You aren't signed in     Sign In    Help

Photographic Psychology: Shooting Clones

this is the best part i think. adds the "special" flavor :-)
Photographic Psychology: Shooting Clones by John Suler.
Also known as “multiplicity” shots, images involving clones can be comical, intriguing, and even disturbing. As highly self-aware creatures, we humans are fascinated by mirrors and reflections of ourselves, by the idea of having a twin, alter ego, doppleganger, and multiple personalities.

The multiplicity shot is a visual representation of the fact that the psyche is not a homogenously unified entity. The human personality is made up of various parts that sometimes cooperate with each other, and sometimes not. Clone images capture the various ways these different elements of the psyche might interact - what some psychologists call “intrapsychic dynamics.” For example:

- The hidden, unconscious, or dissociated parts of ourselves that operate behind the scenes or behind our backs, without our even being aware of their existence

- The unconscious self that suddenly and unexpected appears, much to our surprise, delight, or shock (see The Unconscious)

- The self that we wish or fear to be

- The contradictions, divisions, or opposites within our psyche

- The “evil” or aggressive qualities within, that we usually suppress

- The parts of ourselves that are in conflict with each other, that oppose, thwart or resist each other (see Inside the Psyche)

- The unknown part of our psyche that acts as a “trickster” who creates unpredictability in our lives (see Prankster)

- The inner wise self that wants to help us, perhaps even the “God within”

- Self acceptance, self love, or narcissism

- Inner confusion and chaos created by ambitions, feelings, and thoughts that are at odds with each other

- The inner parts of our psyche that cooperate with each other, work in unison or in parallel with each other, perhaps aware or unaware of each other’s presence (see Biography)

- The self that is simply aware of itself, of the process of observing itself, perhaps with judgment, or, in a mystical fashion, without any judgment or evaluation (see Infinite Progression)

Multiplicity images tend to be more convincing and intriguing when the clones visibly demonstrate this awareness of and interaction with each other. Otherwise the clones appear as unrelated, somewhat uninteresting duplications of each other. Body language and line of sight can suggest a bond among them, although direct eye-to-eye contact can be difficult to simulate. Humans are exquisitely sensitive to the eyes, so if the eye connection among clones is off, even just a little, the viewer will notice and feel that the simulation is false. The most convincing clones are those that overlap, touch, or engage each other physically, although this effect requires careful planning in the shooting of the photos and skillful editing of the composite image.

One strategy for creativity multiplicity images is rather straightforward. Set the camera on a steady surface, preferably a tripod, and shoot the same scene several times over, each time with the subject in a different pose within that scene and in the spot where you want that subject to appear within the final composite image. In a photo editing program, choose one of the shots as a background, then copy just the subjects from the other shots and paste them into their position in the background photo. The tricky part will be the editing of the edges around the clones so that they blend convincingly into the background photo. Also pay close attention to the shadows cast by the clones. Inconsistent or missing shadows will result in an unrealistic final image. Scenes with even or diffuse, steady light will usually result in fewer complications. Poor edge editing, changing light sources, and problematic shadows will produce anomalous clones that look like they were just pasted into the scene.

In the image at the top of this page, which clones appear least convincing as natives of that shot, and why? Can you guess which one wasn’t cut and pasted?

* This image and essay are part of a book on Photographic Psychology that I’m writing within Flickr. Please see the set description
This photo has notes. Move your mouse over the photo to see them.

Comments

view profile

trykemom  Pro User  says:

Oh, well done. You are good at these. The least convincing it the kneeling you in the lower left corner. The shadow above his leg is a bit too sharp. I also think it would just be easier to cut and paste him in.

My brain says that the you on the left behind the couch is the one not pasted because that is where I would start, at the back. It is easier to overlap in front than in behind something. That said, that is a guess because they are all well done.

I like how you added the picture to the camera that is "taking the photo" and how you stopped the clock at 6.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

CountryDreaming  Pro User  says:

This photo truly demonstrates that you have an incredible amount of patience, along with a steady hand! All that editing work ... wow!

Now in this shot, all the clones are wearing the same clothes. What do you suppose it would communicate if each clone had on something different?
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

LaurelT says:

John, this is fantastic. As a true blue fan of Miss Aniela, consider me impressed. I also enjoyed your analysis, thank you.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

assbach says:

haven't read the text yet. :-( ... but wanted to say that it's another great cloning image. you've always been inspiring for me with these. great job! i marked the spot i like most! hope that is ok. :-)
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

J R Webb  Pro User  says:

This would be enough to get you burned at the stake.
The foreground is what makes it so enjoyable.
And furthermore, it takes a remarkable figure to look good in Lee Jeans, especially that cut. Showoff!
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

John Suler  Pro User  says:

Thanks everyone!

