FlickrCentral / Discuss

This thread has been closed by ƃoʌɐʇsnƃ.

Current Discussion

This gives photographers a bad name...
Latest: 3 minutes ago
Look through the photostream of the person above you and choose your favourite
Latest: 5 minutes ago
Professional Photographer Talks About the Realities of the Photography Business
Latest: 9 minutes ago
Books: the chemistry of photography
Latest: 22 minutes ago
Puritan Porn Paranoia. Tilting at Windmills.
Latest: 58 minutes ago
Not just another copyright infringement; this one's, um, amusing.
Latest: 5 hours ago
CloudPic
Latest: 27 hours ago
Yahoo kills Flickr!!!
Latest: 34 hours ago
Sharpening in PS Raw Converter - Am I Going Crazy?
Latest: 35 hours ago
journalist who used a photograph of mine without asking!
Latest: 2 days ago
Post your Galleries here
Latest: 3 days ago
Syria and Lebanon "Descending into sectarian civil war"
Latest: 3 days ago
More...

Search this group's discussions

Photographic Editing Offences. (BLOG AVAILABLE.)

view profile

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EDITING OFFENCES BLOG {blogspot}
Join now and keep track of the explosive goings on of PEO.


THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EDITING OFFENCES GROUP.
Join now and ask for forgiveness for your sins. Everybody is welcome, you are allowed to ask for forgiveness once a day, the pool is moderated by many disciples of the cause. Come along and wash away your blasphemies in the group pool.





There's a new craze every year or so. Off the top of my head I can think of 5 different travesties in the world of digital photography editing.

1. Framing
The process of putting a few extra pixels and lines around your digital image to add 'impact.'

2. Watermarks
The needless rape of a photograph because the photographer is big headed enough to believe someone will come and steal his/her photo to profit from it.

3. Selective Colouring
The process of converting an image to monochrome, but leaving one element coloured, such as a tram, or lady in a red dress.

4. The Flood Filter
A Photoshop plugin introduced a few years ago that everyone went crazy for. Everything for about a year was submerged in perfectly generated rippled water.

5. Highly Overprocessed HDR
The latest new FAD... HDR techniques have been around for over 100 years (Yes they have.) But overprocessed tone mapping nonsense from the likes of Photomatix users are all the rage right now.


These aren't examples of just bad processing, they are intentional attacks on photographs in an attempt to make them more interesting. I will be the first to admit I have tried it all - but more importantly - I moved on.

Can you help me think of some other obvious ones?

--EDIT with EXTRAS--

6. Fake Polaroid Frame
Can't find any Polaroid film? Doesn't matter... Fake it and pretend you're an instant film master.

7. Out of Focus Macros. (BOKEH)
Many thanks to Arty: "Out of focus macros. (You call it bokeh, I call it bollocks. You're supposed to INCREASE the depth of field with close-ups, not leave half the critter/leaf out of focus)."

8. Tilt and Shift Fakes.
Very simple post processing involving blurring a major part of a photograph (usually one overlooking a street.) The selective blurring appears as a shallow depth of field, to give it the photo the appearance of looking like a minature model village.

9. Fake film frames around Digital photographs (similar to #6)

10. Black and White Street Photography
"It's 2009 ffs."(Thank you Arty.)

11. Being a smug wanker/ Purists and Ludites and intentional attacks on photographers artistic explorations.Thank you Goneforawonder
Guilty!

12. TTV (Through the viewfinder.)
As Macredeye says.. "why?" It is basically a photo of what you see when looking through a camera viewfinder. If you want to do it you'll need a small lens. I find my cameraphone does the trick.

13. Cloning yourself / Multiplicity
Keep your camera on a tripod and take 10 pictures of yourself looking like a twat in different positions. Use each file to clone yourself in layer after layer. That'll make you look cool won't it?

14. The Orton Effect.
The original technique invented by Michael Orton was to overlay two or more images of an identical scene with very different exposures on slide film. One image is sharply focused and the others are very out of focus. Alex.Dram points out that he cannot find a reasonable need for it's existence. (Yes I tried it once too.)


