You aren't signed in     Sign In    Help

Comfort Zone?

Comfort Zone? by jasontheaker.
Funny how you see things in an environment that you have passed by many times and not even considered to be there. Its happened to me recently, where I've managed to squeeze a new perspective out of a familiar place. Its almost like the more you look the more you see, but paradoxically the more you see, makes it harder to see anything. And or make the choices harder. (Am I making any sense?)

It’s a greater challenge to attempt a new perspective on a similar place, than to go to a new (photogenic location), because it forces you to push your creativity into new areas, ironically taking you out of your comfort zone. We learn most from our challenges!

It’s a little bit like life, when your 21 you really believe that you have the world sorted. And as you get older you realise that what you thought when you were 21 is in fact naive and that life is ‘a lot’ more complex than that. So extrapolating this what I'm writing now, what I'm producing photographically now, is indeed off its time and I shall develop (hopefully in the positive direction). So those locations visited many times will keep being productive ‘if’ i keep developing.

Anyway getting to the synthesis here, I feel that only a few months ago I wouldn’t have seen this shot, something has inspired me, challenged me to explore this composition. I will give credit to many of you out there in flickr land because some of you guys have both inspired and challenged my thoughts. Cheers guys!

Composing a shot, forces you to select only a small part of an environment, which you choose to present. And this shot to me particularly demonstrates that. When I saw the whole scene I liked it but it was only when I began to frame elements of it, did this part begin to work, (for me at least). I feel the opposing curves here are cut into by the framing, which creates a kind of tension and forces your eye back along to the other side. My eye moves back and forth horizontally, flowing around the curves in a figure of eight. I did consider taking the tree out to the right, (and when I shot this I planned as much), but after some reflection it has grown on me, as a kind of contrast against the smooth, something to break the flow. Something prickly to add tension. 

Comments

view profile

Panorama Paul  Pro User  says:

Hey Jason... I couldn't agree more with your sentiment that it is generally harder to get a second good composition from a familiar spot than it is to get a good composition from a new spot.

However, for me it's all about light... the composition of this photograph works very well indeed... but I'd question whether it is the curve of the grassy hills or the fact that the front hill is so much lighter than the back one that makes this shot work? I often re-visit some of my favourite locations at different times of the day... and I'm constantly amazed how something which was boring yesterday could look so good today!

I wish that more of my contacts would be so open and honest about their thinking process... it's always very inspirational visiting your stream! Thanks!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

H o g n e  Pro User  says:

I like this shot a lot. I disagree with your decision regarding the tree though. I believe without it the shot would have been even more interesting - focusing on the wonderful curves of the landscape and the magnificent sky. In any event it is a wonderful shot with great light and composition. The sky is fabulous.
(Seen in my contacts photos).
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Panorama Paul  Pro User  says:

Two more things... firstly, I would also have cropped out that tree...

and...

secondly, do you ever just stand in one spot and move around the landscape looking for good compositions using only your eyes and your imagination? Or do you have to physically be in a spot to be able to "see" the composition from there? This is not only a question for you Jason, I'd love to hear everyone's opinion on this?
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Pixelda  Pro User  says:

There's a lot of balance in the image, but yes, the tree - all of it, or not at all. I'd like a little more interest in teh grass too. The sky is nice though. You are certainly presenting some "dark" views at the moment - what does that say about your current psychological state?
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

antsplan  Pro User  says:

Not sure if this is similar to you or not but sometimes I see a shot, I shoot, check it out and then try to improve it over the next ten minutes or so. Almost always when I get home, the composition which works best is the one which came first.

The transition from light to dark in your picture works very well both in the hill and the clouds, I'm undecided on the tree though - agree that it could be adding to the shot but I wonder if I want to see the whole tree ?

The border though seems unbalanced in the different sizes (perhaps thats what you wanted ?)

