Criminalizing Photographers?

Newer Older

Explore #192 - March 18th, 2009.
Vancouver, Canada

"Report the suspicious. Not the strange."

While I expected to see the ads implying that photographers are criminals in the UK, I did not expect to see them in my home city.

I am not impressed.

EDIT: Jhenifer from Translink's Buzzer Blog responds to our concerns about this new ad campaign here.

I'm still quite unhappy with Translink, but I appreciate her taking the time to respond to our concerns. Even if it was a brush-off.

Waxy caught my photo showing up under Explore/Places on the flickr.com homepage for Vancouver! Check it out!

--
Taken with my cameraphone on my way to work

sillygwailo, Chris Murray Photo, and 90 other people added this photo to their favorites.

View 20 more comments

  1. michaelspotts 49 months ago | reply

    The NYC Police Department has released a new document (as of 4/3/09) which reaffirms at least the rights of photographers in New York City. It's worth the read:

    www.rrphotoblog.com/2009/05/photographic-rights-in-nyc.html

    If you live in the States print it and keep it close.

  2. Gujjama 49 months ago | reply

    Hi, I'm an admin for a group called Nation Of Domination. (We Rule The Universe), and we'd love to have this added to the group!

  3. cjc4454 49 months ago | reply

    thanks for adding this to our group

    Seen in CAUGHT IN THE ACT~ OF FLICKR~ING!
    [http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3530/buddyicons/1005837@N23.jpg]

  4. TomRadiohead 49 months ago | reply

    Spy world meets Photography and viceversa

  5. Nick.Allen 49 months ago | reply

    great pic! i was harassed in nyc yesterday by the port authority police for taking 'innocent' photos inside the PATH station...not even of infrastructure, cameras, etc. i will have to check out the nypd @michaelspotts posted.

  6. stesib 49 months ago | reply

    Daft rules eh'
    Personally taking a photo of the security camera is irrelevant. Perhaps the only time they can moan is if you are taking a shot of what the camera can actually see.
    Just had to get a rant off my chest.

  7. Rippie: Contra Censura! 49 months ago | reply

    i think the warning is because taking a picture of a camera is like mirrors facing each other.

    everyone knows that's how you create a black hole, and we have enough time/space troubles nowadays.

    i see the point of the program, but believe they are illustrating it in a terrible way.

  8. PeteVonTews 49 months ago | reply

    American paranoia spreading. Shame on the deceiving powers to be.

  9. napolifd 47 months ago | reply

    I have taken photographs of Transit systems and was never caught nor questioned. The simple rule is just to be discreet

  10. Happy Tinfoil Cat 47 months ago | reply

    Oh yes, covertly taking photos is not suspicious at all. ;^) That is, unless you are caught.

  11. burnstuff2003 47 months ago | reply

    Hi, I'm an admin for a group called Hay you, stop taking photos UK, and we'd love to have this added to the group!

  12. Paul Excoff 47 months ago | reply

    I happen to like taking photos of security cameras!

  13. Digital Retina 43 months ago | reply

    so where do we report all the government cameras?

  14. safelyhome 42 months ago | reply

    they are doing this in nyc i hear too.its so you have to get permits like a movie to just take pics.....

  15. peterpur 26 months ago | reply

    invitation: if you want to be this kind of suspicious, let me invite you to sadproject.tv

keyboard shortcuts: previous photo next photo L view in light box F favorite < scroll film strip left > scroll film strip right ? show all shortcuts