When discussing large public structures in the northwest, the term "Richardsonian Romanesque" gets kicked around a lot, especially when it comes to railway stations and government buildings. This is actually rather odd, for Henry Hobson Richardson designed very few rail stations, and those he did were modest suburban stops, not impressive urban structures. Mirky understanding of American architecture of the late 19th century has resulted in Richardson becoming a byword for anything made of large scale with an Italianate bent. For example, Portland Union Station is often described as Richardsonian Romanesque, including in an article I myself wrote for TRAINS Magazine back in 2005.
To which I now say: oops!
Richardson designed no buildings West of Colorado, but if there were a truly Richardsonian inspired structure, I would nominate this one: Old City Hall in Tacoma, Washington. Built in 1893, it was designed by Edward A. Hatherton, a San Francisco architect. It includes in it details similar to structures like Portland Union Station, such as the pressed brickwork and the terra cotta ornaments, yet it is far more Richardsonian in style. Note, for example, that each floor has a different size, scale, and detailing to its windows. The building has a great deal of ornamentation, and a thick clock tower complete with belfry. It is far too decked out with detail to be truly Italianate, as it is sometimes described: genuine Tuscan structures would be far plainer in appearance. Nor does this have the lightness and mixture of Moorish and Gothic styles of Venice. What we see here is the eclecticism of Richardson, a fantasy architecture made from borrowing many stylistic elements of the past and recombining them into a new whole.
Why does this matter? Why should we care what to call it? Because the style of this building tells us a lot about Tacoma's place in the world, both in the past and the present.
Henry Van Brunt clues us in. Van Brunt was another architect of the era, a man who admired Richardson and yet only emerged from his shadow late in life. He also was a prolific critic of art and architecture, frequently writing on these topics for The Atlantic. In the same year that Tacoma's city hall was opened, he writes about what meaning can be gleaned by reading the bricks of a building:
“The Cathedral of Paris, to take a familiar example, if it were properly analyzed… would be found to contain not only all that is essential to know of the spirit of the Middle Ages in general, of all the monastic orders, of the decay of feudalism, of the birth of civil liberty, but in specific detail all the religious, social, and political life of the time; and this, not so much because it is a great municipal and ecclesiastical monument, not because it was deliberately intended to express the history of the times in which it was built, but because it is a work of art, unconsciously expressing that civilization in terms the most exalted and beautiful within the scope of the builders.”
Thus, Old City Hall tells us much about Tacoma. Its Richardsonian style, upon opening, was already obsolete. Richardson himself had died in 1886, six years earlier, with his pinnacle works, the Allegheny Courthouse in Pittsburgh and the Marshal Fields Department Store in Chicago completed around his death. Others -- Van Brunt included -- had begun to move away from eclecticism towards a style that blended Renaissance sensibilities with a robust, Arts and Crafts inspired heft. Portland's Union Station, designed by Van Brunt and a contemporary of Tacoma City Hall, was the harbinger of this new, cleaner precursor to Modernism. So Tacoma, even in the 1890s, was showing its status as a second city, a place that was behind the times rather than ahead of them. This much at least the bricks of its Old City Hall can tell us.
Still, outdated though it was, the structure was no doubt impressive then, and remains so today. Unfortunately, it ceased to be city hall in mid century, and presently it sits empty, with interior water damage and a failed redevelopment scheme hovering over it. We can only hope that better things lie ahead for it. In the meanwhile, though, if you'd like to construct a paper model of the building, the City of Tacoma has downloadable PDF files available to do so: talk about a cool and creative way to build awareness of a historic preservation issue!
If you would like to learn more about the architects of the Gilded Age and the architecture of the northwest's railway stations, I will be giving a lecture at the Architectural Heritage Center on February 18th. Hope to see you there!
(IMG_7440_rough)