Symbolic Immortality

i help LD kids learn kurzweil to help
their written expression with mixed results........

I’ll be introducing Ray and his forthcoming book at SDForum. You can also catch him and other Singularitarians (Vernor Vinge, John Smart) at ACC 2005 this weekend at Stanford. I’ll also be brainstorming about Open Genes, Memes and Dreams.

Ideas and suggested questions for Ray are welcome!

“First we build the tools, then they build us.”
– Marshall McLuhan

Related Blog musings on Nested Evolutionary Dynamics, Accelerating Change & Societal Shock, Genetic Free Speech, Evolving Friendly AI with commentary from Drexler, Rosedale and Yudkowsky, and Supra-Human Emergence.

Some quotes from the SIN galley print:

“it’s the evolution of patterns that constitutes the ultimate story of our world”

“Each epoch continues the evolution of information through a paradigm shift to a further level of ‘indirection.’ (That is, evolution uses the results of one epoch to create the next.)”

“future machines will be human, even if they are not biological. This will be the next step in evolution, the next high-level paradigm shift, the next level of indirection. Most of the intelligence of our civilization will ultimately be nonbiological. By the end of this century, it will be trillions of trillions of times more powerful than human intelligence”

“fulfilling the wishes of a revered biological legacy will occupy only a trivial portion of the intellectual power that the Singularity will bring.”

“you will know the singularity is coming when you have a million emails in your in-box”

This photo has notes. Move your mouse over the photo to see them.

To take full advantage of Flickr, you should use a JavaScript-enabled browser and
install the latest version of the Macromedia Flash Player.

Comments

nardell says:

steve, you always give me something new to think about from that amazing world of yours. i have never heard the term "singularity", but something tells me i will someday. :)
thanks for your most interesting photos and ideas!
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

biotron says:

we had a festival in Glasgow last year, tentatively exploring certain issues at the junction between art and technology - Machinista - at one of the forums on AI and emergence, a fairly young student spoke up and dropped the "singularity" bomb (many hearing this for the first time) on all present in the lecture theatre.... and we all left about 1/2 an inch shorter with baggy trousers....

thanks for reminding me about this. let's hope i can come up with a half-intelligent question you can put to Ray! out of interest, have you heard of Erkki Kurenniemi?
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

biotron says:

ps: that hand cannot be real....
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

RogueAI says:

The link to the Evolving Friendly AI post is incorrect...
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

complexify. says:

Is that a temporary tattoo or a skin-implanted NASA RFID? ;-)

For anyone interested, Ray Kurzweil is also giving a talk this Friday at the Herbst Theater in SF, as part of Long Now's Seminars on Long Term Thinking ($10 suggested donation, not required).

(Bruce Sterling also gave an interesting overview of his thoughts on Vinge and the singularity last year at the Long Now - available as a free MP3 here.)
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

jurvetson says:

thnaks.

RogueAI: very topical user name for this thread.... And to think that you found the bad link to friendly AI...! =) fixed now.

biotron: No, tell me about Erkki Kurenniemi. The hand is not mine, but it is very real. The photo is undoctored if that's what you mean...

complexify: sounds like Ray is packing in a West Coast tour.

hmm. biotron, complexify, rogueAI... nice names.
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

skinjester [deleted] says:

I'm looking forward to Kurzweil's new book and have been interested in posthumanity for many years. Why did I ever get rid of my PowerGlove???

Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

GustavoG says:

when you have a million emails in your in-box

...you will have reached the spamgularity.
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

biotron says:

apologies to the owner of the hand, then! how rude of me - i think i was led astray by the topic of the book, and the spongey, muppet-like consistency the hand appeared to have.... i'd better apologise again! :)

@complexify: great download link, thanks!

@gustavo: heh heh! i'm there already with one of my hotmail accounts ;)
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

benjiman says:

...Just ask him when I can just start stuffing the metadata right into my head.

Ray, please hurry! |)
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

Talking about Accelerating Change (happenning these days, right?), Singularity and Kurzweil... I need to know something, given that I have been told by our friend Tyler ( www.singinst.org -fyi to the people here interested in singularity-) that there is no one that can explain better the exponential growth like you, Steve.

