iPhone 3GS showing New York Times.
julian9, newenglanduk, moritzwade, Domenico / Kiuz, and 18 other people added this photo to their favorites.
iPhone 3GS showing New York Times.
julian9, newenglanduk, moritzwade, Domenico / Kiuz, and 18 other people added this photo to their favorites.
colerise 36 months ago | reply
wow - what a difference. text looks like abstract art compared to the retina display.
Anthony K. Valley 36 months ago | reply
Until I saw your picture of the iPhone 4 displaying the New York Times (http://www.flickr.com/photos/scobleizer/4695267529), the beauty of the retina display never really clicked for me.
Wow!
Dabbler 36 months ago | reply
LOL, they must be testing the browser spec to eliminate Flash on iPhone ;) Wonder what happens if you surf it with Opera Mini browser.
retina display? don't fall for the hype, checkit:
iPhone 4’s ‘Retina’ Display Claims Are False Marketing
iPad is a beautiful display, but let's forgo the superamplified imaginary nonsense.
australia09 36 months ago | reply
@Dabbler
Here is another article, written by someone calibrating a camera on board Hubble, responding to the wired article:
Resolving the iPhone resolution
mjpfaffe 36 months ago | reply
ooooo wow, you compared the 3GS to the 4 and the 4 looks amazing! That's because the resolution on the 3GS sucked compared to what else was out on the market. Obviously the display on the 4 is awesome...but compare it to something like the Incredible, EVO, or Moto Droid not the old 3GS with 320x480 res.
Robert Scoble 36 months ago | reply
I have a Droid, a Nexus One, and a Sprint EVO and the display on the iPhone 4 blows all of those away. More after I get my iPhone.
New2mac 36 months ago | reply
Agree with the findings. There is a considerable difference in the display.
James Pickett 11 months ago | reply
Thank you for allowing your photo to be shared under the Creative Commons license. I used it here on my hobby blog - dependentongadgets.com/2012/03/24/adonit-pro-stylus-review/