You aren't signed in     Sign In    Help

What's Worse For the Baby?

What's Worse For the Baby? by freakonomicsblog.

Comments

view profile

mies van der rohe says:

She looks pretty concerned to me - I'm convinced.

Those cars aren't moving very fast though - what's wrong with them?
Posted 41 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

mjs  Pro User  says:

There's some background/followup to this at:

www.snopes.com/photos/signs/pregnant.asp
Posted 41 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

pondage  Pro User  says:

pure gold..........
Posted 41 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Dornrade  Pro User  says:

Ha.what a div
Posted 41 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

George Donnelly  Pro User  says:

i think the baby is more at risk from her cigarette habit, whadya think? sheesh.
Posted 41 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

reinkefj says:

OK, while I wouldn't do it, or more accurately I wouldn't smoke while pregnant, or more accurately want my wife to smoke if she was pregnant.

We have to allow people the freedom to make their own choices. Mistakes will happen. And people should bear the responsibility for the choices that they make.

But, the pic is funny. Worry about jack hammers? Worry about smoking? Which is the more proximate hazard?

But it's her body and her pregnancy. I would no more tell her what to do than I would want some one to take away my McDonald's French Fries because "everyone knows those are bad for you"!

(I almost tapped out a bad word about being quiet!)

MYOB!


reinkefj.wordpress.com/2006/08/05/rant-look-a t-this-pictu...
Posted 41 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

taralotus1 says:

Ignorance is bliss apparently.
Posted 25 months ago. ( permalink )

Would you like to comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

[?]

freakonomicsblog's photostream

53
uploads

Tags

Additional Information

All rights reserved Anyone can see this photo

Add to your map