic feel using software actually make your image black and white and paint in the colours using an overlay layer, some of the dark of the black and white comes through also and it is closer to the original methods using inks and paints. Of course the simple masking and erasing methods are equally valid and make for amazing images also, not better or worse, just a new style for the digital age :)
sam_samantha
14 years ago
Here's mine...I just used the magnetic tool to select the lemon and then desaturate the photo to create the black and white look through one of the tutorials I found here...by copying the layer, going to unsharp mask, play around with the radius, etc...and changing the opacity level of the three or four layers I've created.
empTV
Posted 14 years ago. Edited by empTV (member) 14 years ago
fast and simple
only for simple object..
just using picasa..focal b&w the area u want it to be color...and then collage the outputs..

never thought this one made it to explore!
only for simple object..
just using picasa..focal b&w the area u want it to be color...and then collage the outputs..

never thought this one made it to explore!
ab.17
14 years ago
i downloaded the free version of paint shop like you suggested, and read through your tutorial.. but can't seem to get the hang of it still? any other tips or help?! :)























