Thanks for sharing.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jasontheaker  Pro User  says:

Hi guys
Cheers for the thoughtful comments you both make some interesting points but I want to try and explain the decision to keep the tree. Just lately I've been trying to push myself away from my comfort zone (and the tree would have gone several months ago), but the way I felt when looking at it was that the shot needed something to take the balance away. Something to jar the shot little. Something to actually add some tension to what is a smooth clean scene. I kind of wanted some to challenge the viewer (sounds a bit in-depth for a Friday morning I’m sorry), but for me the tree is kind of metaphorically a thorn in the side of what would be a sweet “windows vista” shot. (That is also why I de-saturated it). You will of course see it was taken in midday sun and the colours were rather vibrant with the polarizer on and I wanted to take it away from the stereotype ‘little house on the prairie’ green field. Am I making any sense?


Paul you mention the light, and I agree with you, but I also find differing compositions in the same spot because I've developed a different eye over time. Take a look at www.flickr.com/photos/photoimage/2330895036/
this
shot, its from a walk I've done hundreds of times but I've never ‘seen’ this view. (the text explains what I’m trying to say).


And regarding standing in one spot looking for compositions. The way I tend to work is when walking with camera I tend to look for unusual angles, compositions and of course light. I tend to get a feeling that a scene has some potential (normally light or something out of the ordinary) then I set about trying to work the scene to get the composition right. Oh yes movement is rather important to me so I tend to look for moving water, grass, trees and such like.

Hope this has answered some questions.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Simon Burgess  Pro User  says:

very sensuous curves - love it. i agree with your decision about the tree - looks odd to start with but then makes sense. it fits very well with that little free cloud.

great one!!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jasontheaker  Pro User  says:

@Steve yep it’s a more minimal shot than usual and I did try to get something interesting in the grass to increase depth, but I couldn’t work the angle and I felt the curve was the main focus. Regarding my physiological state… god I've been ‘suspect’
For some time now, just ask my wife! )o:

@ Antsplan (away)…
Yep that happens to me sometimes. But shooting from different angles helps you learn. At least you give yourself the optunity to evaluate if from differing perspectives. By the way if your away I don’t expect an answer some time soon (o:
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

The_Photo_Boy  Pro User  says:

very nice!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Corica  Pro User  says:

Jason - as always - a thought provoking narrative and cracking pic. You're right about the tree - it provides a good juxtaposition to the rolling hills.

I think it's clear from your photostream that you've developed photographically over the last two years. Shots you've taken along the NE coast have changed from being the usual (and beautifully done) beach shots of piers to much more abstract shots incorporating movement and feeling (recent shots at Sandsend and Black Nab spring to mind).

The rest of us just sit back and enjoy watching your development progress :-)
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Myles Smith says:

Yeah, it seems you are sticking your finger up to the Windows Vista scene to me... The tree either makes the image or destroys it. For me, it makes it. It adds the intrigue and makes you ask why it is there and actually makes the viwer engage with the shot... otherwise it would be just a nice shot to spend a few seconds looking at i guess.... arrrghh mee ickley pickley, me talkey bollox again.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

s0ulsurfing  Pro User  says:

and then to complicate the whole thing even more, I FEEL differently most times i look at a familiar scene and (not sure if this bit is a conscious decision or not) try to capture something of my mood in what i see before me. That is to me when it really becomes interesting and progresses to what i think of as art.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Anton Jenkins  Pro User  says:

This is a great shot! Your thoughts are very interesting and I think you're onto something with regards developing new compositions in familiar places rather than taking the easy option of a new location.

As for the tree - I think I'd prefer to be able to see the tree in it's entirety or not at all. I agree that having something there breaks it up a little bit, but it's a little nondescript at the moment. If you had an entire tree there it would look really cool.

But then having nothing there at all would work really well as well. Having it tree less would lend it an almost abstract air which I think is what you are trying to achieve anyway. The shot to me is all about lines and curves. Might as well emphasise this. Yea, I vote for no tree!

Either way it's a really cracking shot. You must be chuffed!!!! :o)

--
Seen in my contacts' photos. (?)
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Seung Kye Lee  Pro User  says:

Jason, this is really catching me, both visually and in meaning.
I do also go in a 8 and I would not erase the tree...it is like electricity; it has to be grounded somewhere...a beginning or end, exit or entrance I find it one of the most important elements in this composition.
Further, I admire how you got the earth and sky to reflect eachother!
For me it makes me think of life and death, the four seasons and the flow of our minds...meaning; if we want something, we have to get what is already there and not wait for it to appear by itself.

