You aren't signed in     Sign In    Help

Outlook 2000 vs 2010

Outlook 2000 vs 2010 by Campaign Monitor.
That's 10 years of progress right there. Head to fixoutlook.org/ for all the details. 

Comments

view profile

@cdharrison  Pro User  says:

A little part of me just died inside.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Luke's Beard  Pro User  says:

.......oh great
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

setatakahashi says:

2000 renders the navigation bar correctly while 2010 doesn't.

2010 strips most CSS?
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Jessica King says:

That is really effing ridiculous.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Matt Wiebe says:

Starting with Outlook 2007, MS reverted Outlook to use Word's HTML rendering engine rather than IE's in a bid to decrease the security risks inherent in IE.

Yes, the layering of incompetence is astounding.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

freshspaceinternet says:

Oh my. Why would they use Word as the rendering engine? Doh!
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

moneydick  Pro User  says:

"Standards compliance" is met with a shudder in the halls of MSFT. Sad.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

sighmon  Pro User  says:

@Matt Wiebe - So because of flaws in IE, they're crippling other software as well?

Why not just give the user the option of which webkit they'd like to render their mail.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

petwalrus2  Pro User  says:

Outlook 2015: powered by lynx!
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

david.moffitt  Pro User  says:

MSFT fail. Check out Campaign Monitor's effort at fixoutlook.org - I think its high time someone stood up to Redmond and said "WTF guys, really?" - or something along those lines ;)
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Jake Mates  Pro User  says:

My future self just got a migraine.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Creative World (studio) says:

Opportunity missed, Microsoft... but its not too late to get it together.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

rodrigobarona says:

That is horrible for the web developers like me! ;_( Internet Explorer 8 works great, but Outlook 2010 doesn't works!!

Thanks for the movement!
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Rob Winters says:

Oh well. Google Wave will kill outlook and email anyway, so it doesn't matter. (joke) ;)
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Kosse says:

This, from a strictly economic/ecological point of view is a WASTE, thousands (millions) of hours spent in fixing bad decisions from 1 company... 10 years later it's still mayhem.

Go twitter! Head to fixoutlook.org/ for all the details.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

osborne villas  Pro User  says:

I'd recommend using something else anyway.
--
Seen on fixoutlook.org ( ?² )
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

fannarfreyr  Pro User  says:

Go M$ your are the best! I love this, why should email look good? What a bullsh*t!
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Luís Abreu  Pro User  says:

I'd recommend using something else anyway, too. hint hint: GMail+Chrome/Safari/Firefox
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jmp909 says:

can we see a screenshot of the same email in Gmail/Firefox?

to be honest, i don't think it's just Microsoft that's the problem for email rendering.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

dvux says:

one word: thunderbird...
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

EclecticRadio  Pro User  says:

Unbelievable, really. MS, please get real and use AT LEAST IE8's rendering engine.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

andi*pandi  Pro User  says:

Gmail isn't the standard either, fyi. Strips out css except inline.

But microsoft is just throwing up their hands. I look forward to seeing how other email clients evolve to fit the need.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Kris C  Pro User  says:

Further demise of MS? Looks like it to me.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Verious says:

Microsoft needs to get on the ball and update Outlook 2010 to support modern Web standards.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

lapkitt says:

Switch to Thunderbird Now !
The message will be Clear to
Manglesoft

fixoutlook.org/
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

karl.staudinger  Pro User  says:

is there any reason for this?
--karl
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Tim Ruddell  Pro User  says:

Two simple solutions:

a) If you don't like it, use another client.
b) Don't send (or read) HTML emails. I'm yet to receive anything useful / interesting / serious in a "pretty" CSS-ified email -- it's generally marketing bullshit.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

jeremymandle  Pro User  says:

Tim,

a) 20,000+ employees don't get the luxury of using another client.
So much of the electronic communication on our company intranet is bland text-based content. We like to distribute eye-catching content every so often. Microsoft should want to make that easy. Right?

b) It's not about you. It's mostly about the designers and developers having to cobble together hack included versions of already standards compliant collateral. Outlook 2007/2010 = IE5.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

cajebo  Pro User  says:

To misquote a recent inTel spot: "they're (MS) a different kind of nerd"
They apparently want us all to eat cake.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

JipoNet says:

Microsoft just replied with "The Power of Word in Outlook" blogs.msdn.com/outlook/archive/2009/06/24/the -power-of-wo...
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

William Aleman says:

They need to use Firefox rendering engine for Outlook 2010. Looks like that instead of advancing we are going back.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

automaton_be  Pro User  says:

fuck it, I'm going back to plaintext e-mail newsletters.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Simon Cox  Pro User  says:

One giant leap for mankind. Oh wait.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

andi*pandi  Pro User  says:

That ms blog post is really astonishing. Basically FU.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

noquarter says:

Way-to-go Ballmer!
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

mrDarcyMurphy says:

Am I the only one who looks at that design and says "sure, I'd have to use tables, but I could still make it work."
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

daverau  Pro User  says:

Wackness. Glad to be a OS X Mail user.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

briarrose nightfire says:

please tell me this only affects outlook and not MS entourage (client for the Mac).
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

andi*pandi  Pro User  says:

point being though, that if you are developing an email, you want it to render properly on all email clients... and you don't want to have to write 5 different types of code to do it.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

zbrando  Pro User  says:

Great job Microsoft :(
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

ara_p  Pro User  says:

Everyone is speculating on Web 3.0 while Microsoft seems to be pining for Web 0.1. Sad.
Posted 5 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

paydaynow says:

its working now at Mariloo.com, thanks you guy.
Posted 4 months ago. ( permalink )

Would you like to comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

[?]

Campaign Monitor's photostream

224
uploads

This photo also belongs to:

fixoutlook.org (Set)

7
items

Tags

Additional Information

Attribution Some rights reserved Anyone can see this photo

  • Taken on June 18, 2009
  • Viewed 24,917 times
  • Replaced on June 18, 2009
Add to your map