You aren't signed in     Sign In    Help

Internet censorship in UAE

www.faithfreedom.org

FREEDOM OF FAITH - inconsistent with moral values of the United Arab Emirates!
We apologize the site you are attempting to visit has been blocked due to its content being inconsistent with the religious, cultural, political and moral values of the United Arab Emirates.
Internet censorship in UAE by alarch.
Internet censorship in the United Arab Emirates.
Cenzura Internetu ve Spojených arabských emirátech.

Religion is a bad bad thing, especially when it is powerful enough to enforce censorship of competing ideas. In United Arab Emirates all sites not compatible with the state religion (Islam) are blocked. I am very happy Christianity in Europe lost most of its former power centuries ago...

Náboženství je zlo, zvláště pokud má dost sil prosadit persekuci konkurenčních myšlenek. Ve Spojených arabských emirátech jsou blokovány všechny weby nekompatibilní se státním náboženstvím - islámem. Jsem moc rád, že evropské křesťanství ztratilo většinu své moci již před staletími... 
This photo has notes. Move your mouse over the photo to see them.

Comments

view profile

khalid says:

Many secular states ban hate literature, child pornography, obscene materials as well. There's nothing wrong with having community standards, so long as they allow important critical thought to have its dialogue. And atheistic secularism can be just as 'bad bad' if not worse than religious extremism; someone from your part of the world ought to be especially aware of that.
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

alarch says:

UAE doesn't censor child pornography or hate speech. It bans free speech about religion. And sorry, I do not see how secularism can be worse than religious extremism. Secularism doesn't kill, it doesn't censor Internet. And here in Europe, I can access any page I want to. There are no censor screens.

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." ~Voltaire
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

khalid says:

Secularism is sometimes just another form of religion, with its own dogmas, it own views on truth and human nature. Non-religious regimes, such as Stalin's and Mao's, and perhaps Hitler's, are responsible for the majority of killings in the last century.

In Europe, it is still illegal in many countries to display or sell pro-Nazi propaganda, online or off. In Canada, hate speech is outlawed. The faithfreedom site above isn't a reasonable web site criticizing religion; it is a hate speech site whose contents greatly resemble the anti-Jewish writings of 1930s Germany. It doesn't offer intelligent, rational critiques of religion, such as that of Bertrand Russell, but is clearly motivated more by hate than by truth.

"Their round eyes, their flat nose, their lips which are always thick, their differently shaped ears, the wool on their head, the measure even of their intelligence establishes between them and other species of men prodigious differences. ... If their understanding is not of a different nature from ours, it is at least greatly inferior. They are not capable of any great application or association of ideas, and seem formed neither in the advantages nor the abuses of our philosophy.... As a result of a hierarchy of nations, Negroes are thus slaves of other men ... a people that sells its own children is more condemnable than the buyer; this commerce demonstrates our superiority; he who gives himself a master was born to have one." ~Voltaire, speaking about black people.

"An Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over a black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action." ~Muhammad, pbuh

‘I do not permit priests to concern themselves with politics.' ~Adolf Hitler, Tischgespräche

The great BBC documentary Century of the Self is an excellent introduction to thought control in democratic countries; highly recommended!
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

alarch says:

It may be illegal to DISPLAY nazi content in some European countries, but it is certainly not illegal to READ it, and I can reach any nazi/whatever page whenever I want to without any problems (although it is usually of course waste of time to read stupid nazi propaganda).

Secularism is not religion. In my country, there are atheists (most people), christians, muslims, buddhists, taoists, wiccans, satanists... You can read, write, online or offline about any of these religions (including very harsh criticism) and nobody censors it. We call that freedom of speech and religious tolerance.

When I was browsing the web using the Internet provider located in the UAE, almost every other web site I tried to access was censored. I consider that violation of basic human rights.
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

khalid says:

Well, it seems that the UAE is just blocking the display of hate materials. Do you know if it is really illegal to read them there? I'm sure many UAE citizens have read such material (even through the internet, there are many proxy servers which make it possible) without fear of arrest.

I didn't make a general statement about all secular regimes. I just pointed out that secularism can be taken to extremes, where it starts to involves impositions on people. Stalin and Mao are examples of extremism without religion in the traditional sense. The anti-immigrant bias in parts of modern-day Europe has led to laws banning certain forms of Muslim expression-- in the area of dress, for example.

