 |
(sei un dio:)
(già ne vendono di tue statuette luminescenti/luminose
che lampeggiano langciando benedizioni?)
Originally posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
l_o edited this topic 25 months ago.
|
 |
non hai perso tempo....
ora non ci tocca altro che sperimentare :D
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
MoMaStalker [deleted] says:
ti dovrebbero dare uno spazio in tv per un programma alla mc gyver dove insegni a "creare" con la pellicola! :D
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
il mc gyver della fotografia!!!!
fiko :D
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
ricardomcom [deleted] says:
¡Gran idea esta!. Gracias por tu invitación al grupo y pronto estaré experimentando para subir algún trabajo al grupo.
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Mà says:
sei genio,mi sa che te l'avevogia detto!
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
MoMaStalker no, il mc gyver della fotografia è sicuramente colui che si è creato la pinhole con i lego e che smanetta con tutte le macchine che gli capitino tra le mani ( Found Photographer) però io già sento la sigla di mc nelle orecchie e mi sembra che mi stiano crescendo i capelli biondi
datemi del filo di ferro e un pezzo di vetro e vi farà una lc-a
altro che moltiplicazione dei pani e dei pesci...
comunque...
qualcuno non è che vuole tradurre questo "how to" in inglese? io non ci so proprio fare
moma, tu te la cavi, no? :D
Originally posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
sterile edited this topic 25 months ago.
|
 |
grazie per l'invito!
molto molto interessante!
ho una domanda che forse è banale.. ma se si fa la stessa cosa con una pellicola B/n?
apriti un videocast o un podcast!
che sulla fotografia non c'è nulla!
se lo fai dimmelo subito! ;)
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
holga_pics [deleted] says:
Great Idea - but I've no idea how this works as my Italian is poor.
NIce pics though......
And thanks for the invite I'm sure all will become clear in time
hmmm babelfish....
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
holga_pics [deleted] says:
Nope babelfish didn't help :o)
Leaving from the fact that the film to colors has 3 layers of colors, the BLUE, the last GREEN and for the RED one, the light passing for all the layers will render the photo of all the colors. While in our case we will make to only impress the red layer so as to to have one photography in scale of red. This is the side that normally comes exposed in one film to colors. We instead will expose to the light this side. While we cut the film layer that would serve in order to wrap the film within our camera. Then we attack a piece of scotch to the end of the film, leaving glue half of the scotch to the film... ... for being able free of charge to attack a rullino empty with pezzettino of film that sporge (found them in sure laboratories) then you wrap all the film of the rullino of left within to the rullino of right. ATTENTION THIS OPERATION MUST BE MADE COMPLETE ABSENCE OF LIGHT. Enough to put itself in a darkroom or under one covered in a room buia or within a sleeping bag or... you see... the important you are that not there is light. In order to make to pass to all the film from the rullino of left to the rullino of right you can help you with a pair of scissors, like in the photo over. Hour worse is past, you can relight the light or exit from yours loculo, and cut to the film leaving a pair of centimeters from the rullino of left (than hour it is empty) so as to to be able it to riusare one next time Hour cut to the film that sporge from the rullino full as in the photo over and you are ready in order to take the photos... He convene to you to overexpose po' a photo in the release. As an example if you have a rullino from 200 iso he releases it to you like if he were from 100 IT MAKES YOU TO SEE THEM! This technique I have discovered it percaso badly mounting rullino in one a Pinhole Room
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
holga_pics [deleted] says:
Ok I think I've got it - the film is rewound on an empty spool backwards so that the film emulsion is exposed through the cellulose backing, as the film will be loaded into the camera in reverse, rather than directly onto the emulsion. Doing this however loses a stop of light so that if you do this with 200 iso film you will be exposing at 100 iso in real terms.
The pics are redscale!
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
iseeawell io sempre per caso ho fatto questa tecnica anche con una pellicola in bianco e nero, e mi sembrava la stessa cosa però che avesse perso un po' di definizione...
apriti un videocast o un podcast!
cosa sono?
