|
So here's the Most and Least Interesting photos for the tag "saucy" (as of a few minutes ago anyway):
Most:

Least:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
The tag karaoke gives me:
Most:

Least:

Oddly, neither seems to have any karaoke going on in the photo. Ironically, the least interesting is one of mine.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
you know, i was a little surprised not to find any cooking photos when i looked for saucy...
wonder what's up with that
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I always add the "boncey" tag to all photos with me in.
So I checked the boncey tag.
When sorting by "Most Interesting" I noticed the photo of mine that is actually my most interesting of all was *last* in the list.
This to me suggests we're seeing it sorted by least interesting.
Anyone else care to see if they get any similar results?
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Anyway, I tried this with the London tag and got totally distracted by some incredible images from razorbern.
Check this one out; amazing.

I love it when I discover amazing new images on Flickr.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Haha!
Great idea, VZ! I'm in a puerile mood, so here are the most and least
interesting images for 'butt' *
most:

least:

* searching for this tag results in the disturbing message:
butt clusters
NEW Explore and refine butt photos with our brand new clustery
goodness!
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Bacon!
Most:

Least:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Chia, when that happens to me (which it usually does,) it's always a missing > after the img src bit...
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Teotwawki, someone on the bugs forum just pointed out that I was trying to use the address of the page the pic was on as the address for the image. Which means it's been a very long day... Note to self -- check addresses as well as code...
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
teotwaki: lol butt clustery goodness lmao, oh man, i'm gonna cry
Party
(216790 photos)
Most Interesting with
508 Views
33 Favorites
33 Comments
17 Tags
in 3 Sets and 12 Groups:

From *Ivan*
Least Interesting with
2088 Views
12 Favorites
20 Comments
10 tags
in 1 Set and 1 Group:

From Sexy Swedish Babe
wtf? how is a badly exposed picture of clouds more interesting than a Sexy Swedish Babe dancing half nekkid with her hot girl friend?
what is the world coming to?
i say we set things right! everybody comment and favorite the hell out of Sexy Swedish Babe's photo
When you view it be sure to add something, a favorite, a tag, a comment, a note, something...theoretically this will bring her actions to views ratio up thus raising the interestingness level
we have to restore balance to the flickrverse! are ya with me?!
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
...
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
SNIFF
most interesting:

least interesting:

moral: pigs are interesting, cats are not.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
this was a surprise:
Sex
Most:

Least:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
...
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
ipernity.com/home/nicoleb / No to censorship [deleted] says:
why did you delete the rest of your postings?
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
i accidentally posted twice, it happens after 16 hours of flickring
hey, about the tags thing, you really think it's better to have less tags?
i've copied all the tags from all the first page photos that come up as most interesting with the party tag, good or bad to add them to our Sexy Swedish project?
lemme know asap, not sure how much longer i can stay in the trenches tonight...
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
ipernity.com/home/nicoleb / No to censorship [deleted] says:
well, don't know, but the sexy tag makes it get hundereds of clicks but let's it drop emidiately ;)
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
hmmmm, i'm wondering how this thing really works, i think a photo would rate high in interestingness if it has lots of favorites and comments proportionate to high views.
something with lots of views and few actions like comments, notes and favorites wouldn't be as interesting as something with as many actions as views, or pretty close anyway
tagging and adding to groups would get the photo higher exposure but we need to get higher actions too, i think
each of us can only favorite it once but we can comment the hell out of it all we want so let's be sure to add a comment with every view
going to copy this to the photo as a comment now and add the tags
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
we're up to page3! we're in 45th place for the party tag...up from 216790!
www.flickr.com/photos/tags/party/interesting/
rock on people, keep it goin
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
What's this Sexy Swedish project? As someone who is half Swedish AND living in Sweden, I'm not understanding the "sexy" bit.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
ipernity.com/home/nicoleb / No to censorship [deleted] says:
I wanna know what kicked my pic completely out of that day -I think I really don't get it - sigh ;)
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
studiozoe: check out the Party tag post up above
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
i don't get it, it hasn't moved in two hours i think we need more people favoriting it
favorites have to be the heavy hitter in the interestingness algorithm
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
ipernity.com/home/nicoleb / No to censorship [deleted] says:
Has somebody checked out the dorks in yesterdays listing???
(6th of August :/)
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
we need more commenters and favoriters (especially favoriters) over here on this pic:
we brought it up over 200,000 places to 45th overall but now we're stuck.
i think diversity is a key. diversity and action.
diversity being lots of unique members.
action being favoriting, commenting, adding notes, tags.
so if you haven't already please go comment on and favorite this photo

In case you missed it you can Review the reasons why we're doing this
check our current status
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Being a cat lover I decided to check out the most interesting 'pussy'.
Most:

(from tirau_dan
Least: (warning: massive cock!)

