|
I'm thinking it's just called hand tinting (though in the back of my mind there's another name for it). My parents used to do it alot!
However - just googled and found this - don't bother reading but take a look at the finished article - surely a masterpiece we could all aspire to:
www.creativescrapbooking.com/topics/hand tinting.htm
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
AngMoo edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
i was happily tinkering, then read this and found myself guilty of some crimes! ...ah well :-) i kinda like the tinted look but say no to watermarks!
Can we count stitched together panoramas? Even mobile phones can do these now!
...the beauty of naming/shaming these techniques is you get to spot them quickly, then do something different (well that's the theory anyway!)
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says:
AngM2006 that link... it's... evil
ArchedRoof says:
BTW (Where's the "Fuck the donuts, show me your pancakes" thread?
For you...

complete with frame
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I see another non understander of the 'OP' stumbled in. That's about 500 now.
Panoramas :D. Good call.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
ROFL
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
neelgolapi edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
FFS this has just turned into a list of every photographic/editing technique anyone can come up with
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
don't worry, we will move onto painting soon.
~
are you thinking of the most-expensive photo sold at auction, which was in colour before there was colour film? "The Pond Moonlight" by Edward Steichen.
«Steichen created the impression of color by manually applying layers of
light-sensitive gums to the paper. In 1904, only a few photographers
were using this experimental approach.»
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
I guess it has not being mentioned... but it is nice to "dodge"/brighten the eyes in a portrait. However, like with everything else, people over do it.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Steichen's was the most expensive, Gursky heads that list now.
and while we're at it, portraits with the skin blurred softened into oblivion. Like seeing pores will kill you. instantly.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Ah, yes... infamous blur tool. Absolutely a must for any homegrown fashion photographer.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
See, I slack at my attendance of auctions to always own the 10 most expensive photos, and that is what happens. Now, #1 is missing from my collection.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Being drunk and wrong while uploading. This also ticks a few other boxes.
Check the first and only comment.
I'm such a fuckwit, it's an artform!
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
>2. Watermarks
>The needless rape of a photograph becasue the photographer is big >headed enough to believe someone will come and steal his/her photo to profit from it.
You are entitled to your opinions, but people do steal images and pass them off as their own. Even if I don't plan to profit myself, I care about attribution. If someone likes my picture so much that he wants a pure version for private enjoyment, let him contact me.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Turning your flat boring image sepia because you can't think what else to do, after a bad mono conversion.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
That is my workflow!!!!
Oh yes, use of the word "workflow" should be on the list.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
oops - maybe I HAVE learnt at least one technique after all... :(
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
AngMoo edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
Ah, a confession at last!
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I sentance you to 160 hours community work in a local photolab.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Stitching and/or Panoramas
Searching around I was reminded of 360° as well
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
Leo Reynolds edited this topic 29 months ago.
|
 |
ashtonlewsey [deleted] says:
Aah, sepia makes me want to kill myself.
I think there should be an example for every point made here!
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I'm guilty of many of them, including the worst offence of listening to jazz.
Do you have a noose or should I bring my own?
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
How many points do I get for this?
B&W street photography, sepia toned, panorama, black border with title and copyright in the frame
Trangresses 1, 2, 10, 16 & 26
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I sentence you to lessons learning how to spell!
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Hand tinted with a frame. Do I also win a prize?
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
well possibly - but I happen to LIKE sepia! :(
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
...eventually the champion stood the rest saw the better, Mr. Rogers in a blood stained sweater.
www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/showdown
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Is there really all these rules to photography I thought it was about expression? Our own way of interpreting our own ideas. Now I understand copyrights and how important that is but if someone wants to use bokeh or whatever, is it for us to say whats right and whats wrong. We have the power ourselves to see what we want to see. I do use watermarks but it's definitely not because I have a bighead. I do add artistic touches to my Photo Art but I think I am fairly capable of taking good SOOC photos as well. It just depends on the type of idea I want to convey. I am guilty for doing some stuff on here .... just like a lot of people on here. I have moved past some fads. But if someone wants to keep with it, then I'm sure that's his or her call. There are certainly different levels of photography. We all start at the bottom. So if we all started there how can we discriminate against them. I do my work based on what I like not what others like. Photographs tell my story. I don't think being a mom and taking pics of her kids makes her any less of a photographer than a professional working for money. This is just my opinion though. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong, lol.