[sidenote]Among other critical data I got to know from Tyler as well. Thx Ty. =)
[/sidenote]

Ok, my question to you, Jurv is (and pardon my ignorance on the subject): Given the acceleration of change and technological innovation as it is depicted with the exponential function, shouldn´t it lead to an impossible time, or a time crash in some near future?

This is: (a complete imaginative example) techno breakthroughs happenned every 500 years 1000 years ago, then every 50 years 100 ago, every 5 years 10 ago... how do this continue? every 5 months per year? every 5 days per 10 months? every 5 minutes per 10 days?... This is a reductio ad absurdum to me, that may lead as I say to an unavoidable time crash. Surely there is a logical way to avoid following this linear thinking I am expressing here...

Could you help me? Thx.
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

complexify. says:

Alieness: I like your "time crash" term. ;) I think what you're wrestling with is what's at the heart of the singularity concept. Notice how quickly things begin change as you approach the singularity (time is on the horizontal axis):

(graph taken from www.aleph.se/Trans/Global/Singularity/)
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

timecrash-timecrash-timecrash... say it again: timecrash. For you, complexi. =P

Hey geez, THX YOU for this answer and the graphic. It´s pretty clear, I guess. I admit I have not read enough yet (in depth) about these concepts, eventhough my concern is one same. I´d like to feed my mind openly with the most vast group of theories about the future. About what is ahead of us we don´t know, so no idea about it should be dismissed or put aside. Example: Couple of years before the invention of the Telephone and its massification, people weren´t able to predict such future from their current reality. Maybe some could, tho. Those surely kept an enough open mind to conceive such posible shift. What do you think? :)

[sidenote] How great that the place that talks about singularity is called "Aleph".[/sidenote]
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

Me again. *Thinking* 0-)

Errr... another question: If I am understanding right, isn´t the singularity concept foreseeing an eventual 'materialization' (a paradox that I use this word for this purpose) of the E=MC2 ?
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

complexify. says:

Hi Alieness! An interesting thought, although I doubt humanity could survive to see such a "materialization," or perhaps it'd be more proper to call it an "energizing?" ;-) In any case, there's definitely complexification going on in this crazy world of ours... :)
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

ah, yes, the complexification of it all, due of the energizing of the future is a 'matter of fact'... +)

You know, Complexy, I always enjoy these conversations. Maybe because you are good to me and answer my questions, so I learn a lot. =)

For me, Jurv is listening to us bewildered and taking note. |-) Or is it just some kind of dialectic teaching method you are practicing here? Trying to make us find the answer by ourselves? Or are you just offline? Steeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeve!!! >0(
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

complexify. says:

Alieness: Thanks, I enjoy talking about these things too. :) I appreciate the energy you put into replying (as a matter of fact) at the speed of light^2. :)
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

jurvetson says:

biotron: no problem.... muppet hands are child-like...

Alieness: heh. Tipler. Omega Point. Subjective time is clocked by salient events. out.
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

tipler, tipler... is that an adverb or an adjective? +)

K, k, k... you sound re-busy... I´d better go google "tipler omega point" and see what happens. Gracias.

Bye-Zzzzzzz
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

UPDATE. 1: Tipler. Omega Point. I found it quite confusing. Not that I didn´t understand, that he has confused a lot of ideas mixing them up more than interelating them. (IMHO)

MMMMMMMMMM. :-S

UPDATE 2: THANK YOU. You finally helped me put things together in my brain to start working on a serious writing, putting down in paper what I have in mind. Which now has form. =)
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

complexify. says:

While we're on the subject of singularities, here's a recent quote from Kevin Kelly (and Kurzweil agrees with him, according to Stewart Brand):

"My current understanding of singularities (the cultural kind) is that they are completely imperceptible from WITHIN the transition, because a singularity is primarily a movement to another level, a level which by definition is incapable of being represented by the lower level (just as the mind arises from neurons). Thus a singularity is only visible from the perch of the new level -- after arrival there. From within our emerging global cultural, the coming singularity is real, but it will be imperceptible to us during the transition. Sure, things will speed up, but that will only hide the real change, which is a change in the rules of the game, as the next level of organization and being kick in, levels that we are incapable of perceiving now because the level of their perception has not yet happened."