A saying in buddhism goes like this: If you meet your master on the road, kill him.
This must not be misunderstood.
It simply means that no-one has a master. We must find our answers ourselves and not rely on others to fulfill our wishes nor be slaved by anyone. Buddha also explained that some people can stand right before the face of Buddha, but do not see him.
Others may never meet a Buddha, but nevertheless be enlightnened.

So the short version;
I see the lines and clouds as a wheel of life, comforting and everything is what it appears to be.
As for the tree, it is enlightenment, to actually see, to know how it all interacts.

Jason, thank you for this wonderful photo...it is beautiful!

Have a great weekend.

Peace & Happiness in every breath, in every single heartbeat
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Simon Wiffen says:

I love this shot. Re: the tree I think I would have preferred to see the whole tree in shot to the right?... depends on the tree though I suppose.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jasontheaker  Pro User  says:

I was planning on doing some work today on my website but I'm finding your responses so interesting that I cannot just let this go (o:

@Paul (Croica) “I think it's clear from your photostream that you've developed photographically over the last two years” cheers fella, I do try to change and I tend to agree with you, in fact I’ve thought of taking a few of the earlier shots out of flickr.

@MR Myles. Hey man you always make me laugh! You have this fantastic ability not to take life too seriously but seem to have a very deep side to your personality… and yep it is kind of trying to upset the cute bill gates sugar coated world. Not Bill personally but the corporate ‘nice shot’. Give me an argument any day (o:

@Jason I agree about the thought and feelings we bring to the images. But for me too it’s a tenuous link between setting out to produce a dramatic image and actually being inspired by the world around me. I think I set out looking for similar themes and when I place myself in the right light and interesting location then I occasionally bag a shot or two. (I do try to conceptualise stuff but to be honest I'm occasionally just too lazy) (o: I also feel that talking and thinking about what you guys are saying now helps develop your eye the next time your out. Any cheese (to quote MR m)…I do try.

@Anton your vote is dully taken note of (o:

@ And Lee
Wow man I love your thoughts! Although “I admire how you got the earth and sky to reflect each other” not sure I had much control over the sky, I would love to be able to change it but hey, I'm not god (o:

Regarding killing your master, well I'm glad you explained this! For one minute I thought you were going to the other side. But seriously I agree with you and it’s partly the reason I'm inspired by those philosophies. We all must find our own way and canonising others doesn’t help us find ourselves. (Funny I always found it a bit hippy when friends said they wanted to find themselves) but a life journey is what we are all on and to keep on the development can only be a good thing. After all life is fluid

(Sorry for those that think I'm a soppy hippy, but jokes are welcome, I think I can take them (o: )
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

EiaOlaf says:

wow!great one!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Dean Forbes  Pro User  says:

well seen and photographed. My guess is this looked good in color, too.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Myles Smith says:

Bloody 'ippy!!

Jason the Hippy
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Myles Smith says:

Sorry Jason, I know i promised not to post this portrait of you from our last nudist colony gang bang, but thought you looked soo dashing...

Actually, ....you look a bit like Panorama Paul here! no offence Paul..

I'll get my coat.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Retinol  Pro User  says:

Interesting thoughts Jason, but I can't agree with everything you wrote. It often happens to me that the best pictures I get from a particular spot are usually the last and as time goes by I often start feeling the ones I thought were the best slowly fade away. On one thing I really agree and that might be a good explanation: going often to the same spot makes you look for a different approach, not just a different composition, but different technical parameters. I suppose that enhances creativity.

With that said, I turn to this photography and I can't avoid myself from admiring it and the choices you made. The different layers are extremely effective and enough to give great depth to this image. The tree could be an interesting compositional element IF one could see it entirely as a lonely small tree somewhere on one side. Cropped like this... nã! It would also be a great picture without the tree, of that I'm sure.

Lee's comment is simply amazing and a pleasure to read, too!

