You aren't signed in     Sign In    Help

Lifebuoy - Hamster

Lifebuoy - Hamster by smiteme.
Via Ads of the World.

---------------

Part advertisement, part Internet hoax.
January 11th, 2009 4:44 pm by Kelly

While I understand what they're getting at, this series of print ads for Lifebuoy hand wash are unfortunate, to say the least.

From top to bottom, we have a hamster, a kitten and (presumably dead and edible) fish, mashed and contorted into food shapes - a muffin, a croissant and a baby bottle, respectively. The copy reads, "You eat what you touch."

The message, obviously, is to wash your dirty mitts before handling food, or else you're eating all those germs you previously touched. It's hard to say which image I find most offensive. The fish ad makes sense, as "seafood" (and "meat" in general) is more likely to harbor food borne pathogens such as salmonella; however, this image also assumes that fish are food. Instead of washing your hands after handling animal corpses, a safer bet is to forgo them altogether.

The hamster and kitten graphics, on the other hand, draw upon and reinforce the idea that non-human animals are inherently dirty and gross. (Actually, the same can be said of the fish, whether they're living or dead. And there's also the whole fish as a gendered insult meme.) The graphic department could have just as easily contorted a small child into the shape of a freshly baked loaf of bread (or, for the ultimate ick out, a baby's diaper into a piece of pizza). As a child, I played in the dirt, collected worms, and ate mud pies. Heck, I still play in the dirt. My point is, humans are germy, too. (We're the ones in need of hand wash, right?)

But the most unfortunate aspect of these ads lies in their uncanny (pun intended) resemblance to Bonsai Kittens.

Read more -> 

Comments

view profile

arimoore  Pro User  says:

these images are horrible and scary! also just strange. i mean, usually people are handling and eating corpses, so it's odd to have an issue with a cute little hamster, implying he's dirtier than their "food." weird... thanks for posting these in the Animal Rights group.
Posted 12 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

smiteme  Pro User  says:

I know! And in the version with the fish, the fish are the "food." Which begs the question, if fish are so "dirty," why eat them?
Posted 12 months ago. ( permalink )

Would you like to comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

[?]
view photos Uploaded on December 28, 2008
by smiteme

smiteme's photostream

10,095
uploads

This photo also belongs to:

Blogging '09 (Set)

462
items
Part of: Blogging

Speciesism (Set)

286
items

Animal Rights (Pool)

Speciesist ads / Publicidad especista (Pool)

Fighting ignorance (Pool)

Equal Consideration (Pool)

Fighting stereotypes / Luchando contra los estereotipos (Pool)

Vegans, vegetarians & Friends of animals (Pool)

Speciesism (Pool)

Equal Rights (Pool)

Vegan Soapbox (Pool)

Grito animal / Cry animal (Pool)

Animal Rights and Liberation (Pool)

Tags

Additional Information

All rights reserved Anyone can see this photo

Add to your map