15. Supreme Lack of Subject Matter
thank you Wiseacre for this edition. He states that: my personal peeve with any of these techniques isn't the techniques (or gimmicks), but the supreme lack of subject matter. Bokeh is fine, but of lights, raindrops, a leaf -- anyone with a 50mm and able to set their camera correctly can do that.

16. Attempting to digitally recreate an originally unpredictable effect in a very deliberate way.
You've got a brand new digital camera, it takes 40Mp pictures. You have a £1200 lens... Yet you process your photos to make them look like you took them with a £5 Holga.

17. Light trails.
ahh, how cute. You've learnt long exposures and you've had this great and original thought of going to the local motorway overpass with your tripod and taking a photo of all the red and white lights whizzing passed. Guess what? It's not original.

18. Lens Flare
Now I can't believe I left this off the list. It's perhaps the oldest gimmick on photoshop/psp/corel. Tacky lens flare added to photos creating a little sparkle with faded lines all over the picture. Such beauty!

19. Standard full photo filters
Hmm... My photo looks crap. How about if I press this buttom. *BOOM* It's embossed! Or suddenly looks like an impressionist painting, or has the effect of fur or leather or....

20. Planetoids
Ooh look at this lovely landscape. Best turn it into a planet. Oh not just here though. I'm going to do one EVERYWHERE I GO. Planet, planet planet all day long. Click here to see, but beware, you may end up carving out your own eyes with a spoon.

21. View On Black
"Oh god, yeah. That's probably worse than putting a black frame round a photo. If I want to view something on black, I'll print it out and shove it up my arse." Thank you.

22. Photographers who think they are poets
All thanks to Jamalrob for suggesting this travesty. Such titles on photographs as "True beauty lies within" or "I stopped, I stared, I wondered, as I walked through my placid life" .... on a LANDSCAPE photograph. Grow up you pretentious....

23. Listening to Jazz While Editing Your Photos
A serious offence. May lead to any of the above being reproduced.

24. Cutting the corners off
Why? Have I missed some health and safety b*ll*cks? Do I need to put on a Hi-Viz vest before I go into photoshop. Will I take "someones eye out wi that"?

25. Out of Frame
OMFG WTF LOOK! I'm stepping OUT-OF-THE-FRAME. Man, I am SO awesome.

26. Panoramic stitch togethers
ANYTHING... and I mean anything, that ends up as a gimmick that can be used with a mobile phone is a dreadful offence.

27. Immaculate skin
"...portraits with the skin blurred softened into oblivion. Like seeing pores will kill you. instantly." Thank you.

28. Oversharpening
Anyone who goes to a camera club will understand the fact that since digital photography started popping up... so did oversharpening. It's the sick practise of taking an out of focus photo and jacking up every sharpening filter to FIX it. This offence comes with a 3 year ban on digital cameras.

29. Dropshadow/Buttonise
...Or ANYTHING that makes your photo look like it's jumping off the screen. Creating the illusion that your photo is a 3D work of art is a processing crime. If it's a good photo, it won't need it!

30. Texture Layers
Why must you insist on taking another photo of crumbly plaster and using it to take a dump on another photo? Layers of any type of texture are big and not clever. A bit like stupid dwarfs.

31. Infrared Conversion
Crappy landscape? Convert to B+W... still looks crap? Convert to infrared... oooh... look... it glows.... pretty

32. Cropping
Just because you've got a camera that shoots @ 30Megapixel does not mean you can get lazy about filling up the full frame. Get it right first time and remember "crop is crap."

33. ATTEMPTING TO BE CLEVER
This is ABSOLUTELY unacceptable. There is to be no freedom of thought allowed in any photo editing. Here at Flickrschwitz we like minimal curve adjustment and colour correction ONLY. Anything else and vee shall av u tekkin owt zide and zhot!

34. Fractalius
More like syphilis. Take any boring old picture and turn it into some kind of light drawing that will make you want to scratch out your own eyes with a rusty fork. Needless vandalism on your photos.

