Discussions (99)

Removed from the pool

view profile

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

I removed two shots by 4444u.a.e, as they weren't tagged, and it was impossible for me to determine from the comments whether they were of somebody else's cat or not.

As for shhexycorin's offering, I'm sorely tempted to remove it. While I'm sure the tag "not my cat" is truthful, it isn't "somebody else's cat", which is what this group is all about...
10:42PM, 31 March 2006 PST (permalink)

← prev 1 2
(1 to 100 of 159 replies)
view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

That's the spirit, togr! We have to rule this group with an iron fist if it's not to be overrun with pictures of people's own cats, like all the other cat groups.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

♥ shhexy corin ♥ says:

What if that somebody else thought rabbits were cats?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Already this group is raising some serious philosophical questions. What if the rabbit was cloned with cat genes? What if it was a rabbit-cat, like the elephant-man? (or, for that matter, Vivian's pig-ferret in The Young Ones?)

Discuss.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

On second thoughts, don't.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

It's easy to distinguish cats from rabbits, shhexy. Let them into the bird cage....

Iron fist? I didn't ban them or anything nasty like that, nor did I put evil slurs in the comments to their photos. As you said, we just don't want to be overrun! Given the number of additions just in two days, I'd say the danger is imminent.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Sorry, I meant iron paw.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

And I must say, with AnnabelB's latest offerings, she's pushing it ...

not my big cat
not my chat

and those are pictures of cat pictures. Meta-cat pictures, or cat meta-pictures? And deliberately mischievous tagging. Where will this end?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

It would seem to me that both my postings comply with the statement implicit in the group tag not my cat

So, I'm confused. Very confused. They are not MY cats. They ARE cats. Where have I gone wrong?

Let me consider one of the images I so proudly contributed to this Flickr group which so helpfully keeps our favourite website safe for everyone.

I mean, I asked you nicely about an obligatory seabird which I discovered was appropriately tagged not my cat and your comment in reply seemed to offer fairly clear guidance:

"Well it's not your cat, I'll grant you that -- but is it somebody else's cat?"

So, from your statement, it would appear to me that that image wasn't allowed because, whilst you were in no doubt it was not MY cat, you were not convinced that it was SOMEBODY ELSE's cat.

Which leaves me in confusion about the image I posted in good faith which so clearly featured a black cat that wasn't mine:

chat

In the interests of clarity, and in the context of the above doubt which is so sadly cast on my posting, I herewith confirm that it is definitely and categorically somebody else's chat.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

You must be mistaking me for dr. loopdeloop or the other way around. I'm afraid that questions posted on other people's pictures might not necessarily come to my attention.

As to the distinction between a cat and an image of a cat, I'll simply point you at this Wikipedia article.

As for your tags: are your images tagged with "not my cat" or not?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

I love this group!
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

Well, that one's tagged with "not my chat" for a start. And in the interests of the great Flickr localisation debate, it would be discriminating to suggest that the use of the French language is unacceptable
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

You're of course free to start your own "ceci n'est pas mon chat" group any time you like! (Pardon my French).
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Das ist nicht meine Katze!
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

CLOUSEAU: Does your dog bite?
HOTEL CLERK: No.
CLOUSEAU (patting dog): Nice deuggie...
(dog bites his hand)
CLOUSEAU: I thought you said your dog did not bite!
HOTEL CLERK: That is not my dog.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

But for a group that is compliant with the Flickr rules and seemingly so supportive of the Flickr debates, discussions and ideas, it would be strange that your suggested solution is a duplication of groups (leading to an infinitive number of solutions, perhaps even with potential server capacity implications) and, at the same time, is not very supportive of encouraging a Global Conversation across geographic and cultural boundaries.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

I am NOT joining a That is not my dog group
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

Well, how am I to know if a tag in tagalog says "not my cat" in turkish?

And I thought "dog" was "chien" in French?

And notice that "not my cat" is the tag. The name of the group is "somebody else's cat". Your birds are not cats, regardless of how cute or obligatory they may otherwise be!

