You don't have to burn them, you could put
them on a candle warmer...which takes
electrical energy, energy which was likely
made by burning coal or natural gas. The
people working at the power plants probably
drove to work in a vehicle burning fossil
fuels and came from homes heated by the same.
So back to your question, if they are
environmentally friendly, it's because the
soy that went into making the candle will not
go to feed a human which in time leads them
to starve to death as opposed to creating the
candle out of a non food product...one less
person, one less possible carbon
footprint...so if starving people to death
and eating away at our numbers and ultimately
the environmental impact is environmentally
"friendly"...the marketing is dead
on.
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Guest Passes let you share your photos that aren't public. Anyone can see your public photos anytime, whether they're a Flickr member or not. But! If you want to share photos marked as friends, family or private, use a Guest Pass. If you're sharing photos from a set, you can create a Guest Pass that includes any of your photos marked as friends, family, or private. If you're sharing your entire photostream, you can create a Guest Pass that includes photos marked as friends or family (but not your private photos). Learn more about Guest Passes![?]
HodgsonGreg says:
You don't have to burn them, you could put them on a candle warmer...which takes electrical energy, energy which was likely made by burning coal or natural gas. The people working at the power plants probably drove to work in a vehicle burning fossil fuels and came from homes heated by the same. So back to your question, if they are environmentally friendly, it's because the soy that went into making the candle will not go to feed a human which in time leads them to starve to death as opposed to creating the candle out of a non food product...one less person, one less possible carbon footprint...so if starving people to death and eating away at our numbers and ultimately the environmental impact is environmentally "friendly"...the marketing is dead on.
Greg
Posted 15 months ago. ( permalink )