Drag to set position!
Share
Canon_Patrick
8:34pm, 26 May 2013
This came up on an other topic I posted so I figured I'd share it. I made this reciprocity failure chart for long exposures with fomapan 100. The formula I used gives exactly the same times as the three examples listed in foma's own literature, so I assume we used the same formula.
I'm sure the same info is available somewhere online, but the charts i've found so far do not match this formula.
Fomapan 100 Reciprocity Failure Chart
Edit: I got bored and decided to expand the chart. It covers Foma 100/200/400, TMax 100/400/3200, and Tri-X 320/400.
Heres the new link: BW Reciprocity Failure Charts
I got the formulas here. I have verified all films against the manufacturer's spec sheet, except for TMax 3200 since I can't find the info from kodak. If you find it, please link.
I'm sure the same info is available somewhere online, but the charts i've found so far do not match this formula.
Fomapan 100 Reciprocity Failure Chart
Edit: I got bored and decided to expand the chart. It covers Foma 100/200/400, TMax 100/400/3200, and Tri-X 320/400.
Heres the new link: BW Reciprocity Failure Charts
I got the formulas here. I have verified all films against the manufacturer's spec sheet, except for TMax 3200 since I can't find the info from kodak. If you find it, please link.
A Southern U.S term Spelling is all over the board for it as it is a Southern term.
Thank you very much for posting those. Just for the record Foma 100/200/400 should also apply to Arista EDU Ultra 100/200/400 films.
Alchymia Obscura
7 years ago
Just curious, does anyone know anything about reciprocity failure at the fast end? Some of the Minolta maxxum cameras go as high as 1/12,000s in shutter speed and usually the linearity og the film fails at 1/10,000s. I don't remember ever seeing it addressed anywhere, though. Also, strobes on low power setting can reach those speeds.
joosttermeer
5 years ago
Thanks so much for this!
I was wondering, do you know a thing about the development of this film when exposing it for long (let's say an hour)? I recall that I read somewhere that you have to lower the development time bij 10-20%, but I'm not sure. Hope you can help me out a bit.
I was wondering, do you know a thing about the development of this film when exposing it for long (let's say an hour)? I recall that I read somewhere that you have to lower the development time bij 10-20%, but I'm not sure. Hope you can help me out a bit.
spotted bit [deleted]
5 years ago
when compensating for reciprocity failure the highlights are pushed more than they need to. For example, if your meter reads 1 second, then zone V is already in the failure range and need compensation, but zones Vii or Viii need no compensation, and they will be overexposed. Decreasing the developing time controls those highlights. You can calculate how much they are "pushed" and decrease time accordingly.
ah, I thought those shorter time recommendations were mainly about controlling contrast in night shots (with deep shadows and bright street lights)
good info!
good info!
analogman1961
5 years ago
Now I just need an exposure meter that's accurate at extremely low light levels...
1DunPhoto:
Posted 5 years ago. Edited by 1DunPhoto: (member) 5 years ago
T-MAX 100 is the film i have exposed more than any other after twilight and before dawn and i'm good with those compensation times except for 1 second - with an accurate camera - which may be a bit dark. T-MAX 100 makes for a better exposure in my 40 to 80 year old leaf shutters set for 1 second, go figure?!
Good observation about possibly blowing zones VII and VIII when our efforts in dim light tend to be devoted to appeasing zone V; taming harsh highlights has been much simpler for me with films that require help. Strong running Fuji Acros on the other hand is great at night if there's nothing in the frame that will stop-down my dilated pupils.
Good observation about possibly blowing zones VII and VIII when our efforts in dim light tend to be devoted to appeasing zone V; taming harsh highlights has been much simpler for me with films that require help. Strong running Fuji Acros on the other hand is great at night if there's nothing in the frame that will stop-down my dilated pupils.
1DunPhoto:
Posted 5 years ago. Edited by 1DunPhoto: (member) 5 years ago

A few years ago I spent some time with different films shooting city night scenes. Came to the conclusion that placing zones 6 to 8 and letting shadows fall where they may gave me good images of the city streets.


metrix-x.rraz.ca/2013/08/a-note-on-long-exposures-recipro...


metrix-x.rraz.ca/2013/08/a-note-on-long-exposures-recipro...
analogman1961
Posted 5 years ago. Edited by analogman1961 (member) 5 years ago

I have a 1st-generation Luna Pro that I recalibrated to use 357/303 silver oxide batteries, instead of the original PX 13 mercury type. I used a DSLR as a reference to calibrate the exposure scales, and it's pretty accurate for bright outdoor use down to dim interior lighting. It also has scale indications for exposures up to 8 hours. As you mentioned, the CdS cell must be "primed" with some fairly bright light exposure before it will read accurately. For nighttime street scenes, and landscapes by moonlight or starlight, I'm still making an educated guess, using an EV chart. Reciprocity compensation is the wild card for long time exposures, and these tables should help (along with bracketing).