35. Drink/Drugs While Editing
As demonstrated by many of the thread posters including www.flickr.com/photos/alexdram/, JAMALROB, BLUEBOY & GONEFORAWANDER this may lead to any of the above offences being commited or even worse, topic posts that you may regret in the morning.

36. Straight from my mobile phone and I'm proud of it.
Grow up. Nobody cares.

37. BHL Gimmicks
The never ending camel ride that is BIG HUGE LABS. This is not easy to approach. Everything and anything is available here. It's where View on Black (#21) comes from... Turn your photo into a billboard or a jigsaw. Create instant works of art. This site is photography's version of the Garden of Eden. Please... PLEASE... DO NOT EAT THE FUCKING APPLE.

38. Warholizer
So you think you're Andy Warhol do you? Think that you'd look cool/retro/kitsch/chic if you were multiplied and changed into psychodelic colours? You don't. You look like a prat. Just one of you in the correct colour is enough.

39. Portrait Dumping Grounds
Take your boring portraits and jazz them up using a vile uploading process online. Yersinia alerted us to these ever growing ghastly websites of photo destruction. Such sites as DUMPR or PHOTOFUNIA are trainwrecks and need to be cleaned up.

40. Vignetting
Why? You bought a digital camera to get rid of this common film problem. Don't fake it and pretend you're an artist. You little cheat, you.

41. NOT Cropping
Throwing away or leaving as suboptimal a potentially good shot just because you've confused Cartier-Bresson with God.

42. Abnormally Large Moon
Layering a telephoto, way-out-of-proportion moon into a wide angle night landscape. This isn't science fiction. This isn't a Disney film. This is photography, stop messing about, before I confiscate ur 300mm that rattles.

43. Retitle your photo to "Untitled"
This one struck a nerve in our new GROUP. Not bothering to retitle your picture from the camera file name ie. DSC_0272.jpg is one thing, but actually being so self absorbed that you retiltle your crappy little picture of an abandoned bike in the snow "UNTITLED" is pure blasphemy. A sure sign that the world is coming to an end.

44. Amazing Circles
I've just been holding my head in my hands thinking about what to write about these. I started crying actually. This role of documenting these offences is getting a little too much. Just... Erm... Just... Take a look for yourself....

45. Making a David Hockney
Taking many photographs of one person and arranging them in a neo-Cubist manner like David Hockney. You twit. Take a look at these dumb attempts named Picasso Portraits.

46. Triptych
This gross act of indecency is indulged only by the slightly more pretentious artist/photographers out there... Who want to tell a story with their photos. This is usually the result of all 3 photos being crap.

47. Mosaic
I seem to remember, sometime around eight years ago there was a star wars poster, made up of thousands of time movie stills from star wars in a kind of mosaic. THAT WAS EIGHT YEARS AGO. IT'S TACKY AND OVER DONE. MOVE ON LOSER.



=================================================

The original G20 travesty image ... by ļαŝ τοητεŗιαš

EXPLoRED! EXPLoRED! EXPLoRED! EXPLoRED! EXPLoRED!

I am afraid I do not understand the logic of the magic otter, but I will pray to him and ask that he delve into his wet pocket and find this photo! If you are any kind of Flickrite then you will do the same because this is sure as hell as interesting!


UPDATE! iT MADE EXPLORE! The adopted flag of the Photographic Editing Offences is flying high!

YOU CALL IT BOKEH. I CALL IT...
Someone who has been watching this thread has made something suggested early on!



the PEO music video by Sam Cornwell

THE PEO MUSIC VIDEO. Click bottom left to play
.
Originally posted at 6:07PM, 21 February 2009 PDT (permalink)
ArchedRoof edited this topic 38 months ago.

(301 to 400 of 1,613 replies in Photographic Editing Offences. (BLOG AVAILABLE.))
view photostream

AngMoo  Pro User  says:

I'm thinking it's just called hand tinting (though in the back of my mind there's another name for it). My parents used to do it alot!

However - just googled and found this - don't bother reading but take a look at the finished article - surely a masterpiece we could all aspire to:
www.creativescrapbooking.com/topics/hand tinting.htm
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
AngMoo edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

bevymay  Pro User  says:

i was happily tinkering, then read this and found myself guilty of some crimes! ...ah well :-) i kinda like the tinted look but say no to watermarks!

