You aren't signed in     Sign In    Help

Feminist conscientious objector

Feminist conscientious objector by Bright Tal (Political).
This is Idan Halili, one of the first women conscientious objectors in Israel to publicly claim the right to resist mandatory military service, on grounds of her feminist beliefs and conscience (in Israel military service is mandatory for both men and women).

This is a pictue I took of her standing next to an ad selling mobile phones to soldiers. In the fantasy world of advertising, soldiers are harmless kids playing with toy guns.

Back in the real world, Idan wrote a letter to the army, requesting a hearing before the military “conscience committee”, authorised to grant or deny conscientious exemptions from service.

The army refused her request.

UPDATES:

Idan was sentenced to two weeks’ imprisonment and appealed againt the army's refusal to grant her a hearing.

The appeal was successfuland Idan got a chance to be heard by a committe.
Idan's case attracted quite a lot of media attention in Israel, which must have casued quite a lot of embarrassment for the army.

Idan was exempted from military service on Tuesday 27 December 06.
The official reason given by army was that she was "not fit for military service".


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From Idan's letter to the army:

"A strongly patriarchal institution, like the army, underlines female marginality, on the one hand, and the superiority of male-identified values on the other. …

It might be said that a mood of sexual harassment is endemic to a patriarchal and hierarchical organization like the army. And so the demand that a woman
enlist is tantamount to demanding that she cope with sexual harassment within an environment that encourages such harassment.
Moreover, since the army is such a central institution in society, a culture of sexual harassment also is exported to and further entrenched in civic society. …

I as a feminist, feel I must avoid military service and act to limit and reduce the influence of the army on civic society. …

When men spend a formative period of their lives in the military they are likely to receive positive reinforcements for the use of power and violence, and to develop an indifferent attitude to the use of "mild" forms of violence …

In an organization whose main values include superiority and control, these behaviors are likely to be encouraged in the specific professional (military) activities, but also in interpersonal relations …

I cannot join an organization which, either directly or indirectly, encourages violence – of any form and kind – against women. There is, hence, a contradiction between my being a feminist and my ability to enlist. …

Army service would impose a way of life on me that is deeply contrary to my values and moral beliefs. … I cannot live in such flagrant denial of my conscience … "


המכתב המלא בעברית 

Comments

view profile

excauboi  Pro User  says:

Very interesting, Bright!
Posted 45 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Gadjo Dilo  Pro User  says:

Thank you, Idan.
Hopefuly, more good people will follow your example.
Posted 45 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

yish  Pro User  says:

Thanks!
The refuser solidarity network has circulated an appeal to support Idan's struggle. I've copied it on my blog.
Posted 45 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

velvetart says:

great shot- perfect setting.

good for her!
but I don't think she is the first.
Posted 45 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Bright Tal (Political) says:

thanks everyone.

velvetart, you're right of course, she's not the first one to request an exemption on feminist grounds, but she's one of the first to do so publicly (so I changed the text) and she also the first woman (to the best of my knowledge) who has been imprisoned as a result of her refusal on this ground.
Posted 44 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

velvetart says:

First not first- doesn't matter really. Either way she is doing the right thing! :)
Posted 44 months ago. ( permalink )

Mary Anne2006 [deleted] says:

Two WEEKS imprisonment!
(Does anyone know what the Palis do to people who won't fight! :-(
DOH! (If you DON'T know, google it-- hope you have a strong stomach!)

Or-- the Syrians, Egyptians, Saudis, Iranians, etc, etc.

DOUBLE DOH! (if you don't know, google it)

Oh-- AND they let her appeal that sentence (14 ENTIRE DAYS).

I wonder..which do you think is worse for women...life in Israel..OL... life here under Bush....

Oh-- and the upshot-- she was EXEMPTED from service! Do you think we should call Human Rights Watch? Amnesty International? N.O.W?

Do YOU really consider this so terrible? Do you have ANY idea how women are treated in DARFUR???? (or...ANY mid eastern country?)
Posted 43 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Bright Tal (Political) says:

Mary Anne2006's -

This is a success story.
A partial success, of course, but better that what one could expect.

Idan could have stayed in jail for longer than two weeks, like many other objectors do, but the army must have realised that with the media attention she attracted it's best for them to let her go.

By the way, Amnesty International did find this case worthy of their attention.

Things may be worse in other countries. But instead of dismissing some cases as "not so terrible", as you put it, why not show solidarity?
Posted 43 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

lakerae  Pro User  says:

A message from her Iranian supporters:

The following are excerpts from a rally of Iranian pilgrims in Mecca, aired on Iran's Channel 1 and Al-'Alam TV, on January 9, 2006. The speaker addresses the crowd in front of a backdrop showing the WorldTradeCenter and an American flag in flames.