So perhaps we're already here? ;-)
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

Yes, I think so. At least, the small part fo the world which is already talking about this, is immersed in the change. The other 5.8 billion people, I don´t know. :-S

Anyway, I liked that quote a lot, complexy! And reinforces so much the idea I want to base my writings on. Super! thx!
Posted 47 months ago. ( permalink )

agdam says:

I really love the craze about complexity, or chaos and exponentials. Admittedly, I love them “philosophically” (sorry for abusing the term) as a way to consider human knowledge.

Both chaos and exponentiality need infinity: chaos dies in finite systems, exponential growth quickly chokes in any measurable universe. Both can be nicely plotted on a bifurcation tree. Both produce stunning pictures and astounding implications.

Yet, infinity means that the implications are no more significant today than they were millennia ago. They simply became noticeable to a regular human being.

Remember chaos’s fractals? No matter how closely you zoom in, you get the same picture. It’s just that the total number of visible pixels multiplies (exponentially!) Things don’t get simpler with magnification. Complexity!

Bifurcating from a single “natural philosophy” into gazillions of science branches, we’ve zoomed in closely enough for technological change to become noticeable within a human’s lifespan. We've realized that we progress exponentially! Cool… but, memento infinity.

Endlessness is a powerful epitome. It’s humbling – we are no closer to the “destination” than our remotest ancestors have been. It’s cheering – we are no further from it than our distant offsprings will ever be.

All in all, it gives us a direction: vector of exponentially higher complexity which happened to coincide with what we see as exponentially higher returns.

The disturbing thing is that the fractals’ pattern endlessly repeats itself at every level. Don’t our mistakes?

I love this stuff…
Posted 41 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

agdam, welcome. =D
Posted 41 months ago. ( permalink )

agdam says:

Thank you...
Posted 41 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

hands across the equator =)

Posted 41 months ago. ( permalink )

Altruistic Ventures says:

Hi all; haven't posted here in a while, it's good to be back. I'm enjoying the conversation about the singularity. I have an opinion and would love to get feedback

Einstein once said that you cannot solve a problem whilst dwelling in the mindset (or paradigm) in which you conceived the problem.

Complexify…you stated that "My current understanding of singularities (the cultural kind) is that they are completely imperceptible from WITHIN the transition, because a singularity is primarily a movement to another level, a level which by definition is incapable of being represented by the lower level (just as the mind arises from neurons). Thus a singularity is only visible from the perch of the new level -- after arrival there. From within our emerging global cultural, the coming singularity is real, but it will be imperceptible to us during the transition. Sure, things will speed up, but that will only hide the real change, which is a change in the rules of the game, as the next level of organization and being kick in, levels that we are incapable of perceiving now because the level of their perception has not yet happened."

I agree with most of your “current understanding;” however by my own experience, I know that an individual can indeed see the shift within the shift. This is possible for the collective consciousness to realize this together. What happens if you allow your brain to gain access to a glimpse of that new level that we are emerging into? I think that IT IS possible to not only identify the paradigm shift while in the midst of it, but human beings can affect the singularity because it was invented as a term within our speaking to describe an eventuality that is already written in our DNA. We are coming to a critical mass within our vibrational patterns as humans. This is one reason that the singularity is happening at this moment in time, we are ready and we are talking about it, therefore we speak it into existance. Speaking creates reality and you, me Alieness, Steve, Ray and millions of other people on this planet are speaking the singularity into existence. What do you think?
Posted 40 months ago. ( permalink )

benjiman says:

This thread just keeps on giving!

I'm struck by the comments from several folks about being able to sense and perceive the transitions...

It feels analogous to 2D/3D/4D spaces, where its incredibly difficult for the lessor dimensions to imagine the greater, yet incredibly easy for the greater dimensions to understand and build constructs describing the lessor.
Posted 40 months ago. ( permalink )

jurvetson says:

Very topical to Kevin Kelly's blog about Kurzweil (and his replies in the comments):

"I think that technological transitions represented by the singularity are completely imperceptible from WITHIN the transition that is represented (inaccurately) by a singularity. A phase shift from one level to the next level is only visible from the perch of the new level -- after arrival there. Compared to a neuron the mind is a singularity -- it is invisible and unimaginable to the lower parts. But from the viewpoint of a neuron the movement from a few neurons to many neurons to alert mind will appear to be a slow continuous smooth journey of gathering neurons. There is no sense of disruption, of Rapture. The discontinuity can only be seen in retrospect....

