|
Search this group's discussions
|
Citytv and Flickr Images
|
Hello all... this might be of interest to you.
Last July, I was victim of an attempted burglary at my home in Toronto. In his flight, the would-be burglar fell from my second floor deck and broke his leg. While waiting for the police and ambulance to arrive, I took photos of the burglar as he lay on the ground below.
A newsman from Citytv also came to the scene. I refused his request for an interview. As he was poking around the property, I asked him to leave. We spoke briefly -- he was nice enough; it's the media that I find objectionable. I mentioned that I had taken pictures of the perpetrator and was looking forward to posting them on my Flickr site. He was interested in seeing them, so I provided him with a card.
I left that afternoon for a weekend in Montreal. When I returned home, a friend showed me his recording of the news story which is when I discovered that Citytv had lifted my photos from my Flickr site for their broadcast.
I wrote to the broadcaster, and they denied any wrongdoing. They claimed that I provided them with verbal permission to use my photography. I did no such thing. Furthermore, the images that were broadcast appear to be screencaps of the images since only my "friends" have access to my full-resolution images.
I then appealed to the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council, who just today released their ruling on the matter.
The decision can be found here: cbsc.ca/english/decisions/2008/080509.php
Posted at 8:48AM, 8 May 2008 PDT
(permalink)
|
|
Thanks for that! It's an interesting read. Most interesting for this group is that it points out that fair dealing in Canada includes news reporting but also requires credit to the creator.
Posted 49 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Good work, pursuing the matter to its proper conclusion! It's possible that the news station was under the assumption that you'd throw your hands in the air and say, "oh well."
Posted 49 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Good for you. Media generally do this and its quite tacky at best. I guess this is why they employ the "send in your breaking scene images" tactic, because that implies consent.
A few months ago the same happened in Australia where a few individuals photos were stolen off the web to be run with a story where two teens died in a storm drain flooding which they were caught in.
Posted 49 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
That is awesome! Too bad there isn't a governing board like that in the US.
Posted 49 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Well, folks... on Saturday, May 10th, CablePulse24 broadcast the CBSC's announcement during the 6pm news broadcast. That announcement only admits where the broadcaster wronged -- but does not set things right by reinstating the credit for the works (my photos) that they unlawfully broadcast. The victory is bittersweet.... if it can be called a victory at all.
Posted 49 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Well, I suppose it's better than nothing and according to the ruling that was all they were obliged to do. Well done for fighting it nonetheless.
Posted 49 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Good for you!
Posted 49 months ago.
(permalink)
|
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
|
|