I urge you to withdraw the nomination of
Islam Siddiqui as Chief Agriculture
Negotiator and to reconsider your support of
Roger Beachy as director of the new National
Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA).
Siddiqui is CropLife’s current vice president
of science and regulatory affairs, and until
last month, Beachy was the head of Monsanto’s
de facto nonprofit research arm. As two
textbook cases of the “revolving door”
between industry and the agencies meant to
keep watch, Siddiqui and Beachy’s industry
ties demonstrate that both men are too
beholden to corporate agriculture to serve
the public interest.
Appointing Siddiqui to this critical post
within the U.S. Trade Representative’s office
sends a clear signal to the rest of the world
that the U.S. plans to continue down the worn
and failed path of chemical-intensive
industrial agriculture by pushing pesticides,
inappropriate biotechnologies and unfair
trade arrangements on nations that do not
want and can least afford them. Siddiqui’s
professional record is revealing on several
points:
•Siddiqui was a paid lobbyist for 3
years for Croplife America, which represents
the chemical pesticide industry. Members
include Monsanto, DuPont and Syngenta.
•CropLife America's regional partner
notoriously “shuddered” at Michelle Obama's
organic White House garden, and launched a
letter-writing campaign urging the First Lady
to use chemical pesticides.
•CropLife America has consistently
lobbied the U.S government to weaken and
thwart international treaties governing the
use and export of toxic chemicals such as
PCBs, DDT and dioxins.
•Siddiqui’s past service at the USDA
included overseeing the initial development
of national organic food standards that would
have allowed GMOs and toxic sludge to be
labeled “organic”— until over 230,000
consumers forced their revision.
As the global food crisis deepens and we
head into the Doha round of trade talks at
the WTO, the U.S. needs a lead negotiator who
understands that current trade agreements
work neither for farmers nor for the world’s
hungry. All eyes are on the U.S. to
demonstrate international leadership in this
arena by withdrawing support for the current
industrial model of agriculture, which
imperils both people and the planet by
undermining food security and worsening
climate change.
In his capacity as director of NIFA, Roger
Beachy will be in charge of the nation’s
agricultural research agenda and purse
strings for the next six years. Given
Beachy’s previous career running the Danforth
Plant Science Center, a nonprofit closely
linked to and funded by Monsanto, we believe
that billions more in government funding will
be funneled into genetic engineering and
chemical pesticide research. Meanwhile the
real solutions to our growing agricultural
problems, provided by sustainable and organic
agriculture research, will suffer from a lack
of federal funding and attention.
Despite 20 years of research and 13 years of
commercialization, agricultural
biotechnology—of the kind aggressively
promoted and marketed by CropLife—has failed
to deliver its promises of higher yields for
U.S. farmers, or drought-resistance for
developing country farmers. What Monsanto’s
research agenda has yielded is skyrocketing
herbicide use, resistant “super-weeds”,
rising debt for farmers, polluted waterways,
threats to the health of farmworkers and
rural communities, and unparalleled corporate
consolidation in the agrochemical and seed
industries. The top 10 agribusinesses control
89% of the agrochemicals market, 66% of the
modern biotech market and 67% of the global
seed market.
With farmers here and abroad struggling to
respond to water scarcity and increasingly
volatile growing conditions, we need a
resilient and restorative model of
agriculture that adapts to and mitigates
these effects of climate change. In the most
comprehensive analysis of global agriculture
to date, the International Assessment of
Agricultural Knowledge, Science and
Technology for Development (IAASTD) states
unequivocally that “business as usual is not
an option.” We need a new, sustainable model
of agriculture that regenerates soil health,
sequesters carbon, feeds communities, and
puts profits back in the hands of farmers and
rural communities. Industrial agriculture—and
Roger Beachy, Islam Siddiqui and CropLife in
particular—favor none of these solutions.
While I appreciate your Administration’s
recent gestures in support of local food
systems, I fear these initiatives will not
fulfill their potential unless the
monopolistic power and political influence of
the agricultural input industry is addressed
and curtailed. I therefore respectfully ask
you to withdraw your appointments of Siddiqui
and Beachy, and replace them with candidates
who have a sustainable vision for U.S.
agriculture and trade.
I remember your promise on the campaign
trail: “We’ll tell ConAgra that it’s not the
Department of Agribusiness. It’s the
Department of Agriculture. We’re going to put
the people’s interests ahead of the special
interests.” I am writing to hold you to that
promise.
Posted 5 days ago.
