Discussions (482)

Pyrocat HD

view profile

the.di says:

I've been testing FP4 in Pyrocat HD. I switched from Diafine because of Diafine's toxicity, and Pyrocat is said to be semi-compensating, gives a fine grain, and best of all is non toxic and environmentally benign. I'm impressed by the grain - it's finer than what I get with FP4 in Diafine. If anyone uses Pyrocat, could you post which films you've used? If anyone has used it with pushed film, I'd like to know your experience.
12:34AM, 1 June 2006 PDT (permalink)

view photostream

Ted Forbes says:

I've had no experience with Pyrocat, but it sure looks good in your photostream!

Always been a fan of FP4... looks like a good combination for you!
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

maz hewitt says:

I've never used it, but I just ordered some PMK which is similar (so I'm told). As an aside I head that both Pyrocatechin and Phenidone are highly toxic and both of them are in PYROCAT-HD. The least toxic developer commercially available is Kodak Xtol which is a ascorbic acid based developer. I use it and think it is very good indeed.
ages ago (permalink)

three celery [deleted] says:

Actually, Phenidone has a very low level of toxicity. It is the main developing agent in Xtol and many other modern B&W developers.
ages ago (permalink)

three celery [deleted] says:

Dianna,

I think Jim Galli is a Pyrocat HD user. Chck out his stuff on APUG and his web site for more info.


Brad.
ages ago (permalink)

view photostream

the.di says:

Thanks for the responses. Brad, I'll check Jim's work, thanks!
ages ago (permalink)

Would you like to comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).