Is that portrait Myles posted really yours? You look a bit different from what I imagined, but it could be :-)
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

tricky ™  Pro User  says:

Ace photo - know what you mean about the tree, i dont think it would be anywhere near as interesting without it, and i love the way the cloud next to it seems to add to the balance too.

Def know what you mean about being more challenging going back to a familiar location - someone else put me onto the idea a year or so back - he goes to brimham rocks regularly, with the intent of always trying to get something new and interesting, i've been doing the same at ardsley reservoir for the last year - first time i went there i was a little disappointed - theres no immediate beauty to the spot - its a fairly functional reservoir (with a good view to emley moor and the peaks, ruined by a load of pylons cutting right through the view in the worst possible way!) - it immediately clicked that this needs to be the place i go to regularly to challenge myself (that and its 5 mins drive from home :-).
Certainly gets you thinking a lot more, gauging details, considering what the best weather/time of day will be for things, i've been quite amazed that i've always got at least 2 shots i really like from it too!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

tripowski  Pro User  says:

Wow, great shot, great discussion!

I think you certainly did the right thing to desaturate. As to the tree, I think I like it - you're probably right to suggest that the scene would be a little bland without it.

Good to see that you're stretching yourself - and inspiring others! thanks
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jasontheaker  Pro User  says:

MR Myles
is that what you would like me to look like (o:
well i hope you don't mind me posting this shot of you.

Comfort Zone?


Ha Luis i cannot believe that you think the guy that Myles posted is me (o: LOL a very big LOL, i think he wants it to be me but alas its not!

this is me
Elden and I

@Tricky cheers dude. i remember you saying that when you went to Scotland. trying to learn to get new shots from overcast weather. all part of the fun eh!

and Tripowski
cheers for the possitive feedback, its much apreciated
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Retinol  Pro User  says:

Yeah, I knew that it wasn't yours. I had seen this true portrait before :-)
Myles has a great sense of humor behind a good heart.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

cattivikf18  Pro User  says:

Molto bella.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

doug.siefken  Pro User  says:

Hi, I'm an admin for a group called Still Art, and we'd love to have this added to the group!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

lamuccalilla  Pro User  says:

Great!




:)
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Francesca Forquet says:

beautiful!!!

thanks for your shot
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Francesca Forquet says:

it is so peaceful
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Denis Collette...!!!  Pro User  says:

Hi, I'm an admin for a group called Vision 100 / Invite only (+100 VIEWS), and we'd love to have this added to the group!

Please add your photo to
Your Vision

Please tag your photo "Vision 100"

On Explore my dear friend...!!!
What a beautiful day...!!!
A joy to see your wonderful vision on Front Page...!!!

Congratulations! Félicitation! Felicitazione! Felicidades! Felicitats! Glückwunsch! تهنئة 恭喜 Felicitação! Čestitke! Blahopřání! Gratulation! Felicitatie! Õnnitlus! Onnittelu! Συγχαρητήρια! כל הכבוד! Gratulálok! مبارکPowinszowanie! Felicitação! Честитке! Lyckönskningar! Поздравляю! Tebrikler! Поздравления! تبریک おめでとう Til lukku or til hamingju! GEFELICITEERD! Parabéns! Gourc'hemennoù! 축하합니다!

Champagne... peanuts... chocolate...ice cream... !!! :)))
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Pixelda  Pro User  says:

git ure air cut - OK, I can talk
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Zeb Andrews  Pro User  says:

I follow you Jason. In terms of the comfort zone, I think the best photography comes when you actively try to leave your comfort zone, than when you stay nestled inside of it.

I like this photo. It definitely is your style. And that got me thinking. I know a lot of people's reaction will be "remove the tree". And you know, according to the so-called rules of photography, you should. And you know, if you did, this would be a very visually arresting image. But you know what else? It will lose that character that makes it your image. It will look just like all those other nice moody shots of gently curving landscapes, and there are not a few here on Flickr. I think the simple inclusion of part of this tree has given this photo an edgy and unique feel, and it is definitely yours.