TO VIEW THIS CLIP, VISIT: www.memritv.org/search.asp?ACT=S9&P1=991.

Crowd: "Israel is the enemy of Allah."

Man: "May the hands of the infidels be chopped off."

Crowd: "May the hands of the infidels be chopped off."

Man: "May the hands of the infidels be chopped off."

Crowd: "May the hands of the infidels be chopped off."

Man: "[Chopped off] from the land of the believers."

Crowd: "From the land of the believers."

Man: "The audience will now split into two groups: One group will settle the score with America, and the other will settle the score with Israel. This group now: Death to America!"

Crowd: "Death to America!"

Man: "Death to Israel!"

Crowd: "Death to Israel! Death to America!"

Man: "Death to America!"

Crowd: "Death to America!"

Man: "Death to America!"

Crowd: "Death to Israel! Death to America!" Death to Israel!"

Man: "All together now: Death to America! Death to Israel!"

Crowd: "Death to America! Death to Israel! Death to America! Death to Israel! Death to America! Death to Israel! Death to America! Death to Israel!"
Posted 42 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Bright Tal (Political) says:

lakerae - the enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.
Posted 42 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

lakerae  Pro User  says:

No doubt about that! Things are sure to improve when Israel benefits from a fine government like that of Palestine, or Lebanon, or Syria or Egypt, or nevermind. BTW: you have lots of enemies proudly calling for your elimination, but whoever your friends are they're a mighty quiet bunch.

BTW: assume you know what happened to the Palestinians, do you know what happened to the Jewish populations of North Africa, the Middle East and the Arabian Penninsula?(which by the way, rather dwarves the numbers of displaced Palestinians-not that either makes the other okay, just that it is a very, very salient fact in this matter and receives zero recognition and consideration)

Hey I'm just an infidel, wishing all parties luck in working it all out to your mutual satisfaction.
Posted 42 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Golden Striker says:

Call me silly, but this is desertion, and usually deserters are shot. If she doesn't love Israel, I suggest she STFU and leave it.
Posted 39 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Bright Tal (Political) says:

Golden Striker - How should she leave Israel and where should she go to? To a country without an army and without sexism? Name one.
Posted 39 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Bright Tal (Political) says:

There has been an article on Idan in The Guardian:
www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1755295,00 .html

Also see this entry in Aron's Israeli Peace Weblog:
www.israelblog.org/1145751165/index_html
Posted 39 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Johnnie Rotten or My Little Pony are both sick says:

There is no institution in Israel that can approach the army’s ability to disseminate images and news or to shape a national political class and an academic elite or to produce memory, history, value, wealth, desire. This is the way identification becomes entrenched: not through dictatorship or draconian legislation, but by virtue of the fact that the country’s most powerful institution gets its hands on every citizen at the age of 18. The majority of Israelis identify with the army and the army reciprocates by consolidating our identity, especially when it is – or we are – waging war.
www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n16/laor01_.html
Posted 35 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Golden Striker says:

That's like saying they have control over the psyche of everyone who serves in the military. If that were true then we'd have millions of ex-military drones wandering around the US, because we certainly have our own share of people who went into the military at age 18. Not all of them have the impression the army is great or the US is some kind of ultimate nation. I doubt it's any different in Israel. You probably also think every last Israeli is in the army and served three months of active duty every year, right? Nothing could be father from the truth. The days of universal military service are gone, and there are a lot fewer people in the IDF than you might think as a percentage of the Israeli population.
Posted 35 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Bright Tal (Political) says:

Golden Striker - your final comments raise the question of why the military service should still be mandatory in Israel? If the army can manage quite well with less and less soldiers each year (which is true statistically), then why not turn it into a professional army, like in many other countries?

I'm afraid at least one of the answers to this question has to do with the need of the army to control public life in Israel (as Johnnie Rotten said above). A national institution is very different and much more powerful than a professional army. Its hegemony is extremely difficult to challenge. Still, attitudes are changing very slowly, and this is why public acts like Idan's are significant, in my opinion.
Posted 35 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Golden Striker says:

I will grant you this: Manadatory military service impresses upon the nation that Israel is still surrounded by it's blood enemies who would destroy it in a heartbeat if they could, and have in fact tried that at leat once so far. Israel's survival is tied to keeping that fact front and center in it's psyche. I think one reason the service is sitilll mandatory is to help keep a huge and necessary reserve on hand.

Just FYI, active duty in the IDF is not what it is in the US. Israel is such a small country that soldiers are often able to go home and spend a day or two or even a weekend with their families quite frequently, they can travel wherever they want in under 3 hours on leave (yes the country is that small) and they're often not confined to bases and isolated from the rest of society as they serve. A solider can go to a neighborhood burger place on their lunch break, for instance. They used to have a problem with soldiers all too frequently ordering pizzas to the road checkpoints they were manning. It's not even a long distance call to talk to their families from anywhere in the country. In the IDF, it's not as though they get sent thousands of miles from home and have to serve in a foreign country away from al that is familiar to them for years on end. It's a lot different from the US militray experience.

