|
greg: Really, though, haven't we already had numerous "is this 'street'?" threads, including some that used the exact same picture (or others from Public Relations) as an example of how amorphous--or whatever--it is?
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
in the phlow with some big titted blonde.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Kramer, you're confusing the purpose of the "what is street" threads: it's not to inform the noobs but to entertain the regulars. Those threads get the most wacko responses.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Oh, and I'm kidding.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Hey, if somebody else wants to unlock that thing, I'm always up to watch some bloodletting.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
krameroneill edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
18:30 London
Nice to see Google recognising Stravinsky's birthday today.
Wondering how to best to get our stuff from London to Nuremberg in September.. hmm...
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
20:43, Munich
Yay! Had my first interrogation by a zealous cop today!
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Greg:
Start a new thread, 'Rants on the Definitive Definition of Street Photography'
Then anytime some goes down that direction they can be directed to ROTDDOSP.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Maybe someone can create a quicktime movie for that ROTDDOSP thread to answer the question "what is street photography?" the way David Alan Harvey is answering the question what is Burn?
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Brooklyn - suppose this is better than confronting fascists in the streets day after day...
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
what's the green?
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I think the green has to do with a certain political events in the M.East. Something about protesting the censorship. Guess it's a kind of show of support. My guess...
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
pH [浪人] [deleted] says:
yawn-
close to 7 am. cant sleep.
it must be the thoughts on general inadequacy to anything.
you know, those stupid idle hours in bed counting failure after failure.
fuck.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
ah yeah.. iran blocked the media or something like that. (?)
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
pH [浪人] [deleted] says:
well, it took more than 17 minutes to write that.
:)
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
@barbara - even after watching the "what is burn" video, i didn't kow what burn was....
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
utrecht, 10.10
seeing that green pop up in the contacts stream, i get that it has something to do with the bullshit going on in iran, but for the rest i don't get it. aparently i am not the only one. maybe someone cares to explain?
after being a bit positive about photographic improvement lately this morning i woke up demotivated and this grew when logging into the flickr and looking at the first page of my stream. pffff, maybe i need to shoot less and go for inspiration this weekend. there is enough to do
still havent been here: www.dreamamsterdam.nl/ , www.nyperspectives.com/ and the new exhibtis in www.foam.nl.
and i guess if it's sunny tomorrow morning there might not be a huge line to get into the world press photo exhibit.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
@ Barbara -- I downloaded that .mov file but couldn't play it with Quicktime (well, I could just hear the soundtrack), probably due to my computer being decrepit. What happens?!
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
just watched the burn thing... sexy... cool... dancing... agree it explained nothing... not sure what the video added to the text of the same post?
@Paul: download VLC Player... should be able to do it
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Thanks James, I already tried that but VLC player doesn't work on my computer any more. I even tried downloading the player again. I usually use that GOM player, but it doesn't like .mov files.
I've given up now!
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
Paul Russell99 edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
that's crap! tho slightly better than my scan software deciding it no longer wants to work! uninstalled, deleted all related files, cleansed, upgraded... nothing!
struggling with the learning curve of viewscan at the moment :(
workflow is massively down
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
That's why I like cameras and hate computers. Cameras generally (1) work or (2) are broken, but for computers there's a million different levels between those two states. Bastards.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
@Paul: computers are annoying, I agree (though my Mac usually behaves quite well). But like Ben and James say, there are no answers in the Burn video. Maybe a "what is street photography?" video should just have two slides anyway: slide 1 - what is street photography?, slide 2 - who cares?
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
While I understand the desire to show support for those who are standing up for their voice to be heard, I can't help but wonder whether 'western' support via the internet won't just play into the hands of those who say that the protests are really led from the west? It's a tricky one.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
Findo edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
20.53 Korea
Coming down with something (swine flu?) and listening to a high-volume domestic argument outside my apartment. The window is closed and it still sounds like they are in the room with me. Waiting for the baby to cry too, then I'm outta here.
For once I've not been following the news. Understand that something happened in Iran, but not sure what. Not sure who is the good guy and who is the bad. Am reserving judgement until I've read some stuff. Hello, Al Jazeera.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
@ Barbara: I thought Slide 2 was 72% questions, 28% answers (± a bit).