In a thousand years from now, all the 11-dimensional charts at that time will show that "the singularity is near." Immortal beings and global consciousness and everything else we hope for in the future may be real and present but still, a linear-log curve in 3006 will show that a singularity approaches. The singularity is not a discreet event. It’s a continuum woven into the very warp of extropic systems. It is a traveling mirage that moves along with us, as life and the technium accelerate their evolution."

I had blogged about a similar question, will we comprehend supra-human emergence? Does the minimally-sufficient critical mass of nodes needed to generate emergent behavior necessitate a certain incomprehensibility of the emergent properties by the nodal members?

I'll take notes at the Cognitive Computing event tomorrow at IBM Almaden... and the Singularity Summit on Saturday (free at Stanford, fyi).
Posted 39 months ago. ( permalink )

complexify. says:

Steve: Thanks for pointing out Kevin Kelly's Technium posts. It's almost identical to what he wrote last year (quoted in my post above), but I noticed that he's now longer talking specifically about "cultural" singularities.

I love Esthr's quote that we experience a singularity each day: "It’s called waking up. Looking backwards, you can understand what happens, but in your dreams you are unaware that you could become awake...."

Enjoy the weekend. I'm looking forward to your notes from Almaden and Stanford.

Altruistic Ventures: I just read your reply. Thanks. I wish I could take credit for that "current understanding," but those were Kevin Kelly's words.

However, whether or not "we" understand the singularity, we have to remember that we're in a tiny minority. I'm guessing that few Americans would list the singularity as among their biggest concerns (or else politicians would be making noise about doing something about it.) ;-)
Posted 39 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

oh... I´ll be back here in a while.

I think I oughtta share something which has helped me connect these two aspects (understanding the Singularity -coming- for a side, while not being able of understanding it -self-).

Going to the core: Why has this paradign shift been called "Singularity"? There, imo, in the answer to this question, lies the connection which makes the whole phenomena clearly coherent. The analogies which link the things/concepts for which the word "Singularity" is used is self-explanatory.

I´ll be back. ;)
Posted 39 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

"The "Singularity" was a term originally coined by Vernor Vinge, a mathematician and science-fiction author, to describe the breakdown in our predictions of the future that occurs when some form of greater-than-human intelligence comes into play - the moment when human intelligence, the source of technology, is improved by that technology. The term "Singularity" was coined by Vinge in analogy with the singularity at a center of a black hole, where our current understanding of physics breaks down; beyond the point where transhuman intelligence exists, our model of the future breaks down. A science-fiction author can't write realistic science-fiction stories beyond this point, because no author can create a character that's really smarter than the author." [more at link]

From The Singularity, published by the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, www.singinst.org

--

Steve, if you hear someone talking at the Summit about the mayan factor -a major change in their calendar to happen by 2012 (our time)-, do let me know. I am very interested in following that connection. And all the people I talked so far about this, who are not related to science and of course who have never heard about the Singularity before, but did know in some depth about the mayan predictions, clearly saw the connection too, saw how the current cycle closes and a new one begins, hence understood easily in five minutes what´s the Singularity about -the core concept, that is-. Keep an ear attentive to that for me, please. =)

--

just read this:

“All growth is a leap in the dark, a spontaneous unpremeditated act without the benefit of experience.” - Henry Miller
Posted 39 months ago. ( permalink )

jurvetson says:

I asked about the Mayan factor, but they generalized in the answers to common human aspirations to transcendance (Cory Doctorow called the singularity the "Rapture of the Nerds" =)

A podcast of the conference shouldbe available in a few days...
Posted 39 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

I would like to hear it. Would you let me know the date when you know it, or let me know how to find out?

Thank you a lot for having asked. The answer doesn´t sound too fullfilling really (?) It sounds more as if they didn´t know what you were talking about, or that they misunderstood it and dismissed it as taking it as sort of a Nostradamus prophecy or so -which is not-. This is a calendar, a Time system which shows that their largest measure of time, a Baktun (394 of our years) is coming to an end by 2012. But it is not only that. The Batkun coming to an end is the 12th one. The next Batkun, is the 13th, hence is the end of a greater cycle, if not the cycle itself -if there is such thing-. Number 13 is considered of bad luck ("Twelve years they served Chedorlaomer, and in the thirteenth year they rebelled." Genesis 14:4) when it actually just represents the closing of a period, a change in direction or order as it has been. What "rebellion" means. And this timeline based in the mayan calendar, while being an interpretation, it is based on the mayans´ actual thoughts and calculations. And if you see the way in which is foreseen the 13th batkun pretty much resembles a change in the current order of things. Of such magnitude that we are unable to concieve it from this here and now.