Similarly, you shouldn't make overly general statements about religion. Is religious extremism a problem? Yes, a religious Muslim would agree that it is a problem. The problem isn't religion per se, but the extremism and the misapplication. Is censorship in the UAE too broad? Perhaps it is; I don't know the breadth of what they censor. Is censorship in the UAE due entirely to religion? No, there are other factors at play there too. My point is: your generalizations about religion are much too broad and fails to take into account the complexities of the world.

best regards!
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

alarch says:

The problem is that while secular states can be good or bad (the problem of regimes of Stalin/Hitler was not secularism but communism/nazism), theocracies almost always use censorship, they are undemocratic and very often evil (anywhere in the world, European theocracies were probably some of the worst regimes that ever existed). That is why separation of church and state is a very good thing.

I do not have anything against religion if it is not enforced and if I am free to choose (and read about) any religion I want to.
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Naty Rive says:

Congratulations! This photo won its 3Way Challenge!
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

khalid says:

Well, the UAE isn't a theocracy-- it's a monarchy. Church and state are indeed separate; in fact, in Sunni Islam there isn't any Church to speak of whatsoever. Religious people are actually a little disturbed by how materialistic the UAE has become. In practice, it's very similar to Singapore, which is officially a democracy and which also bans access to material it considers anti-social.
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

alarch says:

Well theocracy is probably not the best word and it is little overemphasizing, but the point is that in the UAE religion has much more power over the state, its laws, government, community standards etc. than anywhere in Europe.
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

John Mark van Rozendaal  Pro User  says:

khalid wrote: "Well, it seems that the UAE is just blocking the display of hate materials."

I have had a look at the faithfreedom website, and I cannot find anything that I would recognize as "hate materials."
Posted 36 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

dtarpennation  Pro User  says:

Khalid and Alarch: Thank you both so much for the interesting and riveting intellectual discourse. Certainly, it is always a good idea to NEVER make broad, sweeping generalization; I've learned this the hard way, too. But what I really enjoyed was that neither of you resorted to yelling (at least I didn't percieve any) or flinging epithets at one another. Truly, inspiring dialogue and intellectually stimulating discourse. Thank you both for your perspectives.
Posted 35 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

krishna109: 2007 says:

Are they just blocking hate materials? It seem that the UAE is also blocking Flickr . . . ?
Posted 34 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

Chrstopher  Pro User  says:

"it is always a good idea to NEVER make broad, sweeping generalization"

Isn't that a sweeping generalization? ;-) sorry couldn't resist!
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

toothycat  Pro User  says:

"And here in Europe, I can access any page I want to. There are no censor screens."

Technically true, yes. You just get arrested instead.
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

FleaCircusDirector says:

Is it possible to test if your site meets the required standards? For example I've tagged aToyshop site with RDF labels but I'm not sure if anyone uses them.
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

mr robbit says:

The problem with one country blocking "inappropriate" content, which largely a free speech issue, is you allow unenlightened control freaks who decide what content is suitable for you to read, view and/or enjoy on the Internet. That is not acceptable and these unenlightened control freaks wanted to control how you live your life because you let them!

The role of a democratic government is to ACKNOWLEDGE and PROTECT your right to free speech, freedom of expression and the free practice of any religion, NOT impose their decisions ON YOU on viewing, reading, enjoying, making and/or following whatever you, as a human being, are allowed to do so. The prevention is an act of DISCRIMINATION against your right as a human being.

Your government, in blocking such contents, would rather dumb you down so to avoid any information from the Internet that might be deemed as "provocative" or "inappropriate", when such information is usually criticism being demonstrated against your government's decisions to control your life and/or the government's inappropriate or criminal actions against the people. By blocking such contents is to allow the government to get away with crime, murder, or violence upon people.

Only YOU decide what is appropriate and what is not appropriate, not your government's (or your monarch's). If you see a hate material on the Net, you do not complain to the government or to a group, you just dismiss it and MOVE ON. Leave whatever hate material to someone dumb enough to believe in or wallow in it.

I have seen some hate materials on the Internet that I thought it was really inappropriate. So what did I do? I dismiss them and move on, not complain to the authorities like a crybaby. So grow up, be intelligent and have a backbone.

Khalid, it has absolutely NOTHING to do with politics, religious beliefs or "ism" concepts, it has to do with you allowing unenlightened control freaks to control and dictate your life. Understand?
Posted 13 months ago. ( permalink )

view profile

anmarkovi says:

Hi, is it ok if I use this image in the article I'm writing about freedom of speach on the internet on my site web dizajn? It would be much appreciated ...
Posted 8 months ago. ( permalink )

Would you like to comment?

Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).

[?]
view photos Uploaded on December 11, 2006
by alarch

alarch's photostream

46
uploads

This photo also belongs to:

Geeky stuff (Set)

2
items

Screenshots (Pool)

Freedom From Religion (Pool)

3Way Challenge (Pool)

Tags

Click this icon to see all public photos and videos tagged with uae uae
Click this icon to see all public photos and videos tagged with web web

Additional Information

All rights reserved Anyone can see this photo

Add to your map