Isreal does have a standing army with many career full time soldiers and officers, they also just have a huge reserve. It used to be that if you were unfit for combat, by some handicap or diabetes or something like that, the military was not going to seek you as amamber, but it was still considered dishonorable if you did not volunteer for and serve in an administrative or support capacity. Now they no longer take such volunteers. Even a diabetic like me who could fix jeeps for them would not be able to lend a hand even in that role if I wanted to. And if your 3 months per year service as an active duty soldier comes up and you're out of the country at the time, they just let it go and do not make you serve it when you get back. Plenty of peopel used to just go to India and hang out for three months at rather than serve actively during that time. There used to be a huge stigma atached to doing that, now no one cares.
Posted 35 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

godlessheathen_still says:

I'm glad the US no longer has the draft! (Umm...so far, anyway) I don't see the difference between mandatory military service and slavery - or I guess it's indentured servitude if they pay you. Still, I think people should have a right to choose, especially when it comes to whether or not to let someone train you to become a killing machine. I know, the military has its uses, it's necessary to have, but that's what they do - train you to kill. That's the main purpose - one that has to be emotionally traumatizing to anyone with a conscience. It SHOULD be voluntary only.
Posted 30 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Golden Striker says:

I think there is one vital fact about living in Israel that you need to know, and that is the state is surrounded on all sides (exceot where they have a coastline) by it's sworn, bloodthirsty enemies who have called for it's outright destruction and attempted to effect that very thing on several occasions. Now, you ask why one should not be able to choose whether or not they serve in the military. I'll enlighten you; it's because you don't have the choice of NOT getting raped to death, having your country destroyed, your relatives murdered in front of you and everything your nation has accomplished in the last sixty years ground into the dirt. That's why.

The society in which Israelis live has every single last right on the face of the earth right to make demands on them to assure the continued safety and survival of it's people. Undiscipluned, spoiled Americans are so used to "choice" as a perceived birthright they have also forgotten one other, more important virtue: Obligation.
Posted 30 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

omer_raviv says:

I understand "conscientious objection" that stems from pacifism. But saying that the army "encourages sexual harrassment", well, that's just ludicrous.
Posted 30 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

urik88 says:

Israel is a country surrounded by enemies and if the military service wasn't obligatory, then Israel would be destroyed in just some days.
What she does is desertion and in other countries deserters are shot.
And as a feminist she should support the obligatory military service for girls, as it shows that girls are as good as men.
Everybody in Israel does the military service and share it's part for the survival of the country. If she doesn't want to do the military service, she doesn't have the right to live in Israel.
Posted 28 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Sylvain Sylvain  Pro User  says:

Hi, I'm an admin for a group called REVENDICATION SHOTS, and we'd love to have your photo added to the group.
Posted 28 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Shubnam - http://www.shubnamgill.com/ says:

Hi, I'm an admin for a group called Art for Oppressed Women, and we'd love to have your photo added to the group.
Posted 25 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Ana Karla says:

Thank you for sharing. This is beautiful.
Posted 24 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

incurable_hippie  Pro User  says:

Hi, I'm an admin for a group called Feminist Art & Documentary, and we'd love to have your photo added to the group.
Posted 21 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

kilo one five says:

You coward! What do you think living under Moslem rule would be like? Would they respect your Feminism? Do your duty. Its not against being female to be a soldier. Infact, it should be part of being equal. Do not expect only the men to defend the nation, do your part as well.

You make me sick, coward scum. You should be shot by 12 men at dawn.
Posted 20 months ago. ( permalink )

Would you like to comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

[?]

Bright Tal (Political)'s photostream

61
uploads

This photo also belongs to:

Stories (Set)

12
items

Peace (Pool)

Promote Peace (Pool)

Feminism (Pool)

Potentially Radical Social Change (Pool)

War: memories, fears, nightmares, ghosts. (Pool)

Protests and Demonstrations (Pool)

=== The Israel Project === (Pool)

Pictures With Stories - 5 sentence MINIMUM (Pool)

Protests, Political Art, Democracy, Social Change (Pool)

Women Rights (Pool)

War (Pool)

AntiWar: Pictures that Protest the Madness. (Pool)

Alternative News (Pool)

Human Rights (Pool)

Middle East (Pool)

Study War No More! (Pool)

Politics on flickr : Standing With Free iran (Pool)

Tags

Click this icon to see all public photos and videos tagged with war war

Additional Information

AttributionNoncommercialShare Alike Some rights reserved Anyone can see this photo

Add to your map