You aren't signed in     Sign In    Help

Critical Mass 1

Critical Mass 1 by Dear Knucklehead.
While walking down to Reckless tonight, I saw a commotion on Broadway. Looking in the distance, I saw all these helmeted heads moving across the intersection. Dozens of them. When I got closer, I broke the camera out and saw that the Critical Mass folks out for a ride.

They were up to their usual hijinks, like blowing red lights (and bragging about it over their megaphone), stopping traffic, pulling in front of cars that tried to muscle their way through the convoy.

What got me was when they harrassed the pedesterians for trying to cross the street. "We're trying to get home from work" one biker said.

"So are we," said the lady he nearly ran over.

Here's the thing I don't get: the ostensible goal is to make people aware of bikers and their right to coexist on the same roads as cars. That's cool. When I ride my bike, I hope that people notice me and on those rare occasions when I drive, I make it a point to give bikers leeway. However, blocking traffic for 10+ minutes, taking up the entire road and shouting at motorists really isn't a good way to endear yourselves.

I recall looking up the law on how far to the right a bicycle should be and it was something like, "as far as conditions permit." Now, AFAIK, this doesn't mean "when you're in a group of hundreds of people who are taking advantage of the opportunity to be complete assholes."

I dunno, maybe I'm just getting old. To be sure, it did kind of look like fun and I'll have to remind myself to try to get in on their next ride. You know, for research. 

Comments

view profile

Luke  Pro User  says:

How can we block traffic? We ARE traffic!

And if we stopped for red lights, imagine the snarl that would create. 10 minutes would become an hour, which would endear us to nobody.

We do try to yield to peds, though in any group of 1,000 riders there's bound to be a few knuckleheads. For most of us the message is about showing the fun and utility of being on a bike.
Posted 53 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Dear Knucklehead  Pro User  says:

You can block traffic by tying up an intersection for 10+ minutes (I base this number on the estimation that it took me a minute from the time I first saw the bikers (somewhere towards, but not the, beginning of the group) and then the time betweent he first shot I took and the last). Using both north- and southbound lanes _and_ having a biker pull in front of a car that tried to head south on Broadway, forcing it to pull over isn't blocking traffic?

As for knuckleheads (hey, I resemble that remark!), fair enough. However, I'm assuming that even the nonknuckleheads know that bikes are to follow the same rules of the road as motor vehicles and blowing stoplights is illegal. You're a bunch of bikers, not a funeral procession. AFAIK, you also don't have a parade permit that would close off intersections (or maybe you do, but that would defeat the purpose wouldn't it?).

As for stopping at intersections, here's a quote from your own photo "Yielding," "Well, here we have stopped for a fire truck and it wasn't even an emergency. I'd like to see a hundred cars move as nimbly and quickly as a thousand bicycles can."

It seems to me if the bikes could have stopped so easily in this case, stoplights would be no problem.

Apparently, I'm not the only one who thinks that blowing through red lights is illegal, check out "getting a ticket" by gluechunk, a photo you commented on.

It does seem like a lot of fun and I'll try to make the Sept. ride to see if I'm missing something. But, honestly.

So, what do you think of the picture? :)
Posted 53 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Luke  Pro User  says:

> You can block traffic by tying up an intersection

But my point is a semantic one. X cannot block X. Bikes are traffic, cars are traffic. Traffic cannot block traffic. Now, if you are accusing "bike traffic" of blocking "car traffic," you may have a point, one to which I say, Anyone crazy enough to drive in this city who isn't yet used to regular 10-minute delays is crazier than I thought. Further, cars own 90 percent of the road 99 percent of the month. All we ask for is one hour. Is that so unreasonable?

> Using both north- and southbound lanes

That's something we try not to do, like blocking buses or peds, but some riders (read as, "knuckleheads") get overzealous. There are a lot of new people to Mass, especially in the summer months. (Just two years ago we had our first 1,000-rider Mass. A head count at this one topped 2,500.) Obviously the more experienced riders are not doing an adequate job of teaching the traditions and ethics.

> vehicles and blowing stoplights is illegal.

"Blowing" implies we are doing so carelessly. Not so.

> You're a bunch of bikers, not a funeral
> procession.

Cars kill 43,000 Americans a year. For many of us, myself included, part of CCM's function is indeed as a funeral procession.

> AFAIK, you also don't have a parade permit that > would close off intersections

Been on the interstates around rush hour to watch the daily car parades? Been to Michigan Avenue lately, where cars block intersections all day long? Where are their permits?

> It seems to me if the bikes could have stopped
> so easily in this case, stoplights would be no
> problem.

We *can* stop, yes. But how this would help the sacred flow of automobile traffic, I'm still not following you. Instead of blocking, say, Michigan Avenue car traffic for 10 minutes, we'd block it for an hour. If we split up the mass at every intersection.

> Apparently, I'm not the only one who thinks that
> blowing through red lights is illegal, check out
> "getting a ticket" by gluechunk, a photo you
> commented on.

That ticket is in Seattle, where the police are less enlightened, unbelievable as it is, than in Chicago.

> It does seem like a lot of fun and I'll try to make > the Sept. ride to see if I'm missing something.

I hope you do! The Mass always needs more positive cyclists.

> So, what do you think of the picture? :)

It's a good attempt at panning. The composition is nice, but would be perfect if the rider were more focused. I usually find that 1/40 is the best exposure for panning a cyclist.
Posted 53 months ago. ( permalink )

Would you like to comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

[?]

Dear Knucklehead's photostream

1,716
uploads

This photo also belongs to:

People (Set)

65
items

Tags

Additional Information

All rights reserved Anyone can see this photo

Add to your map