Can we count stitched together panoramas? Even mobile phones can do these now!

...the beauty of naming/shaming these techniques is you get to spot them quickly, then do something different (well that's the theory anyway!)
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says:

AngM2006 that link... it's... evil
ArchedRoof says:
BTW (Where's the "Fuck the donuts, show me your pancakes" thread?
For you...

complete with frame
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

I see another non understander of the 'OP' stumbled in. That's about 500 now.

Panoramas :D. Good call.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

neelgolapi says:

ROFL
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
neelgolapi edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

goneforawander  Pro User  says:

FFS this has just turned into a list of every photographic/editing technique anyone can come up with
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

~ fernando [deleted] says:


don't worry, we will move onto painting soon.
~


are you thinking of the most-expensive photo sold at auction, which was in colour before there was colour film? "The Pond Moonlight" by Edward Steichen.

«Steichen created the impression of color by manually applying layers of
light-sensitive gums to the paper. In 1904, only a few photographers
were using this experimental approach.»
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

~ fernando [deleted] says:

I guess it has not being mentioned... but it is nice to "dodge"/brighten the eyes in a portrait. However, like with everything else, people over do it.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

sous les pavés, la plage says:

Steichen's was the most expensive, Gursky heads that list now.

and while we're at it, portraits with the skin blurred softened into oblivion. Like seeing pores will kill you. instantly.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Alex Dram says:


Ah, yes... infamous blur tool. Absolutely a must for any homegrown fashion photographer.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

~ fernando [deleted] says:


See, I slack at my attendance of auctions to always own the 10 most expensive photos, and that is what happens. Now, #1 is missing from my collection.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

The Blue Boy  Pro User  says:

Being drunk and wrong while uploading. This also ticks a few other boxes.

Urban Panoramic by The Blue Boy


Check the first and only comment.

I'm such a fuckwit, it's an artform!
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

unixrulz37 says:

>2. Watermarks
>The needless rape of a photograph becasue the photographer is big >headed enough to believe someone will come and steal his/her photo to profit from it.

You are entitled to your opinions, but people do steal images and pass them off as their own. Even if I don't plan to profit myself, I care about attribution. If someone likes my picture so much that he wants a pure version for private enjoyment, let him contact me.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

jamalrob says:

Turning your flat boring image sepia because you can't think what else to do, after a bad mono conversion.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

~ fernando [deleted] says:


That is my workflow!!!!

Oh yes, use of the word "workflow" should be on the list.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

AngMoo  Pro User  says:

oops - maybe I HAVE learnt at least one technique after all... :(
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
AngMoo edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

jamalrob says:

Ah, a confession at last!
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Sam Cornwell says:

I sentance you to 160 hours community work in a local photolab.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Leo Reynolds  Pro User  says:

Stitching and/or Panoramas

skyline by Leo Reynolds

Searching around I was reminded of 360° as well
cloisters unwrapped by Leo Reynolds

Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
Leo Reynolds edited this topic 29 months ago.

ashtonlewsey [deleted] says:

Aah, sepia makes me want to kill myself.


I think there should be an example for every point made here!
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

olivepix  Pro User  says:

I'm guilty of many of them, including the worst offence of listening to jazz.
Do you have a noose or should I bring my own?
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

goneforawander  Pro User  says:

How many points do I get for this?

Late afternoon on Plaza de Armas, Cuzco, Peru by goneforawander


B&W street photography, sepia toned, panorama, black border with title and copyright in the frame

Trangresses 1, 2, 10, 16 & 26
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

AngMoo  Pro User  says:

I sentence you to lessons learning how to spell!
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Dan (aka firrs)  Pro User  says:

Hand tinted with a frame. Do I also win a prize?