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
That Burn thing is just basically an advert to try to get companies to sponsor them, so I wouldn't go through a lot of hassle to watch it, it's really not that great.
Also, came across this last night, made me feel a little better about my photographic inadequacies. Thinking of adopting this guy as my fairy godmother.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
i think the burn video is aimed at sponsors.. (ie- it doesn't have to explain anything per se. it only has to explain that a lot of people will see the ads)
edit- yeah, what fred said
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
flat5 edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
Annie.. The incumbent is the 'baddie' the other is the 'not-so-baddie'. But the issue as I see it, is not so much about who is better, but who actually won the election - it appears that there has been a big case of election fraud by the government.
My concern is that there should be an open and honest election result, and the use of the green can be seen to be supporting the opposition, rather than the fair process.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
Findo edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
Thanks guys. I thought maybe it was footage of Panos and Jim Powers mud-wrestling or something like that.
BTW, this might be of interest to photographers based in England
www.whatisengland.co.uk/
via Simon Roberts' blog
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
Paul Russell99 edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
fido, about what you said earlier... just read an article on iran goverment wanting to sue iran companies that 'cause tension' and say they are supported by the west.
it's tough. i am not sure i agree with you completely, but it does feel pretty useless just uplaoding a bit of green.
on a brighter note (after foreign journalists found their visa withdrawn and themselves thrown out of the country pretty soon after the 'winner' of the elections was decalred. and after facebook being blcoked before the elections) i read this other article this morning on how twitter is playing a big role in people in iran supporting each other in protest and spreading images of police brutality. this might be old news if you actually are on twitter, i dunno, but it's good to see this internet community thing be used for something useful for a change.
wish it wasn't necessary for it to be useful, though.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Brooklyn - scanning crap all night makes one question their priorities.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
The pro dream expired today.... sad times :D
off to the post office to send camera equipment to people who have more money than me.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
Account inactive go to: www.jamesdodd.net (a group admin) edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
"scanning crap all night makes one question their priorities"
Man I hear ya bryan. I did that last night - I'm up to ~600 images and counting from our recent three day family camping trip, and I've got a few rolls left to go. Now that I'm looking at them I'm thinking I should be able to get by on 10% of the shooting I do, and use that 10% very differently from what I'm currently doing.
In other non-news, I just ordered a copy of Letting Go of the Camera.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
Mark_H edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
Colour photos of Russia from 100 years back. Crazy.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
some more logs to throw on the olympus e-p1 fire.
a test drive
thedigitalstory.com/2009/06/whats_more_fun_than.html
ISO comparison's
www.flickr.com/photos/thedigitalstory/sets/72157619851048...
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
I'd guess the green is more symbolic of denouncement of the restrictions and other encumbrances placed on "reporters" (i.e. pros and new media micro blogging "journalists") not so much siding with one side or the other.
It's speaking up against downpression on freedom to disseminate information.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
12.46 am mexico city
finishing a title sequence for a movie ive been working for 6 months
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
I understand that from our perspective, yes, that's what it is, and that's a good thing, but from the Iranian perspective I think it is seen as picking sides, which I don't think is going to help the cause so much.. I don't know, it's tricky - support the freedom of information without giving the oppressors an excuse to restrict those freedoms even more.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
am i that much a cynic that i think doing something like that isn't gonna make a difference one way or another, it's just a way for you to show what your take on the things is and that's that? i don't think the iranian goverment is interestedin the opinion of some western individuals, just of some western governments...
anyway.
amsterdam: 10.30 listenign to t-rex. after finishing dishes doing some diy'ing in my room. then off for a walk around town/ visiting foam. really curious about some of the exhibits.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
i don't know but it's pretty ridiculous for me, as an american, to think that all these people are up in arms about this Iranian election when in reality the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen with not so much as a whimper given by the same citizens of this country. pretty god damn weak if you ask me.
but it's the same shit different day around here.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
What colour will force Gordo to call an election.. certainly the shambles of his cabinet haven't made him do so..
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
brown?
