FlickrCentral / Discuss

This thread has been closed by ƃoʌɐʇsnƃ.

Current Discussion

This gives photographers a bad name...
Latest: 3 minutes ago

Look through the photostream of the person above you and choose your favourite
Latest: 5 minutes ago

Professional Photographer Talks About the Realities of the Photography Business
Latest: 9 minutes ago

Books: the chemistry of photography
Latest: 22 minutes ago

Puritan Porn Paranoia. Tilting at Windmills.
Latest: 58 minutes ago

Not just another copyright infringement; this one's, um, amusing.
Latest: 5 hours ago

CloudPic
Latest: 27 hours ago

Yahoo kills Flickr!!!
Latest: 34 hours ago

Sharpening in PS Raw Converter - Am I Going Crazy?
Latest: 35 hours ago

journalist who used a photograph of mine without asking!
Latest: 2 days ago

Post your Galleries here
Latest: 3 days ago

Syria and Lebanon "Descending into sectarian civil war"
Latest: 3 days ago

More...

Search this group's discussions

Photographic Editing Offences. (BLOG AVAILABLE.)

ArchedRoof says:

THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EDITING OFFENCES BLOG {blogspot}
Join now and keep track of the explosive goings on of PEO.

THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EDITING OFFENCES GROUP.
Join now and ask for forgiveness for your sins. Everybody is welcome, you are allowed to ask for forgiveness once a day, the pool is moderated by many disciples of the cause. Come along and wash away your blasphemies in the group pool.

There's a new craze every year or so. Off the top of my head I can think of 5 different travesties in the world of digital photography editing.

1. Framing
The process of putting a few extra pixels and lines around your digital image to add 'impact.'

2. Watermarks
The needless rape of a photograph because the photographer is big headed enough to believe someone will come and steal his/her photo to profit from it.

3. Selective Colouring
The process of converting an image to monochrome, but leaving one element coloured, such as a tram, or lady in a red dress.

4. The Flood Filter
A Photoshop plugin introduced a few years ago that everyone went crazy for. Everything for about a year was submerged in perfectly generated rippled water.

5. Highly Overprocessed HDR
The latest new FAD... HDR techniques have been around for over 100 years (Yes they have.) But overprocessed tone mapping nonsense from the likes of Photomatix users are all the rage right now.

These aren't examples of just bad processing, they are intentional attacks on photographs in an attempt to make them more interesting. I will be the first to admit I have tried it all - but more importantly - I moved on.

Can you help me think of some other obvious ones?

--EDIT with EXTRAS--

6. Fake Polaroid Frame
Can't find any Polaroid film? Doesn't matter... Fake it and pretend you're an instant film master.

7. Out of Focus Macros. (BOKEH)
Many thanks to Arty: "Out of focus macros. (You call it bokeh, I call it bollocks. You're supposed to INCREASE the depth of field with close-ups, not leave half the critter/leaf out of focus)."

8. Tilt and Shift Fakes.
Very simple post processing involving blurring a major part of a photograph (usually one overlooking a street.) The selective blurring appears as a shallow depth of field, to give it the photo the appearance of looking like a minature model village.

9. Fake film frames around Digital photographs (similar to #6)

10. Black and White Street Photography
"It's 2009 ffs."(Thank you Arty.)

11. Being a smug wanker/ Purists and Ludites and intentional attacks on photographers artistic explorations.Thank you Goneforawonder
Guilty!

12. TTV (Through the viewfinder.)
As Macredeye says.. "why?" It is basically a photo of what you see when looking through a camera viewfinder. If you want to do it you'll need a small lens. I find my cameraphone does the trick.

13. Cloning yourself / Multiplicity
Keep your camera on a tripod and take 10 pictures of yourself looking like a twat in different positions. Use each file to clone yourself in layer after layer. That'll make you look cool won't it?

14. The Orton Effect.
The original technique invented by Michael Orton was to overlay two or more images of an identical scene with very different exposures on slide film. One image is sharply focused and the others are very out of focus. Alex.Dram points out that he cannot find a reasonable need for it's existence. (Yes I tried it once too.)

15. Supreme Lack of Subject Matter
thank you Wiseacre for this edition. He states that: my personal peeve with any of these techniques isn't the techniques (or gimmicks), but the supreme lack of subject matter. Bokeh is fine, but of lights, raindrops, a leaf -- anyone with a 50mm and able to set their camera correctly can do that.

