|
Search this group's discussions
|
Polaroid SX-70 with 600 film - ND filter or not ?
|


The SX-70 cameras were designed to use SX-70 or TimeZero instant film, which came in a pack which was inserted into the camera, and had 10 exposures per pack. SX-70 film had an ISO (film speed) rating of 125, and was prized by art photographers for a unique quality which allowed the emulsion to be manipulated by pressing on the photo using a blunt object - these "SX-70 manipulations" often have a surrealistic quality.
Unfortunately, Polaroid discontinued manufacturing SX-70 film in 2006, so the film is no longer available. This was very sad news to the legion of devoted SX-70 users who prized their unique folding cameras.
Fortunately, there are alternatives that allow one to use Polaroid 600 film in an SX-70 camera - 600 film is widely available at drugstores, so this is indeed good news.
The larger problem with using 600 film in an SX-70 is that it has a much faster film speed rating of ISO 640, and the SX-70 cameras were designed to expose for the original film which had an ISO of 125. What this means is that simply using 600 film in an SX-70 camera will cause the photos to be overexposed. Fortunately there are ways to make the SX-70 expose 600 film correctly
This ND filter basically acts like sunglasses for the camera, and darkens the image by two stops so that the camera exposure is correct.
The advantage of using this type of filter is that it is a very simple modification to the camera, as the filter simply sticks on the front of the lens.
Put your opinion and some examples =)
Originally posted at 1:00PM, 1 March 2009 PDT
(permalink)
mll0ll edited this topic 39 months ago.
|
|
mll0ll,
I did not know that I can use 600 in my SX-70, that's great news. Further inquiry, I just found this link. But hopefully this topic will be moot if Impossible b.v. can reinvent the Time-Zero film.
Posted 39 months ago.
(permalink)
|
 |
time for a new beginning [deleted] says:
The main problem I'm finding is justifying the cost of 600 film - I've yet to shoot anything in my SX-70....
Posted 39 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Impossible b.v. plans to make both 600 and SX-70.
Originally posted 39 months ago.
(permalink)
flifishun edited this topic 39 months ago.
|
|
$2.00 a shot is not cheap, but it's hella cheaper then type 55 at $10 a shot.
Posted 39 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
the best shots i see out of the sx-70 are without using a ND filter.
impossible etc. might pull off some sx-70'ish film, but i don't think that they or anyone else has plans to make "new" cameras...
Posted 39 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
i will agree with davidteter. with the understanding of film speed and proper lighting/setting, i've seen some great results without a filter. for most applications it does need compensation though. the filter on the lens works well, with the only drawback being that it does darken the viewfinder. another option is to add an nd filter to the top of the film pack, resulting in an unobstructed view through the finder. i personally enjoy electronically modifying the circuit board, but obviously, thats not for everyone
Posted 39 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
=)
Posted 39 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
I was unable to get anything other than blown out photos until I removed the ND filter over the light meter and added an ND filter. I did this in a temporary way (using rubber cement, which is ugly and fragile) because I didn't want to eliminate the possibility of shooting SX-70 film, should it become available again.
Here is my camera:

Here are a few shots taken with the ND filter mod as described above, using 600 film:



Posted 39 months ago.
(permalink)
|
|
Mine needed the Filter, but some say theirs don't.
You'll hate me for this ... but I found an pack of original Time Zero, expiry date 12/96 ... at a junk sale for 20 pence last weekend. I just hope all the photos are not stuck together.
My SX-70 died so I can't currently test it.
Posted 38 months ago.
(permalink)
|
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
|
|