 |
just 1000? do we hav a time limit?
Posted 18 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
To prevent flooding the pool with random pictures, I would add a condition disqualifying those who add more than, say, 10 pictures that get kicked out because they don't comply with the groups rules.
Posted 18 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
First one there, I suppose.
Posey, how about if they already have more than 30 in the pool, they just have to add 1000 more. So if they already have 90, they have to add 1000 to reach 1090? But it's your prize, so set whatever rules you want!
Posted 18 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
 That will be up to Posey. But I concur with the sentiment. Of course, these have to be 1000 qualifying photos-- that means two things:
1) Only 1 person in each photo
2) Each person can only be in one photo.
You could get a lot if you set up a portrait booth as part of World Portrait Days, flickr.com/groups/world_portrait_days/
Originally posted 18 months ago.
(
permalink
)
jakerome (a group admin) edited this topic 18 months ago.
|
 |
Jake is always thinking which makes me think I'm not thinkin as much as him which is the thought I would like to leave..
Posted 18 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
agreed
if you have less than 100 photos now in the pool.
1) Only 1 person in each photo
2) Each person can only be in one photo.
3) 1000 additional viable photos,
4) First one there, I suppose.
Posted 18 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
The top submitters right now:
Click this icon to see all smata2's public content smata2 (1,360)
Click this icon to see all Mistifarang (no to videos)'s public content Mistifarang (no to videos) (685)
Click this icon to see all Dober Man's public content Dober Man (556)
Click this icon to see all itzick's public content itzick (484)
Click this icon to see all Oliver_Godby's public content Oliver_Godby (423)
So, for example, smata2 would need 2360 total... and I wouldn't bet against him!
Posted 18 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
no they have to have less than 100 in the pool yesterday,
Posted 18 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
Oh, OK.
Posted 18 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
Bumping this to remind folks, especially World Portrait Days folks. Some people took hundreds of photos!
Posted 17 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
So basically, if you have 1000 photos in the the pool, you have 1000 photos of a thousand different people. Is that correct?
Posted 16 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
exactly.
Posted 16 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
1000 photos, one weekend, one camera
Posted 10 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
i love this project ! :)))
Posted 7 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Very interesting, although if you want to win a pro account means that you don't have one, which means that you have a limit of 200 pictures to upload, so you can never post 1000 ;).
Posted 7 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
 |
Great deduction! Now for that calculation, you should get a pro I think :)
Posted 7 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
Actually, a non-pro could add all their photos to the pool (even more than 200) and they will still be here.
In the meantime, Itzick has claimed the prize, adding 1000 portraits since the contest started! I've sent him a code for a year of Flickr Pro. Of course, I've just realized that Eamon (FM) ALSO added 1000 portraits... but somehow I missed that! As a consolation, my haranguing did get him featured on the Flickr Blog, thus assuaging my guilt. Eamon, if you still want the year of Flickr, let me know & I'll work something out.
Posted 6 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
|
Congrats to Itzick. Wow, adding 1000 photos of people is daunting. Very daunting.
Posted 6 months ago.
(
permalink
)
|
Would you like to comment?
Sign up for a free account, or sign in (if you're already a member).
|
6 Million People (Add one portrait of everyone you know) /
Discuss
Feed – Subscribe to 6 Million People (Add one portrait of everyone you know) discussion threads
|
Deutsch
|
English
|
Español
|
Français
|