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
MoMaStalker [deleted] says:
how to vuol dire "come" inteso tipo "how to make" = "come fare" ....era questo che volevi sapere?
:D
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
Sterile it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcasting
i videocast è la stessa cosa! cmq se usi itunes li ci sono molti pod/videocast!
con la pellicola in B/n viene fuori la foto rossa come se fosse a colori?
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Grazie
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
MoMaStalker speravo che tu avessi voglia di tradurre tutto il topic dove viene spiegata la tecnica :D
so anch'io che "how to" vuol dire zuppa di fagioli
iseeawell no, con la pellicola in bianco e nero, visto che ha uno strato solo ed è di grigio verrà fuori solo grigio, come se l'avessi scattata dalla parte giusta
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
u con la macchina digitale basta metter il dito davanti al flash e piu o meno si ha un effetto simile...
cmq sei un figo ad averlo trovato nel rullino.
yo
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
ehi!!! ci sono riuscita.... ma le mie risultano più arancioni che rosse... posso postarle in questo gruppo comunque?
Originally posted 24 months ago.
(
permalink
)
bastet in the sky with diamonds edited this topic 24 months ago.
|
|
certo, se la tecnica e" quella posta pure!
Posted 24 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
English translation can be found here:
translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr....
Posted 23 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
does the a rullino empty film's DX must be chrome film ?
or any film to be rullino empty is OK ?!
we exposure and develop it would be negative film, rigth ?!
sorry, my english is poor,
i hope someone can understand what I wanna ask.
thank you !
Posted 23 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
hello 7meteor, yes you can also use color negative film for redscale.
and yes, if you use negative film, it will be a negative when you develop it. chrome film will be positive after you develop it.
if your camera reads the DX code on the film cartridge, you can set the + or - exposure compensation to: +1.
or, just tape over the DX code. most cameras will set the film speed to 100 iso if you tape over the DX code.
Originally posted 23 months ago.
(
permalink
)
Mark-B edited this topic 23 months ago.
|
|
P.E. [deleted] says:
are there any difference in colors from slide and negatives??
Posted 23 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
good question, P.E. i've never tried it with slide film. anybody?
i learned one thing about color negative, and that is, you have to expose it 2 stops more: if it's 400 iso, then set it to 100 iso.
Originally posted 22 months ago.
(
permalink
)
Mark-B edited this topic 22 months ago.
|
 |
I only push one stop (with negatives), and that seems to be enough, but next time will try it like you said.
I've done it with some slide film, again inspired by sterile, and the result is much more yellow cast. And with slide looks like you really have to push two stops since the cross processing usualy also needs more contrast.
Originally posted 22 months ago.
(
permalink
)
bricolage.108 edited this topic 22 months ago.
|
|
good advice, bricolage.108, with slide film (+2 stops), as slide film is less forgiving with exposure. thank you ^-^
mark-b
Originally posted 22 months ago.
(
permalink
)
Mark-B edited this topic 22 months ago.
|
 |
A comment on the technique. I think it's easier not to use scissors to respool the film, but to put the take up canister into the camera and apply the camera's rewind mechanism (without closing the camera lid of course).
Results.
Posted 21 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
bellissimo effetto! mi piace molto!
Devo provare subito con la mia holga!
Posted 21 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
mi piace! mamma mia che foto! ma hai usato una scrausissima konica negativa da pochi euro?
avete altri esperimenti da consigliarmi tipo questo?
Posted 20 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
why do you do all this loading film into other film. why not just load it back to front in a cheap camera that allows it or in a mf camera.
i have just put one in my holga back to front and it seems to work
Posted 19 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
Just to make sure I'm getting this right.
+1 Stop for C41
+2 Stops for E6, Processed in C41 (xpro)
How about E6 processed as E6? +1 Stop?
Thanks.
Posted 19 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I'm assuming you just get it developed as normal? i.e. 400iso, exposed at 200iso but developed at 400iso??