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
Ronnie Rabena Photography edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
Was there any need for the "lol" at the end? Spoiled it really.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
Las Tonterias [deleted] says:
I think it was a misspelling of loll:
1. to recline or lean in a relaxed, lazy, or indolent manner; lounge: to loll on a sofa.
2. to hang loosely; droop; dangle: The dog stood in the heat with his tongue lolling out of his mouth.
–verb (used with object)
3. to allow to hang, droop, or dangle.
–noun Archaic.
4. the act of lolling.
5. a person or thing that lolls.
Number 3 would probably be the most apt.
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
Las Tonterias edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
Et tu Ronnie?
I am with ArchedRoof on this one.
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
~ fernando edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
I just find it funny how we've all done those offences and then now we are allowed to criticize. Like I said it's my opinion. I do agree that any of these can be overused but we all learn and move on. But we need to make mistakes to learn. Can't we put up examples of what is a great photo so people know what to work towards?
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
Ronnie Rabena Photography edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
 |
Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says:
Ronnie Rabena Photography...
You forgot the : )
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says:
Converting your landscape to infrared in photoshop?
Or, selective area conversion to infrared.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Here are my additions:
- Adding my very own picture to a comment to make to anyone else's photo. I mean, what decent photo is complete without a photo of mine right next to it?
- Adding a blogspot.com/my very own website you couldn't remember/my weblog address under every shot I publish. I'm not only a crappy photographer, I'm also a lousy writer. Come and waste more time. Follow this link I update twice a year with drunk pictures and fortune cookie philosophy.
- Reposting the very same photo to every group about 300 times a day so I can get more views. Unclick "JoinGroup". Reclick "Join Group". Repeat. Surely enough, if I have 10,000 views on my crappy macro shot of the flower by the toilet, that *must* mean I'm a talented photographer.
- Changing the colors to the photos in PS, so that everyone knows it's been edited. The greater the use of photoshop, the more unreal it looks, the more tweaked it is, the more it means I'm a master of photography. Riiiight. Coz you couldn't spend an extra 2 seconds looking at a *real* background, available light, and take 2 extra seconds to frame your shot.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Is there any way I can hand over moderating rights of this thread to sphynge?
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
No. This is your curse that will haunt you until the end of your days.
[EDIT] Those are excellent additions though.
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
goneforawander edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
Wow, you guys are all pretty easily irritated.
If you don't like when someone posts a photo with your peeves, then basically you're going to have to stop looking at other people's photos.
Let them edit it how they want to edit it. This site is for them also.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I have thouroughly enjoyed ramblers who have stumbled upon this thread entering into my photostream and pointing out every little 'offence' they can find.
I find it very amusing how they think they are being clever.
I might even pop a watermark on tomorrows image.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Thanks guys :-)
I'll let you have fun with your curse. Look forward to more additions ;-)
Here's a couple more:
- Adding every single person I find through groups as a contact, and then un-contacting them next month. If I have 10,000 followers and only follow 12 people, that must mean I'm too famous for the layman.
- Copying/posting the same generic comment to every photo you see Okay so I've taken 3 seconds of my time to see your shot, but I really just want you to come see my shots, so I'll post a "Nice shot" and fave 5 photos I'll unfave later, so that you'll add me as a contact and come and see my photos. My time is too precious to see a shot without reciprocation.
- Adding fancy tags eg "thephotoIthinkitworthyofgettyimagesbutnoonehascontactedmeabout" If I add all these tags, it means that I'm smart, and that I spend time doing important stuff, and thinking important stuff, like how to play the Explore system. That's right.
- Putting nothing but weird characters as photo titles eg L0000L #3 The more obscure the title, the more it sounds like I have an elaborate plan on my photo collection. I'm an Artist with a capital H people.
- Changing my display name every other day. I'm such an artist I certainly don't want just anybody to be able to find my stream. I'm soooo above that.
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
sphynge edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
oi-oi! At this rate you'll include neighbour's dog for the loud barking that don't let you sleep at night in this list. This is about editing, remember?
