BATTLESTAR GALACTICA: RAZOR passes the test with ease, *and* it has exploding starships! What more could one want? -- Seen on alisonbechdel.blogspot.com(?)
I always knew something wasn't quite right, I just couldn't put my finger on it. My Big Winge heretofore has been those episodes in 50s movies where the director invariably has the female character doing something so outrageously dumb that every alpha male in the audience mutters: 'Stoopid bloody woman!', thus endorsing their smug belief that all women are f***wits.
The Bechdel Test is an interesting starting point for a discussion, but it's flawed by the second condition: that the women have to be talking to each other. A film that arguably represented total gender equality – one in which there is an equal number of men and women, their strengths and weaknesses equally divided – could fail the Bechdel Test simply because in each scene there's a man and a woman talking to each other, rather than conversations divided up by sex.
Sadly there are some people who believe (and, perhaps worse, some feminists who give the impression) that feminism is not about redressing the gender balance but about swinging it too far in the opposite direction, and the second condition of the Bechdel Test supports such suspicions.
The Bechdel Test is about detecting a lack of women in meaningful parts in a movie. I've never heard anyone claim it's deeper than that. Also, please don't fight off straw feminists. :/
Hey Allison, walking home from the Farmers Market today, my 11 year old daughter said how hard it was to find a good book for a kid like her. A good book had at least two girl characters, who had fun and adventures. A little romance is ok, but not too much. The girls had to be strong, and not wait around for a boy to rescue them if they got into trouble. Made me think of this strip. Powderhorn Park still misses you!
Hey, I miss Powderhorn Park! And I miss Amazon Bookstore on 26th and Hennepin, put some time in there - that was awhile ago, before Bechdel's Dykes. Didn't see them until Philly in '84, when I went to grad school to learn about film. And I learned that rule - but didn't know where it came from until this moment. It's like coming home.
Imagine trying to find books for a girl (or boy) of color--especially adventure books that aren't social problem narratives. Social problem narratives are great, but not if that's all you get to read that features kids fo color. Why can't brown girls cast spells and ride dragons?
It would be nice if all the movies that passed that test were automatically good. Unfortunately, every single one I've seen except "Brave" objectively sucked.
Hmmm... Maybe I should fix that...
Incidentally, every novel I've ever written passes the Bechdel Test, before I even knew what it was. XD
How about a movie like "Sucker Punch"? It passes all of the criteria easily but it's actually more exploitive than some actual porno movies. How do you factor something like that into the test?
It says very little about an individual film if it passes or fails the Bechdel Test. If a lot of films fail the test, however, then it may well say something about Hollywood.
What is says about Sucker Punch is that it contains a lot of female characters and they have significant roles in the plot of the movie. It doesn't say anything about how well they're treated from a feminist point of view or how good the movie is. ;)
This test is good if you don't take it for more than it is. It detects whether women are invisible or mere plot devices, rather than actual 3-dimensional characters. Death Proof also passes the test, that is definitely not a feminist movie either. But hey, it's a good starting point.
keyboard shortcuts:
← previous photo
→ next photo
L view in light box
F favorite
< scroll film strip left
> scroll film strip right
? show all shortcuts
View 11 more comments
valleyviolet 33 months ago | reply
It's neat to see the original comic. It makes me sad how little fiction in general seems to be able to get past this.
SoraRyu [deleted] 29 months ago | reply
I'm happy to say most of the movies I watch pass this rule!!!
David Cowie 24 months ago | reply
BATTLESTAR GALACTICA: RAZOR passes the test with ease, *and* it has exploding starships! What more could one want?
--
Seen on alisonbechdel.blogspot.com (?)
Black Moon 20 months ago | reply
Actually, there's a cut scene where Ripley and Lambert talk about a man. Ok, he's a robot, but a man one.
honj51 20 months ago | reply
I always knew something wasn't quite right, I just couldn't put my finger on it. My Big Winge heretofore has been those episodes in 50s movies where the director invariably has the female character doing something so outrageously dumb that every alpha male in the audience mutters: 'Stoopid bloody woman!', thus endorsing their smug belief that all women are f***wits.
tmkeesey 18 months ago | reply
I've heard the the script for Alien intentionally doesn't identify the gender of any of the characters. That's why they all go by their surnames.
bec_corn 15 months ago | reply
Excellent rule.
Kinders Al Kinley 10 months ago | reply
The Bechdel Test is an interesting starting point for a discussion, but it's flawed by the second condition: that the women have to be talking to each other. A film that arguably represented total gender equality – one in which there is an equal number of men and women, their strengths and weaknesses equally divided – could fail the Bechdel Test simply because in each scene there's a man and a woman talking to each other, rather than conversations divided up by sex.
Sadly there are some people who believe (and, perhaps worse, some feminists who give the impression) that feminism is not about redressing the gender balance but about swinging it too far in the opposite direction, and the second condition of the Bechdel Test supports such suspicions.
valleyviolet 10 months ago | reply
kirsten55407 9 months ago | reply
Hey Allison, walking home from the Farmers Market today, my 11 year old daughter said how hard it was to find a good book for a kid like her. A good book had at least two girl characters, who had fun and adventures. A little romance is ok, but not too much. The girls had to be strong, and not wait around for a boy to rescue them if they got into trouble. Made me think of this strip. Powderhorn Park still misses you!
clap4U 9 months ago | reply
Hey, I miss Powderhorn Park! And I miss Amazon Bookstore on 26th and Hennepin, put some time in there - that was awhile ago, before Bechdel's Dykes. Didn't see them until Philly in '84, when I went to grad school to learn about film. And I learned that rule - but didn't know where it came from until this moment. It's like coming home.
kingrandom 8 months ago | reply
good rule
Also, those background posters are clever, where those weapons are!
feministmom13 8 months ago | reply
lokiskywalker 8 months ago | reply
So, uh...how do you know whether or not a film passes the test without seeing it?
rainbowsorbet 7 months ago | reply
I love it so much! Thank you for drawing attention to the problem of women being grossly underrepresented in film.
Ryann Conner Reade 6 months ago | reply
It would be nice if all the movies that passed that test were automatically good. Unfortunately, every single one I've seen except "Brave" objectively sucked.
Hmmm... Maybe I should fix that...
Incidentally, every novel I've ever written passes the Bechdel Test, before I even knew what it was. XD
KGFuntime 6 months ago | reply
How about a movie like "Sucker Punch"? It passes all of the criteria easily but it's actually more exploitive than some actual porno movies. How do you factor something like that into the test?
David Cowie 6 months ago | reply
It says very little about an individual film if it passes or fails the Bechdel Test. If a lot of films fail the test, however, then it may well say something about Hollywood.
valleyviolet 6 months ago | reply
thoger.emil 6 months ago | reply
This test is good if you don't take it for more than it is. It detects whether women are invisible or mere plot devices, rather than actual 3-dimensional characters. Death Proof also passes the test, that is definitely not a feminist movie either. But hey, it's a good starting point.