You aren't signed in     Sign In    Help

Des Moines Public Library

Des Moines Public Library by jessamyn.
"Are you taking pictures? Do not take pictures in here." the librarian said as soon as we walked into the library. I felt a little bad, but I took a few photos anyways. 

Comments

view profile

Mike McCaffrey  Pro User  says:

Umm... aren't you allowed to take photos in public buildings? What reason could they have for you not to take photos?
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

bryanboyer  Pro User  says:

is this the new one by David Chipperfield?

No pictures in a public library? that is stupid.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jessamyn  Pro User  says:

Yes, it's the Chipperfield building! Really nice building sort of uninterestingly filled with books.

She said we could talk to the lady in marketing on the third floor about photography permission. We didn't. Maybe I'll go back over there today and have a chat with her.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jbroome  Pro User  says:

Can't you give her the secret librarian handshake and make everything go away?
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

bryanboyer  Pro User  says:

you know, I don't agree with it when an institution like a private museum says you can't take pictures but I can sort of understand it* since they probably want to sell you some trinkets.

but for public institutions like a library there is really no reasonable reason for denying you the right to take pictures. certainly you're not stealing any potential funds from the library by taking some pictures. is it for security? I sure hope not...

if you do talk to the marketing person, you should ask them to google/flickr search for Seattle Public Library and see the immense load of results that come back celebrating their investment in superior architecture. after spending so much money on a Chipperfield building I am surprised they don't want to flaunt it!

*as an architect it is especially annoying when people deny the right to take pictures. I'm usually interested in some tiny detail that will never ever show up in any book or magazine. I've gotten good at sneaking pictures.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jessamyn  Pro User  says:

I wrote the director and the marketing and tech people about why they have this policy and where I can find it. Will see what they say.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jessamyn  Pro User  says:

Got an interesting response from them [upshot: they've got a weird policy but they're nice people] and I'll post it once I'm home from Iowa.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jessamyn  Pro User  says:

Text of email exchange here. So strange.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

bryanboyer  Pro User  says:

I don't know what's more disappointing: that Chipperfield asked them to disallow photos or that the Library complied.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

bryanboyer  Pro User  says:

@jessamyn: this issue has generated a bit of discussion at archinect as well, FYI.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jessamyn  Pro User  says:

I dropped Chipperfield a note via his website, I'll mention if I hear back from him.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

ricklibrarian  Pro User  says:

Funny, I was asked to put my camera away in Iowa City a few years ago. Of course, I had already taken a number of arty pictures at that point. I didn't waste them. We like photographers at Thomas Ford. We figure we get free promotion.
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jessamyn  Pro User  says:

Hey looks like they may make some changes to the policy after all!
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

PrairieHaus says:

Wouldn't surprise me if they don't want photos because of defective windows that keep cracking:

www.glassonweb.com/news/index/7212/
Posted 2 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

flyingember  Pro User  says:

I believe the general agreement is that when you're allowed in a public place you are allowed to take photos.

The location's options are:
- to not allow you in/remove you from the location
- to take your camera and be materially responsible for it or refuse to allow you to have it there. some phone models have a no camera option for this reason. courthouses take items with a ticket like cameras and phones and hold onto it

If you want a good recent example of the latter, several Sarah Palin events have banned cameras, cell phones and the like since it's the only legal way they can stop any sort of recording.

As well, someone being in a public place does not give them a right to privacy as it's a public place. There are exceptions for items like upskirt/downblouse, restrooms, zooming in on medical documents and the like. The other big one is taking a photo and using it for a fake testimonial. Children are not given special treatment from the above but it's generally bad practice to post full names.

www.andrewkantor.com/2005-12/legal-rights-of- photographers/
this is a good beginning source
Posted 4 weeks ago. ( permalink )

Would you like to comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

[?]
view photos Uploaded on October 22, 2009
by jessamyn

jessamyn's photostream

7,694
uploads

Tags

Additional Information

AttributionNoncommercialShare Alike Some rights reserved Anyone can see this photo

Add to your map