16. Attempting to digitally recreate an originally unpredictable effect in a very deliberate way.
You've got a brand new digital camera, it takes 40Mp pictures. You have a £1200 lens... Yet you process your photos to make them look like you took them with a £5 Holga.

17. Light trails.
ahh, how cute. You've learnt long exposures and you've had this great and original thought of going to the local motorway overpass with your tripod and taking a photo of all the red and white lights whizzing passed. Guess what? It's not original.

18. Lens Flare
Now I can't believe I left this off the list. It's perhaps the oldest gimmick on photoshop/psp/corel. Tacky lens flare added to photos creating a little sparkle with faded lines all over the picture. Such beauty!

19. Standard full photo filters
Hmm... My photo looks crap. How about if I press this buttom. *BOOM* It's embossed! Or suddenly looks like an impressionist painting, or has the effect of fur or leather or....

20. Planetoids
Ooh look at this lovely landscape. Best turn it into a planet. Oh not just here though. I'm going to do one EVERYWHERE I GO. Planet, planet planet all day long. Click here to see, but beware, you may end up carving out your own eyes with a spoon.

21. View On Black
"Oh god, yeah. That's probably worse than putting a black frame round a photo. If I want to view something on black, I'll print it out and shove it up my arse." Thank you.

22. Photographers who think they are poets
All thanks to Jamalrob for suggesting this travesty. Such titles on photographs as "True beauty lies within" or "I stopped, I stared, I wondered, as I walked through my placid life" .... on a LANDSCAPE photograph. Grow up you pretentious....

23. Listening to Jazz While Editing Your Photos
A serious offence. May lead to any of the above being reproduced.

24. Cutting the corners off
Why? Have I missed some health and safety b*ll*cks? Do I need to put on a Hi-Viz vest before I go into photoshop. Will I take "someones eye out wi that"?

25. Out of Frame
OMFG WTF LOOK! I'm stepping OUT-OF-THE-FRAME. Man, I am SO awesome.

26. Panoramic stitch togethers
ANYTHING... and I mean anything, that ends up as a gimmick that can be used with a mobile phone is a dreadful offence.

27. Immaculate skin
"...portraits with the skin blurred softened into oblivion. Like seeing pores will kill you. instantly." Thank you.

28. Oversharpening
Anyone who goes to a camera club will understand the fact that since digital photography started popping up... so did oversharpening. It's the sick practise of taking an out of focus photo and jacking up every sharpening filter to FIX it. This offence comes with a 3 year ban on digital cameras.

29. Dropshadow/Buttonise
...Or ANYTHING that makes your photo look like it's jumping off the screen. Creating the illusion that your photo is a 3D work of art is a processing crime. If it's a good photo, it won't need it!

30. Texture Layers
Why must you insist on taking another photo of crumbly plaster and using it to take a dump on another photo? Layers of any type of texture are big and not clever. A bit like stupid dwarfs.

31. Infrared Conversion
Crappy landscape? Convert to B+W... still looks crap? Convert to infrared... oooh... look... it glows.... pretty

32. Cropping
Just because you've got a camera that shoots @ 30Megapixel does not mean you can get lazy about filling up the full frame. Get it right first time and remember "crop is crap."

33. ATTEMPTING TO BE CLEVER
This is ABSOLUTELY unacceptable. There is to be no freedom of thought allowed in any photo editing. Here at Flickrschwitz we like minimal curve adjustment and colour correction ONLY. Anything else and vee shall av u tekkin owt zide and zhot!

34. Fractalius
More like syphilis. Take any boring old picture and turn it into some kind of light drawing that will make you want to scratch out your own eyes with a rusty fork. Needless vandalism on your photos.

35. Drink/Drugs While Editing
As demonstrated by many of the thread posters including www.flickr.com/photos/alexdram/, JAMALROB, BLUEBOY & GONEFORAWANDER this may lead to any of the above offences being commited or even worse, topic posts that you may regret in the morning.