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
@t-m-k-f - so true... It's easy to think what kind of backwards-ass country has false democracy, and then you remember that Bush won because of Fox News...
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
12:12 pm, UK. Trying not to simultaneously throw up and shit myself after drinking something that was past its sell-by date in bright sunshine.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
haha
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
amsterdam. 13.47
luch. trying to not visualize some comments.
found out that the glue holding the carpet is removable. wishing i also found out it is easily removable. so much for museum plans this weekend. and why is diy'ing always a reason to make self portraits? avoiding what really needs to be done?
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
OK, have read up. I already didn't like Iran's current administration, like them even less now.
However, I am concerned that Iran is now one step closer to becoming the new Iraq. Not that anyone even has the resources to invade, but ya know. This huge international interest, I don't know what to think... I'm glad Iranians are marching in the streets, injustice seems to have been done and they need to bring change... but the international newswires are in a frenzy. Why so much more interest in this botched election than others?
Am off to read some more. Who do I trust? CNN? BBC? Al Jazeera? The Telegraph? France 24? I don't know.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
it's all about getting a reader base to view adverts.
iran is sexy at the moment.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
Account inactive go to: www.jamesdodd.net (a group admin) edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
@this-machine-kills-fascists: why is it ridiculous to support them? It's not like we're fucking taking the day off work and marching down the street. it's a symbolic show of support. the web is a much different place now than it was 10 years ago.
and if i recall people were pretty pissed in 2000. but yes, I agree, there probably should have been the same level of anger in the streets.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
bryanF. edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
@this-machine-kills-fascists: We Reject the American Way of Life!
Best quote from Twitter: What Ahmadinejad needs right now is Katherine Harris, some hanging chads and Chief Justice Rehnquist. Oh yeah, and a totally docile public.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
That is a good quote.
Another thing, it's kind of a censorship protest too. I'm not too optimistic the clerics be will over thrown or anything, but I think the media battle is interesting and important. They are doing everything they can to block the flow of information out of the country but it's not really working.
So on Twitter, I think it's a supportive display to show the people in Iran who are attempting to get information out through social media channels that there are people listening who support the risks they are taking. And I don't find that ridiculous at all...
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
bryanF. edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
Annie: That's the thing, isn't it? The left-of-center aren't eager to think about this, but Neoconservatism was born of the left, out of a desire to see a certain -- theoretically more "fair" -- system triumph globally, and out of the delusion that western lifestyles and governments represent the "end of history."
If and when Iraq stabilizes, its government will look very much like Iran's, and the two will be natural Shia allies. According to Seymour Hersh at the New Yorker, the US is currently trying to undermine the Iranian government by funding Sunni extremists there... So some of our tax dollars are going to Sunni terrorists in Iran, while other tax dollars are going toward fighting Sunni terrorists in Iraq. [Another common phrase for "Sunni terrorist network": Al-Qaeda. So those guys who bombed us are now our allies against Iran. Great.]
Long story short: I've funded/am funding quite enough fucking-up of that region right now. I'm gonna sit this one out.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Jason Jones meets a journalist, interviews people on the street, and visits an Iranian family to find out why Iran is so evil.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
i don't know but it's pretty ridiculous for me, as an american, to think that all these people are up in arms about this Iranian election when in reality the 2000 and 2004 elections were stolen with not so much as a whimper given by the same citizens of this country. pretty god damn weak if you ask me.
This statement, to me prays on ignorance. There were some irregularities, but it was verydifferent. Chads and recounts. At least there were about 3 recounts all with slight advantages in the eventual winner's favor. Mr Gore initially only wanted recounts in counties which heavily favored him, his adversary wanted the same advantage and wanted recounts only in counties which turned for him. Had either really wanted fairness, they would have asked for a state-wide recount --but neither did for fear they would actually lose in a statewide recount --too much uncertainty. In any event, the challenger did concede victory to his adversary. This is not what we are seeing now. So, to compare the two instances as similar is quite deceptive.
Nevertheless, there was due process. Some of us might not have liked the result of the process, but it was more or less fair.