Item 500 by Dan (aka firrs)

Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

AngMoo  Pro User  says:

well possibly - but I happen to LIKE sepia! :(
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

...eventually the champion stood the rest saw the better, Mr. Rogers in a blood stained sweater.

www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/showdown
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Ronnie Rabena Photography says:

Is there really all these rules to photography I thought it was about expression? Our own way of interpreting our own ideas. Now I understand copyrights and how important that is but if someone wants to use bokeh or whatever, is it for us to say whats right and whats wrong. We have the power ourselves to see what we want to see. I do use watermarks but it's definitely not because I have a bighead. I do add artistic touches to my Photo Art but I think I am fairly capable of taking good SOOC photos as well. It just depends on the type of idea I want to convey. I am guilty for doing some stuff on here .... just like a lot of people on here. I have moved past some fads. But if someone wants to keep with it, then I'm sure that's his or her call. There are certainly different levels of photography. We all start at the bottom. So if we all started there how can we discriminate against them. I do my work based on what I like not what others like. Photographs tell my story. I don't think being a mom and taking pics of her kids makes her any less of a photographer than a professional working for money. This is just my opinion though. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong, lol.
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
Ronnie Rabena Photography edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

Was there any need for the "lol" at the end? Spoiled it really.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

Las Tonterias [deleted] says:

I think it was a misspelling of loll:

1. to recline or lean in a relaxed, lazy, or indolent manner; lounge: to loll on a sofa.
2. to hang loosely; droop; dangle: The dog stood in the heat with his tongue lolling out of his mouth.
–verb (used with object)
3. to allow to hang, droop, or dangle.
–noun Archaic.
4. the act of lolling.
5. a person or thing that lolls.

Number 3 would probably be the most apt.
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
Las Tonterias edited this topic 40 months ago.

~ fernando [deleted] says:


Et tu Ronnie?

I am with ArchedRoof on this one.
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
~ fernando edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

Ronnie Rabena Photography says:

I just find it funny how we've all done those offences and then now we are allowed to criticize. Like I said it's my opinion. I do agree that any of these can be overused but we all learn and move on. But we need to make mistakes to learn. Can't we put up examples of what is a great photo so people know what to work towards?
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
Ronnie Rabena Photography edited this topic 40 months ago.

Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says:

Ronnie Rabena Photography...
You forgot the : )
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says:

Converting your landscape to infrared in photoshop?
Or, selective area conversion to infrared.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

sphynge  Pro User  says:

Here are my additions:

- Adding my very own picture to a comment to make to anyone else's photo. I mean, what decent photo is complete without a photo of mine right next to it?

- Adding a blogspot.com/my very own website you couldn't remember/my weblog address under every shot I publish. I'm not only a crappy photographer, I'm also a lousy writer. Come and waste more time. Follow this link I update twice a year with drunk pictures and fortune cookie philosophy.

- Reposting the very same photo to every group about 300 times a day so I can get more views. Unclick "JoinGroup". Reclick "Join Group". Repeat. Surely enough, if I have 10,000 views on my crappy macro shot of the flower by the toilet, that *must* mean I'm a talented photographer.

- Changing the colors to the photos in PS, so that everyone knows it's been edited. The greater the use of photoshop, the more unreal it looks, the more tweaked it is, the more it means I'm a master of photography. Riiiight. Coz you couldn't spend an extra 2 seconds looking at a *real* background, available light, and take 2 extra seconds to frame your shot.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

Is there any way I can hand over moderating rights of this thread to sphynge?
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

goneforawander  Pro User  says:

No. This is your curse that will haunt you until the end of your days.

[EDIT] Those are excellent additions though.
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
goneforawander edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

Erik.Jon says:

Wow, you guys are all pretty easily irritated.
If you don't like when someone posts a photo with your peeves, then basically you're going to have to stop looking at other people's photos.
Let them edit it how they want to edit it. This site is for them also.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

I have thouroughly enjoyed ramblers who have stumbled upon this thread entering into my photostream and pointing out every little 'offence' they can find.

I find it very amusing how they think they are being clever.

I might even pop a watermark on tomorrows image.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

sphynge  Pro User  says:

Thanks guys :-)
I'll let you have fun with your curse. Look forward to more additions ;-)

Here's a couple more:

- Adding every single person I find through groups as a contact, and then un-contacting them next month. If I have 10,000 followers and only follow 12 people, that must mean I'm too famous for the layman.