And your seafowl would fit a "not my dog" description just as well as they fit "not my cat", so I don't see what you're trying to argue with that last comment.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

I agree. It all depends on how you say "not my cat". For example, "not my cat" (as in "well it's certainly not my cat!") implies the presence of a cat. On the other hand, "not my cat" (as in "that lowfat doormat is not my cat") does not necessarily. NB This may not be the case in Chinese. Colours may vary.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Seafowl!
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

Mine are not birds. Mine are cats. Except they are not mine.

Robin's is a bird
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

I do not believe that italics show up in Flickr tags
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

What about Mynah Birds?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Besides, I didn't use italics -- I just hit the keys harder.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Oops, wrong thread.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

Which thread did you think it was?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

I thought it was the thread that holds together the very fabric of the universe.

Never mind, at least that hole in my sock won't be back in a hurry.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

key lime pie yumyum says:

Why don't we have the tag the same name as the group like all the normal groups have?

If you put the kitty in Someone Else's Cat, simply tag it "Someone Else's cat"
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

~key lime pie: Now I think you are just causing trouble. I was trying to be diplomatic myself. But you just stormed in there like you owned the place and laid down some new rules. I'm not sure if it's helpful
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Oh, really KLP! You should know that in today's fast-paced world nobody has the time to sit around typing "Someone Else's Cat". Tags should be short and snappy, like "iCat" or "Xcat" ("I am a cat" and "Deceased cat" respectively).

Besides, "not my cat" is what the Big Flickr Boss said, so "not my cat" it shall be.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

It's the rools
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

Sadly, I have to report that it has taken me 15 hours to react appropriately and respond to the Mynah Birds comment. How on earth did I miss that yesterday?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

KLP (and dr. loplop): Read the memo again. It clearly specifies that the tag shalt be: not my cat
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

togr: What about the two missing pages of the memo? They might have said something else.

AnnabelB: 15 hours? That's almost as long as it took me to think of it in the first place.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

♥ shhexy corin ♥ says:

What if my friend's rabbit was called Cat?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

Well, if it were up to me, as long as it wasn't your Cat, I'd be ok. But the thing is that the tag doesn't allow for a capital C, and I have found to my distress that they're a bit strict about the tagging in here.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

I'm all for testing the boundaries of non-cat ownership, even at the risk of committing a capital offence and being NIPSA'd by the Big Flickr Boss.

After all, we don't want to end up like the Top 20 Cats group, do we? All those contrived cat poses, it's worse than Harry Whittier Frees & co.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

For those who desperately want to push shots without cats in them, I've created this new group.

Please not that there has to be a conspicuous absence of a cat (or cats) to apply.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

squacco says:

What about feral cats? Where do they go? They may be 'not my cat' but they're definitely not 'somebody else's cat'. *sniff*
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Some would say that they are all God's creatures, so He could be the "somebody else" for the purposes of this group (subject to where you stand on the whole omnipresence issue, of course).
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

Like this sad example of a feral cat
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

Could someone please advise what about a cat that was once one's own and moved next door but comes back now and then and also hangs out in the back yard that is shared by both apartment buildings and comes to me when I say HEY BO-BO but goes home to sleep but still considers my apartment his turf except for the fact that by now my cats see him as SOMEBODY ELSE'S CAT? Now would this group agree with my cats or with Bo-Bo who still sees himself as my cat but who technically isn't, despite shared yardage. I would appreciate a ruling. Meanwhile I have joined NO CAT HERE NOW MOVE ON, which has brought sunshine to my days. I am trying hard to keep all my cats OUT OF THE FRAME so I can take a lot more NO CAT HERE NOW MOVE ON shots. P.S. I wish my last name were Katz so you could decide whether I could post someone else's pictures of me (not their Katz) in this group but it's not.
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
WaterWindStars edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

The ruling will, in the first instance, depend whether you actually are in possession of a photo or not
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

The photo(s) is (are) possessed. However, I go on to say, I possess photos of Bo-Bo whilst possessed by me and photos of Bo-Bo whilst otherwise possessed. Please rule again.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Your cat is possessed? In that case it's definitely somebody else's cat -- to wit, the Hornèd One's.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