What really upset people in Iran, from what I can tell (via tweets, etc.) was that no sooner had the polls closed than a winner had been announced --more or less mocking the whole electoral system. As if the results were predetermined. People (the electorate there) don't mind that the favorite (of the power structure) might have had some handicap in his favor, that's kind of expected in those parts of the world, but that the electorate was completely dismissed. They called the elections just as polls closed. That's to say, it's not possible to count all ballots real-time. That's what goaded people. They felt their votes had been dismissed out of hand. Not even a kind of semblance of fairness.
Am off to read some more. Who do I trust? CNN? BBC? Al Jazeera? The Telegraph? France 24? I don't know.
Listen to the people. Listen to them in aggregate to get a nice overview --and know that there are also infiltrators -posers, as it were.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
RE. the election result: I don't know how to listen to the people or consider the result without the aid of a third party. I'm on Twitter for the first time ever and it's just an overwhelming flow of voices. Some for, some against, some saying things which don't make sense whichever way you look at it. I'm not trying to belittle the movement, for that's what I believe this could be, I just don't feel I can trust all the information I'm receiving.
Regardless of the election result, its clear that the people of Iran are having their human rights breached at this exact moment in time. Clampdowns on media, social networking, communications. Clampdowns on protesters. That shit is inexcusable and the government needs to loosen its grip.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
Annie (sleeping) edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
maartyn: actually, the US Supreme Court ruled that Florida could not do a statewide recount because their methods did not adhere to a federal standard. Taken to its natural conclusion, of course, this ruling would invalidate all elections in the United States. It was therefore farcical, regardless of political disposition.
edit: I mean, your point is definitely true of the election's immediate aftermath, but the final federal judgement was a sham.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
krameroneill edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
Maybe HCSP should be like the workplace...no religion, no politics.
Only work, which in this case is....mediocre photography.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
bryanF. edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
at least if it's the workplace, we can still have sexual harassment..
1:30p brooklyn
doing all sorts of shit today.. nothing photographically though.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
1231
woke up.. hungover.. starving... the only solution? korean bbq. can't wait.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
yum, bulgogi!
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
krameroneill ..."federal standard" Are you referring to the "safe harbor" deadline? Not sure. Anyhow, representatives, from Florida, post-SCOTUS decision, at certification time, had the opportunity to object to the SCOTUS decision on state-wide recounts --and have a wider recount instated. No senator rose to second the objections -as would be required by law to precede the SCOTUS decision on recounts. Keep in mind, the statewide recount was dismissed because it was projected it would have taken the rendering past the safe harbor date --something which would not have been an issue had Messrs Gore and Bush asked to statewide recount at the outset. Therefore, it's my opinion it was not all that farcical. I do think they took the easy way out of the controversy, and, in that sense one can consider it a "cop-out"; however, use of this kind of technicality is not unusual in the decisions rendered at the SCOTUS (and even lower courts). It's the institution that granted rights to abort a foetus based on privacy, rather than more robust common law precedents.
Moreover, electoral post-mortem suggests that by almost all standards of recounting (overcounts/undercounts interpretation) Mr Bush would have still come out victorious. There were still some scenarios where Mr Gore would have won, but those are at the long tail.
Still, when there is less than one tenth of one per-cent divergence in voting, it's hard to claim disenfranchisement in the process. The machine Mr Gore had on the ground was pathetic/not well organized, from what I understood. I believe it was his lack of attention to that state which cost him and how he was loath to leverage Mr Clinton --still he almost made but for a few hundred votes. I think he's trying to make up for his mistakes by trying to save us form Climate Change. I hope he is better prepared at that.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Boring!
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Boring!
I must, somehow, despite the screaming wisdom in that reply, miss its brilliance. ;)
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Ben: Hell yeah it's boring. Slow day at work, though, so:
maartyn: In answer to your question, I guess that would be the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Want to read something really boring? "The recount mechanisms implemented in response to the decisions of the Florida Supreme Court do not satisfy the minimum requirement for non-arbitrary treatment of voters necessary to secure the fundamental right," and later: "Upon due consideration of the difficulties identified to this point, it is obvious that the recount cannot be conducted in compliance with the requirements of equal protection and due process without substantial additional work. [...] Because it is evident that any recount seeking to meet the December 12 date will be unconstitutional for the reasons we have discussed, we reverse the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida ordering a recount to proceed."