Here on Flickr there is no shortage of outstanding work, but so much of it is soooooo similar in nature. A lot of people produce beautiful images, but very few of them seem to produce much of a unique style. You do that quite well, as is exhibited in this shot. Keep the tree, it's all you.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Panorama Paul  Pro User  says:

Hah hah... Myles... where did you get that photograph of me!?

Here is another... from the early days... ;-)

Panorama Paul
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Kristoffer Fure Johansen  Pro User  says:

Majestic shot!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Corey (__x__blank__x__)  Pro User  says:

Hi, I'm an admin for a group called (A C H R O M A T I C) Nature, and we'd love to have this added to the group!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Laurent Henocque  Pro User  says:

cool lines

((please opt in to help make darckr explore beautiful))
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

RobertoA  Pro User  says:

Bella foto (good shot)

Compliments, I like it
Ed � subito sera
If you like you can add this photo to the Picture at an Exhibition group.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

nikko1974  Pro User  says:

Beautiful composition
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Rachel Schell  Pro User  says:

this is gorgeous! and I love what you wrote.

seen on explore.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

chrisaphoto says:

very nice! love it!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

mbrdnstn says:

simple and complex and totally eye grabbing. i want to look at this for a long time.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

BAS aka An Sophie & Bart  Pro User  says:

Think the tree is not only needed for juxtaposition, but also it's interesting because the structure of the cloud continues in the tree. Great work.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

JonTait2002  Pro User  says:

Great work Jason, I'm glad you stopped to take the shot. I love the abstract arty feel to it.

Seen on the EXPLORE frontpage and deservedly so

--
Seen on the explore page. (?)
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

XStormyX [deleted] says:

Your Superb photo is invited to;
Magic Donkey: The Best



Post 1 Photo and Comment using Comment code to
3 Photos within the first 3 pages.

Please tag with MagicDonkeysBest
Please read the group rules.

~~Admin Qualified~~
The above stamp automatically qualifies this artwork to the group!!

Intriguing and brilliant work!!!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

sjon blackwell  Pro User  says:

nice capture.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Rod Monkey  Pro User  says:

Simple & beautiful - love the gentle undulations.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

David :D [deleted] says:

Very serene and calming to me.. Gantle rolling hills, and I could see some of the grass bending slightly... Very nice shot!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Garp B says:

que preciosa toma, tan Cinematográfica
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

amy mcgibbon  Pro User  says:

Stunning landscape, I enjoy the tree, and your commentary/description was so enjoyable. And congratulations on Explore!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jmven says:

Instant winner
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

thefatcat44  Pro User  says:

Love the mono conversion. Love the composition - but for me, I would lose the tree - I think the simpler the image, the more minimalist, the more powerful it would be. I find the tree distracting - pulling my eyes to the right when I want them to follow the curve all over the image. But that's just my two'pennoth. That's the great thing about photography - there is no 'right answer', no perfect composition - it's up to us and how we make our images - and the debate is good too. Still love the image!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Rob.Hudson  Pro User  says:

In the hands of the wrong photographer this would have looked like Teletubbyland, but you've found such a calm composition and the elements all work well together. Brave and fearless photography Jas!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Blueju38  Pro User  says:

wonderful composition with excellent lines!!
Wow, this shot is fabulous and deserve a big fave from us!!
Please join us and post you artwork in :


"Fave moi France"
group (post 1 - Fave and Comment 3)
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Fatima2t  Pro User  says:

i love this shot!!! and i agree with ur idea of shooting similar places! thats what i like about photography it makes me see the little things that i didnt notice before! so now i always see the world in terms of art rather than with a cynical eye!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

~Jonas Peterson~  Pro User  says:

Lovely
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

gorgopis  Pro User  says:

I like this composition! It reminds me of an Italian photographer, Franco Fontana, although he did this almost two dimensional perspective in colour.
Check this one out:
images.google.nl/images?gbv=2&ndsp=18& hl=nl&q...
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Lissa**  Pro User  says:

Technical: 7
It's really hard to say. You haven't give us a larger version of the photo and there is no exif data. But everything looks crisp and well exposed from this view. There is a slightly hot area on the top left, and just over the hills on the right.