36. Straight from my mobile phone and I'm proud of it.
Grow up. Nobody cares.

37. BHL Gimmicks
The never ending camel ride that is BIG HUGE LABS. This is not easy to approach. Everything and anything is available here. It's where View on Black (#21) comes from... Turn your photo into a billboard or a jigsaw. Create instant works of art. This site is photography's version of the Garden of Eden. Please... PLEASE... DO NOT EAT THE FUCKING APPLE.

38. Warholizer
So you think you're Andy Warhol do you? Think that you'd look cool/retro/kitsch/chic if you were multiplied and changed into psychodelic colours? You don't. You look like a prat. Just one of you in the correct colour is enough.

39. Portrait Dumping Grounds
Take your boring portraits and jazz them up using a vile uploading process online. Yersinia alerted us to these ever growing ghastly websites of photo destruction. Such sites as DUMPR or PHOTOFUNIA are trainwrecks and need to be cleaned up.

40. Vignetting
Why? You bought a digital camera to get rid of this common film problem. Don't fake it and pretend you're an artist. You little cheat, you.

41. NOT Cropping
Throwing away or leaving as suboptimal a potentially good shot just because you've confused Cartier-Bresson with God.

42. Abnormally Large Moon
Layering a telephoto, way-out-of-proportion moon into a wide angle night landscape. This isn't science fiction. This isn't a Disney film. This is photography, stop messing about, before I confiscate ur 300mm that rattles.

43. Retitle your photo to "Untitled"
This one struck a nerve in our new GROUP. Not bothering to retitle your picture from the camera file name ie. DSC_0272.jpg is one thing, but actually being so self absorbed that you retiltle your crappy little picture of an abandoned bike in the snow "UNTITLED" is pure blasphemy. A sure sign that the world is coming to an end.

44. Amazing Circles
I've just been holding my head in my hands thinking about what to write about these. I started crying actually. This role of documenting these offences is getting a little too much. Just... Erm... Just... Take a look for yourself....

45. Making a David Hockney
Taking many photographs of one person and arranging them in a neo-Cubist manner like David Hockney. You twit. Take a look at these dumb attempts named Picasso Portraits.

46. Triptych
This gross act of indecency is indulged only by the slightly more pretentious artist/photographers out there... Who want to tell a story with their photos. This is usually the result of all 3 photos being crap.

47. Mosaic
I seem to remember, sometime around eight years ago there was a star wars poster, made up of thousands of time movie stills from star wars in a kind of mosaic. THAT WAS EIGHT YEARS AGO. IT'S TACKY AND OVER DONE. MOVE ON LOSER.

=================================================

The original G20 travesty image ... by ļαŝ τοητεŗιαš

EXPLoRED! EXPLoRED! EXPLoRED! EXPLoRED! EXPLoRED!

I am afraid I do not understand the logic of the magic otter, but I will pray to him and ask that he delve into his wet pocket and find this photo! If you are any kind of Flickrite then you will do the same because this is sure as hell as interesting!

UPDATE! iT MADE EXPLORE! The adopted flag of the Photographic Editing Offences is flying high!

YOU CALL IT BOKEH. I CALL IT...
Someone who has been watching this thread has made something suggested early on!

THE PEO MUSIC VIDEO. Click bottom left to play
.
Originally posted at 6:07PM, 21 February 2009 PDT (permalink)
ArchedRoof edited this topic 38 months ago.

← prev 1 2 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 next →

(1001 to 1100 of 1,613 replies in Photographic Editing Offences. (BLOG AVAILABLE.))