- Copying/posting the same generic comment to every photo you see Okay so I've taken 3 seconds of my time to see your shot, but I really just want you to come see my shots, so I'll post a "Nice shot" and fave 5 photos I'll unfave later, so that you'll add me as a contact and come and see my photos. My time is too precious to see a shot without reciprocation.

- Adding fancy tags eg "thephotoIthinkitworthyofgettyimagesbutnoonehascontactedmeabout" If I add all these tags, it means that I'm smart, and that I spend time doing important stuff, and thinking important stuff, like how to play the Explore system. That's right.

- Putting nothing but weird characters as photo titles eg L0000L #3 The more obscure the title, the more it sounds like I have an elaborate plan on my photo collection. I'm an Artist with a capital H people.

- Changing my display name every other day. I'm such an artist I certainly don't want just anybody to be able to find my stream. I'm soooo above that.
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
sphynge edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

Alex Dram says:


oi-oi! At this rate you'll include neighbour's dog for the loud barking that don't let you sleep at night in this list. This is about editing, remember?
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
Alex Dram edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

goneforawander  Pro User  says:

My neighbour's dog is going to meet an untimely ending very soon if it doesn't shut the hell up at night.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

sphynge  Pro User  says:

Right, right, sorry, I got carried away. Just been spending too much time on Flickr lately :-p
I can delete the previous post if you want me too :-)
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

*The last son of krypton*  Pro User  says:

puppets always freaked me out as a kid, so I never watched mr. roger's neighborhood.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

neelgolapi says:

How about, adding super dark vignettes, to all your photos, because it makes them stand out (which often covers half the frame)? I myself am guilty of this horrendous one. I just cringe when I come across my own offense, and sometimes even contemplate hanging myself, lol.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

~ fernando [deleted] says:


Wow, Caroline has spunk and important observations have been made.

The first one made me laugh... not because I do it, or I would never admit to it, but yes, it is like "accentuate the positive" though with the opposite effect.

(by first one I meant... "Adding my very own picture ..." though I am known for incomplete quotes and taken out of context)
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
~ fernando edited this topic 40 months ago.

~ fernando [deleted] says:


I might even pop a watermark on tomorrows image.



You make it sound like you are getting to lose some kind of virginity...



and we get to watch? ewwwwww.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Mullenkedheim  Pro User  says:

#11 seems to be at odds with everything else. Do you want to hate the pretentious wankers who look at things with disdain, or do you want to look at people who do everything else on the list with disdain? You can't have it both ways, I'd reckon.

I figure most of the things on the list are fine to do once or twice. Wanna take a shot with light trails from cars? Go for it. You wanna make that your 'thing', and call yourself original? Well probably not so great unless you're looking to live a life of delusion. That sort of thing.

Moderation is key, I'd say.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Silviano Carrillo says:

Trying to be a smartass like alex.dram
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

goneforawander  Pro User  says:

#26 anything, that ends up as a gimmick that can be used with a mobile phone is a dreadful offence

In that case might as well chuck out my camera, stereo, computer, calendar .....
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

AngMoo  Pro User  says:

I'm here for a brief instance (sucked in before I have to get up for work - easily distracted ... ooh, shiny...)...

...and I like the way the discussion title keeps changing - moving with the times, that's a good thing!


Anyway, I'm giving up photographic offences for Lent.


PLEASE don't put a watermark on today's pic, Sam!
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

sphynge  Pro User  says:

Hey when did you change the title to "repent here"???? I haven't done any of the things described above!! I just noticed people doing it (took me a week's worth of observing). Grrrrr.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Jacek (mara2n1) says:

OmG !! I'm totally crazy :1,3,5,6,9,10,14,21,22,23 and many, many others .
sorry .
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

alex cretey systermans  Pro User  says:

adding "Photography" after your your name.
Soooo pro.
this is for #2 rule specialists.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

-RobW-  Pro User  says:

About the only thing that really makes me grind my teeth is plastic people. Removing *every* trace of detail from your model's face.

