Passerelle de Maison-Alfort/Saint-Maurice
To take full advantage of Flickr, you should use a JavaScript-enabled browser and
install the latest version of the Macromedia Flash Player .
Manu, I think the more obvious stitch error is here, but there are more errors visible at original size.
My kind of weather for a panorama: only 35 pictures thanks to the white sky.
The stereographic projection can been seen
here .
(The original picture is 8000x4000, but flickr failed to process it so I uploaded this 7000x3500 version instead.)
This photo has notes. Move your mouse over the photo to see them.
Comments
8000x4000 !
Do you have an unusual computer to compute
such a huge image ?
--
Seen on your photo stream. (? )
Posted 25 months ago.
( permalink
)
Btw I can't find ANY stitch error... BRAVO ! How did you manage that ? did you get
yourself a nodal ninja ?
Posted 25 months ago.
( permalink
)
No fancy computer: a 4 year old Athlon. 1GB
of RAM, but that's pretty common nowadays and
I could really use more: handling 8000x4000
pictures is manageable if I don't work with
more than 2 layers at a time.
This panorama is the first I ever did with
a true tripod. A tripod without panoramic
head though, which means I was constrained
to take landscape shots, and had parallax
errors. The screw of my camera is not even
aligned with its lens, so I cannot even hope
for a single axis to be aligned properly.
The error range is anyway a lot better than
what I can do manually.
As for the stich errors, see the notes for
a start.
Posted 25 months ago.
( permalink
)
Even at original size the errors are not very
visible, congrats.
Sorry for asking so many questions, but did
you do this with the usual Hugin and Enblend
while using the color correction with
PTStitcher (as said here )?
I really need to re-work my technique...
Posted 25 months ago.
( permalink
)
Well chosen vantage point.
Posted 25 months ago.
( permalink
)
While there are some stitch errors, they are
still few and small. So really congrats on
this panorama!
Posted 25 months ago.
( permalink
)
@Manu : Here is how I worked on this panorama (I
never worked this way before, but it might be
an interesting way to combine all these
tools).
- Run autopano-sift and hugin as usual,
export each distorted picture as an
individual 8000x4000 TIFF (that's 128MB times
36 files...)
- color correct the TIFFs of the first row
(9 pictures at pitch 0°) with PTblender, as
it is where I had the most exposure
variations
- blend each row (pitch +20°, 0°, -30°, and
-60°) as a separate TIFF with enblend
- color correct the resulting 4 rows and
the nadir pic with PTblender
- manually merge the resulting 4 rows and
the nadir pic in gimp (two at a time)
- fix the more apparent errors using clone
and rotate
Running PTblender on full rows instead of
all the individual picture was mainly a way
to speed up the process. I also happen to
think that the more picture
you give to PTblender the more your colors
get damaged. Manually blending 5 layers is a
cinch (compared to stitching all 36
pictures), and it avoid many stitch errors
since you can actually chose where the seams
will be. If you consider that this was shot
in landscape mode, in the end I let enblend
bother with stitching the small edges, and I
did the large ones. That also explains why
almost all the stitch errors are vertical.
@Dave , @Seb : Thanks!
Posted 25 months ago.
( permalink
)
Thanks for sharing that technique
I'll definitely have to try blending rows
manually... Of course with my way of shooting
it would mean blending half rows, but either
way it sounds nice.
Posted 25 months ago.
( permalink
)
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
This photo also belongs to:
Additional Information
Some rights reserved
Anyone can see this photo