(From the Supreme Court majority opinion.)
...so how are they not saying exactly what I said?
[Ben, you may want to sleep through this]
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
"Maybe HCSP should be like the workplace...no religion, no politics.
Only work, which in this case is....mediocre photography. "
And this will achieve what? Harmony? Lack of contention? Bryan, this is HCSP. We can't agree on anything.
If there was no controversy here, people would have to go rave about digital in the I Shoot Film group.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
krameroneill IIRC, the 20 or so representatives from FL did protest on those grounds during the certification of the electoral votes. As required by law, such objection (to overrule the SCOTUS's decision on statewide recount) would have only needed one USSenator to sponsor such objection. However, none did so. So, unless there was massive corruption, such as collusion of some type, it appears that was more or less political grandstanding by the reps--or perhaps they truly believed wronging, but no Senator thought it was egregious enough to object. And, if there was collusion, then the point is moot.
My main point, in my original response, was that it's unfair and quite dishonest to compare the situation in Iran to the situation that was in 2000. There are vast differences that ought not be trivialized and glossed over for impact.
1. Mr Gore conceded victory to his opponent. 2. There were about three different recounts -the fourth was invalidated by the SCOTUS on technical grounds (the merits of that are debatable). 3. There was an opportunity to overrule the SCOTUS's decision to forgo a final statewide recount, but that opportunity was waived by all Senators. 4. The difference in votes amounted to chance -the flip of a coin (fewer than 1000 votes made the difference -probably less that the amount of votes erroneously submitted to the unintended candidate). And finally, people protested and vented and showed their displeasure w/o fear of consequences. Given these points, I cannot see how the two events can be compared.
I didn't see massive fraud and rigging as is claimed happened in the recent events in the ME. As I've mentioned before, people in Iran were hopeful, but not overly expecting the opposition to win in Iran, what really inflamed them was the apparent dismissal of the process and belittling of the voters and opposition and claiming they were agents of foreign govt's. Essentially, it's as if the powers there didn't want to bother with covering up what appears to have been a sham.
Sure, we can be upset with the results and upset with the antiquated technology we use for voting, but those are minor issues.
Some dolts resorted to the silly notion that 3rd party candidates contributed to Mr Gore's defeat --as if they didn't have the same right to run as anyone else. I can guess that those who objected to 3rd party candidates as spoilers have no such complaints when "spoilers" spoil it for the opposition --that is to say, such objections are usually desperate and dishonest. But that's an altogether other topic.
5:46 and time to head on home... Welcome weekend.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
fuck. 4.31 (amsterdam) is too late/early for this.
iran the new irak, wasn't it the previous american administration pushing that idea?
it's fucked up for sure, but, like some others, i wonder why the sudden 'hassle'... this stuff has been going on for decades, and at numerous parts of the globe. not that that's an excuse to not act different this time, but really, if all we can do is show support by uploading something or signing some online petition... fuck that. fuck the internet for that matter: at least marching down the street took some effort/ made more of a statement/ uplifted the spirit.
4.36 (amsterdam)
how old do i sound now?
who has some gear we could talk about?
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Well, I have some "disraeli" gears I need to clean on my bike. Do people really wanna talk about sprockets, rust and lubrication?
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Just got back from the farmer's market. After watching this, in somber mood.
adadservices.com/2009/06/20/iran-free-iran-video-send-it-...
Not sure its provenance; its got very good street btw. Those folks have valor.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
18:02 Hudds
Was severely underwhelmed by some negs I got back from the lab, one 8x10 shot I was hoping would turn out well got ruined somehow (Ben, it was the one of Rhea, sp?), they also lost a roll of film and overcharged me including for the missing roll - not happy.
Consoled myself by eating a huge dollop of Dixon's ice cream, the best ice cream in Yorkshire without a doubt.
Thinking I might get pissed.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
BennehBoy edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
Bad luck ben - it's annoying enough when a couple of shots are ruined in a roll, but I guess with 8x10 you don't have the leeway of multiple shots.