@trykemom: Yes, indeed. The clone on the lower left is the least convincing, in part due to the incompatible shadows. I think there also are a few other reasons why it doesn't quite fit. I actually cut and pasted that clone from another shot and from another position in the room. Just goes to show you: it's not easy transplanting clones from one part of a scene to another..... The clone in the back left is actually a cut and paste.

@CD: I considered changing clothes, but that's even more work!! If there are a lot of clones in a shot, it helps unify the image if they are wearing similar clothes.

@laurel: thanks!

@assbach: I'm glad you liked that aspect of the image. It was a last minute inspiration.

@jr: lol! Those jeans are getting rather old now.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

TheLizardQueen  Pro User  says:

Ingenious!! You've taken “multiplicity” to another dimension!
Wonderful tutorial JS!!

Was it the one looking at the camera??
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Slackerus Maximus  Pro User  says:

Thank god there wasn't this many of you when I was growing up! :-)
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

alias65 says:

great!
a wonderful moltitude of John
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

tOkKa  Pro User  says:

-->> ..the man on the left and the right have much older cameras.. well they alll kinda look like they have differant camera..

..this has to do with your introspection there ??

..so maybe the man taking the picture is your future self ??

>v<
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Peter you've lost the news  Pro User  says:

Excellent work, John. This must have taken an age to create.... Well worth it :-)
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

austinspace  Pro User  says:

Nicely done! Very enjoyable interaction. (Multiplicity)
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

wimdejonge  Pro User  says:

i think the one on the right, leaning on the couch with his knee, wasn't cut/pasted. the left two look the least convincing to me.

very clever image, well done. especially the G2 showing the preview of the scene - multi-multiplicity :-)
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

John Suler  Pro User  says:

Right you are, wimdejonge! That's the "original" clone. And thank's for noticing the theme of "photos of photos of clones" and my intention to draw the viewer into this scene as yet another clone. We look at each other as if we are all so different, but are we?

@tokka: Thanks for noticing the different cameras. Paradoxically, the camera that records the image of images is the only one not in the image.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

macallen  Pro User  says:

wow,you have five brothers,cool,that's a joke~
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Manυ  Pro User  says:

Interesting! really!
It even gave me an idea... :D
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Zoomfreaky  Pro User  says:

Thanx for explaining how the mulitplicity photo's work.
I thought it would be something like this, just wasn't sure.
Curious about your book and writing, will take a look soon.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Gale Franey  Pro User  says:

All look convincing and could easily be the original, but when I began to consider, I used the same logic as trykemom, came to the same conclusion ..... just for ease of overlapping the images .... but this might not be the case, because each clone sits in its space in a very convincing way.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

dawna m. says:

best one of these I've ever seen, very impressive.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

Tommok [deleted] says:

This goes that little bit further than the usual type multiplicity shot. It's a really great and interesting piece, John. Wonderful! :-)
But i think the guy pointing towards the screen could do with a bit of a haircut! ;-)
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Barca_Branca says:

Clever, hilarious and interesting image !!!
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

DanRhett  Pro User  says:

Excellent Multiplicity work and theme. Well done and tells a story, although all the text is unecessary, the picture says a thousand words.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

wimdejonge  Pro User  says:

We look at each other as if we are all so different, but are we?

well, we might be in agreement (maybe not on the number). i personally think we're over 95% the same

fun to see i read your picture right :-)
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

*Renee* says:

The many faces of John. Next try different emotions in the expression. (happy, sad, confused, wild with maybe slightly different changes with your hair and maybe something slightly different in the clothes. (different belt, undershirt, shoes). I know it's probably easier said than done. Anyway thanks for sharing and for the explaination on how it's done.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

addicted Eyes says:

wonderfully put together john...
luv the comical slat to these images....
as always, you writing makes i look
at the images different....
call it double take.....:)
and i'll leave the cloning to the experts....
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

wkh861202 says:

Very well.
But I can do it if you give a digital.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

John Suler  Pro User  says:

Thanks so much for your comments!
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Andrew_N  Pro User  says:

Great explaination of why the fascination with this type of image. I've avoided doing my own versions because I haven't thought of an original angle yet.
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

[ CK ]  Pro User  says:

Oh john... that's just perfect. If we could only see ourselves playing around with all the camera gear we surround ourselves with... this is what we would see. In 1 photo you have said so much!
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

emmasplit says:

Wow ! Very ,very interesting !
Very very magical!
My favorit !
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

flork says:

sublime!
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

.Hortencia.Caires.  Pro User  says:

love it
Posted 37 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

[David Wang]  Pro User  says:

