daily dirty diapers >= size of baby - _MG_6851
used here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here
joslyn and cameron sent us a big supply of hypo-allergenic, chlorine-free, environmentally-friendly disposable diapers. last night when i undressed sequoia for his bath, i realized that the volume of his daily diaper output far exceeds the size of his tiny body. even sequoia appears impressed with this accomplishment. thanks for the lovely gift joslyn & cameron! (as you can see, your gift has been thoroughly enjoyed).
copyright © 2006 sean dreilinger
follow me! FB / twitter / G+
view daily dirty diapers >= size of baby - _MG_6851 on a black background.
Comments and faves
noromdiam (66 months ago | reply)
Uh...diaper genie?
bbq cupcake [deleted] (66 months ago | reply)
holy cripes.
O_o
nanna anna (66 months ago | reply)
Isn't technology great? Imagine what it must have been like back in the olden days when most babies used cloth diapers. I heard about a set of twins that used a total of 28 dozen cloth diapers every single week, and their parents didn't even have a washing machine!
isle of beara (66 months ago | reply)
this photo should be on the cover of national geographic. sequoia's expression is incredible!
sean dreilinger (65 months ago | reply)
wait, 28 dozen diapers / week works out to 24 diapers per baby per day. for real?
gardenhoe (65 months ago | reply)
Please add this excellent moment to Marshmallow Supper
laura47 added this photo to her favorites. (64 months ago)
sarah. reed. (63 months ago | reply)
how did i miss this photo!!!???
LOL
sarah. reed. added this photo to her favorites. (63 months ago)
meanjean (54 months ago | reply)
lolol!
poppa chips (53 months ago | reply)
Photo caption: Baby Sequoia and the Baby Sequoia Golum.
Sean, the high count of cloth diapers/day (and diapers washed each week) is partly due to
* the thread-bare condition of the diapers (some probably
handed down from their older sibling, who shall remain
Sean); and partly due to
* the remarkable 'productiveness' of the twins, who were
mighty thirsty kids, seldom seen wobbling around without
a bottle or tippy-cup of one fluid or another.
Consequently, the twins often faced the world each wearing
two diapers.
KnitStorm (47 months ago | reply)
lol! that's INSANE! very cute baby btw...
sean dreilinger (47 months ago | reply)
thanks shutterkate!
Got.Moxie2 and gabeadrienne added this photo to their favorites.
gabeadrienne (44 months ago | reply)
Too funny!
DILO! added this photo to his favorites. (44 months ago)
DILO! (44 months ago | reply)
I understand you!!!!!! my baby is sponsored by Pampers!!!! ;-)))))
Matt Hixson (40 months ago | reply)
that is the most heroin ive ever seen.
that baby is going to be rich as hell.
miss.love (40 months ago | reply)
i heard breast milk is a gateway drug, but i never thought my own infant would be dealing smack!
@_natashaleigh, youngspiritfoundation, and Neeta Lind added this photo to their favorites.
Neeta Lind (31 months ago | reply)
I have a photo from 1976 of Rachel about this age that looks identical to Sequoia's expression. I need to find it and scan it. Will post here someday when I do.
han_frgg added this photo to their favorites. (29 months ago)
Luv, Walter & Sophie (29 months ago | reply)
What a beautiful baby! (and a beautiful name too!) Cute idea for the picture.
berta.liao and Yannou added this photo to their favorites.
Yannou (26 months ago | reply)
This is a great demonstration of the nonsense of our society. Let's build a wolrd covered with trash for our children to grow up. Let's change these habits and use washable diapers.
Dr Beary / Disposal Alternatives (26 months ago | reply)
Washable diapers? EWWWW YUCK, how disgusting!
Let's just learn how to recycle www.knowaste.com
KnitStorm (26 months ago | reply)
Agreed Yannou. I cloth diaper my little guy. It's ridiculously easy and cheaper than disposables in the long run. I'm never turning back!
Dr Beary / Disposal Alternatives (24 months ago | reply)
Ahhhh?
Whats wrong with this pic???
A little photo-shopping maybe?
Each of those diapers are bigger than this baby's head, you could wrap the baby in one from head to toe!.......LOL!
sean dreilinger (24 months ago | reply)
no photoshop, 50mm lens wouldn't distort the relative size of things.
Dr Beary / Disposal Alternatives (24 months ago | reply)
Hmmm? No offense, those diapers just look really big in comparison to the baby...
Great pics though....;)
KnitStorm (24 months ago | reply)
I just saw this photo being used in a Facebook page update, which linked to a Huffington Post article. However, in the article I don't see the photo. But here's the Facebook page! www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/GrowinGreenBums1 ?ref=ts
sean dreilinger (24 months ago | reply)
thanks for sharing KnitStorm - the huffington post eco etiquette column embedded a thumbnail of this picture in jennifer grayson's article today, using an image meta-tag. here's the image they're embedding:
TakMunBaby, Smer 1, and Big Heartbeat added this photo to their favorites.