Apparition

Comments and faves

1. 

   Ole Begemann (44 months ago | reply)

   Sehr coole Idee, aber für meinen Geschmack ist die Erscheinung noch etwas zu undeutlich. Ohne den Titel hätte ich jedenfalls überhaupt nichts erkannt.

2. 

   Sagitte (44 months ago | reply)

   like the concept & that this image makes you look twice!

3. 

   -cr (44 months ago | reply)

   @ Ole: OK, after looking at this in a not color management savvy application on my netbook, I have to agree that the light tones here are *very* light and subtle: To see anything there, I had to tilt the netbook's screen way back. Back here in Firefox with color management enabled and the netbook screen's calibration profile loaded, I get the intended effect (although not quite as well as on my desktop system).
   Thank you very much for your cc!

4. 

   -Ostridge- (44 months ago | reply)

   Its a body of the woman- at list that what i see...people now days even afraid to post images like that- everything has to be sharp-bright-even- imagination just melted in on way thinning brains......well done! made people actually look for it! our generation able to survive on "foods" that were previously chewed for them before and putted in our mouth as a ready product to swallow...

5. 

   rebelshootsfan (44 months ago | reply)

   Someone's legs? Not sure. Interesting idea though.

6. 

   -cr (44 months ago | reply)

   Hmm, I didn't expect that much guesswork here.
   Maybe some notes will help?

   p.s./added: gawd, those notes look awful here!

7. 

   -Ostridge- (44 months ago | reply)

   hey i was right-its a clearly a body from behind! woohoo-is there a price for wining:-)

8. ★

   ~nouran~ added this photo to their favorites. (44 months ago)

9. 

   koko_pictures (44 months ago | reply)

   Christian.....you funny man............... :o)

10. 

    la_bella_polenesiana (43 months ago | reply)

    Very well conceptualize, like a ghostly image heading to it destination :-)

11. 

    Giu GN (43 months ago | reply)

    incredible!

12. 

    natalieography (43 months ago | reply)

    Can't see a darn thing......no matter how I look at the screen.

13. 

    -cr (43 months ago | reply)

    @ natalieography: Can't see a thing? Hmm, looks like this photo/edit is worse than most test pictures I know. I really wasn't aware of that. Thanks for letting me know!Say, what are the lowest numbers you can see here, both in the dark and in the bright half?

14. 

    ccandumplins (43 months ago | reply)

    i can't see a thing either. hmm...

15. 

    natalieography (43 months ago | reply)

    I can see them all (1-7) but 3-7 are much easier to see than 2 and 1 is barely visible. Is it my monitor? I kinda figured it was.......I always fail those color match tests :(

16. 

    -cr (43 months ago | reply)

    Your monitor is fine, Natalie. 1 and 2 are supposed to be barely visible. Looks like it's just me who screwed up with this picture here. As I can see the shadows just fine: Does anybody have an idea what's going on here? Oh, and thanks again everybody who told me they don't see much/anything here!

17. 

    alison lyons photography (43 months ago | reply)

    I really like this... and of course it is the form of a body... it is particularly interesting because I was just this minute looking at katherine's image... about as opposite in tonal values as you can get.

18. ★

    mistybliss added this photo to her favorites. (42 months ago)

19. 

    mistybliss (42 months ago | reply)

    subtle and beautiful
    simple.clean.barely there.
    love x

20. 

    betoeg (35 months ago | reply)

    This one is awesome! It trully 'appears'...

21. 

    agavephoto (19 months ago | reply)

    Nice.

22. 

    ~~AragornPrime~~ (16 months ago | reply)

    figure walking away; but I cheated and downloaded and used PS auto contrast

Want to format your comment?