I have another question. What if I took a photo of my own cat, passed it surreptitiously to a friend and asked the friend to sign up on flickr and to join the somebody else's cat group and to post my photo of my cat as if it were her photo of my cat? Who would actually get in trouble? (This is purely hypothetical.) (Do you think the fact that this hypothesis came into my mind unbidden is a sign that I am possessed by the Hornèd One?) (If so, again, who would actually get in trouble--me, the friend, or the Hornèd One? All of the above may in fact be hypothetical in addition to being manifestly parenthetical.)
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
WaterWindStars edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

becklectic says:

I was under the impression that cats aren't really owned by anyone. Just because you say its yours doesn't make it yours.

Likewise, can you grant ownership of something you don't possess by saying that it must belong to someone else simply because you don't own it?

What would Marx have to say about this?
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
becklectic edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

Marx would say: "The underpinnings of your group have just been resoundingly pulled out from under your fat bourgeois derrieres and your raison d'etre has been swallowed up by its antithesis."

What a revoltin' development!
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

manifestly parenthetical

More like manifestly paranoid I would say.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

More pool cleaning: These have been deleted from the pool:

www.flickr.com/photos/upyerbum/120799927/ (no cat)
www.flickr.com/photos/33744725@N00/117167526/ (no tag)
www.flickr.com/photos/kevinsteele/121714347/ (no cat)
www.flickr.com/photos/annabelb/24509450/ (no cat)
www.flickr.com/photos/11296846@N00/89308639/ (no cat)
www.flickr.com/photos/enchantedgarden/110451036/ (as per www.flickr.com/groups/notmycat/discuss/72057594099646859/)
www.flickr.com/photos/adeuwarsam/125057052/ (no tag)

This one I'm in doubt about. (picture of a cat's shadow)

www.flickr.com/photos/davemitchell/113951715/
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

I recommend that the Administrator read the complete works of Plato and Hume in order to reach a decision on whether a shadow of a cat = an appearance of a cat = an image of a cat = a cat = tableness. In the meanwhile, best to be be on the safe side and evict.
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
WaterWindStars edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

ooh, stinging!

Unless it is only delaying tactics, of course... The complete works of Plato and Hume will be quite a mouthful, especially if they should be read in the original language.

In the meantime, reggaedori has a number of contributions, none of them tagged (but several having title or comments indicating that the cat in the picture is their own, and not somebody else's). I've evicted one, with a comment explaining why, but the comment was immediately deleted. I have half a mind to delete the rest without further ado, but I'm afraid that could be perceived as sheer bloody-mindedness. What are other people here thinking?

And before answering, please keep in mind that there are more than 4000 groups for pictures of cats already; this one is unique in being exclusively for pictures of somebody else's cat, and the only way to keep it that way (given that nobody reads the group description, never mind its name, before posting) is to evict those contributions that don't fit.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

Having just completed my life's work of reading Plato & Hume in unoriginal and very boring language, I hereby add my half-miind to your half-mind to equal one single-minded vote to delete the rest without further ado. The immediate deletion of your comment is extremely rude, never mind bloody-minded, so I hereby move that you move on to delete delete delete to the very last smidgin of the unbefitting pictures.
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
WaterWindStars edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

If you're pressed for time, togr, here's my one paragraph synopsis of the complete works of Plato and Hume:

Plato sits in a cave watching a shadow puppet show, but is frustrated that he cannot see the actual puppets. Hume sits beside him and grumbles that he has just parted with a Scotch shilling for a shadow puppet show that, for all he knows, does not even exist.

Now, on to admin business. Last week I questioned reggaeadori about the status of his cats (notably the one described as "my cat", already evicted), but he deleted my comment and left the group. Therefore I would assume that all of his remaining cats are his own, and should be evicted. In fact, I'll do it right now!

