admin
Mars Observer ♂ PRO 8:28pm, 2 November 2013
In a secret, undisclosed location the Nikon1 stands trial. The buzz of the crowd, there to witness the event, falls silent as Nikon is lead to the front of the courtroom to be addressed by the judge.

Judge: Nikon 1, you stand before us today accused of "failure"; failure to deliver a great camera system, failure to live-up to the hope and promise that modern mirrorless-cameras have to offer, and failure of great product design and innovation. How do you plead?

The courtroom is so silent now you can hear a pin drop.

There's a long delay before the soft-spoken Nikon1 eventually raises his eyes, and quietly speaks.

[caption id="attachment_84" align="alignnone" width="300"]The Nikon1 V1 The Nikon1 V1[/caption]

"Not Guilty, your honour" he says.

The crowd breaks into a raucous buzz as the judge bangs has gavol. "Order!, Order!!" he repeats.

Then, looking at Nikon1 he says "Very well. Let's proceed." Looking alternately between the Prosecutor and Nikon he continues "I've read both your opening statements and quite frankly I've heard enough of the rhetoric. Let's get this session underway. Nikon1, please take the stand. Counselor, if you will, please begin."

"Thank you, your Honour" the prosecutor responds, approaching the witness box.

Prosecutor: 1, you claim to come from an innovative camera company, yet can you please tell us your where-abouts between the fall of 2008 (when Panasonic released the G1) and the fall of 2011?

Nikon1: It's not a 'claim', it's a fact. Nikon has lead the photography industry with many innovations! The D1 was the first DSLR in 1999. The D3 set a new benchmark for low light performance in 2007. Just last month we announced the world's first waterproof, shockproof digital camera with interchangeable lenses.  Don't even get me started on the film days. And wait until you see what we've got planned in November, that's sure to appeal to...


Bang, bang, bang.

Judge: Nikon1, please address the question.

Nikon1: Apologies your honour.  It's true I was in development for a very long time.  But a new lens mount system is something that a company with a heritage like ours takes very seriously.  We've built our reputation on great metering, great auto focus, and, of course, a legacy of great lenses!  We owe it to our customers not to 'rush' a new mount to market, and to make sure we live up to the level of excellence we've established, particularly where AF, metering and lenses are concerned. Heck, we easily beat Canon to market, and look what they tried to pass-off. The crippling AF on the M-series is truly deplorable, 'criminal' even, and...

Judge: Enough Nikon!  It's not Canon who is on trial here today.  Prosecutor, please proceed.

Prosecutor: So... you feel it was 'worth the wait' then, just so that you could deliver good 'metering', 'auto focus' and 'lens compatibility' to your customers?

Nikon1: Yes, absolutely.

Prosecutor:   That aside, let's focus on the real  issue, shall we.  After spending years in development, and to much anticipation, you enter the market with a quote-unquote 1 inch type sensor?  I repeat, 'one... inch...'.  Not an APS-C sized sensor.  Not a Micro 4/3 sized sensor.  But a one inch type which technically isn't even an inch.  A sensor substantially smaller than that offered by Micro Four Thirds or the most common and popular sized sensor on the market, APS-C.

Nikon1: Well, actually, we never claimed that the sensor measured one inch - 'one inch type' is simply a name used in the industry for this type of sensor.  And technically the most popular sized sensor isn't APS-C, but the much smaller sensor found in the iPhone and other camera phones which typically are about 4.5mm wide or about a third of the size of the one we used, which is 13mm wide.  If you're going to compare sensor sizes it likely best to compare the total area.    We use a sensor that has an area of 116mm.  M 4/3 uses a sensor that is 225mm, APS-C is 370mm, And Full Frame is 864mm.  So based on those specifications...

Prosecutor: Let's not get mired in numbers and technical details Nikon1.  Is it fair to say that the Nikon1 sensor is significantly smaller than the popular Micro 4/3 sensor?

Nikon1: No,  No it's not fair to say that.  In my opinion the difference between a typical 'compact camera sensor' and the Nikon1 sensor is significant.  However, the difference between the Nikon1 sensor and the Mirco 4/3 sensor is in fact LESS significant than, say, the difference between an APS-C and Full Frame sensor for example,


Prosecutor: OK, let me phrase the question in a different way then.  When it comes to sensor size, 'bigger is better'.  Would you at least agree with that?

Nikon1: Better for what?

Prosecutor, turning to the judge with an exasperated look: "Your Honour..."

Judge: We're not dealing with generalities or cliches here counselor.  I think Nikon has a right to ask you to be more specific.  Please clarify your question and proceed.

Prosecutor, turning to Nikon: All right.  We all know that small sensor compact cameras, and now camera phones, offer... shall we say... 'adequate' performance for snap-shooters and amateur photographers.  But pro's use larger sensor DSLRs for the performance and image quality they require.  Would you agree that a larger sensor is better at providing the necessary performance and image quality that photo enthusiasts and semi-pro's require?

Nikon 1:  No, No I would not.

Prosecutor: I beg your pardon?

Nikon1: No, sir, I would not agree with that statement.  Today, not all pro's use full frame (or larger) cameras.  Nor is a larger sensor always better.

Prosecutor: Would you say that in general, larger sensors provide better dynamic range, and ISO performance?