Posted 19 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
tem que expor um ISO abaixo?
Posted 17 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
queen_of_scum yes, the film need more light than normal
gilbertosuzuki si
Posted 14 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
edwardolive + sorry no more smut I made like this because in my reflex I can't put the roll back to front
.danimal I don't know. I never overexposed my redscale film but all my negatives are too dark and then I think it's better to overexposed 1 stop
I don't know how to do with a xpro redscale film.
this one
is xpro redscale without overexposed, but I've use photoshop to make it more brighter
Posted 14 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
I've shot 1 roll of redscale slide and xpro'd it. The negatives came back very thin, and the lab had the manually scan each frame of the film to make me an index sheet. I overexposed by +1 stop.
I had to adjust the levels on this one as it was quite dark.
Next time I'll do +2 stops and see what happens, will have to be a very sunny day as It will be 25 iso.
Posted 14 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I'm really interested to try this, but I'm assuming that the roll you wind on to should be the same ISO as the film you're loading in.
I have a roll of Elite Chrome 400 and will shoot at 100 as per the advice above (since I'll be cross processing), but I guess should get hold of an ISO 400 roll to wind on to whilst reversing the film?
Not knowing an awful lot about processing, what would happen if I wound the film on to a 200 or 100 roll and had the 400 redscale (that I'd shot at 100) developed on that - would that produce lighter or darker results, do you think? I guess that kind-of ventures in to the pushing / pulling whole thing that I've never really had done to any of my rolls so far.
Originally posted 13 months ago.
(
permalink
)
Robin Schroder edited this topic 13 months ago.
|
|
I've not had any problems putting 400 iso into a 100 iso canister.
If your camera picks up the iso setting from the film, called DX or something then you will have to override this. If you have a camera where you can set the iso, set it to what film you have rolled into the canister.
The machine reads the iso of the film from the negative strip and will process at that iso.
I think.
Don't forget to write on the canister what iso film you have put in it as I often forget and shoot at the wrong film speed.
Originally posted 13 months ago.
(
permalink
)
.danimal edited this topic 13 months ago.
|
 |
Un consiglio.
Ho seguito le istruzioni alla lettera ma le mie foto non sono uscite con quella predominante rossa tipica di questa tecnica. Ho usato una pellicola Kodak 100 e ho fotografato con una Olympus.Ho notato che le foto scattate con tempi più lunghi sono più rosse.Quelle scattate con tempi più brevi sembrano quasi in B/N.Qualche consiglio?
Posted 13 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Well, I figured it out from the pictures, but it was a little difficult. For anyone else, English-language instructions (with pictures) on how to make redscale film can be found here.
Posted 12 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Full Metals English Version, Redcaling Technique
Posted 8 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
can you take films exposed like this to a regular one-hour photo lab?
Posted 7 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Should be able to. They might get confused when they get the prints and they're all weird coloured and their software might try to correct it to make it look "normal" but chemically speaking there's nothing wrong with the film. It'll be the wrong way up but they dip the whole film, not just one side, into the chemicals so it'll be processed the same way.
Posted 7 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
C-41 process is the same for all colour films. No problem in the lab developing the film. But could be a problem with the DX coding in the camera if you don't override it...
Posted 5 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
wow fantastique! ma allora sei italiano.. e io che ho dato sfogo al mio english4you!!! grazie ora provo il RED e ti faccio sapere ;} sono già gasatissima....,. ❝❞
Posted 4 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Non ne sapevo niente. Nuovi orizzonti...
Ma che storia!
Grazie.
Posted 3 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
well the italian was gobbledegook to me but i got the jist of it cheers was VERY helpful :)
Posted 3 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
|
Redscale Film /
Discuss
Feed – Subscribe to Redscale Film discussion threads
Flickr Blog |
About Flickr |
Terms of Use |
Your Privacy |
Copyright/IP Policy | Report Abuse
|
Deutsch
|
English
|
Español
|
Français
|
|
Italiano
|
Português
Copyright © 2008 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Save to del.icio.us