Be shallow
Who are they talking to? In San Francisco Feb 2004. (Canon D300, 1/60sec, 50mm prime)
This photo was taken on February 16, 2004 using a Canon EOS Digital Rebel.
This photo belongs to
-
-
-
-
- ← Oldest photo
-
This photo also appears in
License
Privacy
-
This photo is visible to everyone
keyboard shortcuts:
← previous photo
→ next photo
L view in light box
F favorite
< scroll film strip left
> scroll film strip right
? show all shortcuts
-
Photo license:
Some rights reserved
Comments and faves
Marcello Senatore (80 months ago | reply)
LIKE IT!!!
anyone_anywhere (80 months ago | reply)
great !
anyone_anywhere added this photo to his favorites. (80 months ago)
Coxee (79 months ago | reply)
Thanks. The subject made quite an impression on me - to the extent that I delayed/annoyed my family I was with to get this shot..
day4coffee (79 months ago | reply)
A great shot!!! Reminds me of SF Buckaroo.
-save
brendadada (79 months ago | reply)
Like this lots and lots. Unfortunately the white light on the sign is just too glarey and I'd have liked more traffic streaks. Very nice though. Welcome to DMU, if I haven't said that already.
/n/n-voted as "delete" (from the Delete Me Uncensored group)
Superchou (79 months ago | reply)
these is something very compelling about this image... but brendadada hit it with the need for more trafficy elements to make it more dynamic
-delete2
smoothdude (79 months ago | reply)
close to being a cool shot but the car doesn't work for me here. I would prefer to see this in landscape.
-delete3
Peter Gilbert [deleted] (79 months ago | reply)
I love the blur of the car,it adds life to the photo,
save2
iboy_daniel (79 months ago | reply)
good clean night shot.
-save3
beebo wallace (79 months ago | reply)
not doing it for me ... just doesn't look composed at all ...
delete4
BigFrank (79 months ago | reply)
If the car was incorporated into the composition (light trails or some other interesting contribution) instead of just poking into the frame as a distraction, this might work.
-voted as "delete3" (from the Delete Me Uncensored group)
Peter Gilbert [deleted] (79 months ago | reply)
Why Frank?
Coxee (79 months ago | reply)
Very interesting feedback. I was trying to give the impression that nobody was interested in the statement on the door. Some comments from me: I tried a slower shutter speed, but the pedestrian and car were blurred and you couldn't tell whether they were interested in the message. I actually liked this one most because it gave the impression that neither were the slightest bit interested. And landscape orientation introduced all sorts of distracting rubbish around the scene... Oh well, you lose some, you lose some!
zombizi prime [deleted] (79 months ago | reply)
I like the fact that the "Look Deeper" sign is being peered at by the cctv, the moodiness, the way it looks like an interior...don't like the stuff the moaning minnies don't like, but there's enough here for a save, I reckon...
save4
Matthew Bischoff (79 months ago | reply)
Great
save5
Dshalock® Libertarian Emperor of America (79 months ago | reply)
Been back to this one a couple of times. I like the way it turned out. Nice job.
-voted as "save5" (from the Delete Me Uncensored group)
kagoo_bythesea (79 months ago | reply)
Interesting photo and great study. The only thing that would prevent me from voting save, is that if I were looking through a book there is nothing to make me look at this picture twice. Then again---I have looked at this more than twice.
-voted as "save6" (from the Delete Me - Uncensored group)
brendadada (79 months ago | reply)
Voting correction - we are on Delete5 Save6
*Ivan* (79 months ago | reply)
We are on save7
-voted as "save7" (from the Delete Me Uncensored group)
covinichrome ☼ (79 months ago | reply)
I don't like that distracting piece of orange light. Otherwise it's very good.
delete6
Thunderchild7 (79 months ago | reply)
triffic good needs more traffic
delete7
Anthony Posey SIR:Poseyal Desposyni (79 months ago | reply)
-voted as "save8" (from the Delete Me - Uncensored group)
H@shim A ™ (79 months ago | reply)
The car in the foreground seems out of place and doesn't add to the image imho. I don't know if you could've, since the person was walking, but a tighter composition I think may have helped.
Good luck, voting is close...
delete8
Coxee (79 months ago | reply)
Blimey you are a tough bunch.
Paint Monkey (79 months ago | reply)
fabulous
-voted as "save9" (from the Delete Me Uncensored group)
Pig Sty Avenue (79 months ago | reply)
I've come back to this several times. I agree that the light above the words is a problem, but it's a forgivable one.
-voted as "save10" (from the Delete Me Uncensored group)
Coxee (79 months ago | reply)
Yey! Thanks all for the comments and encouragement.
andertho (79 months ago | reply)
really excellent
andertho added this photo to their favorites. (79 months ago)
gladtoseeyourback / The Imp Returns (79 months ago | reply)
And then, when you actually get round to voting, someone's already saved the picture.
brendadada (79 months ago | reply)
Congratulations, Coxee.
You may take this to the FOLIO!
- removed from pool
SPH (79 months ago | reply)
I like it
sululabelle added this photo to her favorites. (68 months ago)