( permalink
)
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Guest Passes let you share your photos that aren't public. Anyone can see your public photos anytime, whether they're a Flickr member or not. But! If you want to share photos marked as friends, family or private, use a Guest Pass. If you're sharing photos from a set, you can create a Guest Pass that includes any of your photos marked as friends, family, or private. If you're sharing your entire photostream, you can create a Guest Pass that includes photos marked as friends or family (but not your private photos). Learn more about Guest Passes![?]
Prunila says:
I urge you to withdraw the nomination of Islam Siddiqui as Chief Agriculture Negotiator and to reconsider your support of Roger Beachy as director of the new National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA). Siddiqui is CropLife’s current vice president of science and regulatory affairs, and until last month, Beachy was the head of Monsanto’s de facto nonprofit research arm. As two textbook cases of the “revolving door” between industry and the agencies meant to keep watch, Siddiqui and Beachy’s industry ties demonstrate that both men are too beholden to corporate agriculture to serve the public interest.
Appointing Siddiqui to this critical post within the U.S. Trade Representative’s office sends a clear signal to the rest of the world that the U.S. plans to continue down the worn and failed path of chemical-intensive industrial agriculture by pushing pesticides, inappropriate biotechnologies and unfair trade arrangements on nations that do not want and can least afford them. Siddiqui’s professional record is revealing on several points:
•Siddiqui was a paid lobbyist for 3 years for Croplife America, which represents the chemical pesticide industry. Members include Monsanto, DuPont and Syngenta.
•CropLife America's regional partner notoriously “shuddered” at Michelle Obama's organic White House garden, and launched a letter-writing campaign urging the First Lady to use chemical pesticides.
•CropLife America has consistently lobbied the U.S government to weaken and thwart international treaties governing the use and export of toxic chemicals such as PCBs, DDT and dioxins.
•Siddiqui’s past service at the USDA included overseeing the initial development of national organic food standards that would have allowed GMOs and toxic sludge to be labeled “organic”— until over 230,000 consumers forced their revision.
As the global food crisis deepens and we head into the Doha round of trade talks at the WTO, the U.S. needs a lead negotiator who understands that current trade agreements work neither for farmers nor for the world’s hungry. All eyes are on the U.S. to demonstrate international leadership in this arena by withdrawing support for the current industrial model of agriculture, which imperils both people and the planet by undermining food security and worsening climate change.
In his capacity as director of NIFA, Roger Beachy will be in charge of the nation’s agricultural research agenda and purse strings for the next six years. Given Beachy’s previous career running the Danforth Plant Science Center, a nonprofit closely linked to and funded by Monsanto, we believe that billions more in government funding will be funneled into genetic engineering and chemical pesticide research. Meanwhile the real solutions to our growing agricultural problems, provided by sustainable and organic agriculture research, will suffer from a lack of federal funding and attention.
Despite 20 years of research and 13 years of commercialization, agricultural biotechnology—of the kind aggressively promoted and marketed by CropLife—has failed to deliver its promises of higher yields for U.S. farmers, or drought-resistance for developing country farmers. What Monsanto’s research agenda has yielded is skyrocketing herbicide use, resistant “super-weeds”, rising debt for farmers, polluted waterways, threats to the health of farmworkers and rural communities, and unparalleled corporate consolidation in the agrochemical and seed industries. The top 10 agribusinesses control 89% of the agrochemicals market, 66% of the modern biotech market and 67% of the global seed market.
With farmers here and abroad struggling to respond to water scarcity and increasingly volatile growing conditions, we need a resilient and restorative model of agriculture that adapts to and mitigates these effects of climate change. In the most comprehensive analysis of global agriculture to date, the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) states unequivocally that “business as usual is not an option.” We need a new, sustainable model of agriculture that regenerates soil health, sequesters carbon, feeds communities, and puts profits back in the hands of farmers and rural communities. Industrial agriculture—and Roger Beachy, Islam Siddiqui and CropLife in particular—favor none of these solutions.
While I appreciate your Administration’s recent gestures in support of local food systems, I fear these initiatives will not fulfill their potential unless the monopolistic power and political influence of the agricultural input industry is addressed and curtailed. I therefore respectfully ask you to withdraw your appointments of Siddiqui and Beachy, and replace them with candidates who have a sustainable vision for U.S. agriculture and trade.
I remember your promise on the campaign trail: “We’ll tell ConAgra that it’s not the Department of Agribusiness. It’s the Department of Agriculture. We’re going to put the people’s interests ahead of the special interests.” I am writing to hold you to that promise.
Posted 5 days ago. ( permalink )