Now, on to the matter of the shadow. This is how I see the basic argument, with a little assistance from Plato's puppets:

A photograph of a cat is an image created by some of the light reflected from a cat. A photograph of a cat's shadow is a negative image created by the absence of light which has all been reflected elsewhere or otherwise absorbed by a cat. Ergo, a photograph of the shadow of somebody else's cat is as much, if not more, a manifestation of somebody else's cat as a photograph of somebody else's cat and, as such, should be welcome in the group.

Of course, Hume would argue that no photograph -- whether of a cat, a cat's shadow, or anything else come to that -- necessarily proves the existence of a cat per se, or even of the photograph. Furthermore, that the pie you just bought him for lunch may not have existed, and even if it did, was probably not the right kind of pie; ergo, he couldn't possibly pay you back before Thursday, whatever that means.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

Brilliant, dr loplop, brilliant!!!

Now, I await the extension of your reasoning to a table for without a table, there shall be nowhere to sit down to dinner and we shall have no pie! me-ow, me-ow, me-ow.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

So sipping the Scotch is necessary (and presumably also sufficient) prerequisites for hobnobbing with Hume, Plato and their like? Sounds like I should study harder!

Thanks for your efforts, loplop! I can see that you were meant to be adminstrator of this group!
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

All this eviction stuff going on is beginning to sound suspiciously like Herding cats
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

So it appears but that doesn't mean it is so.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

Ahh.

More pool cleaning.
www.flickr.com/photos/justincormack/62755269/ (no cat)
www.flickr.com/photos/bob007/112635735/ (tagged "mine")
www.flickr.com/photos/magnetika666/127117266/ (my wet cat)
www.flickr.com/photos/38253400@N00/131977300/ (no tags)
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Don't think we haven't noticed that this is your favourite thread, mr_togr!
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

Please tag it your favourite thread

(reaction: phew)
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

Those for hume it is not your favourite thread, please tag it not my (that is your) favourite thread . (Note parenthetically that British spelling is de rigoeuer.
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
WaterWindStars edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Lemons on laptops and other people's kittens
The wrong kind of flapjacks and obligatory mittens
Mounds of pastrami and toroidal breads
These are a few of my favorite threads

ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

squacco says:

What a lovely singing voice you have, dr_loplop.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

With a hey, and a ho, and a hey-nonny-no
Today is someone's birthday that you chaps ought to know.
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
WaterWindStars edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Most shallow man! Thou worms-meat, in respect of a good piece of flesh indeed! Learn of the wise, and perpend: civet is of a baser birth than tar, the very uncleanly flux of a cat. Mend the instance, shepherd.

edit: I forgot a link
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
dr_loplop (a group admin) edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

WaterWindStars says:

Will you have bacon with your pancakes?
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
WaterWindStars edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

The bacon was on the side (to coin an American term), but out of shot on account of some people's sensibilities.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

Whilst we're on the subject of Anglo-American terminology...

No comment
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

BTW, marvellous poem loplop (dr)

Not your usual Seuss-like contribution; here the words alone almost seem to echo around the surrounding hills.

I had a feeling there was one other thread. Bless you for trying.

Only joking
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

Meanwhile, could we all raise our voices together in song - C (fl)at major.

*all immediately start singing together, in a way that warms the cockles and uplifts the sole*

Happy birthday to you.
Happy birthday to you...
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

... tooooo youuuuuu!

Happy furry birthday!

Oh, and dr. loplop's verse goes on the group's front page!
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

In the meantime, to return to business, the images from this set are all in the pool. Dr. loplop has already requested that they be tagged a week ago, but nothing has happened. I move that we evict them all. Any objections?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

A prize to anyone who can guess which one was mine, and which the Immortal Bard's.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

(Bob Bonk -- now there's a name)
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

*thumbs down*
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

I vote we keep them, on account of our (hidden) aim of global domination
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

I have a girl friend (who's not a girlfriend) who will throw entire repertoires of the bard's insluts around, given the slightest provocation. She even bought fridge magnets to always have them at hand.