Composition:5
There really isn't anything going on here that really captures the eye. It's possible that the texture of the grass would provide enough visual interest at a larger size, but I can't judge that from what is here. The tree on the right should either be fully in the picture or cropped out. I do like this as a panoramic shot though.

Impact: 5
It kind of reminds me of a black and white version of the windows default background. :) The sky is kind of dramatic, but right now there is just a little too much going on to be really minimalist and not enough for a big impact.

Commercial Viability: 5
Maybe an art print.

Grade 5.5/10 as seen in
Critique

Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

A Puppet  Pro User  says:

For this shot i have to agree to Lissa, Jason. There is something, that i like here, the atmosphere and the b&w transition. But i don't feel comfortable with the proportions of the surfaces and the croped tree to the right is probable not the most elegant element for tension.
But it is interesting, that you are trying something different here! So you get an extrapoint for originality from me. ;-)
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

serg 30003 says:

There is smth very catching in this picture....on the other hand the landscape is tranquil..and on the other..there is a feeling of smth dramatic, over the hills and far away.....great photo)
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Luĭs Eduardo  Pro User  says:

I like the b/w
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

thewrightshot  Pro User  says:

Technical: (4/10 )
(The exposure looks ok, with the exception of the "hot spots" along the horizon. The photo looks to be in focus too. Nothing else to really comment on, if you could include a link to a larger version or provide some exif data next time that would be great and would allow us to better grade your photo. Oh, and the black and white treatment is a plus here.)

Composition: (4/10)
(I would have loved to see either the tree included, or completely removed. As it stands though, I don't like the composition because it feels incomplete. The hillside has good direction, but at the tree is where my eye gets "lost".)

Impact: (5/10)
(Not really all that impact-ful, but the black borders do add a sense of gloom.)

Commercial Viability: (3/10)
(I cannot see a use for this outside of a print for a family/friend )

Grade (4)/10 as seen in
Critique

Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jasontheaker  Pro User  says:

Wow I can see that there is some split views about this image. (I wouldn’t have expected anything else) but its clear to me that this is one that you either love or hate. As you might not be surprised i love it otherwise I wouldn’t have posted it here. I do thank you guys for the time and effort it has taken to think and comment on this. I never fail to learn something about human nature from your kind (and not so kind) words.

And the award to the lowest awarded mark in the portfolio pro group goes to "thewrightshot". Wow man you really didn’t like it did you...

Rob, Lutz, Doug, cheers guys, feedback always appreciated.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Monday Morning Photography  Pro User  says:

Technical: 6
I am giving the benefit of the doubt since your other work is outstanding but this is landscape that needs to be seen at a larger size to examine the true detail. An example is the sky. The clouds to the left seem like they have beautiful detail and the sky to the right seems blown out. On the other hand it could just be bright. The sparkly grass probably is wonderful if the detail could be seen.

Composition: 6
What is most likely a majestic seen when viewed in person seems a bit cramped when reduced to a cropped rectangle. The wonderful "S" of the rolling hills is slightly diminished by the partial tree and bright sky.

Impact: 5
This is one I truly want to like more because of its strengths but cannot get past the distracting elements.

Commercial Viability: 5
I get the distinct feeling I am missing something wonderful in this image that others are seeing and it only takes one person loving it for it to sell.

Grade 5.5/10 as seen in
Critique

Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Lissa**  Pro User  says:

Jason, I really think it's not having an available view in large size that is hurting this photo. I think there are likely some lovely details in here that just lack impact at a smaller size, like the texture and the play of light on the grass. I can see a little bit of that at this size, but not a lot.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

~Jonas Peterson~  Pro User  says:

4/10?

Really?

I love it.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Myles Smith says:

I think we should rename you '4/10'.....
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Myles Smith says:

Is that your height too? 4ft 10?
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jasontheaker  Pro User  says:

@Lissaphoto1. I take your point about size and thank you for that suggestion. I personally feel that 'even if' the detail (in the high res version) were present, that i still would get the lower grades. But hey, it’s all about the fun eh!

