 |
Thank you for this little tutorial.
Though, the link doesn't work :-/
Posted 42 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
here i think: http://www.hadleyweb.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/CZ5/combinez5.htm
Posted 42 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Thanks Schizoform- have updated the link (I think).
Brian V.
Posted 42 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Thank you posting this tutorial, Brian.....MUCH appreciated by those of us who would like to give the focus stacking a try.....but did not know how to get started.
Posted 42 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Very cool, I've never heard of focus stacking until today, but the possibility of doing something like this had occurred to me. Kind of like HDR except with focus instead of exposure. Using both techniques together could get very interesting.
I use a Mac, so cominez5 won't work for me. I did a search on Version Tracker and didn't find anything similar for the Mac OS. If anyone in the group knows of such a program, or has any experience focus stacking manually in PhotoShop, I'd be interested.
Posted 40 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Hi Finistr
Helicon have released focus stacking prog on a MAC- 30 day free trial $30 after
www.myzips.com/software/Helicon-Focus-Mac.phtml
There is some other freeware software for the mac- I'll see if I can locate it.
Think the freeware one is this- bigwww.epfl.ch/demo/edf/
Brian V.
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(
permalink
)
Lord V edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
 |
Thanks so much Lord V, I'll check it out.
Posted 40 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
awesome programme, and well explained!! i have tried it and you really do need to keep the subject in the same position, as if its only a fraction out you get lines and stuff round some the edges.
Posted 40 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
tr33lo
Yes you do sometimes get halo effects- I just remove them with the clone tool. Think this mainly occurs if there are rotational differences between the pics which combinez5 does not check for.
Brian V.
Posted 40 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Excellent explanation: I'll have to try this sometime.
Posted 39 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Awesome, thanks for the info.
Posted 39 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Thank you so much. I followed the link here from your 100% fly crop. I have never heard of focus stacking and I've been taking tons of Dragonfly macros lately and I can't wait to have a moment to see if I can pull off a dragonfly focus stack.
Posted 39 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I did several dragons last year- works well as long as nothing moves.
Brian V.
Posted 38 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I´ve asked this to you in another picture, but then I found this tutorial!!
Thanks Brian! ^^
Posted 37 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
why not using photoshop? :)
Posted 32 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
This is much easier than photoshop because the prog does the alignment, resizing, colour matching etc for you. I do use photoshop to tidy up after if necessary.
Brian V.
Posted 32 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I have tried it with 9 pictures.
I focussed each time (manually) a bit further.

thank you Lord
Originally posted 30 months ago.
(
permalink
)
Dirk Delbaere edited this topic 23 months ago.
|
 |
Brilliant tutorial, well done.
Posted 30 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
jazzology [deleted] says:
Searching "Stacking" I come across this... Nice example of a "Louisiana Iris" "I. fulva" Our state flower and now in prolific bloom just about anywhere that stays wet...
I'm trying "imagej" as I'm on a mac
cheers, Jeff...from the camel
Posted 27 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Thanks for this very helpful tutorial. I've just referred a great flickr friend to focus stacking and really appreciated someone had already done such a nice guide.
Originally posted 26 months ago.
(
permalink
)
Fort Photo edited this topic 26 months ago.
|
 |
I regretted why I havn't discovered this a long time ago. Thanks a lot Lord V for this tutorial. I'm bit fan of your macro work.
Posted 25 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Another focus stacking program for Mac is Photo Acute Studio. It also has a number of other functions for stacked images, such as noise reduction, elimination of moving objects, etc
photoacute.com/studio/index.html
Originally posted 10 months ago.
(
permalink
)
Zozo Calypso edited this topic 10 months ago.
|
 |
Photoshop CS4 will have this feature too.
Posted 10 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I have Photoshop CS4, but can find nothing about how to use it to do focus stacking. I see that LordV uses CombineMZ. I have tried Helicon Focus, with pretty good initial results, but am wondering whether anyone has made a comparison of these three software options for doing focus stacking.
Anyone?
Posted 5 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Hi Lord V and all
The other day i was trying to take a series of pics of a watch with focus stacking. But at the end i noticed that with the change of focus point the subjects also moves a little. i tried to auto blend it in ps4 but the result is not as perfect as i wanted it to be. I heard that one has to move the camera according focus point. Can u pl! tell me what should i do to solve this issue .
Thank You
Posted 4 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I've seen excellent stacks doen with both the combine series (combine z5, combinezm and combinezp) as well as helicon focus. Not really seen much done with cs4 yet.
Posted 4 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
urgyen.- how are you changing the focus point ?
The FOV will change slightly as you move in - this means that each image slice has slightly different sizes which are automatically re-sized when you use stacking software. Not sure if you are suffering from too much movement but often when doing manual focus stacking you may need to re-size the images and perhaps rotate them a bit to get them to align before trying to overlay them.
brian V.
Posted 4 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Hi Lord V
Thank you very much for ur time. I had some other issues so i couldn't answers ur question earlier. Mean while i tried to stack photos with helicon and it worked really good.
Thank you once again for sharing ur knowledge with us.
Posted 4 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Hi Brian
I'm finding CS4 much more forgiving than Combine ZM with respect to frame to frame alignment and halos.
Linden
Posted 4 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Hi Lord V,
I have been having issues with stacking using Combine ZM. The output is not as sharp as I expected. Should I use more frames? When I used more than 3 frames, artifacts showed up. Secondly, when I try to stack a straight object, the output seems to "bend" to one side. How can I resolve this? And lastly, I have tried using Helicon Focus, but the output seems like it's been rotated on the axis. Can you help me with my issues? Thank you for sharing. Rio.
Originally posted 3 months ago.
(
permalink
)
R10's edited this topic 3 months ago.
|
 |
Hi Rio - must admit I don't use CZM- I tend to use the older CZ5 (it's better at not having artifacts). Interestingly I took the sharpening routines out of the stack macro as I didn't like the results (oversharpened) so I sharpen after in PS. WRT not getting sharp images- are the individual slices sharp in the first place ?
One thing none of the stacking progs are good at is handling low contrast detail.
What magnification and aperture are you using for the shots ?
Brian V.
Posted 3 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Hi Lord V,
Thank you, I will try to use the older CZ5 instead. I use EF 100mm for the lens, at 1:1 magnification and f/11. I have recently read somewhere, that with that lens, I shouldn't be setting aperture lower than f/5.6 due to diffraction, Is it true? Thank you again for your guidance.
Posted 3 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Hi R10,
re the aperture and diffraction, The real answer is you should use whatever aperture you need to get the effect you want. It's true especially with macro that images suffer from diffraction softening, but they also suffer often from lack of DOF and you just need to balance the two effects.
I'm a bit of detail junkie but still take most of my 1:1 shots at F11, true they will be slightly sharper at F8 but I don't like the DOF loss. You start seeing very significant sharpness loss at 1:1 at about F16 or smaller.
Brian V.
Posted 3 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Hi Lord V, thank you for your tips... Regards, Rio.
Posted 3 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
I tried both, and found the Helicon focus interesting.
i am only trying, there were few movements due to focus adjustments and movement of subject.
helicon did well to sort it, but costs $200.
Posted 2 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
There is another new software prog around now that is getting good reports - think the beta is free. Zerene stacker
here zerenesystems.com/stacker/
Posted 2 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
|