So, dr. loplop, I don't have to guess....
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

squacco says:



Please don't evict me. I've only got half a moustache.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

And I certainly don't have a goal of global domination. I'm just trying to keep this little garden of mine tidy.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

squacco: (madam, for some reason I was about to call you nancy) let me remind you of what I said earlier.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

Oh, and if you actually look at the set we're discussing, you'll see that its description is, and I quote it in entirety:


mon chat !



Now, I know that there are people well versed and chaptered in French amongst the admins. Perhaps they can translate, so we're absolutely sure to get it right?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

squacco says:



Mais j'adore c'ete groupe. C'est magnifique.
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
squacco edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

squacco says:



Alors, adieu mes amies. Je ne peu pas voir...
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

What was la question?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

J'adore le chat d'or.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

Nevermind, I'm removing them now.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Morituri te salutant!

*solemnly takes off imaginary hat*
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

I thought that meant "we who are about to die salute you".

What did you mean to say?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Err... "meow"?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

I've tried tagging this thread "my favourite thread", but I've been unable to find any knobbly appendages to which it would be appropriate to attach the tag. Perhaps I can leave it here instead?

My favourite thread

In the meantime, our most recent addition to the pool is causing me some confusion. It appears that the picture was taken of a cat which was somebody else's, but between then and the picture being posted, the cat has become the photographer's as witnessed by the tag my cat now.

I feel that such dilemmatical borderline cases require a review by a larger selection of the administrative board. What say ye?

[edit: spelling]
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
[togr] edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Well togged, tagr! Now on to the dilemmatic image. My understanding of the memo is that the definition of "cat", insofar as Flickr is concerned, is synonymous with "photograph of a cat".

Therefore, a photograph of somebody else's cat will remain such, regardless of subsequent events (including -- but not limited to -- adoption, death, vivisection, infection, intoxication, inappropriation, obligation, and abduction by meerkats).

In the interests of our members, it might be prudent to clarify the group's position on such matters by endorsing my cat now as an optional sanctioned tag.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

I would suggest now my cat, except the "w" and "t" keys are quite close together, which could result in accidental mistagging. What do you think?
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

I think your philosophical interpretation and proposed resolution makes a lot of sense, but as boots appear to be of a philosophical persuation as well, perhaps we'll wait and hear what she says?

As for optional sanctioned tags, I think my cat now has been established as in common use already. Well, not too common yet, but more common than the competition.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

I forgot to say: If the status of a given cat's own/other's-ness wasn't to be interpreted as decided at the instant of photography, then tracking the ownership of every cat in this pool could easily become an overwhelming task!
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

Also, assuming relationships between cats and their owners are not always black and white (black and white cats excepted), how would we classify a photograph of a cat (whether black and white or colour) taken while in the process of becoming someone's own cat?

I think this question really does call for the expertise of boots and her metaphysical muses.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

[togr] is a group administrator [togr] says:

That is uncanny, dr. loplip! I was thinking exactly the same thing, but I was afraid bringing such issues into what is manifestly a photo sharing site could cause the whole of the known universe to implode upon itself.

*looks around*

It seems to have survived. Now, isn't this problem fascinatingly similar to the topic of collapse of quantum wave functions, or transitions between allowed states?

Does anyone have a photo of Schrödinger's cat? As long as it isn't photographed by Schrödinger himself, it should fit exceedingly well in this pool, and this thread!

[edit: we now have a photo of the famous Schrödinger's cat!]
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
[togr] edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

squacco says:

If I was Schrödinger's cat, this is how I would dress on my big day:


Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
squacco edited this topic ages ago.

view photostream

AnnabelB is a group administrator AnnabelB says:

*solemnly takes off imaginary cat*
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

dr_loplop is a group administrator dr_loplop says:

*solemnly proffers imaginary hat*
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

Sheila Steele says:

I am gathering together a herd of all my previous cats, future cats, cats I wish were mine, cats who wish they were mine, cats I served well and cats I utterly failed, dead cats and soon to be dead cats. I don't know what I am going to do with this herd.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

Should I post photos of them here?
ages ago (permalink)

← prev 1 2
(1 to 100 of 159 replies in Removed from the pool)