L'Oreal's photographers aren't exactly subtle, but they do realise that the result has to look vaguely human.

Oh, actually, dismal failures to achieve "The Dave Hill Look" entitled "Eureka! The Dave Hill Look!". I mean, he's not really my cup of tea, but he's undeniably talented, and cranking the unsharp mask to max on everything is not his secret recipe, sorry.

People who do this:

Boston Pops by -RobW-


Yuck.
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
-RobW- edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

Alex Dram says:


OH YEAH! I didn't even started!


Hey, me too have this dog problem! Will we post a photos of a dead puppies once we deliver the punishment?
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
Alex Dram edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

LouiseKnight says:

Guilty of a few, although I ditched frames a long time ago!

When I googled 'the orton effect' to see what the heck it was, this was top of the list.
I'd love to see some of their other 'tip of the week' tutorials!
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
LouiseKnight edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

Tineke Bolleman  Pro User  says:

1, 2 and 26. Guilty as charged. I think I'll have to whip myself this evening to repent.

Hm... Are overly cute furry animals an offence too?
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Alex Dram says:


No-no, those are out of this! :3
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

You call it BOKEH, I call it....

Haha, I told a friend about this thread the other day and look what they've done!


I guess we can thank Arty for these great words.
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
ArchedRoof edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

ShadowsandLightNW says:


i hope not! ;-)
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Ben Cooper  Pro User  says:

Similar to no. 6, how about sprocket holes etc along the edges of a picture. Either real (scanned and not cropped) or even worse faked.

That bit isn't meant to be in the picture, you fools.

Or how about zoom-blur - streaky lines that make you feel like you're head-butting the monitor?
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

-RobW-  Pro User  says:

I bet you only don't like that because you headbutted a monitor once and broke it.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Ben Cooper  Pro User  says:

Well, I am Glaswegian - it's an automatic reaction...
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Dr Karanka says:

The b&w street remark is incredibly silly, having around people such as Trent Parke that keep on pushing the limits of monochrome street photography. And also the comment that street photography has to be realistic... since when?
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

EJP Photo  Pro User  says:

You know what I hate? People who take pictures using cameras. They're a bunch of uncreative jerks - using light to make an image? Really? How much more cliche can you get?

One of these days everyone is going to realize this whole "photography" thing is a fad and go back to oil painting.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Will Goring  Pro User  says:

"....people such as Trent Parke."

Wow - amazing. Thanks for the link.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Shutter-Happy  Pro User  says:

When people have pages and pages of their photostream full up of ALL their holiday pics or pages and pages of the same picture but a little darker or lighter or from two paces back.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Dr Karanka says:

@Electric Spam: you're welcome! I was expecting more of a "burn all black and white!" reaction than an appreciation of the link ;-)
You might enjoy as well -not street this time- the Shadow Chamber by Roger Ballen, more contemporary black and white photography bordering the surreal.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Alex Dram says:


That Parke guy is full of win! Though Ballen's site is so user-unfriendly that I didn't bother to browse the gallery.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

Sorry.

Just did.

Day 56 of 365. - "Pillar" by ArchedRoof


tum ti tum.... PIIIIIIIMP
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
ArchedRoof edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

-RobW-  Pro User  says:

Trent Parke is indeed rather good. I found the pics on Roger Ballen but every time I clicked on an thumbnail it shut the popup down the instant after it opened it, which made looking at the images rather hard.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

Why has NOBODY mentioned oversharpening?

It's the norm at most camera clubs.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

The Blue Boy  Pro User  says:

Coloured water and coloured smoke, B*st*rds.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

~ fernando [deleted] says:


You attend meetings at camera clubs? I think attending camera clubs should be on the list.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Alex Dram says:


What is camera club?
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

-RobW-  Pro User  says:

Actually, in a slight win for Arty, I think I prefer Trent Parke's colour stuff.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

-RobW-  Pro User  says:

Pictures of graffiti. ;o)

EDIT: Oh, that's not an editing offence, sorry.
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
-RobW- edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

kolored says:

#5 is spot on. people need to chill the hell out with all the HDR madness.

although these are pretty funny, i can't take any of them seriously. if i see something that looks awful, i move on. before i used it to feel better about my own work, but then i realized that i was wasting time and i should've been looking at things that inspire me and challenge me.

here's a challenge... try to put as many of those don'ts as possible into one photograph :)
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

[http://www.flickr.com/photos/32794040@N03/3303772792/]

One such attempt.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

~ fernando [deleted] says:


What is camera club?


