 |
tom-cater [deleted] says:
yeah same
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I have this sinking feeling that voting by our friends/contacts/peers/flickrites will come into it - but I do so hope not...
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I've noticed a sudden outbreak of hyper positive comments on some pictures.
So the 'judging' might be by acclamation - the number of wow's divided by the co-efficient of way-to-go and that old favourite 'awwwwright' perhaps.
But at least it will save anyone from making a choice....
P
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Let's hope we hear differently!
PS
I've never had an AAwWWRight! What have I been missing!
Originally posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
The tamed shrew edited this topic 48 months ago.
|
|
|
It usually comes with a side order of phew. Can occur spontaneously and there is no known cure.
P
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Not much longer to wait...
We'll announce the judges next week.
Tate
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Hi Paul - I think I'm immune... but you never know!
Tate! - many thanks.
K8
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Any judges yet?
K8
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Hi, hopping they won't care about the comments and the votes (not objectives) but the real values of the pictures.)
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
The wait is over!
The judges who will select the 100 photographs to be included in the photobook are:
Juergen Teller: artist whose work is included in the exhibition
Ute Eskildsen: curator of Street and Studio: An Urban History of Photography
Heather Champ: photographer and member of the Flickr team
Tate
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Thank you for letting us know!
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Have checked you out! Goodbye... good luck to you others who stay - OMG definitely not for me! lol!
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Excellent News.
Great to see my work on the Tate Modern website.
Thank you
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
tamed shrew: what do you mean?
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
What can I say (here!). I've realised that the ethos behind the comp is 'modern' street and studio - how much degradation can we photograph or put on display. I'm into catching the 'different' moment - the one that makes you smile, not frown - or look away.
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
do you not think there's a healthy mix in the pool?
and i'm not quite sure how you've arrived at that conclusion anyway.
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Has this anything to do with Juergen Teller's back catalogue? If so, I don't think you should worry - nudity is not compulsory.
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Oh, don't get me wrong - I'm happy with nudity - just not his portrayal of it - quite turns me off!
Please! As I said, it's a personal thing and I don't want to influence anyone else one way or another (whether they understand or not). I'm just too old and too square!!
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
nudity's not compulsory?
:(
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
:)
Posted 48 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
@ Shrew - If you didn't want to influence anyone else, then the best way to do so was walk away silently without commenting on why you walk away.. Clearly, you posting your reasons for leaving implies you DO want people to have their thought process influenced...
Hmmm, maybe i'm just beeing hypersensitive.. but it just seems conflicting to hear people note that they don't want to influence others while exposing people to their opinion/thoughts which by it's very nature causes them to injest the information and use it to formulate their own opinioin.. ie they have become influenced, even if they simply disregard your comment..
See.. if I didn't want to influence you and others Shrew, i'd have shut up and walked away... probably should have huh? :)
Originally posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
BigFuzzy edited this topic 47 months ago.
|
|
|
Mmm-Hhhhmmm....
:~)(
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Hehe.. on further review.. I was abit harsh perhaps, but my point stands..hehe, just try to remember it as more nicely said. ;)
Now I'll mmmm..-hmmmm myself!
Originally posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
BigFuzzy edited this topic 47 months ago.
|
|
I still don't get it.
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
me neither
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
me neither.. huh, what we talkin' about y'all? ;)
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
tamed shrew why is it not for you, like can you simply clarify, what aspect or aspects have bought you to your descission the, idia and concept
the set up
the subject/s
the time limmitt
the, i never win anything aney way attitude [my curse too !]
the judges what?its a simple fun thing to involve your self in.
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I'm very happy with the judging panel and, without wanting to sound too obsequious, I have a lot of sympathy for them, since they have so much to sift through. While there is a great deal of fine street photography in the pool, there is an awful lot of crap being submitted by people who have probably not even read more than two word's of the Tate's exhibition guide, let alone stepped foot in an art gallery for several years.
While they say the internet is great for democracy (and flickr is a particularly good example of "average" people having a chance to have their voices heard and their pictures seen) I often wish that people who have no concept of art weren't allowed to enter competitions like this. There might be a couple of Martin Parrs or Gillian Wearings lurking here, but it's gonna take a very good eye to find them amongst all the A.N. Others.