19:39, london:
Cooking sausages, drinking wine. Got a free evening for the first time in ages so I'm going to get busy with some scanning and reprocess some shots.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
21:11 Bochum
Thinking I might get pissed.
exactly what I'm about to do :)
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
zero vision at the empire state today! just water
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
14:40, london:
Working. And watching the trail for Adam Curtis's new film. The third video down is the longest. Looks pretty amazing.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
martinnicholls edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
I bought some camera- and flashtriggers on ebay, and defying gravity from now on.
Life isn't all about streetphotography.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
scanning slides... watching things I've already seen... my belly is full and I'm a little bit sleepy.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
pH [浪人] [deleted] says:
smoking pot after looking last night's shoot for playboy.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
OMG beetroot sunburn - ouch.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
You know, the UK has a higher mortality rate from skin cancer than Australia..
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
You know, the UK has a higher mortality rate from skin cancer than Australia..
Yeah, giving a little sun to the British is like giving Crack to babies...
edit: :-)
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
krameroneill edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
Just back from an epic coach journey tootling around winding country lanes in Dorset, Somerset and Devon.
Five hours of feeling a bit nauseous, and a couple of hours recovering from feeling a bit nauseous. Wont be doing that again in a hurry...
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Brooklyn - RIP Kodachrome. Happy I was able to burn through 20 rolls...
www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hNE3DMbUR1JFgM...
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Fuck, I just got my first roll of Kodachrome back from Duane's. Wonder when they'll stop developing it.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
@chris:
"Because of the complexity, only Dwayne's Photo, in Parsons, Kan., still processes Kodachrome film. The lab has agreed to continue through 2010, Kodak said."
www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hNE3DMbUR1JFgM...
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
peter eavis is the only person i know of on flickr that shoots a lot of kodachrome so i guess he'll have to find something else.
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
flat5 edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
Awesome, thanks. Perhaps I'll get a few more rolls.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
I've been debating on buying a few rolls, but now I think I won't, if only to keep myself from falling into depressed longing should kodachrome turn out just as wonderful as everyone says.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
well that sucks... luckily i have around 40-50 rolls in my refrigerator... guess i'll have to get on shooting them... but again that sucks massively.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
18:22 Hudds
Off work after nocturnal puking session (sun stroke?), feeling somewhat weak today, but had a note from Peak to say my missing roll is in the post.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujhdf9_IO4w
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
shot a wedding in catalonia in ten rolls of 220 c41... what's the best (cheapest) place to develop that?
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
peak imaging. 7.15 per roll. 10% discount with ten rolls.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Will be laid off as of Wednesday next week. I'm at least relieved to know, rather than worry that it might happen. Now I can get on with updating my resume and all that.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
sorry to hear that Mark, hope you find something soon.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
@Mark: Sorry man. I've been there before. Tough times. I became a photographer after that. Still tough times...
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
Damn, Mark, sorry to hear that.
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
@ben: just found that I can do it locally at the same price, plus they scan for cheaper! (cardiff, sweet cardiff) I mostly needed scans good enough for sequencing... and then rescanning the keepers...
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
|
listening to Weegee tell me how: from "Famous Photographers Tell How" from 1958.
Also Cartier Bresson uploaded though that's less good as most of us have heard and or seen him speak... but never the less cool.
Blog post:
boogiewoogieflu.blogspot.com/2009/06/weegee-speaks.html
Weegee recording:
tedbarron.com/BWF-June-2009/22-Weegee.mp3
HCB recording:
tedbarron.com/BWF-June-2009/23-Henri-Cartier-Bresson.mp3
"Now the easiest kind of a job was a murder, because the stiff would be laying on the ground. He couldn't get up and walk away and get tempermental and he would be good for at least two hours."
Originally posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
this-machine-kills-fascists edited this topic 36 months ago.
|
|
|
currently bored shitless... spent the whole day doing design work (websites, flyers and posters... blah!) feel like I should close my laptop but have nothing to do and it at least makes me feel important
Posted 36 months ago.
(permalink)
|
HCSP (Hardcore Street Photography) /
Discuss
Feed – Subscribe to HCSP (Hardcore Street Photography) discussion threads