 |
Link to press release, por favor.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Caminho para o anuncio do fabricante, please.
:p
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
yowzers... NAS going into full swing! I wonder why Nikon and chosen to to imbue these lenses with VR? I am guessing that the f/ 1.2 lens would be a killer ambient light lens but it would probably cost $1200, seeing how much Canon charges for their 50mm f/1.2 version
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1030&messag...
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
i think this is a fake, most parts of both lens is identical. Plus f1.2 can't be roughly the same size as the f1.4.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
the "AF NIKKOR" on the front bezzel give these away as fakes.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Not to mention the focus ring is straight off the AF series. I would expect any AFS prime to have a similar focus ring to the 10.5 or 105VR with the long thin groves, not the dual nubs.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I hope these are fake. My wallet can't take another beating.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I'm down for a good Photoshopping now and then, but this is just pure unadulterated evil. On the other hand, I don't know if my pocketbook could stand it if it was true. :)
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
oh well I guess that was fun while it lasted. I do agree that that if you think about it, the f/1.2 should be quite huge and not be the same size as the f/1.4. I have to say that I don't understand why people would even bother to create something like that. It's like they have nothing better to do with their time.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I have to say that I don't understand why people would even bother to create something like that.
It makes them giggle to fool people? Because they always fool people no matter how poorly they're done.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
i may be new at this, but why the hell would nikon both with releasing lenses like this when the moneymakers are their over the top zooms?
kind of a cool idea though
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I would love for Nikon to release either of these lenses, but I hate to admit it's not likely soon. I hope that I'm wrong though. ;)
I have to agree with Tracer on the "AF NIKKOR" on the front not being typical of other AF-S VR desgns by Nikon.
Originally posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
disneymike (a group admin) edited this topic 26 months ago.
|
 |
Tsk - it should've said "AF-S VR 33mm f/1.2G" etc. Then I'd be interested. Especially if the VR was the new improved nonexistent hyper-VR that they'll hopefully invent in the future, that can electronically reposition the axis to emulate a tilt-shift lens.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
This is cruel to those of us who are NAS junkies, and jonesing for a fix. Damn wife nicked the CC.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
The ED and VR were the fakeouts. There's no reason for either one in a lens that short.
VR, maybe, but ED glass would be optically frivolous at 50mm.
They're good shoops, though, I'll give the artist that.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
If an AF-S 50mm came out, would it really be the lens that everyone wants? It would have the same limitations for DSLR users (Nikon's clear intended market) that the current cheap 50mm does. And if Nikon did produce a f/1.2 model, it would be outrageously expensive and probably end up shortly discontinued for lack of sales like the 28mm f/1.4.
I know there are people who are jonesing to get a new fast prime, so I hope that Nikon announces something before years end.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
justinphillips
a. the 28mm f/1.4 was not discontinued due to lack of sales. It was discontinued due to the lead content in the lens elements not jiving with EU regulations.
b. The 50mm f/1.2 AI-S, which is still a current lens produced by Nikon is not that huge. Adding the AF-S motor system wouldn't make it much larger.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I'd like to see them put an AF-S motor on the 35mm f/1.4, too.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
yep, the f/1.2 lens is way to small to be an actual 50mm f/1.2
also, why would they bother with VR?
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Hello Nikon????
where is my 14mm f/1.4 AF-S damn it!
seriously
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
GabrielR [deleted] says:
Mean, or stupid.....or both.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
i would prefer a zoom 10-500mm f1.4
.....!!!
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
iliasnikon, i would only buy that if it was 3G VR and sharp as the 50mm in all focal length... and less than 100€...
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
@iliasnikon : Be careful what you wish for. The front element of your lens would be 500mm/1.4 = 357mm or ~14".
That's about the size of a family-sized pizza. And you gonna need that pizza after you have carried such a lens up and down a hill.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I'd like a 14mm f/1.4 as well.
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I'd take the following. A 24/1.4 AF-S, a 50/1.2 AF-S, an 85/1.2 AF-S, and a 135/1.8 AF-S. ...and I'd be set. :)
Posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
not bad but yeah i just checked up with nikon and they havent made AF-S 50mm VRs you wouldnt even need VR at 1.2 1.4 and 1.8 seriously,
its a prime, no need for VR
but they are making a AF 1.2 to fight with the canon L series 1.2 but like AS IF they would put VR thats just too much, its the fastest lens on the nikkor list, and it CLEARLY does not need VR!!
oh yeah another point out that its clearly photoshopped
look at it, the body is a mix of several zoom nikkors, because that focus window thing is just too small and the "switch" is just too tiny
Originally posted 19 months ago.
(
permalink
)
uoʞıɾnɟ ʇıq-8。 edited this topic 19 months ago.
|
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
|
Nikkor /
Discuss
Feed – Subscribe to Nikkor discussion threads
Flickr Blog |
About Flickr |
Terms of Use |
Your Privacy |
Copyright/IP Policy | Report Abuse
|
Deutsch
|
English
|
Español
|
Français
|
|
Italiano
|
Português
Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
