wow! my question though is how early did you
mean by early? I recently went to see the taj
and was there at 8:30 and the crowd was large
already!!
Posted 35 months ago.
( permalink
)
~I SNIFFED out this wonderful image!
You deserve this nose worthy award!
Please ADD your
Impressively beautiful
photo to~ Impressed by your Beauty! (Invite only
images) Please tag your photos ImpressedBeauty [?]
Posted 35 months ago.
( permalink
)
Wow. How did you manage it? I've rarely
seen the place this empty, and never when it
was open for tourists- most publicity shots
and postcards even seem to be taken while
they closed it and cleared it out for special
events. I mean, I can see that there are a
couple of people there, but they totally
vanish if you aren't looking for them. It's
an absolutely lovely shot, just stunning, of
one of my favorite places. Excellent job.
Posted 35 months ago.
( permalink
)
I was wondering if we could use this
beautiful image on Wikipedia. You would have
to change the license to creative commons
sharealike attribution. You would be given
credit, of course, and a link would be placed
to this site. Thanks for all your help.
how many of you knew that Taj Mahal is a
turkish structure made by the turkish king
"Shah Jihan" for his wife?
sadly enough, the marbels of this beautiful
structure are getting more and more yellowish
each day although they were designed to stay
white forever.
Posted 30 months ago.
( permalink
)
Hi. I wanted to let you know that I'm using
this photo, in accorance with the Creative
Commons License, on my blog: weeklymobilegoodies.blogspot.com
Posted 30 months ago.
( permalink
)
Hoping to be interested to all of you I am
forwarding the "Fact About
Tajmahal" forwarded to me by one of my
friend, can't comment on or verify it's
authenticity.
"Do you know your history The Moghul
Emperor Shah Jahan in the memory of his wife
Mumtaz Mahal built the Taj Mahal.
It was built in 22 years (1631 to 1653) by
20,000 artisans brought to India from all
over the world. Many people believe Ustad Isa
of Iran designed it. This is what your guide
probably told you if you ever visited the Taj
Mahal. This is the story I read in my history
book as a student in India.
No one has ever challenged it except
Professor P.N. Oak, who believes the whole
world has been duped. In his book - Taj
Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal
is not Queen Mumtaz Mahal's tomb but an
ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva
(then known as Tejo Mahalaya). In the course
of his research, Oak discovered the Shiva
temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from
then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. Shah
Jahan then remodeled the palace into his
wife's memorial. In his own court chronicle,
Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an
exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra
was taken from Jai Singh for Mumtaz's burial.
The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in
his secret collection two orders from Shah
Jahan for surrendering the Taj building.
Using captured temples and mansions, as a
burial place for dead courtiers and royalty
was a common practice among Muslim rulers.
For example, Humayun, Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula
and Safdarjung are all buried in such
mansions. Oak's inquiries begin with the name
Taj Mahal. He says this term does not occur
in any Moghul court papers or chronicles,
even after ShahJahan's time. The term
"Mahal" has never been used for a
building in any of the Muslim countries, from
Afghanistan to Algeria.
"The unusual explanation that the term
Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal is
illogical in at least two respects. Firstly,
her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but
Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes.
"Secondly, one cannot omit the first
three letters 'Mum' from a woman's name to
derive the remainder as the name for the
building." The Taj Mahal, he claims, is
a corrupt version of Tejo-Mahalaya, or the
Shiva's Palace. Oak also says the love story
of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale
created by court sycophants, blundering
historians and sloppy archaeologists. Not a
single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time
corroborates the love story. Furthermore, Oak
cites several documents suggesting the Taj
Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a
temple palace dedicated to Shiva worshipped
by the Rajputs of Agra city.
For example, Professor Marvin Miller of New
York took a few samples from the riverside
doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests
revealed that the door was 300 years older
than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan
Albert Mandelslo, who visited Agra in 1638
(only seven years after Mumtaz's death),
describes the life of the city in his
memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj
Mahal being built. The writings of Peter
Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a
year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj
was a noteworthy building long well before
Shah Jahan's time.
Oak points out a number of design and
architectural inconsistencies that support
the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical
Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many
rooms in the Taj Mahal have remained sealed
since Shah Jahan's time, and are still
inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they
contain a headless statue of Shiva and other
objects commonly used for worship rituals in
Hindu temples.
Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's
government tried to have Oak's book withdrawn
from the bookstores, and threatened the
Indian publisher of the first edition with
dire consequences. There is only one way to
discredit or validate Oak's research. The
current Indian government should open the
sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under UN
supervision, and let international experts
investigate.
Posted 30 months ago.
( permalink
)
Hi, and thanks for licensing this image as
CC-BY-SA! Your choice of a free license has
allowed us to use this image in Wikimedia Commons, and to illustrate articles in 24+ different
language versions of Wikipedia.
Posted 27 months ago.
( permalink
)
sorry bout that. its been fixed. since this
image was nominated for featured picture (the
best on wiki),many users edited the info and
also some added wrong info . thanks for ur
concern. great image, its on many other
language wikis as well.
Posted 26 months ago.
( permalink
)
the colors make it feel like a painting.
really great. Do you remember how old your
ektachrome film was?
Posted 25 months ago.
( permalink
)
borishnokov [deleted] says:
You've taken such a well-documented landmark
and have managed to make it stunning despite
all the times it's previously been viewed
elsewhere.
Posted 24 months ago.
( permalink
)
thanks akinremi, the funny thing is that it's
such a conventional shot of the taj mahal. i
find it quite boring actually, but i guess
it's the time of day, film type that make it.
Posted 24 months ago.
( permalink
)
This is so good that it's hard to believe
it's taken with Lubitel!!! :) This picture
makes me regret I get rid of my Lubi.... :(
Really WONDERFUL job on this one.
Respect!
Posted 11 months ago.
( permalink
)
Well that's just gorgeous.
Posted 4 hours ago.
( permalink
)
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
Guest Passes let you share your photos that aren't public. Anyone can see your public photos anytime, whether they're a Flickr member or not. But! If you want to share photos marked as friends, family or private, use a Guest Pass. If you're sharing photos from a set, you can create a Guest Pass that includes any of your photos marked as friends, family, or private. If you're sharing your entire photostream, you can create a Guest Pass that includes photos marked as friends or family (but not your private photos). Learn more about Guest Passes![?]
MARTYr Photo says:
The more I look at this, the less I believe it's actually a photograph. It's incredible.
Posted 35 months ago. ( permalink )