It is an accessory that you carry around with your camera. When it does not take good photos, you hit the camera with the club, until it learns.

Kind of like some people do potty training for a dog, but without the guilt of using a newspaper to hit the dog in the hind legs to actually pee/poo on the newspaper.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Alex Dram says:


I knew I should have added "in before you hit your camera with it"! *sigh*
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
Alex Dram edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

@Alex

You'd be suprised how many there are. There's probably one near you. It's usually a weekly meetup of photographers who get to verbally masturbate over their own and others work. Regular competitions, talks, demos, shows, annual gallery etc.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

AngMoo  Pro User  says:

too much to catch up on.

love your friend's T shirt - am thinking of getting one printed myself next time I'm around one of those places that do them.
As for the watermark - well, it WAS inevitable after all...
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

Still The Oldie  Pro User  says:

...What is camera club?...

First rule of camera club is don't talk about camera club.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

AngMoo  Pro User  says:

ha!
If only they were THAT exciting...
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says:

I'm gettin the T-shirt with "16 things about me" printed on it.

BTW... why 16? was it originally 10, but the OP was listening to jazz, so there just had to be a few extra?
Not an editing faux pas (thats french) but still, it's getting out of hand.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

sphynge  Pro User  says:

Where's the T-shirt!! I want one! AND I want one that says "I went to a camera club ... (switch to back of shirt) ... and all I got was a broken ego".

OK one more processing offense: the Warhol effect. My photo sucks, but if I make 4 versions of it in wild colors and stick'em together, then it's a Masterpiece.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

-RobW-  Pro User  says:

A camera club is an invaluable aid for doing street photography in certain areas.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

ArchedRoof  Pro User  says:

Very very very very top of the page sphynge. Haha.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

The Blue Boy  Pro User  says:

I'm getting a hi-viz vest. It will have the slogan;

Cutting corners.

B*ll*cks.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

goneforawander  Pro User  says:

Can we get that printed onto a photographers vest too please.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

~ fernando [deleted] says:


well.. we know it all, don't we? Some clubs ARE exciting. They even get more exciting when you bring a camera.

Clubs about camera... not so much.
Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
~ fernando edited this topic 40 months ago.

~ fernando [deleted] says:


For the t-shirt, I propose an edit. Change "masterpiece" to "mantelpiece"
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

nickjones101  Pro User  says:

Has no one mentioned long exposures of water - streams, waterfalls, waves, clouds etc ad nauseam?

And, yes, I've done my fair share - you think you're clean then, next thing you know...
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

~ fernando [deleted] says:


Define long. The 30s+ variety is so Michael Kenna of the 90s, no? Then it should go on the list.

The 0.5s to 1.5s... well, that is very exciting.
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

AngMoo  Pro User  says:

your clubs sound MUCH more exciting than mine!
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

♥moorz84♥ says:

hmmmm people who steal photos, crop, & over process in ps and pass them off as their own pics.

flickr peeps who use the word ~licious~ after every god damn word in their tags.

what group annoys you the most?

Originally posted 40 months ago. (permalink)
♥moorz84♥ edited this topic 40 months ago.

view photostream

jamalrob says:

Photographers who say "peeps" ;)
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

view photostream

♥moorz84♥ says:

okay flickr tarts
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

~ fernando [deleted] says:


That is usually what is said about San Francisco. :)
Posted 40 months ago. (permalink)

(301 to 400 of 1,613 replies in Photographic Editing Offences. (BLOG AVAILABLE.))
RSS 2.0 feedSubscribe to a feed of stuff on this page...</!!> Feed – Subscribe to FlickrCentral discussion threads