	Kevin Steele says: It reminds me of the traffic accident scene from Godard’s Weekend. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	The Blue Boy says: PLEASE... DO NOT EAT THE FUCKING APPLE. I like apples ...nuff sed! Originally posted 39 months ago. (permalink) The Blue Boy edited this topic 39 months ago.
	AngMoo says: ha Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: oops - I think I have been guilty of #38. Not deliberately - I was bored one day ... and I can't even blame BHL for it. :( Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Las Tonterias [deleted] says: BHL does have its uses [http://www.flickr.com/photos/32794040@N03/3338538811/] Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Jelltex says: Yup, I used this one just a couple of months ago; twelve hail Marys from me as pennace. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	‹shin› says: ha ha, I just left a comment. I quickly caught up. Went for a quick weekend trip to the Netherlands without internet. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: you managed to catch up? Good grief - I struggle after one day... (not that I'm ever away for one day.... even if I say I will be) Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	‹shin› says: I have to admit, I didn't look at all the links :D Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	sami k (the k stands for potassium!) says: hey, i'm here at least a couple times a day and even i have trouble keeping up! Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: I think before long a weekly summary will appear in the Soap magazines ... "Trish faces up to Barry, there are saucy goings on down on Emmerdale, meanwhile on the Travesties this week ... Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	The Blue Boy says: Please check the notes. I can't remember if they were sh*t. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ArchedRoof says: You're being charged with offence #35. Judged without jury and no parole. Hung, drawn and quartered at noon tomorrow. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: I do believe that photo needs tags too ...... :) Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	The Blue Boy says: I love you ArchedRoof. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Jelltex says: OK, its way too late for me; see y'all in the morning. A bottle of red has done it for me. Yawn. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Jelltex says: Thats a yawn for me, not because you're boring. Hell no. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	The Blue Boy says: He's gone to bed. I suggest some tag terrorism. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: Isn't that Ian Paisley ? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ArchedRoof says: No no no no no no no no no no no yes. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: goodnight (and dare I suggest you sleep with one eye open ... there's some evil plotting going on..) I hardly dare announce when I go to bed now.... Originally posted 39 months ago. (permalink) AngMoo edited this topic 39 months ago.
	goneforawander says: Were you in The Proclaimers by any chance? :-) Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	atomicules says: Re: Hull (sorry a page behind). Spiders nightclub, is it still there? Brings back memories: Pink vomit the first (and last) time visiting my then girlfriend's parents. Hull's really not all that bad. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	photo208cam says: At times I just have to use the weird angle, the wide angle doesn't distort words that good. Probably makes me a sinner without salvation. “So it goes”. I liked Kid Shelleen in that Cat Ballou movie (Lee Marvin won best actor that year at the Oscars for that role). It has something to do with reinventing the western genre. It shows how important it is to use the antihero in the proper fashion. www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2cvt7p_7Dk 7 left, 26 right, 14 left (digital bokeh, Panoramic stitch togethers, digital Orton,). I will try that then. See what comes up. Now I hope this makes sense, I can never be clearer than this. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ArchedRoof says: Now I hope this makes sense, I can never be clearer than this. Is the only line I understood. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	jamalrob says: Now I hope this makes sense, I can never be clearer than this. Comedy gold! Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Falconhawkman says: ummmmmm what did you say????? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Schrodingers Cat [deleted] says: 7 left, 26 right, 14 left (digital bokeh, Panoramic stitch togethers, digital Orton,)* Holy shit! Now I get it. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: I still don't ... Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ArchedRoof says: OHHHH.... 2:00 in. I'm getting there. Slowly. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: dammit - it's a secret code? I need to know now... :( Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	sami k (the k stands for potassium!) says: my brain hurts. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ShadowsandLightNW says: that really is the clearest he's ever been... Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: This is like the emperor's new clothes. Everyone can see but me ... I feel very sad now. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	jamalrob says: Wow, it all makes sense... Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: damn you too! Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: Now then now then, what's all this shouting? We'll have no shouting here. This is a local thread for local people, we'll have no trouble here. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: If anyone would care to enlighten me in the next 2 mins, before I go to bed, then feel free. Otherwise, I don't think I'm as happy coming over here anymore, feeling like you all know something I don't. I feel like I must be the most stupid person around not to understand the joke (if it is one)... Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	jamalrob says: For my part, I was just winding you up, but I did have a cosmic epiphany when I watched the video, at 2 minutes in. Still don't really understand photo208cam Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	M. Sanders says: I'm loving this post and all it's comments. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: Great isn't it? well, thank YOU for letting me know I'm not on my own. Still feeling sad now though, so I'm off to bed. Not sure when I'll next get online - probably around midday at work tomorrow, due to the ongoing restrictions. Goodnight all x Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	sami k (the k stands for potassium!) says: yeah no seriously, the man makes no sense. but that video was kind of fantastic. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says: it's simple really... is thinking in random algorithms and applying it in a completely relevant way to the PEO's (that's Photographic Editing Offences).... pretty standard MO for people who.... best I stop right there. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	TheDamnМushroom says: A belated BRAVO! to you, ArchedRoof. If Flickr has any sort of archive -- hey, they do, the Blog -- this list should be in it. And thank you especially for the new trend of layers (#30). Saw a photo today that was getting all kinds of praise, but I had to be the wet blanket and say something to the effect of "uh, less is more". The two layers were a very nice picture of the photographer who is a 16 year old female, and an upward shot of rosepetals -- the combination looked like a "tribute" by a literal wanker due to where the leaf "blotches" fell. Not the effect sought, miss. Keep up the good work, there's way more than 38 offenses. :) Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	photo208cam says: Somethings in life … you can’t understand. Like take me for instance I can hardly understand myself (I know go figure) Does it bother me ? A bit… Should it bother you, none what so ever. « So it goes » is in the beautiful memory of Kurt Vonnegut Jr’s Slaughterhouse-Five (65 on a list of most often banned book) « The story continually employs the refrain So it goes . . . when death, dying, and mortality occur, as a narrative transition to another subject, as a memento mori, as comic relief, and to explain the unexplained. It appears one hundred sixteen times. » So may God bless Billy Pilgrim 116 times It is a time to move on To rob the train. To go beyond HDR, and Bokeh, and frames, at least for a few days ( Now you can’t say that this is void of sense, to jump with the cash, to write the byline, to flow with creative juices, to fry melt in mars land, man How many versions did they make of King Kong ? Not one to many I hope) Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Schrodingers Cat [deleted] says: Yes, I did get the reference to the antihero and train robbery and PEO's. Originally posted 39 months ago. (permalink) Schrodingers Cat edited this topic 39 months ago.
	Yersinia says: Have we done dumpr yet? Because your dull cruddy piece-of-shit wankfest of a snap will look so much better warped into an egg shape, framed in a 'museum', or made into a 'sketch'. Oh yes. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says: that definitely must be PEO#39 It's in the realm of #20, Planetoids, BUT it goes sooo much further... Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	jamalrob says: Thanks for alerting me to that stuff. I'd never seen it before. My first reaction was "wow, that's truly abominable." As I browsed through the pool that reaction did not diminish. In fact it became quite overpowering. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: Arg! That's off the scale! They put BHL to shame in the crapness league. * wipes ejected lunch from the screen * Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Las Tonterias [deleted] says: But then again ... it is the "coolest place for digital photography" ... you wouldn't want to be seen to be uncool now would you? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	flipteezy says: i love this post Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	sami k (the k stands for potassium!) says: wow. i mean, good god WHYYYYYYYY? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	~ fernando [deleted] says: I am just catching up... reading all of these comments, is like getting hit with a bag of ass. Geez! ~ I think this is the good use of BHL that proves that it is a bad site. I am hoping that this makes it to Explore. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	~ fernando [deleted] says: I agree... it reads fluidly, but like any fluid, it is difficult to catch it with my hands. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: Let's not go there, it is a family show after all ... Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	~ fernando [deleted] says: Alright. Let's go with: It reads like the sand of time(), but my brain is really a sifter in space. There is no space-time continuum to be had. () though perhaps confined to a small egg-timer thingie. Originally posted 39 months ago. (permalink) ~ fernando edited this topic 39 months ago.
	goneforawander says: Ah yes ... you could almost say "like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of our lives" ... that would make a great intro for a tv show don't you think? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	~ fernando [deleted] says: It has a nice ring to it, and I hope someone on TV land would capitalize on it, because really... corny is not promoted enough. Queen also made a song out of it. (NB: apropos, I think that Queen video has a few violations of the ethics we speak in this magnum opus of a thread, when extended to video.) I think if photo208cam wants to add a poem to his photos, in accordance to #22, then he can use a variation of those words. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	photo208cam says: Lee Marvin www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5CmwD_lWfs He said it all Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: So did MacDonald Carey Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says: If I put photos on a black background, is that still like putting a black boarder on it? or view on black? ~_^ Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: Guilty of both sins. A special place awaits you in Hull where small demons will flail you with pointy things for your transgressions. Followed by a week in Scunthorpe. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Jelltex says: OK, woke up this morning trying to catch up with the late night posts, and now I'm confused. what were you all smoking last night? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ArchedRoof says: Go forth and multiply my son. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ShadowsandLightNW says: nice vignettes... is vignetting on the list yet? ;-) Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: PEO? Piss-taking Executive Officer? I've met a few of those. Vignettes, heavily done in a very unsubtle way should be included for sure. Very faddy at present. More Lightroom presets than you can shake a stick at that will do this. Hmm ... that reminds me ... the use of any Lightroom preset published by www.lightroomkillertips.com/. Make your photo vignetted and bright purple at the touch of a button. Excellent. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ShadowsandLightNW says: runs away to buy lightroom for killer presets Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	-RobW- says: Vignettes actually taken with a Holga are somewhat different, of course :o) Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: Vinaigrettes made with plenty of garlic and pesto are allowed too. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ArchedRoof says: It's up there. I just had a thought.... WHY do people remove EXIF data? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: Government agents will find out who you are and steal your weapons if you don't. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Crick3 says: Yes, but they have to applied with a brush, in order to qualify. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	goneforawander says: Who? The Government agents? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ArchedRoof says: Have you all of a sudden assumed voluntary leadership of this cause/thread? Handing over rights of editing the OP and keeping order is much harder than it looks. Originally posted 39 months ago. (permalink) ArchedRoof edited this topic 39 months ago.
	sous les pavés, la plage says: Arched Roof, umm, PS save for web just removes the exif without asking. Nasty nasty. Originally posted 39 months ago. (permalink) sous les pavés, la plage edited this topic 39 months ago.
	ArchedRoof says: I KNOW! I've lost important data (Well detail I'd like to have kept) before by doing this and misplacing the original file. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: OK - i'm back on - lunch time. I have no way of catching up because I still don't understand most of what's been said above. I'll assume that i'll never understand what photo208cam says - and I can live with that I suppose! Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	-RobW- says: "I'll assume that i'll never understand what photo208cam says - and I can live with that I suppose!" I read it as "just say no to drugs". Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	The Blue Boy says: I've just popped home from work to see what it was that I did last night with a feeling of trepidation. Peter and Ted. I am evil. Excellent. Oh well, back in about 4hrs for more terrorism. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: TBB - Peter and Ted were inspirational! Originally posted 39 months ago. (permalink) AngMoo edited this topic 39 months ago.
	Schrodingers Cat [deleted] says: I paid a good 6,000円 for a plastic camera just to get those vignettes. Though, must say that there's been recent hair pulling and eye-scratching on some Holga threads over the iPhone-Holgaised uploading ......... photo208cam* can go sort it out for them. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ArchedRoof says: Don't knock the iphone and all it's incredibly handy photo apps. www.flickr.com/photos/i-phone Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Schrodinger*s Cat [deleted] says: Ahhhhhhhh.... molopix cool like the Lomo SuperSampler. But will chicks dig me more if I flaunt an iPhone or a Super Sampler??? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Alex Dram says: Just went for a drink, finished a bottle of sambuca, woke up in my friend's bed with him and his wife and now I don't understand what's going on here. I tried to catch up... honestly. Is there any brief summary? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	‹shin› says: Jeesh I'm away for the weekend and it's not too bad catching up. I'm gone since last night and all this has happened. was hoping you had one. Ask your friend and his wife. Perhaps they understand more Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ArchedRoof says: Frankly I'm more interested in this: woke up in my friend's bed with him and his wife Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	‹shin› says: I though that was too obvious Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Schrodingers Cat [deleted] says: woke up in my friend's bed with him and his wife* ... did you have your camera with you? Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Alex Dram says: I was going to get in on the way there yesterday and forgot (((( Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Yersinia says: Solarization. Partially reversing the tones in your photograph. That couldn't possibly make it look shit, could it? Oh. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Jelltex says: Solarization; thats just nasty! Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Jelltex says: HDR to the max? www.flickr.com/photos/johnmueller/3336067428/ Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	ArchedRoof says: Jelltecks. #5 Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Jelltex says: Yeah, I just thought how the heck did that make explore today? And all the comments. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Alex Dram says: You are artblind. Accept it. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	AngMoo says: I think I'm going mad... Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Jelltex says: No, the whole world is. Simple as that. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	The Blue Boy says: I've sneaked out of work early, so I was able to create this fantastic creation; Blame Yersinia Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)
	Yersinia says: Oh yeah. Blame me. That's right. I'm not responsible for your failure to encase that in a tasteful museum frame, admired by appreciative patrons of the arts, am I? It's time you faced up to your own responsibilities, and admitted that it's your own lack of artistic sensibilities. Innit. Posted 39 months ago. (permalink)