Nikon1: Yes, in general, I would agree with that.

Prosecutor: And yet you're saying that smaller is be better.  Could you please elaborate.

Nikon1: Well, I didn't say that smaller is better.  Or that bigger is better.  Just like with a large SUV or a small sports car - one isn't necessarily better than the other.  It depends on the purpose and other performance factors and features.  It's really about the 'right tool for the right job'. Dynamic range and ISO performance are only 2 characteristics of a camera.  Obviously, there are many factors to consider.  With the advances found in today's cameras many already offer great ISO performance.  Often, ISO isn't the most limiting factor for many people in getting the most from their camera.

Prosecutor: I see.   And would you care to tell us what the "limiting factors" are (camera-wise) for most enthusiasts?

Nikon1:  It really depends on each individual's photography needs, but for many It's speed.  Speed and portability.

Prosecutor (rolling his eyes): Speed and portability?

Nikon1: That's right.  Many photographers are leaving their larger, heavier cameras and lenses at home because they're too burdensome to take, or it simply 'isn't fun' bringing them. They can be too intrusive, and take you 'out of the moment'.  And as for speed, many of the systems today just don't have sufficient AF speed and frame rates to capture our fast-moving, action packed lives. Life doesn't always 'stand still and pose for you'. I would definitely say speed and size are 2 big limiting factors  in many cameras for many people today.

Prosecutor: Be-that-as-it-may, let's talk about price...

Bang, Bang, Bang

Judge (with a slightly dis-interested sigh): That's it - I've heard enough

Prosecutor: Your honour?

Judge: I'm dismissing this case.

Prosecutor: But your honour!!

Judge: Enough counselor! Both of you are wasting the court's time here. Ultimately the worth of the Nikon1 will be judged by those who use it. The success of the product line will be judged by market sales over time.  The image quality will be judged by those who view them. There is no 'overriding decision' here. This is a personal choice decision. I hate to tell you counselor, but no crime has been committed here - no law has been broken.  Case dismissed!

BANG!

The Evidence File  - Guess the sensor: Nikon1, APS-C, or Full Frame. Grab a pencil - there are 25 images (answers at bottom - no peaking!)

P.S. yes, I know it's not a 'valid' test- different lenses, setting, and post processing techniques were used.  It's just for fun.

Night shots

[caption id="attachment_635" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 1 Image 1[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_636" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 2 Image 2[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_489" align="alignnone" width="200"]Image 3 Image 3[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_312" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 4 Image 4[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_294" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 5 Image 5[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_640" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 6 Image 6[/caption]

Continious Studio Light

[caption id="attachment_643" align="alignnone" width="200"]Image 7 Image 7[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_644" align="alignnone" width="200"]Image 8 Image 8[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_645" align="alignnone" width="200"]Image 9 Image 9[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_572" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 10 Image 10[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_646" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 11 Image 11[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_647" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 12 Image 12[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_648" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 13 Image 13[/caption]

Action Shots

[caption id="attachment_651" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 14 Image 14[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_652" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 15 Image 15[/caption]

Subject Isolation / DoF / Bokeh

[caption id="attachment_653" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 16 Image 16[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_654" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 17 Image 17[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_655" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 18 Image 18[/caption]

Misc Images

[caption id="attachment_656" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 19 Image 19[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_657" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 20 Image 20[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_658" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 21 Image 21[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_659" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 22 Image 22[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_660" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 23 Image 23[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_661" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 24 Image 24[/caption]

[caption id="attachment_662" align="alignnone" width="300"]Image 25 Image 25[/caption]

Scroll down for answers

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Answers (N1=Nikon1, APS=Sony NEX APS-C, FF=Nikon D700 Full Frame

1.N1  2.FF  3.APS  4.N1  5.N1  6.N1  7.N1  8.APS  9.N1  10.FF

11.FF 12.FF  13.FF  14.N1  15.FF  16.N1  17.N1  18.FF  19.FF  20.N1

22.N1 22.N1  23.FF  24.FF  25.N1

[polldaddy poll=7496300]
MOD
Zen Mustard Ott PRO 5 years ago
My head hurts reading this.
Fix Brix 5 years ago
The often overlooked factor is the Nikon 1 is excellent for street shooting. people notice a full frame camera with a bazooka lens, but the Nikon 1 can shoot within a few yards without attracting much attention if any.

These cameras are excellent nightime shooters and the only real limitation is the ISO has to be fairly low to limit noise.

I carry a J1 virtually everywhere, and I can honestly say that I've only had a few pictures that could have used more resolution, and those are frames where I'm trying to crop down because I didn't have enough focal length to get in where I needed to be. The megapixel wars are over, just look to the Nikon Df that took a pass on 36MP for a 16.2.

My guess is that the CX format will continue to advance in Japan because of the form factor regardless of international sales, and like most technology, it will incrementally improve.

There was a time a few years ago when people made important calls on landlines, complaining that cell phones were inferior. But people wanted the cell phone form factor so manufacturers overcame the call quality issues. Now a large percentage of people don't even have a landline. The same will happen in the camera world, because its not a world at all, it's just part of the tech sector and in the tech sector, things get smaller and more powerful in response to ergonomics.
Groups Beta