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
Alex Dram edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
My neighbour's dog is going to meet an untimely ending very soon if it doesn't shut the hell up at night.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Right, right, sorry, I got carried away. Just been spending too much time on Flickr lately :-p
I can delete the previous post if you want me too :-)
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
puppets always freaked me out as a kid, so I never watched mr. roger's neighborhood.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
How about, adding super dark vignettes, to all your photos, because it makes them stand out (which often covers half the frame)? I myself am guilty of this horrendous one. I just cringe when I come across my own offense, and sometimes even contemplate hanging myself, lol.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
Wow, Caroline has spunk and important observations have been made.
The first one made me laugh... not because I do it, or I would never admit to it, but yes, it is like "accentuate the positive" though with the opposite effect.
(by first one I meant... "Adding my very own picture ..." though I am known for incomplete quotes and taken out of context)
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
~ fernando edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
I might even pop a watermark on tomorrows image.
You make it sound like you are getting to lose some kind of virginity...
and we get to watch? ewwwwww.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
#11 seems to be at odds with everything else. Do you want to hate the pretentious wankers who look at things with disdain, or do you want to look at people who do everything else on the list with disdain? You can't have it both ways, I'd reckon.
I figure most of the things on the list are fine to do once or twice. Wanna take a shot with light trails from cars? Go for it. You wanna make that your 'thing', and call yourself original? Well probably not so great unless you're looking to live a life of delusion. That sort of thing.
Moderation is key, I'd say.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Trying to be a smartass like alex.dram
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
#26 anything, that ends up as a gimmick that can be used with a mobile phone is a dreadful offence
In that case might as well chuck out my camera, stereo, computer, calendar .....
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I'm here for a brief instance (sucked in before I have to get up for work - easily distracted ... ooh, shiny...)...
...and I like the way the discussion title keeps changing - moving with the times, that's a good thing!
Anyway, I'm giving up photographic offences for Lent.
PLEASE don't put a watermark on today's pic, Sam!
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Hey when did you change the title to "repent here"???? I haven't done any of the things described above!! I just noticed people doing it (took me a week's worth of observing). Grrrrr.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
OmG !! I'm totally crazy :1,3,5,6,9,10,14,21,22,23 and many, many others .
sorry .
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
adding "Photography" after your your name.
Soooo pro.
this is for #2 rule specialists.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
About the only thing that really makes me grind my teeth is plastic people. Removing *every* trace of detail from your model's face.
L'Oreal's photographers aren't exactly subtle, but they do realise that the result has to look vaguely human.
Oh, actually, dismal failures to achieve "The Dave Hill Look" entitled "Eureka! The Dave Hill Look!". I mean, he's not really my cup of tea, but he's undeniably talented, and cranking the unsharp mask to max on everything is not his secret recipe, sorry.
People who do this:
Yuck.
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
-RobW- edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
OH YEAH! I didn't even started!
Hey, me too have this dog problem! Will we post a photos of a dead puppies once we deliver the punishment?
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
Alex Dram edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
Guilty of a few, although I ditched frames a long time ago!
When I googled 'the orton effect' to see what the heck it was, this was top of the list.
I'd love to see some of their other 'tip of the week' tutorials!
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
LouiseKnight edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
1, 2 and 26. Guilty as charged. I think I'll have to whip myself this evening to repent.
Hm... Are overly cute furry animals an offence too?
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
No-no, those are out of this! :3
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
You call it BOKEH, I call it....
Haha, I told a friend about this thread the other day and look what they've done!
I guess we can thank Arty for these great words.
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
ArchedRoof edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|

i hope not! ;-)
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Similar to no. 6, how about sprocket holes etc along the edges of a picture. Either real (scanned and not cropped) or even worse faked.
That bit isn't meant to be in the picture, you fools.
Or how about zoom-blur - streaky lines that make you feel like you're head-butting the monitor?
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I bet you only don't like that because you headbutted a monitor once and broke it.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Well, I am Glaswegian - it's an automatic reaction...
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
The b&w street remark is incredibly silly, having around people such as Trent Parke that keep on pushing the limits of monochrome street photography. And also the comment that street photography has to be realistic... since when?
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
You know what I hate? People who take pictures using cameras. They're a bunch of uncreative jerks - using light to make an image? Really? How much more cliche can you get?
One of these days everyone is going to realize this whole "photography" thing is a fad and go back to oil painting.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
"....people such as Trent Parke."