(from Tom Coates)
What's cool is I've also found some more pictures for other groups I admin (such as number 2 belongs in 'Cats in Sinks' and Tom Coates has some lovely examples of Symmetry in his photostream)
Great idea, VoodooZebra!
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
teotwaki came up with the brilliant idea of blogging the pic. please favorite, comment, add notes and blog the hell out of those girls!
it's 1am in my part of the world, i'm going to bed, hope you all keep at it
the balance is definitely shifting
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
BTW: I have an idea for a new game. To be revealed once the balance has been restored ;-)
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
try putting some notes on. I think notes are the secret weapon on interestingness.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
To counter all the naughtiness of the Sexy Swedish Dancing Babes I decided to bring a bit of morality back to the thread and take a look at nun.
Most interesting:

Least interesting:

Strangely, the least interesting had 31 favourites in 444 views. The photographer awful sara is a wicked photog. More proof that this thing must be undermined and brought down...
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
most interesting pic tagged BURN:

least:

i like the least much more...
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I'm pleased to say that I have the most interesting cock on Flickr:

...and Leo Tilt has the least interesting:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Since I just woke up (it's saturday, i'm allowed to sleep long) I searched for
Coffee
most interesting:

least interesting

And all I wanted was a nice picture of a brown hot beverage. ..
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
Deadbeat Dad [deleted] says:
The most interesting picture tagged with Boring:

And the most boring picture tagged with Boring:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
The most interesting people are ...

bathing ones
and #98573 interesting people are

not real.
Interestingly, famous robholland is a close second least interesting people.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Booda
I ran this on Booda, my english bulldog, because she is my most
interesting photo. She is 1 of 107. I hope this
isn't considered cheating.
Most Interesting.

Least Interesting
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Most interesting pic tagged ACCIDENT is an appropriately interesting chuffing hell-train fire....

But the LEAST interesting is far for arresting then the piles of for-insurance-purposes snaps of bent fenders and minor dings. I mean, how often do YOU see a great pile of gleaming, silvery FISH in the middle of the road??
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Voodoo Zebra, what's the status?
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Party
We've moved up a couple spots from 45 to 42. We're on Page 3 of the Party list sorted by Interestingness: www.flickr.com/photos/tags/party/interesting/
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Ok, I will do some rituals here in my bedroom, real life, and hope it will help -- Mr Voodoo.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Continuing on from teotwawki's puerile search, I thought it would be interesting (in a public school sort of way) to see the most and least interesting fart pictures.
The most interesting is somewhat predictable...

The least interesting is a bit easier on the eyes

At the time of writing this has been favourited 5 times!! Which just goes to show you - farting gets you favourites.
Curiously wonder-photographer tarotastic has an image in the interesting+farts list. Can you find it?
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Is balance restored? I'm just not sure.
Tag: Jerseysurf
Most interesting:

Least:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I see that the most interesting photo tagged with "hamster" is mine:

The least interesting photo is this one that looks like a creepy drowned rat:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
ipernity.com/home/nicoleb / No to censorship [deleted] says:
I've checked out the Labrador tag :)
The most interesting there is this one (one of my favs so it must be true ;)

And the least interesting is this poor pooch:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
@guy ingognito: by my reckoning balance will only be restored when Sexy Swedish Babe's pic comes in ahead of ivan's pic in the most interesting Party tag search results
but it's good to know this is having interesting side effects
we're currently at #41, we've moved up from #216790 but he's still at #1 so keep at it, blog, favorite, comment and note this picture:

BTW Jim Skea: that fart thing is just too funny, well done
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
hmmm, it hasn't moved much overnight, 23 favorites for 2300 views, maybe if Sexy removes it then reuploads it, tags it "party" and we all go favorite it really quick?
anybody else think that would work?
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
OK, I've just thrown all my Flickr principles in the air and favourited "dancing me with friend - part 2" in a shameless attempt to nudge it up a place or two (and of course to get in those 2 girls' good books).
@VZ: Glad you liked the fart finds. But remember kids, don't try to make your own version of that photo at home (with or without the self-timer).
PS: didn't work. "dancing me with friend - part 2" is still at #40.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Yout think that there is a correlation between interestingness and how much time is in between the upload date and the comment/favorite/view date?
Well, Swedish Babe's photo has 12 comments (8 unique comments not including her)from one month since the photo was uploaded.
Ivan's photo has 33 comments (20 unique) within a span of 8 days since being uploaded. It also has 8 more favs, but around 2000 less views.
Ali's photo which is #2 has 17 comments (15 unique) within one month of being uploaded. It has 15 less favs than Swedish Babe's pic and over 2000 less views.
The #3 most interesting party picture has only 3 comments in a one month span since the photo was uploaded, but has 74 more favs and about 1000 less views.
Conclusion? I have no idea.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
i think faves have to have more weight than comments, not sure if the timing matters though
this was at the bottom of the party pile yesterday and rose over 200,000 places to #45 within a matter of hours once we got started.
going off notihing but how I might design the algorithm i would give more weight to faves and "blog this" than just about anything else. and if a photo had thousands of views but only a few faves i think it would be less interesting compared to a photo with fewer views and more faves, that makes sense but how do we manipulate it?
i just think we have to fave it and blog it to death until it jumps up there
i appreciate your taking one for the team like that Jim, you're a good man and once the flickrvers is in balance i'm looking forward to partying with you in Sweden
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
ipernity.com/home/nicoleb / No to censorship [deleted] says:
Oh yeah - you always wanted to know what a toilet looks like?
Check that tag out ;)
(I've two or three pics myself :)
The most interesting is this one:

The lest interesting is this one:

Uh - well :D
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Auugh! My eyes!
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
ipernity.com/home/nicoleb / No to censorship [deleted] says:
:)
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
'Interesting' tag :

Most

Least
How boring !
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Most interesting crotch:

Least interesting crotch:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
The most interesting dumbass:

The least interesting:

And I had to note the number two dumbass:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
ipernity.com/home/nicoleb / No to censorship [deleted] says:
crotch is freakin' boring too - but a good idea for some tags ;)
Guess we have to do something to get nr. 2 dumbass at Nr. 1 ;)
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
HA! Bush is now Flickr's Number 1 Dumbass. I faved and commented and alas...
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
i just on a whim checked the "blond" tag and was astounded to find that 14 out of 20 on the first page were my own (gloat) and a similar number on the second page. egads. but heres the most interesting:

and the least interesting:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
of course i got a different result with "blonde". i suppose it could be debated if both spellings are legit. but hey.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
VeeZee, others who've blogged the Sexy Swedish party pic... Could you post a link to the blog, so we can try clicking through to the shot from outside of Flickr? I'm wondering if clicking in from external links weighs with the algorhythm.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
Brother Love [deleted] says:
CRACK
Most interesting:

Least interesting:

An "interesting" result: Asthetics 1 - Reality 0
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
chialynn: here's my blog post:
fucking with flickr interestingness
good idea ;-)
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Strangely, the girls have dropped from the top 100. They were up to 22 or something last time I checked.
Maybe somebody from Flickr caught wind of our experiment and weighted that photo separately.
Photos tagged with Party
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
They're not even in the top 400. Though another photo of SSB is.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
that's odd as hell...wonder what happened
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
we've added 600 views in the last 48 hours and tripled the favorites, we should be in there baby...maybe somebody marked it "may offend"? would that do it?
let's do a test, here's my most interesting photo tagged with voodoozebra:

somebody go mark it "may offend" and let's see what happens...
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
OK, done. But it's still #1.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
no, actually it worked, it's gone from the scale entirely now:
www.flickr.com/photos/tags/voodoozebra/interesting/
must take a few minutes for the scale to update. so i bet that's what happened, bet somebody marked our experiment as may offend.
maybe we should retaliate by marking all party photos as may offend? that'll teach 'em
[edit]
even better idea: if Sexy Swedish Babe uploads the photo again and we all go mark it as a favorite really quick that should get it way up the scale fast since we won't be fighting against the 2000+ views the original had, sortof a sideways way of restoring balance but wtf?
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Is there any way we can know if someone has marked one of our photos as "may offend"?
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Let's dethrone *Ivan*!
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
that's too easy grebo, we'll save that as a last resort, if nothing else we now know all we have to do is mark everybody ahead of us as "may offend"
but first we need a pic that'll show again, i think SSB will need to upload the image again and let us know when she does so we can time our actions to bump it up the scale
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
@Jim: no, i don't have any indicators that rentahamster marked my photo offensive, no flickr message, nothing on the photo page, nothing in organizr. i think flickr only contacts you if enough people (3 or more i think) mark it as offensive and then flickr asks you to make it private or something...but it seems only 1 "may offend" mark is enough to remove it from interestingness scales
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I marked it offensive too, but I do that with all your photos as a matter of routine.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Ok guys! I will upload the picture in COLOR! How about that? And keep the old picture online too. I have no idea on who might have marked it offensive. And oh boy, I have seen pictures on Flickr that were a lot more offensive than my stomach. I think the algorithm is on to us...
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
yay! new pic and in color too:

you all know what to do by now: go fave, comment and blog this bad boy 'till it's #1 in the Party list
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
ipernity.com/home/nicoleb / No to censorship [deleted] says:
@Sexy Swedish Babe
Guess what - there's a bunch off jealous assholes out there & flickr is definetly deleting accounts which contain (in their opinion) offensive pics.
I've just set all of mine private, cause somebody must have flagged mine too (I can guess who did it) - they where not to be found in the top 500 nor in my top 200.
Maybe I get deleted for expressing my opnion about that like this, but I'm pissed:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I'm with you Rain. Here's to the lame-ass whiny wankers:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
ipernity.com/home/nicoleb / No to censorship [deleted] says:
Thanks :D
It's actually for all of us.
I like taking those pics and looking at others. Most of you do too.
So, this really sucks :(
Let's flick yahoo and flickr off ;)
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Erotic
Most:

Least:
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Update on the Restoration of Balance project:
Plan B, we have a new colorized version of the original photo which we're trying to push to the top now.
Currently we're on page 5, 88th place for the party tag! Not a bad debut but we need more faves! we can take this one all the way to the top
www.flickr.com/photos/sexyswedishbabe/32119853/
edit: now we're in 82nd place
edit: i blogged it, faved it and added a note and we're up to 63rd already, if a few more people do the same we should hit the top 20 soon
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Rain -- I just don't know... I am Swedish... what can I say. I am pretty liberal. The things I find offensive are maybe not what the average American would find offensive, and vice versa. The Flickr Team should be proud to have such a lively, intelligent, and creative community going on.
So we do know now what makes a picture interesing according to Flickr? Favorites rank the picture higher, comments are good, tags and notes semi-good, blogging it is super-good.
And high views = probably nipple-warning and not very good for the interestingness, because it is not safe for kids.
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
It's on the first page of the most interesting photo overall on Flickr, not just the party tag page! Very cool and good job everyone. Seems like we're figuring out what works. Lots of views and comments, but less important the added tags?
www.flickr.com/explore/interesting/24hours/
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I'd say it's important to get many faves + views (but not too many).
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Oh, SSB, that is interesting. Why would that be?
It's at #15 on the party tag interestingness page. Woo-hoo! www.flickr.com/photos/tags/party/interesting/
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
@Lorri37: we think too many views without enough actions (comments, faves, notes, blogging) hurts the interestingness because the algorithm reads it as "well lots of people are looking at it but then they're not saying anything about it or favoriting it so it must not be that interesting..."
at least that's the impression we had from the original BW pic we were rallying behind...she had over 2000 views but only a few faves and was languishing at the bottom of the party pool
#15? Really?! That's hawt
edit: now it's dropped back down to #57 for some reason, but it's still showing so at least it hasn't been blacklisted yet...
www.flickr.com/photos/tags/party/interesting/?page=3
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
In honor of my new pet, Simon, here are the results for betta, interestingly the most and least interesting photo is from the same person (and yes, there are more than two photos in the search results):
Most:

From spyzter
Least:

From spyzter
Posted 83 months ago.
(permalink)
|
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
|