Very well done, John! Superb!
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

John Suler  Pro User  says:

Santa Clone!.... lol!
Posted 35 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Scott Beveridge  Pro User  says:

This is cool.
Thanks again for talking to me about Second Life today.
You can find the story Sunday at www.observer-reporter.com
Posted 33 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

John Suler  Pro User  says:

I'm glad I could be of help, scott.
Posted 33 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jonmatthew photography  Pro User  says:

Going through your stream I found this wonderful multiplicity shot. One of the better I have seen and there are some great ones out there. Anyway great amusing imagery. -Jonathan
Posted 33 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

John Suler  Pro User  says:

Thanks jonathan!
Posted 33 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Asai says:

Hi there!

Please share this photo at www.flickr.com/groups/whostheassistant/

Thanks!

The Assistant
Posted 33 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

rdiigraphics says:

I think its a great image, but the onl thing that I dont feel fitting in is the clone kneeling in the lower left hand corner. Other than that I think its done very well.
Posted 32 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

linus is the L word  Pro User  says:

how do you take pictures like that ?
is it photoshopped ?

i wonder how you do it... d'you mind teaching me ?
Posted 30 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Dumb Wisdom  Pro User  says:

great idea!
Posted 30 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Mr Whisky-soon says:

Hi John: I'm just spending some time browsing 'old shots' and I noticed this. Sorry I missed it before. Wow!
I was very interested in your explanation of our interest in multiple images 'doppelgangers' etc.
This is a fascinating and extremely clever (and amusing) piece of work - I like the little touches, such as you wagging your finger reproachfully at the 'you' taking a picture of all of you, and the fact that he's using the same camera off to one side. I've had a good deal of fun trying to work out in what order you took the photos, and I wondered if I was correct with any of them:
from left to right:
5th, 3rd, 2nd, 1st, 4th, 6th
Any correct?
Posted 29 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

John Suler  Pro User  says:

Actually, Mr. Ws, I don't remember! I'd have to go back and find the original images. I do remember that the background image (the one not cut and pasted) is the one of me in the background with my knee on the couch. That "me" would have been the most difficult to cut and paste.
Posted 29 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Creativity+ Timothy K Hamilton  Pro User  says:

Congratulations, this shot is ready for the 500 views + 20 faves group
Thanks for the short "tutorial" on this sort of shot. . . I've always wanted to try it !
Posted 29 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

wimdejonge  Pro User  says:

funny how i was only focused on the technical issues, and not that much on the text. lots of good explanations in there, thanks :-)
Posted 28 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

A.J. French says:

this is really nicely done!
Posted 27 months ago. ( permalink )

davidluna [deleted] says:

Hi, I'm an admin for a group called Fotografo Fotografiado, and we'd love to have your photo added to the group.
Posted 26 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

paperbackwriter(: says:

Lol, very well done, I enjoyed your writing and this picture(:
I think the one clone that is sitting and looking up and showing the camera to the one in the top left cornor is the one that wasn't pasted.
Just a q, what program do you recomend for pictures like these?
I have gimp and thinking of investing in photoshop in the future.
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

John Suler  Pro User  says:

Thanks for your comment, pbw. It's been a while since I did this image, so I don't remember which is the un-pasted me! I think it's the one pointing at us. I'd have to go back and check.

I don't know much about Gimp. I use Photoshop exclusively. I imagine you could also do this kind of clone shot in GIMP. Clone shots don't require any fancy software features. Just the basic features for cutting and pasting, and tone/color adjustments are enough. The one exception might be the ability to make a clean selection for cutting and pasting. In that case, Photoshop does have some useful tools.
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

marcellucray says:

Hi, I'm an admin for a group called worldlightning, and we'd love to have this added to the group!



....clonerama.................
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

wimdejonge  Pro User  says:

paperbackwriter (: - it's in the comments. :-)

I made all my old clone shots in GIMP. PS is more convenient than GIMP, but in this area you can do the same things with layers & masks & stuff like that.
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )

Would you like to comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

[?]
view photos Uploaded on October 18, 2006
by John Suler

John Suler's photostream

1,396
uploads

This photo also belongs to:

Photographic Psychology (Set)

89
items

Multiple Me's (Set)

27
items

Multiple Personalities (Pool)

clone meets clone (Pool)

My Very Own Clone (Pool)

600 views or more (Pool)

600 Views (Pool)

Multiplicity (Pool)

600_views...NO: Porn Or nudity !!! No more than 799 views at tim (Pool)

Clones (Pool)

Fotografo Fotografiado (Pool)

worldlightning (Pool)

Tags

Additional Information

All rights reserved Anyone can see this photo

Add to your map