Wow - amazing. Thanks for the link.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
When people have pages and pages of their photostream full up of ALL their holiday pics or pages and pages of the same picture but a little darker or lighter or from two paces back.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
@Electric Spam: you're welcome! I was expecting more of a "burn all black and white!" reaction than an appreciation of the link ;-)
You might enjoy as well -not street this time- the Shadow Chamber by Roger Ballen, more contemporary black and white photography bordering the surreal.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
That Parke guy is full of win! Though Ballen's site is so user-unfriendly that I didn't bother to browse the gallery.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Sorry.
Just did.
tum ti tum.... PIIIIIIIMP
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
ArchedRoof edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
Trent Parke is indeed rather good. I found the pics on Roger Ballen but every time I clicked on an thumbnail it shut the popup down the instant after it opened it, which made looking at the images rather hard.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Why has NOBODY mentioned oversharpening?
It's the norm at most camera clubs.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Coloured water and coloured smoke, B*st*rds.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
You attend meetings at camera clubs? I think attending camera clubs should be on the list.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
What is camera club?
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Actually, in a slight win for Arty, I think I prefer Trent Parke's colour stuff.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Pictures of graffiti. ;o)
EDIT: Oh, that's not an editing offence, sorry.
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
-RobW- edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
#5 is spot on. people need to chill the hell out with all the HDR madness.
although these are pretty funny, i can't take any of them seriously. if i see something that looks awful, i move on. before i used it to feel better about my own work, but then i realized that i was wasting time and i should've been looking at things that inspire me and challenge me.
here's a challenge... try to put as many of those don'ts as possible into one photograph :)
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
[http://www.flickr.com/photos/32794040@N03/3303772792/]
One such attempt.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
What is camera club?
It is an accessory that you carry around with your camera. When it does not take good photos, you hit the camera with the club, until it learns.
Kind of like some people do potty training for a dog, but without the guilt of using a newspaper to hit the dog in the hind legs to actually pee/poo on the newspaper.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I knew I should have added "in before you hit your camera with it"! *sigh*
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
Alex Dram edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
@Alex
You'd be suprised how many there are. There's probably one near you. It's usually a weekly meetup of photographers who get to verbally masturbate over their own and others work. Regular competitions, talks, demos, shows, annual gallery etc.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
too much to catch up on.
love your friend's T shirt - am thinking of getting one printed myself next time I'm around one of those places that do them.
As for the watermark - well, it WAS inevitable after all...
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
...What is camera club?...
First rule of camera club is don't talk about camera club.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
ha!
If only they were THAT exciting...
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says:
I'm gettin the T-shirt with "16 things about me" printed on it.
BTW... why 16? was it originally 10, but the OP was listening to jazz, so there just had to be a few extra?
Not an editing faux pas (thats french) but still, it's getting out of hand.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Where's the T-shirt!! I want one! AND I want one that says "I went to a camera club ... (switch to back of shirt) ... and all I got was a broken ego".
OK one more processing offense: the Warhol effect. My photo sucks, but if I make 4 versions of it in wild colors and stick'em together, then it's a Masterpiece.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
A camera club is an invaluable aid for doing street photography in certain areas.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Very very very very top of the page sphynge. Haha.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I'm getting a hi-viz vest. It will have the slogan;
Cutting corners.
B*ll*cks.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Can we get that printed onto a photographers vest too please.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
well.. we know it all, don't we? Some clubs ARE exciting. They even get more exciting when you bring a camera.
Clubs about camera... not so much.
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
~ fernando edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
For the t-shirt, I propose an edit. Change "masterpiece" to "mantelpiece"
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Has no one mentioned long exposures of water - streams, waterfalls, waves, clouds etc ad nauseam?
And, yes, I've done my fair share - you think you're clean then, next thing you know...
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
Define long. The 30s+ variety is so Michael Kenna of the 90s, no? Then it should go on the list.
The 0.5s to 1.5s... well, that is very exciting.
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
your clubs sound MUCH more exciting than mine!
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
hmmmm people who steal photos, crop, & over process in ps and pass them off as their own pics.
flickr peeps who use the word ~licious~ after every god damn word in their tags.
what group annoys you the most?
Originally posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
♥moorz84♥ edited this topic 40 months ago.
|
|
Photographers who say "peeps" ;)
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
okay flickr tarts
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
~ fernando [deleted] says:
That is usually what is said about San Francisco. :)
Posted 40 months ago.
(permalink)
|