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
surely celebrARTY you're missing the point, its a pool, a cross-section. It's just taking part that matters.
Sorry, you do sound obsequious.
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Hi Lustrous Chemistry.
CelebrARTY 156's profile is enlightening.
Peter
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Yes, Peter. You're "Male and Single". I have a personality. ;)
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
My goodness CelebrARTY 156 - you seem the perfect candidate for the judging panel - no need to worry there. :)
doustpauline
Hi
The streets are full of ordinary people going about in their ordinary ways.
Recent competitions (and galleries) seem to favour depicting (I won't say finding, because I have my doubts about contrived scenes) cinematic seedy dives and back-alleys. If a portrait photographer is "exploring my inner sexuality and darker side" - rather than exploring the humanity all around them - they are flavour of this moment in time.
It's just so predictable! But I guess photography does go in cycles and each "innovator" thinks they were the first to invent a style.
The style of the top named judge is one that I find totally contrived and £$funding-seeking. So be it! This seems to be what is wanted at present.
This is why I'm not participating -it's not my style, nor would I contrive or manipulate people to come up with something "eye-catching" and of the moment.
Hope you now understand.
Good luck!
K8
Originally posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
The tamed shrew edited this topic 46 months ago.
|
|
|
It's true my online persona is sadly lacking in so many ways.
Peter
Originally posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
Urbanimage edited this topic 47 months ago.
|
|
|
high tamed shrew thanks for reply, sort of comprehend where your commimg from, i personaly skipp contrived relative to this [street] section but re studio, is it not so that portrature is by its own description dressed/contrived falsely lighted / made up / back droped etc, being the very opposite of what you may encounter on the street , especialy if the subject is unawear of you getting the shot you deemed a instant must have,for your colection, or other. top named judje? iknow nought of, will endevor check them out an post again, the other judges may be tending more in the street prefferd [style] . which would seemingly balance things i think flickr are considerably balanced in their descisions, and play a fair hand to all, well we will see whenwe see eh, p.
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
well i typed in the j. teller bit .didnt get her/ his photo stream?? only 41 people intrested in j t, didnt know flickr permitted .. all rubishy i felt, sort of naughty bedsit , look at me stuff, and worse,= down right revolting[ man and piano,] i mean whos intrested in arseholes as depicted! hardly the clasicial interlectual nude,so yes i now see your reasons for opptig out p.
Originally posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
doustpauline of > \whatwhenwhere/ <all behind. edited this topic 47 months ago.
|
|
Did someone mention Martin Parr?
mebbe i should enter this
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Perhaps we should start a competition to judge the judges? And when they've judged us, we can give them a small prize - like being able to judge forever based only on comments in on-line discussions like this.
And so; on.
P
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Competitions like this have become a cheap way for Galleries and/or websites to get photographs. Perhaps we *should* start querying and judging the judges - it's the only fun/input/feedback we can do!
Originally posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
The tamed shrew edited this topic 47 months ago.
|
|
|
Er... moaning about the judges isn't going to change anything. While each of them has a personal taste, they are all very capable of spotting "interesting" work whether it was created in a studio, snatched on a street or painted on the back of a bus. I think people will be surprised by the variety of work that ends up being included in the book. The pool for this group includes Parr-ish shots of chavs, gritty urbex shots of dark alleys and derelict buildings, Teller-like commuters on tube trains and every sort of snapshot/portrait you can imagine. No one expects you to like everything that gets chosen, but the Tate thrives on including "controversial" material in its exhibitions. If you don't like "Modern" art, then go elsewhere; preferably back to the nineteenth century. :)
If you think your "happy" pictures say something about the modern world, then by all means enter them. Someone might like them, but I don't think it will be me. :)
Originally posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
Arty Smokes (deaf mute) edited this topic 47 months ago.
|
|
|
I would love to see some modern art. What disappoints me is seeing art as old as humanity - and as boringly predictable in puporting to be 'modern'. If it weren't so sad it would be laughable.
Posted 47 months ago.
(permalink)
|
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
|
Street or Studio /
Discuss
Feed – Subscribe to Street or Studio discussion threads