@Pixel Boy, cheers fella, just shows how different we all are.

@ Myles its not height mate its length!
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Flemming Gade  Pro User  says:

I nominate this image for this week's pool contest.

Nomination

--
Seen in .The Portfolio:Pro Invitation POST 1, GRADE THE 3 TO YOUR RIGHT (?)
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Tim Parkin  Pro User  says:

Some of the comments on this shot do make me giggle.. I for one think the shot is inspired and it's all abouit light and dark, the contrast inversion across the scene is enthralling and I see the tree as an extension of the transition of the clouds from white on the left to dark on the right and then punctuated by the black tree. If you removed the tree, the energy in the photograph would end up 'leaking' out of the right of the picture. If you showed the whole tree, it would become a focal point, but the picture isn't about the tree. the half tree reduces it's "treeness" and lets it become just a shape to enhance the picture. Just my opinion of course.. Everything Important: 9/10
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Luca Baldassarre says:

I nominate this image for this week's pool contest.

Nomination
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Signosis  Pro User  says:

I nominate this image for this week's pool contest.

Nomination
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jasontheaker  Pro User  says:

@ tim cheers for the comment mate! its great to see somebody putting into words what i was thinking with regards this image. "If you removed the tree, the energy in the photograph would end up 'leaking' out of the right of the picture" Yep i couldn't have put it better myself. anyway cheers again fella. Jason
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

abercolin  Pro User  says:

I really like the simplicity of the landscape in this picture. For me though I would have prefered either the whole tree or no tree, sorry.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Luka Skracic says:

There is definetely somethign abou tthis, it has an eerie dreamlike memory about it, someplac ei'm sure i've seen but forget about it a few seconds after i wake up. Very cool.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

photofool  Pro User  says:

beautiful composition jason.

if this were mine, i'd crop the tree out entirely to further emphasize the curve line and to minimize the distraction. perhaps you're going for the disruptive feel as the eyes traverse the line and reach the tree, but personally, i would like it better to let the line flow out of the frame.

ps: your question about the fisherman, yes, same guy, different shot.
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

zane&inzane  Pro User  says:

i would not crop out the tree, but clone it out maybe - so i agree with the removal of the tree. But i think some space is needed for that floating cloud near the tree, so don't crop it...

i would also probably darken the top left corner so that the viewer can concentrate on the curve and the floating cloud...

B&W conversion and the mood is excellent.

This photo has good impact but i just like it to be more minimal...
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

f l u x  Pro User  says:

immensity and comfort.

love it:)
Posted 17 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

ortalpeleg says:

your work is a true inspiration.
loved this one particularly.
Posted 16 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

David Lewis-Baker  Pro User  says:

Less is so often more Jason, as here. The tree echos the clouds and should certainly remain in this composition, for me. The simple and valuable thngs in life are, of course, free, its just spotting them and recording them with equal simplicity that marks the difficulty.
david:>)
Posted 15 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

VEMB  Pro User  says:

amazing, your images are so spectacular.... keep on the good work!!!

--
Seen on your photo stream. (?)
Posted 11 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

bubs1223  Pro User  says:

Lovely shot!
Posted 11 months ago. ( permalink )

Bill Jones Jr [deleted] says:

Hi, I'm an admin for a group called The Woman ♀ Adored - Moderated!, and we'd love to have this added to the group!


--
Seen on fiveprime.org (?)
Posted 11 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

N A B A Z  Pro User  says:

wonderful B/W lines.
Posted 10 months ago. ( permalink )

Would you like to comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

[?]
view photos Uploaded on June 6, 2008
by jasontheaker

jasontheaker's photostream

305
uploads

This photo also belongs to:

landscapes (Set)

Lake District (Set)

Presentation (Set)

desaturated images (Set)

"The Portfolio:Pro Invitation" - Constructive Critiques (Pool)

Landscape Exhibition (Pool)

The Art of Landscape Composition, UK (Pool)

Tags

Additional Information

All rights reserved Anyone can see this photo

Add to your map
Anyone will be able to see this on the map
 (edit)