I hope that you don´t think me crazy now for this I say. Or "enraptured" like Cory thinks of Nerds and the Singularity... btw that could have sounded bit insulting, was it said like that?

For this comment of yours and your post on the Summit, I sense that it wasn´t that great as -at least me- expected. Was the conclusion then, that this won´t happen as predicted, for decades at least and that it is more a fantasy or a "rapture" than an actual thing happening? Because this is what I perceive from your two posts. Maybe it´s me, I am not sure.

=S
Posted 39 months ago. ( permalink )

tarotastic says:

Is Vernor Vinge also a SF writer? I'm sure I read some books of his years ago.
Posted 38 months ago. ( permalink )

complexify. says:

tarotastic: yep, Vinge is indeed a multitalented guy (he wrote A Fire Upon the Deep and A Deepness in the Sky, among others).
Posted 38 months ago. ( permalink )

benjiman says:

There are many singularities, including those in the shaving business!

;-)
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

jurvetson says:

b-man: I had missed that link earlier... hilarious....
Posted 28 months ago. ( permalink )

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

heya, missed that too. LOL! Blade Running... :D
Posted 28 months ago. ( permalink )

jurvetson says:

And now, Ray and this book are the subject of a movie, Transcendent Man, which will debut on April 25 at the Tribeca Film Festival.
Posted 4 months ago. ( permalink )

Would you like to comment?

[?]

	jurvetson's photostream
		2,830 uploads

This photo also belongs to:

	Biographical Sketches (Set)
		308 items

	Weird Science (Set)
		233 items

	Aliens, Robots & Cyborgs (Set)
		131 items

	Simulation & Simulacrum (Set)
		219 items

	Nano & Na not (Set)
		45 items

	ACC - Accelerating Change Conference (Set)
		10 items

	Emergence (Pool)
		0

	Brains (Pool)
		0

	C Y B O R G S (Pool)
		0

	ROBOTS: technology + pop culture (Pool)
		0

	Bookshelf Project (Pool)
		0

	Pictures With Stories - 5 sentence MINIMUM (Pool)
		0

	Headless (Pool)
		0

	1-2-3 (Pool)
		0

	10-25 favorites (Pool)
		0

	Favourites (3+ Faves) READ THE RULES, PLEASE (Pool)
		0

	1000 Views (Pool)
		0

	Science Nerd Depot (Pool)
		0

	100 views + 10 favourites (unlimited) (Pool)
		0

	2000 Views (Pool)
		0

	5000 Views - [ © Plz Read Rules ] (Pool)
		0

	1500 views (Pool)
		0

	The World Through My Eyes - Post 1 / Comment Any 1 (Pool)
		0

	Viva Evolution! (Pool)
		0

Additional Information

Some rights reserved Anyone can see this photo

Taken with a Casio EX-Z3.
More properties
Taken on September 10, 2005

10 people call this photo a favorite

Viewed 6,459 times

Add to your map

Yay location removed

...

(Some formats are OK.)

Or, remove it from the map.

Go to the map

You	Sign in \| Create Your Free Account
Explore	Places \| Last 7 Days \| This Month \| Popular Tags \| The Commons \| Creative Commons \| Search
Help	Community Guidelines \| The Help Forum \| FAQ \| Sitemap \| Help by Email

Symbolic Immortality

Comments

nardell says:

biotron says:

biotron says:

RogueAI says:

complexify. says:

jurvetson says:

skinjester [deleted] says:

GustavoG says:

biotron says:

benjiman says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

complexify. says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

complexify. says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

complexify. says:

jurvetson says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

complexify. says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

agdam says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

agdam says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

Altruistic Ventures says:

benjiman says:

jurvetson says:

complexify. says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

jurvetson says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

tarotastic says:

complexify. says:

benjiman says:

jurvetson says:

TheAlieness GiselaGiardino²³ says:

jurvetson says:

Would you like to comment?

Tags

Additional Information